Notice2025-04050

Taking of Threatened or Endangered Marine Mammals Incidental to Commercial Fishing Operations; Proposed Issuance of Permit

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
March 14, 2025

Issuing agencies

Commerce DepartmentNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Abstract

NMFS is proposing to issue a permit to authorize the incidental, but not intentional, take of specific Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed marine mammal species or stocks under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), in the Category II California (CA) thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 inch (in) mesh) fishery and the corresponding high seas component of the fishery as defined on the MMPA List of Fisheries as the Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 49 (Friday, March 14, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 49 (Friday, March 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12148-12152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-04050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE634]


Taking of Threatened or Endangered Marine Mammals Incidental to 
Commercial Fishing Operations; Proposed Issuance of Permit

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is proposing to issue a permit to authorize the 
incidental, but not intentional, take of specific Endangered Species 
Act (ESA)-listed marine mammal species or stocks under the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), in the Category II California (CA) 
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 inch (in) mesh) fishery 
and the corresponding high seas component of the fishery as defined on 
the MMPA List of Fisheries as the Pacific highly migratory species 
drift gillnet fishery (hereinafter, collectively referred to as the CA 
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly 
migratory species drift gillnet fishery.

DATES: Comments on this action and supporting documents must be 
received by April 14, 2025.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed permit and the 
preliminary determination supporting the permit, identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2025-0007, through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
    1. Go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and enter NOAA-NMFS-2025-0007 
in the Search box.
    2. Click the ``Comment'' icon, and complete the required fields.
    3. Enter or attach your comments.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter N/A in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).
    The preliminary determination supporting the permit is available on 
the internet at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS">https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS</a>-2025--
0007. Other supporting information is available on the internet 
including: recovery plans for the ESA-listed marine mammal species, 
<a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/recovery-species-under-endangered-species-act">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/recovery-species-under-endangered-species-act</a>; 2024 MMPA 
List of Fisheries (LOF), <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables</a>; the most recent 
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SAR) by region, <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports</a>-region, and stock, <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports</a>-species-stock; and Take Reduction Teams (TRT) 
and Plans, <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-take-reduction-plans-and-teams">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-take-reduction-plans-and-teams</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Lawson, West Coast Region, (206) 
526-4740, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16527778385a7761657978567879777738717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0a4818eceac8197938f8ea08e8f8181ce878f96">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>, or Jaclyn Taylor, NMFS Office of 
Protected Resources, (301) 427-8402, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f654e4c435641017b4e5643405d6f41404e4e01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c58fa4a6a9bcabeb91a4bca9aab785abaaa4a4eba2aab3">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MMPA requires NMFS to authorize the 
incidental take of ESA-listed marine mammals in commercial fisheries 
provided it can make the following determinations: (1) the incidental 
mortality and serious injury (M/SI) from commercial fisheries will have 
a negligible impact on the affected species or stocks; (2) a recovery 
plan for all affected species or stocks of threatened or endangered 
marine mammals has been developed or is being developed pursuant to the 
ESA; and (3) where required under MMPA section 118, a take reduction 
plan (TRP) has been developed or is being developed, a monitoring 
program is established, and vessels participating in the fishery are 
registered. We have made a preliminary determination that the Category 
II CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific 
highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery meets these three 
requirements and propose to issue a permit to the fishery to authorize 
the incidental take of ESA-listed marine mammal species or stocks 
(Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/WA and Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA 
stocks of humpback whale; CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whale) under the MMPA 
for a period of 3 years. We solicit public comments on the proposed 
issuance of the permit and the underlying preliminary determination.

