Notice2025-02377
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Canada: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
February 10, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE) from Canada. The period of investigation is January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary determination.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 26 (Monday, February 10, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 26 (Monday, February 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9231-9234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-02377]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-122-872]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Canada:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment
of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to
producers and exporters of certain corrosion-resistant steel products
(CORE) from Canada. The period of investigation is January 1, 2023,
through December 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on
this preliminary determination.
DATES: Applicable February 10, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colin Thrasher or Eric Hawkins, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
[[Page 9232]]
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-3004 or (202) 482-1988, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section
703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On October 2,
2024, Commerce published the notice of initiation of this
countervailing duty (CVD) investigation.\1\ On November 14, 2024,
Commerce postponed the preliminary determination until February 3,
2025.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Brazil,
Canada, Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 89 FR 80204 (October 2, 2024)
(Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Brazil,
Canada, Mexico, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Postponement
of Preliminary Determinations in the Countervailing Duty
Investigations, 89 FR 89955 (November 14, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a complete description of events that followed the initiation
of this investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\ A
list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Affirmative Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation
of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Canada,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are CORE from Canada.
For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see
Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preamble to Commerce's regulations,\4\ the
Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\5\ Certain interested
parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in
the Initiation Notice. Commerce intends to issue its preliminary
decision regarding comments concerning the scope of the less-than-fair-
value (LTFV) and CVD investigations in the preliminary determination of
the companion LTFV investigations. We will incorporate the scope
decisions from the LTFV investigation into the scope of the final CVD
determination for this investigation after considering any relevant
comments submitted in scope case and rebuttal briefs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble).
\5\ See Initiation Notice, 89 FR at 80205.
\6\ The deadline for interested parties to submit scope case and
rebuttal briefs will be established in the preliminary scope
decision memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found to be
countervailable, Commerce preliminarily determines that there is a
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that gives
rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.\7\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our
preliminary determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce notes that, in making these findings, it relied, in part,
on facts available, and, because it finds that certain companies that
failed to timely respond to Commerce's quantity and value (Q&V)
questionnaire did not act to the best of their abilities to respond to
Commerce's requests for information, it drew an adverse inference in
selecting from among the facts otherwise available.\8\ For further
information, see the ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse
Inferences'' section in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alignment
In accordance with section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(4), Commerce is aligning the final CVD determination in this
investigation with the final determination in the concurrent LTFV of
CORE from Canada, based on a request made by the petitioners.\9\
Consequently, the final CVD determination will be issued on the same
date as the final LTFV determination, which is currently scheduled to
be issued no later than June 17, 2025, unless postponed.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The petitioners are Nucor Corporation and Steel Dynamics,
Inc. See Petitioners' Letter, ``Request to Align Countervailing Duty
Investigation Final Determination with Antidumping Duty
Investigation Final Determination,'' dated January 14, 2025.
\10\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa,
Taiwan, the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye, the United Arab Emirates, and
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 90 FR
8260 (January 28, 2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-Others Rate
Sections 703(d) and 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that, in the
preliminary determination, Commerce shall determine an estimated all-
others rate for companies not individually examined. This rate shall be
an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated subsidy rates
established for those companies individually examined, excluding any
rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely under section 776 of
the Act.
In this investigation, Commerce preliminarily calculated total net
subsidy rates for ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc. (AMD) and Stelco, Inc.
(Stelco) that are not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on the facts
otherwise available. Because Commerce calculated individual estimated
countervailable subsidy rates for AMD and Stelco that are not zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on the facts otherwise available, we have
preliminarily calculated the all-others rate using a weighted-average
of the individual estimated subsidy rates calculated for the examined
respondents using each company's publicly-ranged sales values.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of Subsidy Rate for All
Others,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Responsive Company
One potential exporter and/or producer of CORE from Canada did not
timely respond to Commerce's Q&V questionnaire.\12\ We find that, by
not timely responding to the Q&V questionnaire, this company withheld
requested information and significantly impeded this proceeding. Thus,
in reaching our preliminary determination, pursuant to sections
776(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the Act, we are basing the subsidy rate for the
non-responsive company on facts otherwise available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ This company is Nova Steel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We further preliminarily determine that an adverse inference is
warranted, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act. By failing to submit
responses to Commerce's Q&V questionnaire, the non-responsive company
did not cooperate to the best of its abilities in this investigation.
Accordingly, we preliminarily find that an adverse inference is
warranted to ensure that the non-responsive company will not obtain
[[Page 9233]]
a more favorable result than had they fully complied with our request
for information. For more information on the application of adverse
facts available to the non-responsive company, see ``Use of Facts
Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences'' in the Preliminary
Determination Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination
Commerce preliminarily determines that the following estimated
countervailable subsidy rates exist:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Commerce found ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc., ArcelorMittal
Canada Holdings Inc., ArcelorMittal Canada Inc., ArcelorMittal
Canada MP Inc., ArcelorMittal Long Products Canada G.P.,
ArcelorMittal Mining Canada GP/ArcelorMittal Exploitation Miniere
Canada s.e.n.c., and ArcelorMittal Coteau-du-Lac Limited Partnership
to be cross-owned entities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate (percent
Company ad valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc./ArcelorMittal Canada 1.21
Holdings Inc./ArcelorMittal Canada Inc./
ArcelorMittal Canada MP Inc./ArcelorMittal
Long Products Canada G.P./ArcelorMittal Mining
Canada GP/ArcelorMittal Exploitation Miniere
Canada s.e.n.c./ArcelorMittal Coteau-du-Lac
Limited Partnership \13\......................
