Notice2025-06233
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2022-2023
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 11, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that the companies which Commerce granted a separate rate sold subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2023. Commerce also preliminarily determines that one company does not qualify for a separate rate, certain companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, and that it is appropriate to rescind this review with respect to certain companies. Commerce invites interested parties to comment on these preliminary results of review.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 69 (Friday, April 11, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 69 (Friday, April 11, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15439-15443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-06233]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-979]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results
and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2022-2023
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that the companies which Commerce granted a separate rate
sold subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the
period of review (POR) December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2023.
Commerce also preliminarily determines that one company does not
qualify for a separate rate, certain companies had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR, and that it is appropriate to
rescind this review with respect to certain companies. Commerce invites
interested parties to comment on these preliminary results of review.
DATES: Applicable April 11, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In response to review requests from multiple parties, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), on February 8, 2024, Commerce initiated
an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into
modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China (China) with
respect to 60 companies/company groupings covering the POR December 1,
2022, through
[[Page 15440]]
November 30, 2023.\1\ One mandatory respondent, Shenzhen Sungold Solar
Co., Ltd. (Sungold), participated in this review by filing responses to
Commerce's questionnaire and supplemental questionnaires. Multiple
parties commented on surrogate country and surrogate value selection
during the course of the review. The current deadline for issuing the
preliminary results of this review is April 7, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 89 FR 8641 (February 8, 2024) (Initiation
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For details regarding the above events and other events that
occurred subsequent to the initiation of the review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>. A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is in Appendix I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the 2022-2023 Administrative Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or not
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order <SUP>3</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73018 (December 7, 2012) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are crystalline silicon
photovoltaic cells, and modules, laminates, and panels, consisting of
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not partially or
fully assembled into other products, including, but not limited to,
modules, laminates, panels and building integrated materials. For a
complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce's practice to
rescind an administrative review of an AD order where it concludes that
there were no suspended entries of subject merchandise during the
POR.\4\ Commerce notified all interested parties of its intent to
rescind the instant review with respect to the companies listed in
Appendix II because there were no suspended entries of subject
merchandise from those companies during the POR and invited interested
parties to comment on Commerce's intention to rescind the review with
respect to these companies.\5\ Certain interested parties commented on
Commerce's intent to rescind memorandum.\6\ In the absence of any
suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR from the
companies listed in Appendix II, we are rescinding this administrative
review of those companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to Length
Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: Recission of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2020-2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023).
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Notice of Intent to Rescind, In Part,''
dated May 14, 2024.
\6\ See Vina Solar Technology Company Limited and Vina Cell
Technology Company Limited's Letter, ``Comments on Notice of Intent
to Rescind Review,'' dated May 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part
Commerce intends to rescind this review with respect to Red Sun
Energy Long An Company Limited. See the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
for details.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. (BYD Shangluo), Jinko Solar,\7\
Longi Solar Technology Co. Ltd. (Longi Solar), and Zhejiang Aiko Solar
Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhejiang Aiko) claimed that they did not
ship subject merchandise during the POR. Information that we obtained
from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regarding certain
potential entries of subject merchandise from Jinko Solar, Longi Solar,
and Zhejiang Aiko is consistent with those claims.\8\ Therefore, we
preliminarily determine that there were no entries, exports, or sales
of the subject merchandise for Jinko Solar, Longi Solar, and Zhejiang
Aiko during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Jinko Solar refers to the following companies which Commerce
has previously treated as a single entity: Jinko Solar Import and
Export Co., Ltd.; Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar Technology
(Haining) Co., Ltd.; Yuhuan Jinko Solar Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Jinko
Solar Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Jinko Tiansheng Solar Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar
(Chuzhou) Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar (Yiwu) Co., Ltd.; JinkoSolar
(Shangrao) Co., Ltd.
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Analysis of No Entries, Exports, or Sales
by Certain Companies,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, subsequent to its no shipments claim, BYD Shangluo
provided information that CBP is now suspending certain POR entries of
BYD Shangluo's merchandise as subject merchandise.\9\ Based on this
information, we preliminarily determine that record evidence
contradicts BYD Shangluo's no shipments claim. As a result of our
separate rate analysis, we preliminarily determine that BYD Shangluo is
eligible for a separate rate. For additional information, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). Pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, Commerce has
preliminarily assigned a weighted average dumping margin to Sungold
based upon total facts otherwise available with adverse inferences. For
a full description of the methodology underlying the preliminary
results of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Separate Rates
In all proceedings involving a non-market economy (NME) country,
Commerce maintains a rebuttable presumption that all companies are
subject to government control and, thus, should be assessed a single
weighted-average dumping margin unless the company can affirmatively
demonstrate an absence of government control, both in law (de jure) and
in fact (de facto), with respect to its exports (i.e., can
affirmatively demonstrate that it is eligible for a separate rate).\10\
Commerce has preliminarily determined that information provided by
Sungold, BYD H.K. Co., Ltd., BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd., Maodi
Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., Trina Solar Energy Development
Company Limited, and Trina Solar Science & Technology (Thailand) Ltd.
demonstrates that these companies are eligible for a separate rate.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, and Affirmative Critical Circumstances, In Part: Certain
Lined Paper Products from the People's Republic of China, 71 FR
53079, 53082 (September 8, 2006); see also Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts
Thereof from the People's Republic of China, 71 FR 9303, 29307 (May
22, 2006).