Background

    The MMPA LOF classifies each commercial fishery as a Category I, 
II, or III fishery based on the level of mortality and injury of marine 
mammals occurring incidental to each fishery as defined in 50 CFR 
229.2. Section 118(c)(2) of the MMPA requires fishing vessels that 
operate in Category I and II fisheries to register with NMFS and are 
subsequently authorized to incidentally take marine mammals during 
commercial fishing operations. However, that authorization is limited 
to those marine mammals that are not listed as threatened or endangered 
under the ESA. Section 118(a)(2) of the MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1387(a)(2), 
also requires an additional authorization at section 101(a)(5) of the 
MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1371, for incidental taking of ESA-listed marine 
mammals. Section 101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1371, states that 
NMFS, as delegated by the Secretary of Commerce, for a period of up to 
3 consecutive years shall allow the incidental, but not intentional, 
taking of marine mammal species or stocks designated as depleted 
because of their listing as an endangered species or threatened species 
under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., by persons using vessels of the 
United States, while engaging in commercial fishing operations, if NMFS 
makes certain

[[Page 12149]]

determinations. NMFS must determine, after notice and opportunity for 
public comment, that: (1) incidental M/SI from commercial fisheries 
will have a negligible impact on the affected species or stock; (2) a 
recovery plan has been developed or is being developed for such species 
or stock pursuant to the ESA; and (3) where required under section 118 
of the MMPA, a monitoring program has been established, vessels engaged 
in such fisheries are registered in accordance with section 118 of the 
MMPA, and a TRP has been developed or is being developed for such 
species or stock.
    The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species or stocks 
incidentally killed or injured in each commercial fishery. We evaluated 
ESA-listed stocks or species included on the final 2024 MMPA LOF (89 FR 
12257, February 16, 2024) as killed or seriously injured following 
NMFS' Procedural Directive 02-238 ``Process for Distinguishing Serious 
from Non-Serious Injury of Marine Mammals.'' Based on this evaluation, 
we propose to issue a permit under MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E) to vessels 
registered in the Category II CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet 
(>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery, 
as classified on the final 2024 MMPA LOF, to incidentally kill or 
seriously injure individuals from the Central America/Southern Mexico-
CA/OR/WA and Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whale and CA/
OR/WA stock of sperm whale.
    NMFS regularly evaluates commercial fisheries for purposes of 
making a negligible impact determination (NID) and issuing section 
101(a)(5)(E) authorizations with the annual LOF as new information 
becomes available. More information about the fisheries is available in 
the 2024 MMPA LOF (89 FR 12257, February 16, 2024) and on the internet 
at: <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables</a>.
    We reviewed the best available scientific information to determine 
if the fishery met the three requirements of MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E) 
for issuing a permit. This information is included in the 2024 MMPA LOF 
(89 FR 12257, February 16, 2024), the SARs for these species (available 
at: <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports</a>), recovery plans for these 
species (available at: <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/recovery-species-under-endangered-species-act">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/recovery-species-under-endangered-species-act</a>), and other relevant information, as detailed further in 
the document describing the preliminary determination supporting the 
permit (available at: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS">https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS</a>-
2025-0007).

Basis for Determining Negligible Impact

    Prior to issuing a MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) permit to take ESA-listed 
marine mammals incidental to commercial fishing, NMFS must determine if 
the M/SI incidental to commercial fisheries will have a negligible 
impact on the affected marine mammal species or stocks. NMFS satisfies 
this requirement by making a NID. Although the MMPA does not define 
``negligible impact,'' NMFS has issued regulations providing a 
qualitative definition of ``negligible impact,'' defined in 50 CFR 
216.103, as an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot 
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely 
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of 
recruitment or survival.

