Notice2025-00545
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 14, 2025
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 14, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3175-3179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00545]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-191]
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains From the People's
Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable January 6, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suresh Maniam, Office I, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1603.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On November 25, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of sol
gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains (ceramic abrasive grains)
from the People's Republic of China (China) filed in proper form on
behalf of Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. (the petitioner), a
U.S. producer of ceramic abrasive grains.\1\ The CVD Petition was
accompanied by an antidumping duty (AD) petition concerning imports of
ceramic abrasive grains from China.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties,'' dated November 25, 2024
(Petition).
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Between November 27, 2024, and December 17, 2024, Commerce
requested supplemental information pertaining to certain aspects of the
Petition in supplemental questionnaires.\3\ Between December 4 and 23,
2024, the petitioner filed timely responses to these requests for
additional information.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated
November 27, 2024 (General Issues Questionnaire); ``Supplemental
Questions,'' dated November 27, 2024; and ``Supplemental
Questions,'' dated December 17, 2024; see also Memorandum, ``Phone
Call with Counsel to the Petitioner,'' dated December 6, 2024
(December 6, 2024, Memorandum).
\4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Antidumping and Countervailing
Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 4, 2024
(General Issues Supplement); ``Countervailing Supplemental
Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 4, 2024; ``Antidumping and
Countervailing General Issues Supplement Response,'' dated December
9, 2024 (Scope Supplement); and ``Antidumping and Countervailing
Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 23, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 6, 2024, Commerce extended the initiation deadline by
20 days to poll the domestic industry in accordance with sections
702(c)(1)(B) and 702(c)(4)(D) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), because the Petition ``{had{time} not established that the
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
total production support the {Petition{time} . . . .'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Notice of Extension of the Deadline for Determining the
Adequacy of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions: Sol
Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from the People's Republic
of China, 89 FR 100465 (December 12, 2024) (Initiation Extension
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Act, the petitioner
alleges that the Government of China (GOC) is providing countervailable
subsidies, within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to
producers of ceramic abrasive grains in China, and that such imports
are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, the
domestic industry producing ceramic abrasive grains in the United
States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are initiating a CVD
investigation, the Petition was accompanied by information reasonably
available to the petitioner supporting its allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry, because the petitioner is an interested party,
as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. Commerce also finds that
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See section on ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition,'' infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on November 25, 2024, the period of
investigation for the CVD investigation is January 1, 2023, through
December 31, 2023.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 3176]]
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are ceramic abrasive
grains from China. For a full description of the scope of this
investigation, see the appendix to this notice.
Comments on the Scope of the Investigation
On November 27, 2024 and December 6, 2024, Commerce requested
information and clarification from the petitioner regarding the
proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petition is an
accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic industry is
seeking relief.\8\ On December 4 and 9, 2024, the petitioner provided
clarifications and revised the scope.\9\ The description of merchandise
covered by this investigation, as described in the appendix to this
notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See General Issues Questionnaire; see also December 6, 2024,
Memorandum.
\9\ See General Issues Supplement at 1-3; see also Scope
Supplement at 4-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).\10\ Commerce will consider all comments
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary
determination. If scope comments include factual information, all such
factual information should be limited to public information.\11\ To
facilitate preparation of its questionnaire, Commerce requests that
scope comments be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on January
27, 2025, which is the next business day after 20 calendar days from
the signature date of this notice.\12\ Any rebuttal comments, which may
include factual information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on February
6, 2025, which is 10 calendar days from the initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble).
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1). The deadline for scope comments
falls on January 26, 2025, which is a Sunday. In accordance with 19
CFR 351.303(b)(1), Commerce will accept comments filed by 5:00 p.m.
ET on January 27, 2025 (``For both electronically filed and manually
filed documents, if the applicable due date falls on a non-business
day, the Secretary will accept documents that are filed on the next
business day.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information that parties
consider relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during
that time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party must contact Commerce and
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope
comments must be filed simultaneously on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception
applies.\13\ An electronically filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx</a> and a handbook
can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified the GOC of the receipt of the Petition and provided an
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\14\ The GOC
did not request consultations.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Invitation for Consultation to
Discuss the Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated November 26, 2024.
