Notice2025-01794
Slag Pots From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 28, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 17 (Tuesday, January 28, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 28, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8267-8271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01794]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-197]
Slag Pots From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable January 21, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt, Office III, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On December 31, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of
slag pots from the People's Republic of China (China) filed in proper
form on behalf of WHEMCO-Steel Castings, Inc. (the petitioner), a U.S.
producer of slag pots.\1\ The CVD Petition was accompanied by an
antidumping duty (AD) petition concerning imports of slag pots from
China.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated December 31, 2024
(Petition).
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8268]]
Between January 6 and 14, 2025, Commerce requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition in
supplemental questionnaires.\3\ On January 13 and 16, 2025, the
petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for additional
information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated
January 6, 2025; and ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated January 7,
2025 (General Issues Questionnaire); see also Memorandum ``Phone
Call with Counsel to the Petitioner, dated January 14, 2024 (January
14, 2025 Memorandum).
\4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Response to Supplemental
Questions Regarding Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated January
13, 2025; ``Response to Supplemental Questions Regarding Antidumping
Volume I of the Petitions,'' dated January 13, 2025 (First General
Issues Supplement); and ``Response to Second Supplemental Questions
Regarding Volume I of Petitions,'' dated January 16, 2025 (Second
General Issues Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of China
(GOC) is providing countervailable subsidies, within the meaning of
sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of slag pots in China,
and that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening material
injury to, the domestic industry producing slag pots in the United
States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are initiating a CVD
investigation, the Petition was accompanied by information reasonably
available to the petitioner supporting its allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party,
as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. Commerce also finds that
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on December 31, 2024, the period of
investigation for the CVD investigation is January 1, 2023, through
December 31, 2023.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is slag pots from China.
For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the
appendix to this notice.
Comments on the Scope of the Investigation
On January 7 and 14, 2025, Commerce requested information and
clarification from the petitioner regarding the proposed scope to
ensure that the scope language in the Petition is an accurate
reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is seeking
relief.\7\ On January 13 and 16, 2025, the petitioner provided
clarifications and revised the scope.\8\ The description of merchandise
covered by this investigation, as described in the appendix to this
notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See General Issues Questionnaire; see also January 14, 2025,
Memorandum.
\8\ See First General Issues Supplement at 1-3 and Exhibit I-
SUPP-2; see also Second General Issues Supplement at 1 and Exhibit
I-2Supp-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).\9\ Commerce will consider all comments
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary
determination. If scope comments include factual information, all such
factual information should be limited to public information.\10\ To
facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that
scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on February
10, 2025, which is 20 calendar days from the signature date of this
notice. Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual information,
and should also be limited to public information, must be filed by 5:00
p.m. ET on February 20, 2025, which is 10 calendar days from the
initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information that parties
consider relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during
that time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception
applies.\11\ An electronically filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx</a> and a handbook
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified the GOC of the receipt of the Petition and provided an
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\12\ The GOC
did not request consultations.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultation to
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated December 16, 2024.
\13\ The GOC submitted comments on the CVD petition. See GOC's
Letter, ``Comments on Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated January
14, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S. International
[[Page 8269]]
Trade Commission (ITC), which is responsible for determining whether
``the domestic industry'' has been injured, must also determine what
constitutes a domestic like product in order to define the industry.
While both Commerce and the ITC apply the same statutory definition
regarding the domestic like product,\14\ they do so for different
purposes and pursuant to a separate and distinct authority. In
addition, Commerce's determination is subject to limitations of time
and information. Although this may result in different definitions of
the like product, such differences do not render the decision of either
agency contrary to law.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\15\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\16\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that slag pots, as defined
in the scope, constitute a single domestic like product, and we have
analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see
Checklist, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Slag Pots from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (China CVD Initiation
Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry Support for the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Slag Pots
from the People's Republic of China (Attachment II). This checklist
is on file electronically via ACCESS.
\17\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether the petitioner has standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data
contained in the Petition with reference to the domestic like product
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the appendix to
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioner provided its
own production of the domestic like product in 2023 and compared this
to the estimated total production of the domestic like product in 2023
by the U.S. slag pots industry.\18\ We relied on data provided by the
petitioner for purposes of measuring industry support.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Id.
\19\ For further discussion, see Attachment II of the China CVD
Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petition, the First General
Issues Supplement, the Second General Issues Supplement, and other
information readily available to Commerce indicates that the petitioner
has established industry support for the Petition.\20\ First, the
Petition established support from domestic producers (or workers)
accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the
domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not required to take
further action in order to evaluate industry support (e.g.,
polling).\21\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have met the
statutory criteria for industry support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i)
of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers) who support the
Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the
domestic like product.\22\ Finally, the domestic producers (or workers)
have met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the
industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\23\
Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petition was filed on behalf
of the domestic industry within the meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the
Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id.
