Notice2025-06520

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule by Introducing an NBBO Setter Program Under Proposed New Fee Code SS and Introducing a Definitions Section to the Fee Schedule

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
April 17, 2025

Issuing agencies

Securities and Exchange Commission

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 73 (Thursday, April 17, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 73 (Thursday, April 17, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16356-16359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-06520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-102842; File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2025-009]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Its Fee Schedule by Introducing an NBBO Setter Program Under 
Proposed New Fee Code SS and Introducing a Definitions Section to the 
Fee Schedule

April 11, 2025.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on April 9, 2025, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGA'') proposes to 
amend its Fee Schedule by introducing an NBBO Setter Program under 
proposed new fee code SS and introducing a Definitions section to the 
Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in 
Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (<a href="http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/edga/">http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/edga/</a>), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its 
equities trading platform (``EDGA Equities'') by introducing an NBBO 
Setter Program under proposed new fee code SS and introducing a 
Definitions section to the Fee Schedule. The Exchange proposes to 
implement these changes effective April 1, 2025.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange originally proposed to amend its Fee Schedule 
on April 1, 2025 (SR-CboeEDGA-2025-008). On April 9, 2025, the 
Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a 
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues 
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), to which market 
participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available 
information,\4\ no single registered equities exchange has more than 
15% of the market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly 
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant 
pricing power in the execution of order flow. The Exchange in 
particular operates a

[[Page 16357]]

