Notice2024-29507
Finding of Failure To Attain by the Attainment Date for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard; Guam; Piti-Cabras Nonattainment Area
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 19, 2024
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is determining that the Piti-Cabras, Guam, sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) nonattainment area (NAA) failed to attain the 2010 1-hour SO<INF>2</INF> primary national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS, "standard," or "2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS") by the applicable statutory attainment date of April 9, 2023. This determination is based on an analysis of available modeling, emissions data, and information concerning control strategy implementation. This action addresses the EPA's obligation under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 179(c) to determine whether the Piti-Cabras SO<INF>2</INF> NAA ("Piti-Cabras area") attained the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the April 9, 2023 attainment date.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 103819-103823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29507]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0510; FRL-12382-01-R9]
Finding of Failure To Attain by the Attainment Date for the 2010
1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard;
Guam; Piti-Cabras Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Determination of nonattainment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is determining that
the Piti-Cabras, Guam, sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) nonattainment
area (NAA) failed to attain the 2010 1-hour SO<INF>2</INF> primary
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS, ``standard,'' or ``2010
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS'') by the applicable statutory attainment date of
April 9, 2023. This determination is based on an analysis of available
modeling, emissions data, and information concerning control strategy
implementation. This action addresses the EPA's obligation under Clean
Air Act (CAA) section 179(c) to determine whether the Piti-Cabras
SO<INF>2</INF> NAA (``Piti-Cabras area'') attained the 2010
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the April 9, 2023 attainment date.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0510. All documents in the docket are
listed on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with a disability
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Ledezma, Air Planning Office
(ARD-2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105,
(415) 972-3985, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bd7fefffee1f6fab5daf5ffe9feecdbfeebfab5fcf4ed"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a98081809f8884cba48b81978092a5809584cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
[[Page 103820]]
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. The 2010 1-Hour Primary SO<INF>4</INF> NAAQS
B. Designations, Classifications, and Attainment Dates for the
2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS
C. Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Determination
A. Area Characterization
B. Evaluation of SO<INF>2</INF> Modeling, Emissions Data, and
Control Strategy Implementation Information
C. Conclusion
III. The EPA's Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. Background
A. The 2010 1-Hour Primary SO2 NAAQS
Under section 109 of the CAA, the EPA has established primary and
secondary NAAQS for certain pervasive air pollutants (referred to as
``criteria pollutants'') and conducts periodic reviews of the NAAQS to
determine whether they should be revised or whether new NAAQS should be
established. The primary NAAQS represent ambient air quality standards
that the EPA has determined are requisite to protect public health with
an adequate margin of safety, while the secondary NAAQS represent
ambient air quality standards that the EPA has determined are requisite
to protect public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects
associated with the presence of the air pollutant in the ambient air.
Under the CAA, the EPA must establish a NAAQS for SO<INF>2</INF>,
which is primarily released to the atmosphere through the burning of
fossil fuels by power plants and other industrial facilities.
SO<INF>2</INF> is also emitted from industrial processes, including
metal extraction from ore and heavy equipment that burn fuel with a
high sulfur content. Short term exposure to SO<INF>2</INF> can damage
the human respiratory system and increase breathing difficulties. Small
children and people with respiratory conditions, such as asthma, are
more sensitive to the effects of SO<INF>2</INF>. Sulfur oxides at high
concentrations in ambient air can also react with compounds to form
small particulates (fine particulate matter, or ``PM<INF>2.5</INF>'')
that can penetrate deeply into the lungs and cause acute health
problems and/or chronic diseases. The EPA first established primary
SO<INF>2</INF> standards in 1971 at 140 parts per billion (ppb) over a
24-hour averaging period and at 30 ppb over an annual averaging
period.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 36 FR 8186 (April 30, 1971).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 22, 2010, the EPA published in the Federal Register a
strengthened, primary 1-hour SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, establishing a new
standard at a level of 75 ppb, based on the 3-year average of the
annual 99th percentile of daily maximum 1-hour average concentrations
of SO<INF>2</INF>.\2\ The revised SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS provides
increased protection of public health. Along with revision of the
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, the EPA revoked the 1971 primary annual and 24-
hour SO<INF>2</INF> standards for most areas of the country following
area designations under the new NAAQS.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 75 FR 35520, codified at 40 CFR 50.17.