\11\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
(Anji DaSol), which was selected as a mandatory respondent, failed to
[[Page 15441]]
respond to Commerce's questionnaire. Therefore, we preliminarily
determine that Anji DaSol has not demonstrated that it qualifies for a
separate rate \12\ and thus it is part of the China-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Commerce informed parties in the Initiation Notice that
firms that submitted a separate rate application or a separate rate
certification that are subsequently selected as mandatory
respondents, would not be eligible for separate rate status unless
they responded to all parts of the questionnaire that Commerce
issued to them as mandatory respondents. See Initiation Notice, 89
FR at 8642.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dumping Margins for Separate Rate Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address what dumping
margin to apply to respondents that are not selected for individual
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)
of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act,
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when calculating the dumping margin for
respondents that are not individually examined in an administrative
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is
normally ``equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted
average dumping margins established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis dumping
margins, and any dumping margins determined entirely {on the basis of
facts available{time} .'' When the weighted-average dumping margins
established for all individually examined respondents are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act permits Commerce to ``use any reasonable method to establish
the estimated all-others rate for exporters and producers not
individually investigated, including averaging the estimated weighted
average dumping margins determined for the exporters and producers
individually investigated. In accordance with the statute and the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision in Primesource,\13\
we preliminarily determined to apply the weight average of the rate
assigned to Sungold in this administrative review (i.e., 238.95
percent) to the non-individually examined respondents that are eligible
for a separate rate. For additional information, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Primesource Building Products, Inc. et al. v. United
States, 111 F.4th 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2024) (Primesource).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
China-Wide Entity
Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide
entity applies to this administrative review.\14\ Under this policy,
the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party
specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the
entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity,
the entity is not under review and the entity's assessment rate (i.e.,
238.95 percent \15\) is not subject to change. Because there were no
entries of subject merchandise from the companies listed in Appendix
III during the POR, none of which had a separate rate during the POR,
these companies remain in the China-wide entity.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\15\ The China-wide entity rate was last changed in the first
administrative review of this proceeding and has been the applicable
rate for the entity in each subsequent review, including the most
recently completed review. See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2012- 2013, 80 FR
40998, 41002 (July 14, 2015) (Solar Cells AR 1); see also
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final Results and
Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021-2022, 89 FR 55562
(July 5, 2024) (Solar Cells AR 10).
\16\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the following estimated weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period December 1, 2022, through
November 30, 2023:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd............................. 238.95
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rate Companies
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BYD H.K. Co., Ltd........................................... 238.95
BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.......................... 238.95
Maodi Solar Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.................. 238.95
Trina Solar Energy Development Company Limited.............. 238.95
Trina Solar Science & Technology (Thailand) Ltd............. 238.95
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
Normally, Commerce discloses to parties to the proceeding the
calculations performed in connection with a preliminary results of
review within five days of any public announcement of the preliminary
results or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the
date of publication of the notice of preliminary results of review in
the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
because Commerce preliminarily applied a weighted-average dumping
margin based on total adverse facts available (AFA) to the individually
examined company in this administrative review, in accordance with
section 776 of the Act, and the applied AFA is the China-wide entity
rate last changed in the first administrative review of this proceeding
and has been the applicable rate for the entity in each subsequent
review,\17\ there are no calculations to disclose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Solar Cells AR 1; see also Solar Cells AR 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we have modified the deadline for interested parties
to submit case briefs to Commerce to no later than 21 days after the
date of publication of this notice.\18\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the date for filing case briefs.\19\ Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review must submit: (1) a statement
of the issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\20\ All briefs must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the established deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.309.
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\20\ See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that
interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a public,
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\21\ Further,
we
[[Page 15442]]
request that interested parties limit their executive summary of each
issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to
use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries
included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the
final results in this administrative review. We request that interested
parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the executive
summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its
requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR
351.303(f).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\22\ See APO and Final Service Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) the requesting party's name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the number of individuals associated
with the requesting party that will attend the hearing and whether any
of those individuals is a foreign national; and (3) a list of the
issues the party intends to discuss at the hearing. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case
briefs. An electronically filed hearing request must be received
successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system,
ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, Commerce will
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.\23\ Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date
of publication of the notice of the final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012)
(Final Modification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Commerce continues to base Sungold's weighted-average dumping
margin upon total facts otherwise available, with adverse inferences,
in the final results of this review, then Commerce will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties at a rate equal to 238.95 percent to all the
entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Sungold.