``Maker-Taker'' model whereby it pays rebates to members that add 
liquidity and assesses fees to those that remove liquidity. The 
Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates and rates 
applied per share for orders that provide and remove liquidity, 
respectively. Currently, for orders in securities priced at or above 
$1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00270 per share 
for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per share 
for orders that remove liquidity.\5\ For orders in securities priced 
below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of 0.15% of the 
dollar value and assesses a fee of 0.15% of the dollar value.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume 
Summary, Month-to-Date (March 20, 2025), available at <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/_statistics/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/_statistics/</a>.
    \5\ See EDGA Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fee Codes and Associated Rates
    The Exchange offers various fee codes applicable to orders that add 
or remove liquidity on EDGA. The Exchange now proposes to introduce a 
new incentive program, referred to by the Exchange as the NBBO Setter 
Program (the ``Program'') under new proposed fee code SS, which is 
designed to improve market quality in illiquid securities on the 
Exchange. As proposed, the Program would provide a rebate of $0.00300 
in securities priced at or above $1.00 and a rebate of 0.15000% of the 
dollar value in securities priced below $1.00 for orders that set the 
Setter NBBO \7\ in securities not included in the NBBO Setter Excluded 
Securities List (``NBBO Setter Securities''). As proposed, the NBBO 
Setter Excluded Securities List means a list of securities not eligible 
for the rebate provided under proposed fee code SS. The securities 
included in the NBBO Setter Excluded Securities List will be determined 
by the Exchange on a quarterly basis and published in a Notice 
distributed to Members and on the Exchange's website. At the outset, 
the NBBO Setter Excluded Securities List will include those securities 
included in the S&P 500 Index, the Nasdaq 100 Index, and certain ETPs 
that the Exchange believes have high levels of liquidity. The initial 
NBBO Setter Excluded Securities List will be comprised of approximately 
550 securities, leaving approximately 9,700 NBBO Setter Securities in 
which Members may earn a rebate under proposed fee code SS. The 
Exchange also proposes to introduce a Definitions section to the Fee 
Schedule in order to codify the terms ``NBBO Setter Securities'' and 
``Setter NBBO.'' The Exchange believes that providing a Definitions 
section will provide Members additional clarity on the terms applicable 
to the proposed NBBO Setter Program available under proposed fee code 
SS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ As proposed, ``Setter NBBO'' means a quotation of at least 
100 shares that is better than the NBBO or a quotation of a notional 
size of at least $10,000.00 that is better than the NBBO. A 
quotation of at least 100 shares or a quotation of at least 
$10,000.00 that merely joins the NBBO (i.e., is ``at the NBBO'') 
will not qualify as a Setter NBBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that there are no volume requirements for the 
proposed NBBO Setter Program and the Program will be available to all 
Members and will provide Members an opportunity to earn a higher rebate 
than what is currently provided under the Exchange's standard rebate. 
Moreover, the Program is designed to encourage Members that provide 
displayed liquidity on the Exchange to increase overall volume and 
order flow in illiquid names, which would benefit all Members by 
providing greater execution opportunities on the Exchange and 
contribute to a deeper, more liquid market, benefiting all investors.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the 
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the 
Act.\8\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of 
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of 
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as Section 6(b)(4) \11\ 
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using 
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee code SS 
and corresponding NBBO Setter Program is reasonable, equitable, and not 
unfairly discriminatory. The proposed fee code and Program reflects a 
competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize participants to 
direct their order flow to the Exchange and enhance market quality in 
NBBO Setter Securities. The Exchange believes the proposed Program, 
which provides a higher rebate to Members that set the Setter NBBO in 
NBBO Setter Securities, provides a reasonable means to encourage 
overall growth in order flow that establishes a Setter NBBO in the 
approximately 9,700 securities traded on EDGA that the Exchange 
believes are illiquid. An overall increase in activity would deepen the 
Exchange's liquidity pool, offer more narrow spreads, support the 
quality of price discovery, promote market transparency, and improve 
market quality for all investors.
    The Exchange believes that limiting its Program to NBBO Setter 
Securities is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory 
because the Exchange has identified such securities as securities for 
which it would like to inject additional quoting competition, which it 
believes will generally act to narrow spreads, increase size at the 
inside, and increase liquidity depth in such securities. The Exchange 
also believes that the proposed definition of Setter NBBO is reasonable 
in that it provides Members alternative ways to qualify for the rebate 
under the Program and encourages Members to quote the NBBO in higher-
priced securities in which Members might not otherwise quote at least 
100 shares due to the higher notional value associated with securities 
priced over $100.00. For example, if a Member wanted to set the NBBO in 
hypothetical symbol XYZ, the Member would, under the Exchange's 
standard definition of NBBO,\12\ have to provide a round lot quotation 
priced better than the hypothetical price of $967.99, which equates to 
a notional value of $96,799. Under the Exchange's proposed Setter NBBO 
definition, however, the Member could qualify for the rebate under 
proposed fee code SS by providing an odd lot quotation in hypothetical 
symbol XYZ with a notional value of at least $10,000.00 that ``sets'' 
(i.e., is better than) the NBBO. The Exchange believes that by allowing 
Members to qualify for the rebate under the Program by satisfying the 
definition of Setter NBBO with either a quotation of at least 100 
shares better than the NBBO or an odd lot quotation better than the 
NBBO with a notional value of

[[Page 16358]]