Stelco, Inc.................................... 1.40
Nova Steel..................................... * 41.40
All Others..................................... 1.22
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rate based on facts available with adverse inferences.
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with this preliminary determination within five
days of its public announcement or, if there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce will analyze and, if
appropriate, correct any timely allegations of significant ministerial
errors by amending the preliminary determination. However, consistent
with 19 CFR 351.224(d), Commerce will not consider incomplete
allegations that do not address the significance standard under 19 CFR
351.224(g) following the preliminary determination. Instead, Commerce
will address such allegations in the final determination together with
issues raised in the case briefs or other written comments.
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act,
Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of entries of subject merchandise as described in
the scope of the investigation entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Further, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(d), Commerce
will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit equal to the rates
indicated above.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(1) of the Act, Commerce intends to
verify the information relied upon in making its final determination.
Public Comment
All interested parties will have the opportunity to submit scope
case and rebuttal briefs on the preliminary decision regarding the
scope of the LTFV and CVD investigations. The deadlines to submit scope
case and rebuttal briefs will be provided in the preliminary scope
decision memorandum. For all scope case and rebuttal briefs, parties
must file identical documents simultaneously on the records of the
ongoing LTFV and CVD CORE investigations. No new factual information or
business proprietary information may be included in either scope case
or rebuttal briefs.
Case briefs or other written comments on non-scope issues may be
submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no
later than seven days after the date on which the last verification
report is issued in this investigation. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the date for filing case briefs.\14\ Interested parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding must submit:
(1) a table of contents listing each issue; and (2) a table of
authorities.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings we have encouraged interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their briefs that should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes. In this investigation, we instead request
that interested parties provide at the beginning of their briefs a
public, executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\16\
Further, we request that interested parties limit their executive
summary of each issue to no more than 450 words, not including
citations. We intend to use the executive summaries as the basis of the
comment summaries included in the issues and decision memorandum that
will accompany the final determination in this investigation. We
request that interested parties include footnotes for relevant
citations in the executive summary of each issue. Note that Commerce
has amended certain of its requirements pertaining to the service of
documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\17\ See APO and Service Final Rule, 88 FR at 67069.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce via ACCESS
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the
number of participants and whether any participant is a foreign
national, and a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations
at the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a
request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and
date for the hearing.\18\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 9234]]
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
In accordance with section 703(f) of the Act, Commerce will notify
the ITC of its determination. If the final determination is
affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after
the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after the final
determination whether imports of CORE from Canada are materially
injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 703(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: February 3, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are certain flat-
rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-,
aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated
or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The
products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or
greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7
mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in
straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or
other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or
rounded at the edges).
For purposes of the width and thickness requirements referenced
above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions
set forth above, and
(2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape,
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
Steel products included in the scope of these investigations are
products in which: (1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2
percent or less, by weight.
Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that
has been further processed in a third country, including but not
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming,
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope corrosion resistant steel.
All products that meet the written physical description are
within the scope of the investigation unless specifically excluded.
The following products are outside of and/or specifically excluded
from the scope of this investigation:
<bullet> Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (``terne
plate'') or both chromium and chromium oxides (``tin free steel''),
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
<bullet> Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more
in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and
measures at least twice the thickness;
<bullet> Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are
three-layered corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat-rolled products
less than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a carbon
steel flat-rolled product clad on both sides with stainless steel in
a 20%-60%-20% ratio; and
Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty
investigation on corrosion resistant steel from Taiwan are any
products covered by the existing antidumping duty order on
corrosion-resistant steel from Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-
Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, the People's Republic of
China, the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Determination for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty
Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25, 2016); Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products from Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court Decision and Partial
Exclusion from Antidumping Duty Order, 88 FR 58245 (August 25,
2023).
Also excluded from the scope of the antidumping duty
investigation on corrosion-resistant steel from the United Arab
Emirates and the antidumping duty and countervailing duty
investigations on corrosion-resistant steel from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam are any products covered by the existing
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant
steel from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea
and the antidumping duty order on corrosion-resistant steel from
Taiwan. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016); see also Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
India, Italy, Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016). This
exclusion does not apply to imports of corrosion-resistant steel
that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption in
the United States for which the relevant importer and exporter
certifications have been completed and maintained and all other
applicable certification requirements have been met such that the
entry is entered into the United States as not subject to the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant
steel from the People's Republic of China, the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on corrosion-resistant steel from the
Republic of Korea, or the antidumping duty order on corrosion-
resistant steel from Taiwan.
The products subject to the investigation are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060,
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0040, 7210.49.0045,
7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000,
7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000,
7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090,
7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000,
7212.50.0000, 7212.60.0000, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000,
7226.99.0110, and 7226.99.0130.
The products subject to the investigation may also enter under
the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000,
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530,
7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060,
7217.90.5090, 7225.99.0090, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000,
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Injury Test
IV. Diversification of Canada's Economy
V. Subsidies Valuation
VI. Change in Ownership
VII. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
VIII. Analysis of Programs
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2025-02377 Filed 2-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on February 10, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.