\3\ 75 FR at 35592, codified at 40 CFR 50.4(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Designations, Classifications, and Attainment Dates for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS
Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the EPA is
required to designate all areas of the country as either
``attainment,'' ``nonattainment,'' or ``unclassifiable,'' pursuant to
CAA section 107(d)(1).
On December 21, 2017, the EPA designated as nonattainment six areas
in three states and two territories in the third round of
SO<INF>2</INF> designations.\4\ With that action, the EPA designated as
nonattainment the portion of Guam within a 6.074-km radius centered on
universal transverse mercator (UTM) easting 249,601.60 meters and UTM
northing 1,489,602 meters (UTM zone 55N).\5\ Pursuant to section 192(a)
of the CAA, the statutory attainment date for the Piti-Cabras area was
established as no later than five years after the effective date of the
initial designation, i.e., April 9, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 83 FR 1098 (January 9, 2018).
\5\ For designations technical discussions, see EPA's Technical
Support Document, Chapter 11, Section 3, 6-26, at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf</a>, available in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAA section 191(a) requires states that contain an area designated
nonattainment for the 2010 1-hour primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS to
develop and submit an NAA state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA
within 18 months of the effective date of an area's designation as
nonattainment. For SO<INF>2</INF>, a NAA SIP submission (also referred
to as an attainment plan) must meet the requirements of sections 110,
172(c), 191, and 192 of the CAA, and provide for attainment of the
NAAQS by the applicable statutory attainment date, i.e., no later than
five years from the effective date of the area's nonattainment
designation. The effective date of the Piti-Cabras area nonattainment
designation is April 9, 2018, so the attainment plan for the area was
due on October 9, 2019. On November 3, 2020, the EPA issued a finding
that Guam failed to submit a SIP revision for the Piti-Cabras area;
this finding became effective on December 4, 2020.\6\ Guam has not
submitted a SIP revision for the Piti-Cabras area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 85 FR 69504 (November 3, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Determinations of Attainment by the Attainment Date
Section 179(c)(1) of the CAA requires the EPA to determine whether
a NAA attained an applicable standard by the applicable statutory
attainment date based on the area's air quality as of the attainment
date within six months of the attainment date. Thus, the EPA had a
mandatory duty under CAA section 179(c) to determine by October 9,
2023, whether the Piti-Cabras SO<INF>2</INF> NAA attained the 2010
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the statutory attainment date of April 9, 2023.
A determination of whether an area's air quality meets applicable
standards is generally based upon the most recent three years of
complete, quality-assured data gathered at established state and local
air monitoring stations (SLAMS) in the NAA and other available
information. The EPA's April 23, 2014 memorandum, ``Guidance for 1-Hour
SO<INF>2</INF> Nonattainment Area SIP Submissions,'' states, ``[t]he
EPA will determine whether or not an SO<INF>2</INF> nonattainment area
has attained the NAAQS based on air quality monitoring data (when
available) and air quality dispersion modeling information for the
affected area, and/or a demonstration that the control strategy has
been fully implemented.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Guidance for 1-Hour SO<INF>2</INF> Nonattainment Area SIP
Submissions; EPA, April 23, 2014, can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-06/documents/20140423guidance_nonattainment_sip.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-06/documents/20140423guidance_nonattainment_sip.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 103821]]
In the case of the Piti-Cabras area, the relevant three years
preceding the statutory attainment date are 2020-2022. There are no
available SO<INF>2</INF> monitoring data from the Piti-Cabras
SO<INF>2</INF> NAA in this period, and the only modeling results
submitted by the Guam Environmental Protection Agency (Guam EPA) were
the results from the time of designation, which showed violations of
the NAAQS.\8\ The modeling analysis included the largest sources of
SO<INF>2</INF> emissions in the area and relied upon actual hourly
emissions rates from 2011-2013. In addition, as noted above, Guam has
not submitted a modeled attainment demonstration or control strategy
(via SIP revision) for the NAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For designations technical discussions, see EPA's Technical
Support Document, Chapter 11, Section 3, 6-26, at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf</a>, available in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the absence of monitoring data and updated modeling analyses,
the EPA is evaluating whether the Piti-Cabras area attained the 2010 1-
hour primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the applicable statutory
attainment date of April 9, 2023, based on available modeling,
emissions data, and information concerning control strategy
implementation.