at least $10,000.00 will promote price discovery and market quality in 
NBBO Setter Securities and, further, that the tightened spreads and 
increased liquidity from the Program will benefit all investors by 
deepening the Exchange's liquidity pool, offering the potential for 
executions at more aggressive prices, supporting the quality of price 
discovery, enhancing quoting competition across exchanges, promoting 
market transparency, and improving investor protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Exchange Rule 1.5(o) (``NBB, NBO, and NBBO'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange's introduction of a Definitions section 
to the Fee Schedule is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly 
discriminatory because it serves to provide all Members additional 
clarity surrounding proposed fee code SS. Particularly, the proposed 
Definitions section will contain the relevant terms that will enable 
Members to potentially earn the proposed higher rebate under proposed 
fee code SS. The Definitions section will be available on the Fee 
Schedule to all Members, equally.
    The Exchange notes that the proposed NBBO Setter Program is not 
dissimilar from other programs incentivizing quoting at the NBBO 
offered by other exchanges.\13\ The Exchange's proposed Program differs 
from the MEMX NBBO Program and MIAX NBBO Program in that the Exchange's 
proposed Program is not a volume-based tier, but rather an incentive 
earned simply by setting the Setter NBBO in NBBO Setter Securities. 
Additionally, the Exchange's proposed NBBO Setter Program will pay a 
rebate of 0.15000% of the dollar value in securities priced below 
$1.00, while the MEMX NBBO Program and MIAX NBBO Program are both 
limited to securities priced at or above $1.00. The Exchange's proposed 
NBBO Setter Program also includes an alternative method for ``setting'' 
the NBBO through its Setter NBBO definition, which is not offered under 
the MEMX NBBO Program or the MIAX NBBO Program. Under the Setter NBBO, 
a Member may ``set'' the NBBO by providing an odd lot quotation with a 
notional value of at least $10,000.00, which the Exchange believes will 
assist Members in ``setting'' the NBBO in securities with prices 
greater than $100.00. Further, the Exchange's proposed Program is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it is open to all 
Members on an equal basis and provides a higher rebate reasonably 
related to the value of the Exchange's market quality. In fact, the 
Exchange believes its program is less discriminatory than those offered 
by other exchanges in that there is no minimum volume requirement in 
order to qualify for the higher rebate offered under proposed fee code 
SS, whereas both the MEMX NBBO Program and MIAX NBBO Program each 
require a minimum amount of volume in addition to setting the NBBO in 
order to earn an additive rebate. Much like volume-based tiers are 
generally designed to incentivize higher levels of liquidity provision 
and/or growth patterns on exchanges, the proposed NBBO Setter Program 
is designed to incentivize enhanced market quality on the Exchange 
through tighter spreads, greater size at the inside, and greater 
quoting depth in NBBO Setter Securities by offering a higher rebate 
under fee code SS. As such, the Exchange believes the proposed higher 
rebate will act to enhance liquidity and competition across exchanges 
in NBBO Setter Securities by providing a rebate reasonably related to 
such enhanced market quality to the benefit of all investors, thereby 
promoting the principles discussed in Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See, e.g., MEMX Equities Fee Schedule, NBBO Setter Tier 
(``MEMX NBBO Program''). See also, MIAX Pearl Equities Fee Schedule, 
NBBO Setter Plus Program (``MIAX NBBO Program'').
    \14\ Supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above, 
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would encourage the 
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby 
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution 
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all 
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes 
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering 
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of 
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not impose any 
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed 
introduction of an NBBO Setter Program does not impose an unnecessary 
burden as all Members will be eligible to earn the rebate offered under 
proposed fee code SS should they set the Setter NBBO in NBBO Setter 
Securities. Additionally, the proposed introduction of a Definitions 
section does not impose an unnecessary burden upon Members as all 
Members will be able to view the relevant definitions applicable to the 
Program. The Exchange does not believe the proposed change burdens 
competition, but rather, enhances competition as it is intended to 
increase the competitiveness of EDGA by amending existing pricing 
incentives in order to attract order flow and incentivize participants 
to increase their participation on the Exchange. Greater overall order 
flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits all 
market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and 
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing 
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
    Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change does not 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously 
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the 
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on 
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more 
than 15% of the market share.\15\ Therefore, no exchange possesses 
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed, 
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange 
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed 
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in 
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. 
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the 
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, 
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has 
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its 
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed 
companies.'' \16\ The fact that this market is competitive has also 
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit

[[Page 16359]]

stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow 
is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, '[i]n the U.S. national market 
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that 
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of 
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to 
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange 
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of 
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''.\17\ Accordingly, the Exchange 
does not believe its proposed fee change imposes any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Supra note 4.
    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \17\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \18\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \19\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6c4c3dad39bd5d9dbdbd3d8c2c5f6c5d3d598d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5c7c0d9d098d6dad8d8d0dbc1c6f5c6d0d69bd2dac3">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>. Please include 
file number SR-CboeEDGA-2025-009 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGA-2025-009. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All 
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGA-2025-009 and should 
be submitted on or before May 8, 2025.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-06520 Filed 4-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on April 17, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.