Criteria for Determining Negligible Impact

    NMFS uses a quantitative approach for determining negligible impact 
detailed in NMFS Procedural Directive 02-204-02 (directive), ``Criteria 
for Determining Negligible Impact under MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E),'' 
which became effective on June 17, 2020 (NMFS 2020). The procedural 
directive is available online at: <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/laws-and-policies/protected-resources-policy-directives">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/laws-and-policies/protected-resources-policy-directives</a>. The 
directive describes NMFS' process for determining whether incidental M/
SI from commercial fisheries will have a negligible impact on ESA-
listed marine mammal species/stocks (the first requirement necessary 
for issuing a MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E) permit as noted above).
    The directive first describes the derivation of two Negligible 
Impact Thresholds (NIT), which represent levels of removal from a 
marine mammal species or stock. The first, Total Negligible Impact 
Threshold (NIT<INF>t</INF>), represents the total amount of human-
caused M/SI that NMFS considers negligible for a given stock. The 
second, lower threshold, Single NIT (NIT<INF>s</INF>) represents the 
level of M/SI from a single commercial fishery that NMFS considers 
negligible for a stock. NIT<INF>s</INF> was developed in recognition 
that some stocks may experience non-negligible levels of total human-
caused M/SI but one or more individual fisheries may contribute a very 
small portion of that M/SI, and the effect of an individual fishery may 
be considered negligible.
    The directive describes a detailed process for using these NIT 
values to conduct a NID analysis for each fishery classified as a 
Category I or II fishery on the MMPA LOF. The NID process uses a two-
tiered analysis. The Tier 1 analysis first compares the total human-
caused M/SI for a particular stock to NIT<INF>t</INF>. If 
NIT<INF>t</INF> is not exceeded, then all commercial fisheries that 
kill or seriously injure the stock are determined to have a negligible 
impact on the particular stock. If NIT<INF>t</INF> is exceeded, then 
the Tier 2 analysis compares each individual commercial fishery's M/SI 
for a particular stock to NIT<INF>s</INF>. If NIT<INF>s</INF> is not 
exceeded, then the commercial fishery is determined to have a 
negligible impact on that particular stock. For transboundary, 
migratory stocks, where the M/SI that occurs outside of U.S. waters is 
uncertain, we assume that total M/SI exceeds NIT<INF>t</INF> and 
proceed directly to the Tier 2 NIT<INF>s</INF> analysis. If a 
commercial fishery has a negligible impact across all ESA-listed 
stocks, then the first of three findings necessary for issuing a MMPA 
101(a)(5)(E) permit to the commercial fishery has been met (i.e., a 
NID). If a commercial fishery has a non-negligible impact on any ESA-
listed stock, then NMFS cannot issue a MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) permit for the 
fishery to incidentally take ESA-listed marine mammals.
    These NID criteria rely on the best available scientific 
information, including estimates of a stock's minimum population size 
and human-caused M/SI levels, as published in the most recent SARs and 
other supporting documents, as appropriate. Using these inputs, the 
quantitative negligible impact thresholds allow for straightforward 
calculations that lead to clear negligible or non-negligible impact 
determinations for each commercial fishery analyzed. In rare cases, 
robust data may be unavailable for a straightforward calculation, and 
the directive provides instructions for completing alternative 
calculations or assessments where appropriate.

Negligible Impact Determination

    NMFS evaluated the impact of the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift 
gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet 
fishery following the directive and based on the best available 
scientific information, made a preliminary NID. The NID analysis is 
presented in the accompanying MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) evaluation document 
that provides summaries of the information used to evaluate each ESA-
listed stock

[[Page 12150]]

