Notice2025-05273

Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 27, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain lined paper products (lined paper) from India were sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2023.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 58 (Thursday, March 27, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 58 (Thursday, March 27, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13852-13854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-05273]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that 
certain lined paper products (lined paper) from India were sold in the 
United States at less than normal value during the period of review 
(POR), September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2023.

DATES: Applicable March 27, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Barton, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 11, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this review in the Federal Register, and invited interested parties to 
comment on those results.\1\ For a summary of the events that occurred 
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this administrative review in 
accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2022-2023, 89 FR 82569 (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain 
Lined Paper Products from India; 2022-2023,'' dated concurrently 
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order <SUP>3</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) 
(Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by this Order are lined paper from India. For 
a

[[Page 13853]]

complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is attached at Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain 
changes to the margin calculation for ITC Limited,\4\ as well as the 
selection of the rate for non-selected companies. For a discussion of 
these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ As discussed in the Preliminary Results, we find that the 
correct name of the company is ITC Limited, whereas the Initiation 
Notice uses the name ``ITC Limited-Education and Stationary Products 
Business,'' which is a division of ITC Limited, and not a legal 
entity. See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 82569; see also Initiation 
of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 
78298 (November 15, 2023) (Initiation Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination

    For the rate for non-selected respondents in an administrative 
review, generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a 
market economy investigation. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 
the all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted-
average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established 
for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any 
zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the 
basis of facts available{time} .'' In this segment of the proceeding, 
because the rate calculated for Navneet Education Ltd. is zero, we have 
assigned a dumping margin to the companies not selected for individual 
review based on the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for ITC 
Limited.

Final Results of Review

    Commerce determines that the following estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the period September 1, 2022, through August 
31, 2023:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Appendix II for a full list of the companies not 
individually examined in this review.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                    Producer or exporter                        dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITC Limited.................................................        1.07
Navneet Education Ltd.......................................        0.00
Non-Selected Companies \5\..................................        1.07
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed for these final results in this review within five days of 
the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rate

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries covered by this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), where 
the respondent reported the entered value of its U.S. sales, we 
calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates by 
aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined 
sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total 
entered value associated with those sales. Where the respondent did not 
report entered value, we calculated a per-unit assessment rate for each 
importer by dividing the total amount of dumping calculated for the 
examined sales made to that importer by the total quantity associated 
with those sales. To determine whether an importer-specific, per-unit 
assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), 
we also calculated an importer-specific ad valorem ratio based on 
estimated entered values. Where either the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 
CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' will apply to entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by the mandatory 
respondents for which the companies did not know that the merchandise 
they sold to an intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or 
exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate companies involved in the 
transaction.
    Further, the assessment rate for antidumping duties for each of the 
companies not selected for individual examination will be equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margin identified above in ``Final Results of 
Review.''
    Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier 
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this 
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the 
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rates for the companies 
identified above in the ``Final Results of Review'' section will be 
equal to the company-specific weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by a company not covered in this administrative 
review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or completed 
prior segment of this proceeding but the producer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the company-specific rate established for the most 
recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the rate 
established in the

[[Page 13854]]

investigation of this proceeding.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure 
to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption 
that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties has 
occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties, 
and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping duties by the amount of 
the countervailing duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5) 
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).

    Dated: March 21, 2025.
Christopher Abbott,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the 
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Adjust ITC Limited's Home 
Market Prices to Reflect Certain Discounts
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Limit Certain ITC Limited 
Offsets
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Utilize ITC Limited's Export 
Subsidy Offset Calculations
    Comment 4: Whether Navneet's E-Commerce Sales Were Made at the 
Same Level of Trade (LOT) as its Home Market Sales in Channels Two, 
Three, Four, and Five
VI. Recommendation

Appendix II

Non-Individually Examined Companies Receiving a Review-Specific Rate

1. Cellpage Ventures Private Limited
2. Dinakar Process Private Limited
3. Lotus Global Private Limited
4. Pioneer Stationery Private Limited
5. PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited
6. SGM Paper Products

[FR Doc. 2025-05273 Filed 3-26-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 27, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.