\15\ The GOC submitted comments on the CVD petition. See GOC's
Letter, ``Comments on Countervailing Duty Petition,'' dated December
13, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC),
which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry''
has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like
product,\16\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\17\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United
States, 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\18\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that
[[Page 3177]]
ceramic abrasive grains, as defined in the scope, constitute a single
domestic like product, and we have analyzed industry support in terms
of that domestic like product.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see
Checklist, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist:
Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from the People's
Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (China CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II,
Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Petitions Covering Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive
Grains from the People's Republic of China (Attachment II). This
checklist is on file electronically via ACCESS.
\19\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, on December 6, 2024, Commerce extended the
initiation deadline by 20 days to poll the domestic industry in
accordance with sections 702(c)(1)(B) and 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act
because the Petition ``{had{time} not established that the domestic
producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of total
production support the {Petition{time} . . . .'' \20\ On December 10,
2024, we issued polling questionnaires to all known producers
identified in the Petition.\21\ We requested that the companies
complete the polling questionnaire and certify their responses by the
due date specified in the cover letter to the questionnaire. We
received timely responses to these questionnaires from domestic
producers on December 17, 2024.\22\ No interested party submitted
comments on the polling questionnaire responses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Initiation Extension Notice.
\21\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Polling Questionnaire,'' dated
December 10, 2024; see also Memorandum, ``Email to Counsel for
Domestic Producers,'' dated December 23, 2024.
\22\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Polling Questionnaire
Response,'' dated December 17, 2024; see also 3M Company's Letter,
``Industry Polling Questionnaire Response,'' dated December 17,
2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our analysis of the data we received in the polling questionnaire
responses indicates that the domestic producers and workers who support
the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total production of
the domestic like product and more than 50 percent of the production of
the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\23\
Accordingly, Commerce determines that the industry support requirements
of section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act have been met and that the Petition
was filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
\24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because China is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from China materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefiting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner
alleges that subject imports from China exceed the negligibility
threshold provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ For further information regarding negligibility and the
injury allegation, see China CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment
III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and
Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Sol Gel Alumina-Based Ceramic Abrasive Grains from the
People's Republic of China (Attachment III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by the increasing volume of subject imports; reduced market
share; underselling and price depression and/or suppression; lost sales
and revenues; and declines in the domestic industry's production,
capacity utilization, and financial performance.\26\ We assessed the
allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat
of material injury, causation, cumulation, as well as negligibility,
and we have determined that these allegations are properly supported by
adequate evidence and meet the statutory requirements for
initiation.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Id.
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine
whether imports of ceramic abrasive grains benefit from countervailable
subsidies conferred by the GOC. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our
preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the date of this
initiation.
Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 24 of the 29
programs alleged by the petitioner. For a full discussion of the basis
for our decision to initiate on each program, see the China CVD
Initiation Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for
this investigation is available on ACCESS.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioner identified 11 companies in China as
producers and/or exporters of ceramic abrasive grains.\28\ Commerce
intends to follow its standard practice in CVD investigations and
calculate company-specific subsidy rates in this investigation. In the
event that Commerce determines that the number of companies is large
and it cannot individually examine each company based on Commerce's
resources, Commerce normally selects mandatory respondents in CVD
investigations using U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) entry
data for U.S. imports under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) subheading(s) listed in the ``Scope of the
Investigation'' in the appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Petition at Volume I (Exhibit I-5); see also General
Issues Supplement at 1 and Exhibit I-5-Revised.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 2, 2025 Commerce released CBP data on imports of ceramic
abrasive grains from China under administrative protective order (APO)
to all parties with access to information protected by APO and
indicated that interested parties wishing to comment on CBP data and/or
respondent selection must do so within three business days of the
publication date of the notice of initiation of this investigation.\29\
Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety via ACCESS
by 5:00 p.m. ET on the specified deadline. Commerce will not accept
rebuttal comments regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See Memorandum, ``Release of U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Entry Data,'' dated January 2, 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order (APO) in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may be found on
Commerce's website at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders">https://www.trade.gov/administrative-protective-orders</a>.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
[[Page 3178]]
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 25 days after the date
on which the ITC receives notice from Commerce of initiation of the
investigation, whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of
ceramic abrasive grains from China are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\30\ A negative ITC
determination will result in the investigation being terminated.\31\
Otherwise, this CVD investigation will proceed according to statutory
and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See section 703(a) of the Act.
