Notice2025-06900

Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 23, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this administrative review did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 77 (Wednesday, April 23, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 23, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17038-17041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-06900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-876]


Welded Line Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 
determines that certain producers/exporters subject to this 
administrative review did not make sales of subject merchandise at less 
than normal value (NV). Interested parties are invited to comment on 
these preliminary results of review.

DATES: Applicable April 23, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Fuller, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 8, 2024, based on timely requests for review, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on welded line pipe from the 
Republic of Korea (Korea).\1\ The period of review (POR) is December 1, 
2022, through November 30, 2023. On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled 
certain deadlines in this

[[Page 17039]]

administrative proceeding by seven days.\2\ On August 23, 2024, we 
extended the preliminary results of this review to December 24, 
2024.\3\ Further, on December 9, 2024, we extended the preliminary 
results of this review to no later than January 6, 2025.\4\ Also on 
December 9, 2024, Commerce tolled the deadline to issue the preliminary 
results in this administrative review by 90 days.\5\ Accordingly, the 
deadline for these preliminary results is now April 7, 2025. For a 
complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this 
review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 8641 (February 8, 2024); see also 
Welded Line Pipe from the Republic of Korea and the Republic of 
Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 75056, 75057 (December 1, 
2015) (Order).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of 2022-2023 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated 
August 23, 2024.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Second Extension of Deadline for 
Preliminary Results of 2022-2023 Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review,'' dated December 9, 2024.
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated December 9, 2024.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the 2022-2023 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Welded Line Pipe from Korea,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the Order is welded line pipe. For a 
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price 
and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 
772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the 
Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the 
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as 
an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Review-Specific Rate for Non-Examined Companies

    The Act and Commerce's regulations do not address the establishment 
of a weighted-average dumping margin to be applied to companies not 
selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its 
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) 
of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a 
less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for guidance when 
calculating the weighted-average dumping margin for companies which 
were not selected for individual examination in an administrative 
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is 
normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated 
weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and 
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis 
margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts 
available{time} .''
    Where the dumping margin for individually examined respondents are 
all zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that Commerce may use ``any reasonable 
method to establish the estimated all-others rate for exporters and 
producers not individually investigated, including averaging the 
estimated weighted average dumping margins determined for the exporters 
and producers individually investigated.''
    In this review, we preliminarily calculated weighted-average 
dumping margins of zero percent for the mandatory respondents Hyundai 
Pipe and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH). Consistent with the U.S. Court 
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Albemarle,\7\ and 
Commerce's practice,\8\ we assigned the companies not selected for 
individual examination in this review, Husteel Co., Ltd. and NEXTEEL 
Co., Ltd., a weighted-average dumping margin of zero percent based on 
the rates calculated for Hyundai Pipe and SeAH, in accordance with 
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. 
Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).
    \8\ See, e.g., Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 87 FR 60989 (October 7, 2022), 
unchanged in Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 20218 (April 5, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine the 
following estimated weighted-average dumping margins for the period 
December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2023:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                    Producer or exporter                       dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Husteel Co., Ltd...........................................         0.00
Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd \9\............................         0.00
NEXTEEL Co., Ltd...........................................         0.00
SeAH Steel Corporation.....................................         0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations and analysis performed to 
interested parties for these preliminary results within five days of 
any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within 
five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ On November 14, 2024, Commerce found via a changed 
circumstances review that Hyundai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. is the 
successor-in-interest to Hyundai Steel Company. See Circular Welded 
Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea; Certain Oil Country 
Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea; Welded Line Pipe from the 
Republic of Korea; and Large Diameter Welded Pipe from the Republic 
of Korea: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 
Circumstances Reviews, 89 FR 89962 (November 14, 2024), and 
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested parties 
to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the 
date of the publication of this notice.\10\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to 
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days 
after the date for filing case briefs.\11\ Interested parties who 
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit: 
(1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of 
authorities.\12\ All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. 
An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety in ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective 
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
    \12\ See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 
proceedings we have encouraged

[[Page 17040]]

interested parties to provide an executive summary of their briefs that 
should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. In this 
review, we instead request that interested parties provide at the 
beginning of their briefs a public, executive summary for each issue 
raised in their briefs.\13\ Further, we request that interested parties 
limit their executive summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, 
not including citations. We intend to use the executive summaries as 
the basis of the comment summaries included in the issues and decision 
memorandum that will accompany the final results in this administrative 
review. We request that interested parties include footnotes for 
relevant citations in the executive summary of each issue. Note that 
Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the 
service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that 
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \14\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) the requesting party's name, 
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of individuals from the 
requesting party that will attend the hearing and whether any of those 
individuals is a foreign national; and (3) a list of the issues the 
party intends to discuss at the hearing. Issues raised in the hearing 
by a party will be limited to those raised in the party's case and 
rebuttal briefs. An electronically filed hearing request must be 
received successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records 
system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of 
publication of this notice in the Federal Register. If a request for a 
hearing is made, Commerce will inform parties of the scheduled date for 
the hearing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuing the final results, Commerce shall determine, and CBP 
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If either 
Hyundai Pipe's or SeAH's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or 
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this 
review: (1) for Hyundai Pipe, we will calculate importer-specific ad 
valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total 
entered value of these sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1); 
and (2) for SeAH, because it did not report actual entered value for 
all of its U.S. sales, we will calculate importer-specific per-unit 
duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping 
duties calculated for the examined sales and dividing this amount by 
the total quantity of those sales. Where either the respondent's 
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the 
meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific rate is zero 
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice will apply to entries 
of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Hyundai Pipe or SeAH 
for which the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they 
sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or 
exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in 
the transaction.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we 
will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries at a rate equal to the weighted-average of the dumping margins 
calculated for Hyundai Pipe and SeAH in the final results of this 
review, unless that rate is zero or de minimis, in which case we intend 
to instruct CBP to liquidate relevant entries without regarding to 
antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis 
for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise 
covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of 
estimated duties, where applicable.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed above will be that established in the final results of this 
review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the 
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or 
reviewed companies not covered in this review, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific cash deposit rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the 
company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, or the LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent 
segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to 
be 4.38 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\18\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final 
results of this administrative review, including the results of its 
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 
days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.213(h)(1), unless otherwise extended.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double 
antidumping duties.

[[Page 17041]]

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: April 7, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2025-06900 Filed 4-22-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 23, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.