Proposed Rule2024-31420
Safety Zone; Cable Laying Corridor, Atlantic Ocean, Virginia Beach, Virginia
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 15, 2025
Issuing agencies
Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
Abstract
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary moving safety zone to surround nearshore operations conducted by a cable laying barge. Cable lay and burial operations will create navigational hazards moving along a corridor from shore extending seaward 12 NM. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Virginia Beach, Virginia. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Virginia or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 15, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3729-3731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31420]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-1093]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Cable Laying Corridor, Atlantic Ocean, Virginia
Beach, Virginia
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary moving
safety zone to surround nearshore operations conducted by a cable
laying barge. Cable lay and burial operations will create navigational
hazards moving along a corridor from shore extending seaward 12 NM.
This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters near Virginia Beach, Virginia. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Virginia or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before January 29, 2025. A shorter comment period is
necessary for this rule to provide ample time to review and address
comments on the proposed rule prior to the day the rule is needs to
take effect to protect the public from the hazards it addresses.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2024-1093 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments. This notice of proposed rulemaking
with its plain-language, 100-word-or-less proposed rule summary will be
available in this same docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Justin Strassfield, Sector
Virginia, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard, Telephone:
(757) 668-5581; or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e89e819a8f818681899f899c8d9a9f89919ba89d9b8b8fc6858184"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05736c77626c6b6c64726471607772647c7645707666622b686c69">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CLB Cable Laying Barge
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NM Nautical Miles
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On December 3, 2024, Dominion Energy notified the Coast Guard with
a request for a moving safety zone to encompass the operations
conducted by the CLB ULISSE, to extend 1000-yards from the center of
the barge. The Sector Virgnia COTP has determined that potential
hazards associated with the anchorage arrangements necessary for the
cable laying barge to conduct operations would be a safety concern for
anyone within a 1000-yard radius of the barge.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
vessels and the navigable waters within a 1000-yard radius of the CLB
during its operations. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a safety zone on January 25,
2025, for 365 days. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters
within 1000 yards of the CBL ULISSE, only while it conducts cable
handling and burial in the Atlantic Ocean beginning roughly 300 yards
from the shore of the State Military Reservation in Virginia Beach,
Virginia out to 12 NM, the U.S. Territorial Seas border. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters during the 365-day period. No vessel or person would
be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. Due to the stability required
for the cable laying and burial process, the multipoint anchorage
configurations used are highly dynamic and create large unseen hazards
to navigation requiring someone familiar with the current anchoring
positions to determine if safe transit corridors exist or if a
transiting vessel must avoid the full 1000 yards radius of the zone to
mitigate the hazards present. A designated representative, in
communication with the anchor handling vessels, can communicate these
hazards and possible safe transit corridors, decreasing the burden on
the non-project vessels seeking access through or around the zone. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic would be able
to safely transit around this safety zone to the east initially without
losing sight of land and the impact the nearshore recreational boaters
near Rudee Inlet in Virginia Beach, Virginia would be reduced further
as the CLB moves further from shore, providing safe transit options to
the west along the shoreline.
[[Page 3730]]
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zones may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
establishment of safety zones to protect the public from hazards
created by cable laying and burial operations, as well as the anchoring
configurations, required for the operations of the CLB ULISSE. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L[60a] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision-Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. To
do so, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-2024-1093 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> Frequently Asked
Questions web page. Also, if you click on the Dockets tab and then the
proposed rule, you should see a ``Subscribe'' option for email alerts.
The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is
published.
We review all comments received, but we will only post comments
that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post
off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> will
[[Page 3731]]
include any personal information you have provided. For more about
privacy and submissions to the docket in response to this document, see
DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11,
2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-1093 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-1093 Safety Zone; Cable Laying Corridor, Atlantic
Ocean, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
(a) Location. The following area is a moving safety zone: Any
navigable waters located within 1000 yards in all directions from the
Cable Laying Barge (CLB) ULISSE while operating off the coast of
Virginia Beach, Virginia while it conducts work within 12 nm of the
shore. The CLB operations will occur within a perimeter enclosed by
positions: 36[deg]49'4.8'' N, 75[deg]57'43.2'' W; 36[deg]49'13.9'' N,
75[deg]42'39.8'' W; 36[deg]47'' 11.7'' N, 75[deg]41'' 50.8'' W and
36[deg]48'' 28.8'' N, 75[deg]57'' 43.2'' W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sector Virginia (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone. The term also includes the master of a U.S.-flagged vessel
supporting the CLB ULISSE for the sole purpose of designating and
establishing safe transit corridors, to permit passage into or through
this safety zones, or to notify vessels and individuals of the actual
hazards present if they have entered the safety zone and inform them of
the safe direction to which they should depart.
(c) Regulations.
(1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this
part, no vessel or person may enter or remain in any safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the
COTP, or designated representative. If a vessel or person is notified
by the COTP, or designated representative that they have entered one of
these safety zones without permission, they are required to immediately
depart in a safe manner following the directions given.
(2) Mariners requesting to transit this safety zone must first
contact the designated representative who will be monitoring VHF-FM
channels 13 and 16 while work is ongoing. If permission is granted,
mariners must proceed at their own risk and strictly observe any and
all instructions provided by the COTP, or designated representative to
the mariner regarding the conditions of entry to and exit from any
location within the moving safety zone.
(d) Enforcement. The Sector Virginia COTP may enforce the
regulations in this section and may be assisted by any Federal, state,
county, or municipal law enforcement agency.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be subject to enforcement
from January 25, 2025, until January 25, 2026. If cable laying work is
completed before January 25, 2026, or for a different reason the COTP
determines the zone need no longer be enforced, they will issue a
general permission to enter.
Dated: December 26, 2024.
Peggy M. Britton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2024-31420 Filed 1-14-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 15, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.