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Determination
A. Area Characterization
The Piti-Cabras area is located on the western side of the island
of Guam, centered on the Piti and Cabras power plants. The Piti
facility (also referred to as ``MEC'' by Guam), consists of Units 8 and
9, and the Cabras facility consists of four units (two of which, Cabras
3 and 4, have ceased operation). These two facilities are the primary
sources of SO<INF>2</INF> in the area. Nearby, the ``TEMES'' power
plant, commercial marine vessel ports, and the United States Navy
(``Navy'') marine vessel port are also significant sources of
SO<INF>2</INF>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
\10\ SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS Designations Modeling Technical
Assistance Document, EPA, August 2016, available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-04/documents/so2modelingtad.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-04/documents/so2modelingtad.pdf</a>
and available in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Evaluation of SO2 Modeling, Emissions Data, and Control Strategy
Implementation Information
First, to determine whether the Piti-Cabras area attained the
NAAQS, the EPA considered the modeling that was conducted for the
designation of the Piti-Cabras area as nonattainment. As noted earlier,
the EPA based the nonattainment designation for the Piti-Cabras area on
modeling submitted by Guam EPA. In our review of that modeling, as
documented in the EPA's Technical Support Document (TSD) \9\
accompanying the designation, we concluded that the source
characterization, modeling parameters, and techniques submitted by Guam
EPA for this designation conformed with the EPA's August 2016 guidance
document, ``SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS Designations Modeling Technical
Assistance Document.'' \10\
The EPA's designation of the Piti-Cabras area relied on the modeled
SO<INF>2</INF> emissions for the years 2011-2013. The Piti, Cabras, and
TEMES stationary sources, along with marine sources from the commercial
and Navy ports, were modeled as the largest sources of SO<INF>2</INF>
emissions in the Piti-Cabras area. For the stationary sources,
SO<INF>2</INF> emissions are generated by combusting diesel fuel for
electricity generation. Guam Power Authority (GPA), the owner and
operator of the Piti, Cabras, and TEMES facilities, compiled the data
needed to calculate hourly emissions rates for 2011-2013 based on AP-42
emissions factors and hourly production data for each unit included in
the modeling. For maritime sources, SO<INF>2</INF> emissions are
generated by fuel combustion from docking and hoteling at the
commercial and Navy ports. Guam EPA used reports of vessels docking and
hoteling at the ports and AP-42 emissions factors to calculate hourly
emissions rates to include in the modeling.
The peak modeled receptor design value (DV) from the EPA's
designations TSD is summarized in Table 1. The modeling analysis showed
that the area was violating the 2010 1-hour primary SO<INF>2</INF>
NAAQS based on source emissions from 2011-2013, with a modeled DV of
585 [micro]g/m\3\, nearly three times the value of the 2010 1-hour
primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS level of 196.4 [micro]g/m\3\ (equivalent
to 75 ppb).
Table 1--Summary of 2011-2013 Peak Modeled Receptor 1-Hour SO2 Design Value for the Piti-Cabras Area \a\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99th percentile daily maximum 1-hour SO2
concentration ([micro]g/m\3\)
Averaging period Data period -----------------------------------------------
Modeled concentration
(including background) NAAQS level
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
99th Percentile 1-hour average.................. 2011-2013 585 \b\ 196.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Retrieved from EPA's Technical Support Document, Chapter 11, Section 3, 6-26, at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf</a>, available in the docket for this action.
\b\ Equivalent to the 2010 SO2 NAAQS of 75 ppb using 2.619 [micro]g/m\3\ conversion factor.
We note that, on September 24, 2024, GPA sent the EPA draft
modeling files intended to support a modeled attainment demonstration
for the Piti-Cabras area.\11\ The EPA is reviewing these files and
related information and has not yet determined whether they meet the
requirements for such a demonstration. However, we note that, even if
the modeling is found to be technically sound, the emissions limits
relied upon in that modeling did not take effect under Guam law until
after the attainment date, as explained later in Section II.B of this
document. Therefore, the results of this modeling cannot be relied upon
to determine whether the area attained the NAAQS by the attainment
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See two emails dated September 24, 2024 from Roland T.
