Rule2025-02999

Inactivated Burkholderia Rinojensis Strain A396 Cells and Spent Fermentation Media; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
February 25, 2025
Effective
February 25, 2025

Issuing agencies

Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract

This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media in or on all food commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media under FFDCA when used in accordance with this exemption.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 36 (Tuesday, February 25, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 25, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10608-10610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-0143; FRL-12383-01-OCSPP]


Inactivated Burkholderia Rinojensis Strain A396 Cells and Spent 
Fermentation Media; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis 
strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media in or on all food 
commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good 
agricultural practices. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., submitted a 
petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 
requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This 
regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level 
for residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells 
and spent fermentation media under FFDCA when used in accordance with 
this exemption.

DATES: This regulation is effective February 25, 2025. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 28, 2025 and 
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR 
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-0143, is available at 
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection 
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., 
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The 
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room, and for the OPP Docket is (202) 566-1744. For the latest 
status information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madison H. Le, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (7511M), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, 
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (202) 566-1400; email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8bc9dbdbcfcdd9c5e4ffe2e8eef8cbeefbeaa5ece4fd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="783a28283c3e2a36170c111b1d0b381d0819561f170e">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
    <bullet> Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    <bullet> Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    <bullet> Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    <bullet> Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Office of the Federal Register's e-CFR site at 
<a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40">https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40</a>.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file 
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-0143, in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
April 28, 2025. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and 
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2023-0143, by one of 
the following methods:

[[Page 10609]]

    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    <bullet> Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
    <bullet> Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets</a>.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.

II. Background

    In the Federal Register of March 24, 2023 (88 FR 17778) (FRL-10579-
02), EPA issued a notice pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance exemption 
petition (PP 1F8955) by Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., 1540 Drew Ave., 
Davis, CA 95618. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended 
by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for 
residues of the insecticide, fungicide, miticide, and nematicide 
Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media in or on all agricultural commodities. That notice 
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner Marrone 
Bio Innovations, Inc., and is available in the docket via <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. No comments were received on the notice of filing.

III. Final Rule

A. EPA's Safety Determination

    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include 
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in 
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in 
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance or tolerance exemption and 
to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide 
chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) 
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the 
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and 
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has evaluated the 
available toxicological and exposure data on Inactivated Burkholderia 
rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media and 
considered their validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as 
the relationship of this information to human risk. A full explanation 
of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment based on 
those data can be found within the document entitled ``Microbial Human 
Health Risk Assessment for Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain 
A396 cells and spent fermentation media''. This document, as well as 
other relevant information, is available in the docket for this action 
as described under ADDRESSES.
    The available data and rationale demonstrated that, with regard to 
humans, Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media has low toxicity via oral, dermal, or inhalation 
routes of exposure. Additionally, it was found to be minimally 
irritating to the skin and to the eye and is not a skin sensitizer. In 
a 90-day oral toxicity study conducted with Inactivated Burkholderia 
rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media, there were 
no adverse effects observed at the maximum dose of 900mg/kg/day. The 
90-day dermal, 90-day inhalation, prenatal developmental toxicity, and 
genotoxicity data requirements were addressed with rationale using a 
weight of the evidence (WOE) approach that considered the lack of 
adverse effects in the toxicity data, among other considerations. Based 
on the lack of adverse effects seen in the available toxicity/
pathogenicity data, EPA did not identify any points of departure for 
assessing risk; thus, no quantitative risk assessment was conducted. 
Significant dietary and non-occupational exposures to residues of 
Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media are not anticipated because of its rapid 
biodegradability and it is not expected to remain at high levels on 
plant surfaces or readily percolate through soil before reaching ground 
water. Even if dietary and non-occupational exposures to residues of 
Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media were to occur, there is no risk of concern due to 
the lack of potential for adverse effects.
    Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering 
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency 
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of 
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.'' No risk of cumulative toxicity/effects 
from Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media has been identified as no toxicity has been shown 
for Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media in the submitted studies. Therefore, EPA has not 
assumed that Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and 
spent fermentation media has a common mechanism of toxicity with other 
substances.
    Additionally, although FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides for an 
additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the 
case of threshold effects, EPA has determined that there are no such 
effects due to the lack of toxicity of Inactivated Burkholderia 
rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media. Because 
there are no threshold levels of concern with the toxicity of 
Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent 
fermentation media, EPA determined that no additional margin of safety 
is necessary to protect infants and children as part of the qualitative 
assessment conducted.
    Based upon its evaluation described above and in the Microbial 
Human Health Risk Assessment for Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis 
strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media, which concludes that 
there are no risks of concern from aggregate exposure to Inactivated 
Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media, 
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
result to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from 
aggregate exposure to residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis 
strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media.

[[Page 10610]]

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for Inactivated Burkholderia 
rinojensis strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media because EPA 
is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance 
without any numerical limitation.

C. Conclusion

    Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is 
established for residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain 
A396 cells and spent fermentation media in or on all agricultural food 
commodities when used in accordance with label directions and good 
agricultural practices.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition 
submitted to EPA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, 
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review 
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive 
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information 
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 
44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations 
under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance 
exemption in this action, do not require the issuance of a proposed 
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 
et seq.) do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes. As a result, this 
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA has determined that this 
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal 
governments, on the relationship between the National Government and 
the States or Tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the 
Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, EPA has determined that 
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and 
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000), do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not 
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as 
described under title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 
1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require EPA's consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: January 8, 2025.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Add Sec.  180.1415 to subpart D to read as follows:


Sec.  180.1415  Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells 
and spent fermentation media; exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance.

    An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for 
residues of Inactivated Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 cells and 
spent fermentation media in or on all agricultural commodities when 
used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural 
practices.

[FR Doc. 2025-02999 Filed 2-24-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on February 25, 2025.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.