However, if Sungold's final weighted-average dumping margin is not
based on total facts otherwise available, with adverse inferences,
Commerce intends to calculate importer/customer-specific assessment
rates \24\ by dividing the total amount of dumping for reviewed sales
to the importer/customer by the total quantity of those sales. Commerce
will calculate an estimated ad valorem importer/customer-specific
assessment rate to determine whether the per-unit assessment rate is de
minimis; however, it will instruct CBP to apply the per-unit assessment
rate.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\25\ See Final Modification, 77 FR at 8103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce will base the assessment rate of any company not selected
for individual examination that qualifies for a separate rate on the
weighted-average dumping margin that it calculates for Sungold in the
final results of this review.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to a refinement of its practice, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate entries of Sungold's subject merchandise for which
sales were not reported in the U.S. sales database at the dumping
margin assigned to the China-wide entity.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Solar Cells from China AR1, 80 FR at 41002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject
merchandise during the POR that were recorded under the company-
specific case numbers of Jinko Solar, Longi Solar, and Zhejiang Aiko at
the China-wide rate.
For the companies listed in Appendix II for which Commerce is
rescinding this review, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries at a rate equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period
December 1, 2022, through November 30, 2023. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP regarding the companies listed in
Appendix II no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be in effect for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on, or after, the date of publication of the notice of
the final results of this administrative review in the Federal
Register, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for
the exporters listed in the table in the ``Preliminary Results of
Review'' section of this notice above, the cash deposit rate will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final
results of this review for the exporter (except, if the dumping margin
is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then the cash deposit rate
will be zero for that exporter); (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters that are not listed in the
rate table in the final results of review that have separate rates, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter's existing cash
deposit rate; (3) for all China exporters of subject merchandise that
do not have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin assigned to the China-wide entity,
which is 238.95 percent, and (4) for all non-China exporters of subject
merchandise that do not have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate
will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin applicable to the
China exporter(s) that supplied that non-China exporter. These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Final Results of Review
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis of all issues raised in
any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the publication of
these preliminary results of review in the Federal Register, unless
otherwise extended.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties and/or
countervailing duties has occurred, and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the amount of
antidumping duties by the amount of the countervailing duties.
[[Page 15443]]
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results of review
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: April 7, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative Review
V. Intent to Rescind Administrative Review in Part
VI. Preliminary No-Shipments Determination
VII. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inferences
VIII. Discussion of the Methodology
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies for Which Commerce Is Rescinding the Review
1. Canadian Solar International Limited; Canadian Solar
Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc.; Canadian Solar Manufacturing
(Luoyang) Inc.; CSI Cells Co., Ltd.; CSI Solar Co., Ltd.; and CSI
Solar Manufacturing (Fu Ning) Co., Ltd.
2. Chint Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited; Chint Solar (Jiuquan)
Co., Ltd.; Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; and Chint New Energy
Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd.
3. JingAo Solar Co., Ltd.
4. Risen Energy Co. Ltd.; Risen Energy (Changzhou) Co., Ltd.; Risen
(Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology
Co., Ltd.; Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd.; Jiujiang Shengchao
Xinye Technology Co., Ltd.; Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co.,
Ltd.; Ruichang Branch, Risen Energy (HongKong) Co., Ltd.; and Risen
Energy (YIWU) Co., Ltd.
5. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.
6. Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
7. Shenzhen Glory Industries Co., Ltd.
8. Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd.
9. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Baoding Jiasheng
Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.; Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources
Co., Ltd.; Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Hengshui
Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.; Lixian Yingli New Energy
Resources Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.;
Yingli Energy (China) Company.
10. Trina Solar (Singapore) Science and Technology Pte. Ltd.
11. Trina Solar Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and
Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Guoneng Photovoltaic Technology
Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan
Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.;
Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou
Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd.
12. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd.
13. Xiamen Yiyusheng Solar Co., Ltd.
Appendix III
Companies That Remain in the China-Wide Entity
1. Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd.
2. Canadian Solar Manufacturing, Inc.
3. Changzhou Trina PV Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.
4. Chint Energy (Haining) Co., Ltd.
5. CSI Modules (DaFeng) Co., Ltd.
6. CSI Solar Co., Ltd. (f.k.a. CSI Solar Power (China) Inc.)
7. CSI Solar Manufacturing (Fu Ning) Co., Ltd. (f.k.a. CSI-GCL Solar
Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd.)
8. CSI Solar Power Group Co., Ltd. (f.k.a. CSI Solar Power (China)
Inc.)
9. De-Tech Trading Limited HK
10. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co. Ltd.
11. Hongkong Hello Tech Energy Co., Ltd.
12. Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
13. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.
14. Jinko Solar (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
15. Jinko Solar International Limited
16. Jinko Solar Technology Sdn. Bhd.
17. Jinkosolar Middle East DMCC
18. Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd.
19. Longi (HK) Trading Ltd.
20. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
21. New East Solar Energy Cambodia Co., Ltd.
22. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd.
23. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.
24. Renesola Jiangsu Ltd.
25. ReneSola Zhejiang Ltd.
26. Risen Solar Technology Sdn. Bhd
27. Shanghai Nimble Co., Ltd.
28. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd.
29. Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
30. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd.
31. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
32. Trina Solar Energy Development PTE Ltd.
33. Vina Cell Technology Company Limited
34. Vina Solar Technology Company Limited
35. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.
36. Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited
[FR Doc. 2025-06233 Filed 4-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 11, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.