Rule2024-30649
Interim Final Determination To Defer Sanctions; AK, Fairbanks North Star Borough
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
January 8, 2025
Effective
January 8, 2025
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making an interim final determination that the State of Alaska has submitted state implementation plan (SIP) revisions that satisfy outstanding Clean Air Act requirements. This interim final determination defers the imposition of sanctions for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) Fairbanks North Star Borough PM<INF>2.5</INF> nonattainment area. This determination is based on a proposed approval, published in the "Proposed Rules" section of this Federal Register, of the SIP revisions, submitted by the State of Alaska (Alaska or the State) on December 4, 2024, to address Clean Air Act requirements for the 2006 24-hour PM<INF>2.5</INF> national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 90 Issue 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1378-1380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30649]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2024-0595; FRL-12391-03-R10]
Interim Final Determination To Defer Sanctions; AK, Fairbanks
North Star Borough
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making an interim
final determination that the State of Alaska has submitted state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions that satisfy outstanding Clean Air
Act requirements. This interim final determination defers the
imposition of sanctions for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter
(PM<INF>2.5</INF>) Fairbanks North Star Borough PM<INF>2.5</INF>
nonattainment area. This determination is based on a proposed approval,
published in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register,
of the SIP revisions, submitted by the State of Alaska (Alaska or the
State) on December 4, 2024, to address Clean Air Act requirements for
the 2006 24-hour PM<INF>2.5</INF> national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS).
DATES: This interim final determination is effective January 8, 2025.
However, comments will be accepted until February 7, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2024-0595, at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from <a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information the disclosure of which is
[[Page 1379]]
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Jentgen, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553-0340,
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a404f445e4d4f4404474b5e5e424f5d6a4f5a4b044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670d020913000209490a0613130f02102702170649000811">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
I. Background
In 2009, the EPA designated a portion of the Fairbanks North Star
Borough as ``nonattainment'' for the 2006 24-hour PM<INF>2.5</INF>
NAAQS, which is set at the level of 35 micrograms per cubic meter
([mu]g/m\3\) (Fairbanks PM<INF>2.5</INF> Nonattainment Area) (74 FR
58688, November 13, 2009). Effective July 2, 2014, the EPA classified
the area as ``Moderate'' (79 FR 31566, June 2, 2014). Subsequently,
Alaska submitted, and the EPA approved, a plan to meet the Moderate
nonattainment area requirements (82 FR 42457, September 8, 2017)
(Fairbanks Moderate Plan).
On May 10, 2017, the EPA determined that the Fairbanks
PM<INF>2.5</INF> Nonattainment Area failed to attain the 2006 24-hour
PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS in the area by the outermost statutory Moderate
area attainment date of December 31, 2015 (82 FR 21711). As a result,
the Fairbanks PM<INF>2.5</INF> Nonattainment Area was reclassified as a
``Serious'' nonattainment area by operation of law. On September 2,
2020, the EPA determined that the area failed to attain by the Serious
area attainment date and denied the State's Serious area attainment
date extension request (85 FR 54509). As a result, Alaska was required
to submit a revised SIP submission to meet both the Serious area
attainment plan requirements and the additional requirements set forth
in Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 189(d) by December 31, 2020.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 40 CFR 51.1003(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 13, 2019, and December 15, 2020, Alaska submitted two
state implementation plan (SIP) revisions to meet the CAA planning
requirements for the Serious Fairbanks PM<INF>2.5</INF> Nonattainment
Area. On December 5, 2023, the EPA issued a final rule approving in
part and disapproving in part these SIP submissions.\2\ Pursuant to
section 179 of the CAA and the EPA's regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR 52.31, our partial disapproval action
started an 18-month clock for the application of the offset sanction
and a 24-month clock for the application of the highway sanction,
beginning on the effective date of our December 5, 2023, action (i.e.,
January 4, 2024), unless the State submits, and the EPA approves, a SIP
revision or revisions that address the deficiencies that formed the
basis for the disapproval prior to the expiration of the sanctions
clocks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 88 FR 84626, December 5, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 4, 2024, Alaska submitted SIP revisions to rectify the
previously disapproved portions of its SIP submissions for the
Fairbanks PM<INF>2.5</INF> Nonattainment Area (Fairbanks Revised 189(d)
Plan). In the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
proposing to approve the Fairbanks Revised 189(d) Plan as meeting the
CAA Serious area and CAA section 189(d) requirements for the Fairbanks
PM<INF>2.5</INF> Nonattainment Area. Pursuant to 40 CFR 52.31(d)(2)(i),
based on the proposed approval of previously deficient planning
requirements, we are taking this interim final action to defer the
imposition of the offset sanctions and the highway sanctions triggered
by our December 5, 2023, disapproval.
