Notice2025-07819

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Program Evaluation

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 6, 2025

Issuing agencies

National Science Foundation

Abstract

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to establish this collection. In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing the opportunity for final public comment on this action, following the expiration of the sixty-day Notice. After obtaining and considering this final public comment, NSF will, if necessary, update the OMB submission if requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance of this collection for no longer than 3 years.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 86 (Tuesday, May 6, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 6, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19231-19232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-07819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; Louis 
Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Program Evaluation

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to 
establish this collection. In accordance with the requirements of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing the opportunity for 
final public comment on this action, following the expiration of the 
sixty-day Notice. After obtaining and considering this final public 
comment, NSF will, if necessary, update the OMB submission if 
requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearance of this 
collection for no longer than 3 years.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of 
this notice to <a href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAmain">www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAmain</a>. Find this particular 
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suzanne H. Plimpton, Reports Clearance 
Officer, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 
E6447, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; telephone (703) 292-7556; or send 
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e2d2e3237332e2a311e302d3870393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92e1e2fefbffe2e6fdd2fce1f4bcf5fde4">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Individuals who use a telecommunications 
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay 
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339, which is accessible 24 hours a day, 7 
days a week, 365 days a year (including Federal holidays).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Comments: Comments regarding (a) whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the NSF, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the NSF's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
use, and clarity of the information on respondents; and (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology should be addressed to the points 
of contact in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Title of Collection: Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority 
Participation (LSAMP) Program Evaluation.
    OMB Control No.: 3145-New.
    Abstract: This proposed data collection is a core component of a 
larger comprehensive evaluation strategy to assess the effectiveness 
and functioning of the Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority 
Participation (LSAMP) program, funded through grants from the National 
Science Foundation (NSF). LSAMP alliances are institutions of higher 
education (IHEs) that support the preparation of students at the 
undergraduate and postbaccalaureate levels in science, technology, 
engineering and technology (STEM) disciplines.
    This current research seeks to consider the experiences of those 
leading and participating in LSAMP since the last full evaluation 
(which concluded in 2007), as well as current experiences, at ten 
select site locations. The ten sites were selected by the NSF in 
collaboration with its research partner, NORC at the University of 
Chicago, who will conduct all data collection. A key component of the 
site selection process was ensuring inclusion of alliance sites with 
varied features, to include sites with more remote geographies and 
alliance types.
    This work will enable the program to better understand where 
successes can be modeled and replicated and opportunities can be 
identified to better support promising LSAMP students in these fields, 
by encouraging greater participation in academic and professional 
development opportunities. Currently, we are seeking approval to 
conduct interviews and focus groups with individuals who are affiliated 
with the LSAMP alliances at these pre-identified sites using the 
procedures discussed below.
    As of FY2021, there were 61 LSAMP alliances, 55 of which were led 
by four-year institutions. There are three groups of LSAMP alliances: 
11 STEM Pathways Implementation Only (SPIO) alliances in existence less 
than 10 years, 22 STEM Pathways Research Alliances (SPRA) in existence 
at least 10 or more years, and 22 alliances that had not yet applied 
for funding under the 2018 solicitation. Ten of the alliances in 
existence at least 10 years also have Bridge to the Doctorate (BD) 
projects that provide additional funding to support students' graduate 
work. An additional 6 alliances are Bridge to the Baccalaureate (B2B) 
alliances led by two-year institutions. Each alliance consists of a 
lead institution and several other partner

[[Page 19232]]

institutions consisting of two-and-four year IHEs all operating towards 
the same alliance goals. Partner institutions typically are in the same 
geographic region. Participating STEM students in alliance schools 
could be defined in three groups: Level 1 students who receive direct 
financial support through the alliance for activities, Level 2 students 
who attended activities sponsored by the alliances but receive no 
direct funding, and Level 3 students who are students at LSAMP 
institutions who did not receive funds or participate in LSAMP 
activities.
    Research suggests that collaboratives, such as the alliances funded 
by the LSAMP program can improve STEM degree completion rates, but 
long-term success requires sustained change at the institutional level 
(Center for Urban Education, 2019; May & Bridger, 2010). The LSAMP 
program has a 30-year history of broadening participation \1\ in STEM 
disciplines and the STEM workforce.
    NORC at the University of Chicago's is leading the present approach 
for evaluating the effectiveness and impact, of the LSAMP program, 
under the guidance and sponsorship of the NSF Directorate for STEM 
Education (EDU). This evaluation aims to identify and characterize the 
organizational structure and institutionalization of LSAMP alliances 
and assess the impact of LSAMP activities and strategies to strengthen 
pathways and increase STEM degrees earned by promising LSAMP students 
in STEM on all educational levels.
    As part of this comprehensive evaluation, and with a focus on fully 
utilizing all preexisting data, NORC has completed a thorough review of 
available data (e.g., annual reports). The LSAMP program anticipates 
using the results of this evaluation (both the review of existing data 
and data from site visits) to identify ``LSAMP best practices'' that 
can be implemented by both LSAMP grantee/alliance institutions and non-
LSAMP grantees/alliance institutions to sustain and grow impacts of the 
LSAMP programming on broadening participation in STEM and inform the 
LSAMP program on sustainability mechanisms and goals appropriate for 
LSAMP alliance institutions to maintain their successful outcomes.
    Respondents: LSAMP Faculty and Staff (200); LSAMP Students (120).
    Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 320.
    Burden on the Public: Estimated 1-3 hours to participate in an 
interview or focus group (1 hour for staff and students, 3 hours for 
coordinators/provosts or other leaders). The estimated burden time is 
750 hours.

    Dated: April 30, 2025.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2025-07819 Filed 5-5-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 6, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.