documented on the 2024 MMPA LOF as killed or injured incidental to the 
fishery (available at: <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables</a>). The draft MMPA 
101(a)(5)(E) evaluation document is available at: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS">https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS</a>-2025-0007.
    The Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/WA and Mainland Mexico-
CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whale are transboundary stocks. The CA/OR/
WA stock of sperm whales is also a transboundary stock based on the 
description of the stock's geographic range in the 2023 SAR (Carretta 
et al. 2024). A recent study by Wild et al. (2024) found that after 
foraging in the Gulf of Alaska, tagged male sperm whales travelled 
south, along the west coast of North America, down to Mexican waters. 
Because the M/SI that occurs outside of U.S. waters for these 
transboundary stocks is uncertain, we assumed that total M/SI exceeds 
NIT<INF>t</INF> for these stocks and proceeded directly to the Tier 2 
NIT<INF>s</INF> analysis.
    Based on the criteria outlined in the directive, the most recent 
SARs, and the best available scientific information, NMFS has 
determined that the M/SI of Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/WA 
and Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whale and CA/OR/WA 
stock of sperm whale incidental to the CA thresher shark/swordfish 
drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift 
gillnet fishery will have a negligible impact on these stocks. 
Accordingly, this MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) requirement is satisfied for CA 
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly 
migratory species drift gillnet fishery (see draft MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) 
determination document is available at: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS">https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS</a>-2025-0007). Summaries of the NID analyses are provided 
below.
    The Category II CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery has 
documented incidental M/SI of the Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/
OR/WA stock of humpback whale. The 2022 SAR includes a mean annual 
total commercial fishery-related M/SI (8.1) (data from 2016-2020) for 
the Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale 
(Carretta et al. 2023). This comprises M/SI from all commercial 
fisheries, including the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet 
(>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery, 
as well as fishery-related M/SI for the stock not assigned to a 
specific commercial fishery.
    A more recent publication, Carretta 2023, includes bycatch data 
from 1990 through 2022 for the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift 
gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet 
fishery. Using M/SI from 2018-2022 from Carretta 2023, estimated M/SI 
of humpback whales (Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock) in 
the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific 
highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery is 0.170 (Carretta 
2023). Since this M/SI (0.170) is less than NIT<INF>s</INF> (0.68), 
NMFS preliminarily determined that the CA thresher shark/swordfish 
drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift 
gillnet fishery has a negligible impact on the Central America/Southern 
Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale (see accompanying MMPA 
101(a)(5)(E) evaluation document).
    The Category II CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery has 
documented incidental M/SI of the Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock of 
humpback whale. The 2022 SAR includes a mean annual total commercial 
fishery-related M/SI (11.4) (data from 2016-2020) for the Mainland 
Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale (Carretta et al. 2023). This 
comprises M/SI from all commercial fisheries, including the CA thresher 
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory 
species drift gillnet fishery, as well as fishery-related M/SI for the 
stock not assigned to a specific commercial fishery.
    A more recent publication, Carretta 2023, includes bycatch data 
from 1990 through 2022 for the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift 
gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet 
fishery. Using M/SI from 2018-2022, estimated M/SI of humpback whales 
(Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock) in the CA thresher shark/swordfish 
drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift 
gillnet fishery is 0.231 (Carretta 2023). Since this M/SI (0.231) is 
less than NIT<INF>s</INF> (1.70), NMFS preliminarily determined that 
the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific 
highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery has a negligible impact 
on the Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale (see 
accompanying MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) evaluation document).
    The Category II CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery has 
documented incidental M/SI of the CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whale in the 
2023 SAR. Mean annual total commercial fishery-related M/SI for the CA/
OR/WA stock of sperm whales from 2017-2021 is 0.52 (Carretta et al. 
2024). This comprises M/SI from all commercial fisheries, including the 
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly 
migratory species drift gillnet fishery, as well as fishery-related M/
SI for the stock not assigned to a specific commercial fishery.
    Carretta 2023, includes bycatch data from 1990 through 2022 for the 
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly 
migratory species drift gillnet fishery. Using M/SI from 2018-2022, 
estimated M/SI of sperm whales (CA/OR/WA stock) in the CA thresher 
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory 
species drift gillnet fishery is 0.00 (Carretta 2023). Since this M/SI 
(0.00) is less than NIT<INF>s</INF> (0.523), NMFS preliminarily 
determined that the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery has a 
negligible impact on the CA/OR/WA stock of sperm whale (see 
accompanying MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) evaluation document).
    The most recent SARs for the Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/
WA and Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whale and CA/OR/WA 
stock of sperm whale include fishery-related M/SI not assigned to a 
specific commercial fishery. This unattributed fishery-related M/SI 
could be from any number of commercial, recreational, or tribal 
fisheries. However, because this fishery is observed (~20 percent 
observer coverage) we are confident that any unobserved humpback or 
sperm whale M/SI in the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 
in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery is 
accounted for in the model-based M/SI estimates for these stocks 
(Carretta 2023). Given this, any unattributed fishery-related M/SI that 
may be incidental to this specific commercial fishery is already 
accounted for, and we did not include unattributed mortality in the 
calculations for NID Tier 2 analyses (described above). NMFS is 
actively monitoring the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 
in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery through 
a fishery observer program. If additional fishery-related M/SI is 
documented through the observer program and required reporting that 
indicates additional M/SI of the Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/
WA and

[[Page 12151]]

Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whale or CA/OR/WA stock of 
sperm whale is occurring, then NMFS will re-evaluate the NIDs and the 
permit.