The EPA is providing the public with an opportunity to comment on
this deferral of sanctions. If our assessment described in this interim
final determination and the proposed approval of previously deficient
planning requirements change on the basis of comments submitted, we
will take subsequent final action to impose sanctions pursuant to 40
CFR 52.31(d). All sanctions and sanction clocks related to the December
5, 2023, disapproval will be permanently terminated on the effective
date of a full final approval action.
II. EPA Action
We are making an interim final determination to defer the
imposition of CAA section 179 sanctions associated with our December 5,
2023, final rule approving in part and disapproving in part the
Fairbanks Serious Plan and Fairbanks 189(d) Plan.\3\ This action is
based on our concurrent proposed approval, in the ``Proposed Rules''
section of this Federal Register, of the SIP revisions submitted by
Alaska on December 4, 2024.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 88 FR 84626, December 5, 2023.
\4\ See EPA-R10-OAR-2024-0595.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the EPA has preliminarily determined that Alaska has
addressed the SIP deficiencies, relief from sanctions designed to
compel submission of revised SIP elements, should be provided as
quickly as possible. Therefore, the EPA is invoking the good cause
exception under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing
an opportunity for comment before this action takes effect (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)). However, by this action the EPA is providing the public
with a chance to comment on the EPA's determination after the effective
date, and the EPA will consider any comments received in determining
whether to reverse such action.
The EPA believes that notice and comment rulemaking before the
effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. As discussed in detail in the proposed approval of
Alaska's SIP revisions published in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
this Federal Register, the EPA has reviewed the State's revisions and,
through its proposed action, have proposed to find that the State has
corrected the deficiencies that started the sanctions clocks.
Therefore, it is not in the public interest to apply sanctions. The EPA
believes that it is necessary to use the interim final process to defer
sanctions while the EPA completes its rulemaking process on the
approvability of the SIP revisions. Moreover, with respect to the
effective date of this action, the EPA is invoking the good cause
exception to the 30-day notice requirement of the APA because the
purpose of this notice is to relieve a restriction (5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1)).
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders</a>.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review as Amended by
Executive Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
[[Page 1380]]
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3401 et seq.)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action defers application of sanctions and imposes no new
requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
defers application of sanctions and imposes no new requirements.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action defers application of sanctions and
imposes no new requirements. In addition, this action does not apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will
not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. This
action does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on communities with environmental justice
(EJ) concerns to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
Executive Order 14096 (Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All, 88 FR 25251, April 26, 2023) builds on
and supplements Executive Order 12898 and defines EJ as, among other
things, the just treatment and meaningful involvement of all people,
regardless of income, race, color, national origin, or Tribal
affiliation, or disability in agency decision-making and other Federal
activities that affect human health and the environment.''
The air agency did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its
SIP submission; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Order 12898/14096
of achieving EJ for communities with EJ concerns.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.)
This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA), and
the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. The CRA allows the
issuing agency to make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided
by the CRA if the agency makes a good cause finding that notice and
comment rulemaking procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest (5 U.S.C. 808(2)). The EPA has made a
good cause finding for this action as discussed in section II of this
preamble, including the basis for that finding.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 10, 2025. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the EPA Administrator of this action does not affect
the finality of this action for the purpose of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see CAA section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 17, 2024.
Casey Sixkiller,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2024-30649 Filed 1-7-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on January 8, 2025.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.