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors of production under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or
to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2);
(iv) evidence placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other
than factual information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of
Commerce's regulations requires any party, when submitting factual
information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)
the information is being submitted \32\ and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut,
clarify, or correct.\33\ Time limits for the submission of factual
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted.
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting
factual information in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as otherwise specified by
Commerce.\34\ For submissions that are due from multiple parties
simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, we
will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the deadline
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed
to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in a
separate, standalone submission; under limited circumstances we will
grant untimely filed requests for the extension of time limits, where
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning the
extension of time limits and the Time Limits Final Rule prior to
submitting factual information in this investigation.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
\35\ See 19 CFR 351.301; see also Extension of Time Limits;
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013) (Time Limits Final
Rule), available at <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\36\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\37\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\37\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
<a href="https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf">https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Parties wishing to participate
in this investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of
19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the required letters of appearance).
Note that Commerce has amended certain of its requirements pertaining
to the service of documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See Administrative Protective Order, Service, and Other
Procedures in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 88 FR
67069 (September 29, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: January 6, 2025.
Steven Presing,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is sol gel
alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains which are comprised of minimum
94% aluminum oxide (Al<INF>2</INF>O<INF>3</INF>), and may contain
other compounds, including, but not limited to, titanium dioxide,
silicon dioxide, calcium oxide, sodium superoxide, ferric oxide,
magnesium oxide, di-aluminum magnesium tetroxide, lanthanum oxide,
lanthanum magnesium oxide, zirconium dioxide, or zirconium
carbonate. Grain sizes of sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive
grains range from 0.85 mm to 0.0395 mm (which corresponds to
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) grit sizes from 20 to
280).
Shapes include but are not limited to angular, sharp, extra
sharp, blocky, splintery, round stripped, triangular or shaped like
extruded rods or stars.
Ceramic abrasive grains have unique crystalline structures that
impart certain advanced properties, such as their extreme hardness
and strength ranging between 16 and 22 gigapascals by the Vickers
Diamond Indent Method, high melting point (2050 [deg]C), and a
single- or multi-phase microstructure, which may contain multiple
phases, having crystalline sizes ranging from 0.05 to 30[micro]m.
These ceramic abrasive grains include but are not limited to blue,
white, white-translucent, or off-white opaque colors.
Sol gel alumina-based ceramic abrasive grains are covered by the
scope of this investigation, whether or not incorporated into
downstream articles, including but not limited to, abrasive papers,
grinding wheels, grinding cylinders, and grinding discs. When
incorporated into downstream articles, only the sol gel alumina-
based ceramic abrasive grains component of such articles is covered
by the product scope, and not the downstream product as a whole.
The merchandise subject to this investigation is properly
classified under subheadings 2818.10.2020 and 2818.10.2090 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Other
merchandise subject to the current scope, including when
incorporated into the abovementioned downstream articles, may be
classified under HTSUS subheadings 2818.10.1000, 2818.20.0000,
2818.30.0000, 3824.99.1100, 3824.99.1900, 6805.10.0000,
6805.20.0000, 6805.30.1000, 6805.30.5000, 6804.22.1000,
6804.22.4000, 6804.22.6000, 8204.12.0000, 8474.90.0010,
8474.90.0020, 8474.90.0050,
[[Page 3179]]
and 8474.90.0090. Although the HTSUS statistical reporting numbers
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2025-00545 Filed 1-13-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 14, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.