Recovery Plans

    A recovery plan for sperm whales has been developed (see <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/recovery-species-under-endangered-species-act">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-species-conservation/recovery-species-under-endangered-species-act</a>).
    A recovery plan for the globally ESA-listed humpback whale species 
was developed in 1991. In 2016, NMFS revised the listing status of the 
humpback whale under the ESA. The globally listed endangered species 
was divided into 14 distinct population segments (DPSs), the species-
level listing was removed, and NMFS listed four DPSs as endangered and 
one DPS as threatened (81 FR 62260, September 8, 2016). In June 2022, 
NMFS published a recovery outline for the Central America, Mexico, and 
Western North Pacific DPSs of humpback whales (<a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/recovery-outline-central-america-mexico-and-western-north-pacific-distinct">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/recovery-outline-central-america-mexico-and-western-north-pacific-distinct</a>). The recovery 
outline serves as an interim guidance document and, with the existing 
species-wide recovery plan, directs recovery efforts, including 
recovery planning, for the Central America and Mexico DPSs of humpback 
whales. These DPSs correspond with the Central America/Southern Mexico-
CA/OR/WA and Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whales, 
respectively. Once finalized, the new recovery plan will replace the 
species-wide recovery plan.
    Accordingly, the requirement that a recovery plan has been 
developed pursuant to the ESA is satisfied.

Take Reduction Plan

    The MMPA section 118 requires the development and implementation of 
a TRP for each strategic stock that interacts with a Category I or II 
fishery. Subject to available funding, the Secretary shall give highest 
priority to the development of TRPs for species or stocks whose M/SI 
exceeds potential biological removal level, have a small population 
size, and which are declining most rapidly. The stocks considered for 
these permits are designated as strategic stocks under the MMPA because 
the stocks or a component of the stocks are listed as threatened 
species or endangered species under the ESA (MMPA section 3(19)(C)). A 
TRP for the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/
Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery and the affected 
marine mammal species or stocks (Central America/Southern Mexico-CA/OR/
WA and Mainland Mexico-CA/OR/WA stocks of humpback whale and CA/OR/WA 
stock of sperm whale) has been developed (see Pacific Offshore Cetacean 
Take Reduction Plan).
    Accordingly, the requirement under MMPA section 118 to have a TRP 
in place or in development is satisfied (see preliminary determination 
supporting the permit available on the internet at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS">https://www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAA-NMFS</a>-2025-0007).

Monitoring Program

    Under MMPA section 118(d), NMFS is to establish a program for 
monitoring incidental M/SI of marine mammals from commercial fishing 
operations. The CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery is 
monitored by a NMFS fishery observer program. Accordingly, the 
requirement under MMPA section 118 to have a monitoring program in 
place is satisfied.

Vessel Registration

    MMPA section 118(c) requires that vessels participating in Category 
I and II fisheries register to obtain an authorization to take marine 
mammals incidental to fishing activities. NMFS has integrated the MMPA 
registration process, implemented through the Marine Mammal 
Authorization Program, with existing state and Federal fishery license, 
registration, or permit systems for Category I and II fisheries on the 
LOF. Therefore, the requirement for vessel registration is satisfied.