Gutierrez, Environmental Manager, GPA, to Gale Hoffnagle, Senior
Vice President and Technical Director, TRC Corporation, Subject:
``SIP Modeling Files,'' and from Gale Hoffnagle to Andrew Ledezma,
EPA, Subject: ``RE: SIP Modeling Files.msg,'' included in the docket
for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, to determine whether the Piti-Cabras area attained the
NAAQS, the EPA considered annual SO<INF>2</INF> emissions trends for
the most significant SO<INF>2</INF> sources in the area using emissions
inventory information provided by Guam EPA. Table 2 lists the average
reported actual SO<INF>2</INF> emissions for 2011-2013, which were the
emissions used in the air quality modeling underlying the EPA's
designation of the area as nonattainment, as well as SO<INF>2</INF>
emissions for 2020. While the relevant three-year DV period for the
April 9, 2023
[[Page 103822]]
attainment date was from 2020-2022, we have only received complete
actual emissions data for 2020. Therefore, we are considering those
emissions because this is the most recent, complete emissions inventory
available based on actual emissions from the 2020-2022 DV time period.
Table 2--Annual Emissions From SO2 Sources in the Piti-Cabras Area for
2011-2013 Average Actual Emissions and 2020 Actual Emissions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actual SO2 emissions (tons per year,
tpy)
Facility name -------------------------------------
2011-2013
(average) \a\ 2020 \b\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cabras............................ 8,891 6,816
Piti (MEC)........................ 4,828 2,297
TEMES............................. 2 0.11
Marine Vessels.................... 76 84
-------------------------------------
Total \c\..................... 13,797 9,197
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Actual SO2 emissions retrieved from EPA's Technical Support
Document, Chapter 11, Section 3, 6-26, at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-08/documents/11_guam_so2_rd3-final.pdf</a>, available
in the docket for this action.
\b\ Actual SO2 emissions retrieved from Guam EPA's April 2024 draft SIP,
Appendix A, available in the docket for this action.
\c\ Totals may not be a precise addition of all rows due to rounding.
These data show that some reductions in SO<INF>2</INF> emissions
did occur prior to the attainment date, as annual emissions from 2020
were 9,197 tpy, approximately 33 percent lower than the 2011-2013
average emissions of 13,797 tpy. However, there is no evidence that we
are aware of to suggest that this level of emissions reductions was
sufficient to attain the NAAQS given that the modeled 2011-2013 design
value was 585 [micro]g/m\3\, nearly three times the NAAQS level of
196.4 [micro]g/m\3\. Although the reduction of 4,600 tpy of emissions
over this time period likely lowered the design value in 2020-2022, as
compared with 2011-2013, additional information would be needed to
determine whether such reductions were sufficient to provide for
attainment of the NAAQS.
Third, to determine whether the Piti-Cabras area attained the
NAAQS, the EPA considered the available information about control
strategy implementation. On June 30, 2023, the Guam Legislature adopted
Substitute Bill No. 101-37 (COR), ``An Act to Repeal and Reenact Sec.
1310 of Article 1, Chapter 1, Title 22 Guam Administrative Rules and
Regulations, Relative to Adopting Updated Emission Standards For Sulfur
Oxides From Fuel Combustion to Ensure the Island of Guam Meets the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards For Sulfur Dioxide Transmitted
by the Guam Environmental Protection Agency.'' Revised Title 22,
Section 1310 of the Guam Administrative Rules and Regulations (``Rule
1310'') sets fuel sulfur content limits of 0.2 percent for Cabras Units
1 and 2, and 0.0015 percent for all other sources except ocean-going
vessels. The revised rule took effect on July 12, 2023. Rule 1310 was
designed as the control strategy for attainment of the 2010
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS in the Piti-Cabras area but was not adopted and
implemented until after the applicable attainment date of April 9,
2023, indicating that the control strategy that Guam EPA believes is
needed to attain the NAAQS was not fully implemented by that date.