\21\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
\22\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
\23\ Id.
\24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because China is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from China materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner
alleges that subject imports from China exceed the negligibility
threshold provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ For further information regarding negligibility and the
injury allegation, see China CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment
III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and
Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Slag Pots from the People's Republic of China (Attachment
III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by the significant volume and market share of subject
imports; underselling and price suppression; lost sales and revenues;
and declines in the domestic industry's net sales quantities,
employment variables, and financial performance.\26\ We assessed the
allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat
of material injury, causation, cumulation, as well as negligibility,
and we have determined that these allegations are properly supported by
adequate evidence and meet the statutory requirements for
initiation.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Id.
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine
whether imports of slag pots from China benefit from countervailable
subsidies conferred by the GOC. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our
preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the date of this
initiation.
Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 29 of the 32
programs alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis
for our decision to initiate on each program, see the China CVD
Initiation Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for
this investigation is available on ACCESS.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioner identified 11 companies in China as
producers and/or exporters of slag pots.\28\ Commerce intends to follow
its
[[Page 8270]]
standard practice in CVD investigations and calculate company-specific
subsidy rates in this investigation. In the event that Commerce
determines that the number of companies is large and it cannot
individually examine each company based on Commerce's resources,
Commerce normally selects mandatory respondents in CVD investigations
using U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry data for U.S.
imports under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS) subheading(s) listed in the ``Scope of the
Investigation'' in the appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Petition at Volume I (page 6 and Exhibit I-4); see also
First General Issues Supplement at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 16, 2025, Commerce released CBP data on imports of slag
pots from China under administrative protective order (APO) to all
parties with access to information protected by APO and indicated that
interested parties wishing to comment on CBP data and/or respondent
selection must do so within three business days of the publication date
of the notice of initiation of this investigation.\29\ Comments must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically-filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m.
ET on the specified deadline. Commerce will not accept rebuttal
comments regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Entry Data,'' dated January 16, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such
applications may be found on Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable
indication that imports of slag pots from China are materially
injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\30\ A
negative ITC determination will result in the investigation being
terminated.\31\ Otherwise, this CVD investigation will proceed
according to statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2);
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)
the information is being submitted \32\ and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut,
clarify, or correct.\33\ Time limits for the submission of factual
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted.
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting
factual information in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by
Commerce.\34\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to
submitting factual information in this investigation.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
\35\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits;
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\36\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\37\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\37\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
<a href="https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf">https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate
in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of
19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of appearance).
Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining
to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
[[Page 8271]]
Dated: January 21, 2025.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by the investigation is slag pots with a
nominal capacity of 65 cubic feet to 1200 cubic feet regardless of
shape, form, or finish.
Slag pots are load bearing devices typically formed as a curved
shell or bowl-shaped container. Slag pots are metallurgical goods
typically produced either using a casting process or a fabrication
process (e.g., welding) and may include a ceramic refractory
coating, heat treatment or various finishes in order to handle high
temperature slag. Slag pots may contain integral features or
attachments including (1) legs (or a stand) and (2) pivotal mounting
hooks or brackets. Legs (or a stand) are a fixed or detachable
support structure which allows the slag pot to be securely
positioned upright on a surface when not being lifted or transported
and may also keep the slag pot off the ground and allow for air
cooling. The pivotal mounting hooks and brackets are specialized
attachment points (such as lifting lugs or trunnions) that allow the
slag pot to be securely lifted and transported by a crane or lifting
device, or that enable the slag pot to swing or rotate while
remaining attached to the lifting mechanism. The merchandise covered
by this investigation includes all aforementioned attachments of a
fully assembled slag pot, regardless of whether shipped assembled or
unassembled.
Slag pots are included within the scope whether finished or
unfinished, whether imported individually or with other subject or
non-subject merchandise, or whether assembled with attachments or
unassembled. Finishing includes, but is not limited to, arc washing,
welding, grinding, shot blasting, heat treatment, machining, and
assembly of various parts.
The country of origin for slag pots whether fully assembled,
unfinished or finished, is the country where the slag pot was cast
or forged. Subject merchandise includes slag pots that have been
further processed or further assembled in a third country. Further
processing and further assembly include, but is not limited to, arc
washing, welding, grinding, shot blasting, heat treatment, painting,
coating, priming, machining, and assembly of attachments.
Slag pots subject to the investigation are specified within the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under
subheading 7309.00.0090. The slag pot attachments covered by the
scope of this investigation may enter under HTSUS subheadings
7316.00.0000, 7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7325.99.5000, and
7326.19.0080. The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2025-01794 Filed 1-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 28, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.