Conclusions for Proposed Permit

    Based on the above evaluation for the CA thresher shark/swordfish 
drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift 
gillnet fishery as it relates to the three requirements of MMPA section 
101(a)(5)(E), we propose to issue a MMPA 101(a)(5)(E) permit to the CA 
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)/Pacific highly 
migratory species drift gillnet fishery to authorize the incidental 
take of ESA-listed species or stocks during commercial fishing 
operations. If, during the 3-year authorization, there is a significant 
change in the information or conditions used to support any of these 
determinations, NMFS will re-evaluate whether to amend or modify the 
authorization, after notice and opportunity for public comment. NMFS 
solicits public comments on the proposed permit and the preliminary 
determinations supporting the permit.

ESA Section 7 and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Requirements

    ESA section 7(a)(2) requires Federal agencies to ensure that 
actions they authorize, fund, or carry out do not jeopardize the 
continued existence of any species listed under the ESA, or destroy or 
adversely modify designated critical habitat of any ESA-listed species. 
The effects of CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery on ESA-
listed marine mammals for which a permit is proposed here, were 
analyzed in the appropriate ESA section 7 Biological Opinion on the 
commercial fishery (see <a href="https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/51058">https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/51058</a>), and incidental take was exempted for those ESA-listed marine 
mammals for the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in 
mesh)/Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet fishery in 
accordance with the Biological Opinions' incidental take statement. 
Under section 7 of the ESA, Biological Opinions quantify the effects of 
the proposed action on ESA-listed species and their critical habitat 
and, where appropriate, exempt take of ESA-listed species that is 
reasonably certain to occur, as specified in the incidental take 
statement.
    Under MMPA section 101(a)(5)(E), NMFS analyzes previously 
documented M/SI incidental to commercial fisheries through the NID 
process, and when the necessary findings can be made, issues a MMPA 
section 101(a)(5)(E) permit that allows for an unspecified amount of 
incidental taking of specific ESA-listed marine mammal stocks while 
engaging in commercial fishing operations. Thus, the applicable 
standards and resulting analyses under the MMPA and ESA differ, and as 
such, do not always align.
    NEPA requires Federal agencies to evaluate the impacts of 
alternatives for their actions on the human environment. Because the 
proposed permit would not modify any fishery operation and the effects 
of the fishery operations have been evaluated in accordance with NEPA, 
no additional NEPA analysis beyond that conducted for the associated 
Fishery Management Plans is required for the permit. Issuing the 
proposed permit would have no additional impact on the human 
environment or effects on threatened or endangered species beyond those 
analyzed in these documents.

References

Carretta, James V. 2023. Estimates of Marine Mammal, Sea Turtle, and 
Seabird Bycatch in the California Large-Mesh Drift Gillnet Fishery: 
1990-2022. U.S.

[[Page 12152]]

Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-687. 67 
p.
Carretta, J.W., E.M. Oleson, K.A. Forney, M.M. Muto, D.W. Weller, 
A.R. Lang, J. Baker, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, J. Barlow, J.E. Moore, and 
R.L. Brownell. 2023. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 
2022. U.S. Department of Commerce. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-
SWFSC-684. 409 p.
Carretta, J.W., E.M. Oleson, K.A. Forney, A.L. Bradford, K. Yano, 
D.W. Weller, A.R. Lang, J. Baker, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, J.E. Moore, 
M. Wallen and R.L. Brownell. 2024. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock 
Assessments: 2023. U.S. Department of Commerce. NOAA Technical 
Memorandum. NMFS-SWFSC-704. 420 p.
Wild, L.A., Mueter, F.J., Straley, J.M. and Andrews, R.D., 2024. 
Movement and Diving Behavior of Satellite-Tagged Male Sperm Whales 
in the Gulf of Alaska. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11, p.1394687.
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2020. National Marine 
Fisheries Service Procedure 02-204-02: Criteria for Determining 
Negligible Impact under MMPA Section 101(a)(5)(E). 20 p. Available 
online: <a href="https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/laws-and-policies/protected-resources-policy-directives">https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/laws-and-policies/protected-resources-policy-directives</a>.

    Dated: March 10, 2025.
Kimberly Damon-Randall,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-04050 Filed 3-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on March 14, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.