Furthermore, we note that, while some of the emissions reductions that
Guam EPA believes are needed for attainment were required to occur
earlier under a consent decree between the United States and GPA,\12\
following a modification to the consent decree,\13\ the compliance
dates for several of the controls were revised to July 1, 2022 (for
Piti Units 8 and 9) and December 31, 2022 (for Cabras Units 1 and 2).
Given that these dates were near to or at the end of the 2020-2022 DV
period, there is no evidence that the original modeled violations were
remedied in time to achieve an attaining design value in the three-year
2020-2022 period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ D. Guam, Case 1:20-cv-00007, Document 5, Filed 04/20/20.
\13\ D. Guam, Case 1:20-cv-00007, Document 7, Filed 01/14/22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Conclusion
We find that the Piti-Cabras area failed to attain the 2010 1-hour
primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the statutory attainment date of April
9, 2023, based on available modeling, emissions data, and information
concerning control strategy implementation.
Under CAA section 179(d), if the EPA determines that an area did
not attain the NAAQS by the applicable deadline, the responsible air
agency is required, within one year from the publication date of the
finding, to submit a revised plan for the area demonstrating attainment
and containing any additional measures that the EPA may reasonably
prescribe that can be feasibly implemented in the area in light of
technological achievability, costs, and any non-air quality and other
air quality-related health and environmental impacts as required. Under
CAA section 179(d)(3), such a revised SIP submission is required to
achieve attainment of the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS as expeditiously as
practicable, but no later than five years from the date of notice of
the area's failure to attain (i.e., five years after the EPA publishes
a determination in the Federal Register that the area failed to attain
the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS).
The EPA anticipates that Guam's submission of a complete
SO<INF>2</INF> attainment plan for the new attainment date in response
to this finding of failure to attain would also address the Territory's
existing obligations to submit an attainment plan for the 2010
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS.
III. The EPA's Action
Based on the EPA's review of available evidence described in this
document, the EPA finds that the Piti-Cabras area failed to attain the
2010 1-hour primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the statutory attainment
date of April 9, 2023. This determination triggers the requirements of
CAA section 179(d) for the Territory of Guam to submit a revision to
the Guam SIP for the Piti-Cabras nonattainment area to the EPA within
one year after publication of this determination in the Federal
Register. The SIP revision must, among other elements, provide for
attainment of the 1-hour primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS in the Piti-
[[Page 103823]]
Cabras nonattainment area as expeditiously as practicable but no later
than five years after publication of this determination in the Federal
Register. This action will not affect the designation status of the
area, and the Piti-Cabras area will remain designated nonattainment for
the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS until the area meets the requirements of
the CAA for redesignation and the EPA takes action to redesignate the
area. This action addresses the EPA's obligation under CAA section
179(c) to determine if the Piti-Cabras area attained the 2010 1-hour
SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS by the April 9, 2023 attainment date.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, and Executive
Order 14094: Modernizing Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under Executive Order 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the PRA of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This action
does not contain any information collection activities and serves only
to make a determination that the Piti-Cabras nonattainment area failed
to attain the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> primary standard by the April 9, 2023
attainment date.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This action will not impose any requirements on
small entities. The determination of failure to attain the 2010 1-hour
primary SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS, does not create any new requirements
beyond what is mandated by the CAA.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. The
division of responsibility between the Federal government and the
states for purposes of implementing the NAAQS is established under the
CAA.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), requires the
EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely
input by Tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have Tribal implications.'' This action does not have Tribal
implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. This action does
not apply on any Indian reservation land, any other area where EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction, or non-
reservation areas of Indian country. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) as applying to those regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe
may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered
regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not
establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or
safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, the
EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on communities with environmental justice
(EJ) concerns to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines EJ as ``the fair treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income
with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and policies.'' The EPA further
defines the term fair treatment to mean that ``no group of people
should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences
of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and
policies.''
The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in
this action. Due to the nature of the action being taken here, this
action is expected to have a neutral to positive impact on the air
quality of the affected area. Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no information in the record
inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for communities with EJ concerns.
K. Congressional Review Act
This action is not a rule and is therefore not subject to the CRA.
The action is an informal adjudication dealing with the application of
specific facts to preestablished discernible criteria.
L. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 18, 2025. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this action does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of this action. This
action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
Dated: December 10, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2024-29507 Filed 12-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 19, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.