Notice2024-27218
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Schedule of Credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
November 21, 2024
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92266-92269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27218]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-101638; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2024-066]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Schedule of Credits at Equity 7, Section 118(a)
November 15, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 1, 2024, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
[[Page 92267]]
(``Nasdaq'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II and III, below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's schedule of credits
at Equity 7, Section 118(a), as described further below.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at <a href="https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules">https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules</a>, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
schedule of credits, at Equity 7, Section 118(a). Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to introduce a new credit applicable to Tapes A, B,
and C for displayed quotes (other than Supplemental Orders) that
provide liquidity. Under the proposed rule change, members will be
eligible for the new credit of $0.0029 if they meet the following
criteria: (1) the member adds at least 0.50% of the Consolidated
Volume, with at least 0.10% of such volume being Tape B securities; and
(2) the member adds at least 0.15% of Consolidated Volume of non-
displayed liquidity, which includes midpoint orders and Midpoint
Extended Life Orders (``M-ELO'').
This proposed change will apply to Tapes A, B, and C. The purpose
of the new credit structure is to incentivize members to increase their
liquidity adding activity on the Exchange. By providing an additional
incentive for members to contribute displayed liquidity, the Exchange
aims to enhance market quality and improve liquidity.
The new proposed credit of $0.0029 is in addition to other credits
the Exchange already offers to member for providing displayed
liquidity. The Exchange believes that if this incentive successfully
drives additional liquidity, the resulting increase will enhance
overall market quality, benefiting all participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\3\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\4\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposal Is Reasonable
The Exchange's proposed change to its schedule of credits is
reasonable in several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is
subject to significant competitive forces in the market for equity
securities transaction services that constrain its pricing
determinations in that market. The fact that this market is competitive
has long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . ..'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70
FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous indicia demonstrate the competitive nature of this market.
For example, clear substitutes to the Exchange exist in the market for
equity security transaction services. The Exchange is only one of
several equity venues to which market participants may direct their
order flow. Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing
structures to that of the Exchange, including schedules of rebates and
fees that apply based upon members achieving certain volume thresholds.
Within this environment, market participants can freely and often
do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues in
response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. As such, the
proposal represents a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to increase
its liquidity and market share relative to its competitors.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to establish a new
credit of $0.0029 for members that add displayed liquidity when the
member adds at least 0.50% of Consolidated Volume, of which at least
0.10% are Tape B securities, and the member adds at least 0.15% of
Consolidated Volume of non-displayed liquidity (including midpoint
orders) and Midpoint Extended Life Orders. This proposal is reasonable
because it will incentivize liquidity adding activity and provide an
incentive to members that provide additional displayed liquidity to the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that if such incentive is effective,
then any ensuring increase in liquidity to the Exchange will improve
market quality, to the benefit of all participants.
The Exchange believes that establishing a new credit for members
that add displayed liquidity is equitable. To the extent that the
Exchange succeeds in increasing the levels of liquidity and activity on
the Exchange, the Exchange will experience improvements in its market
quality, which stands to benefit all market participants. The Exchange
further believes that the proposed new credit of
[[Page 92268]]
$0.0029 for members providing additional liquidity is equitable because
it will be applied uniformly to all members that meet the specified
criteria.
Any participant that is dissatisfied with the proposal is free to
shift their order flow to competing venues that provide more generous
pricing or less stringent qualifying criteria.
The Proposal Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed $0.0029 new credit for
members adding additional liquidity is not unfairly discriminatory. As
an initial matter, the Exchange believes that nothing about its volume-
based tiered pricing model is inherently unfair; instead, it is a
rational pricing model that is well-established and ubiquitous in
today's economy among firms in various industries--from co-branded
credit cards to grocery stores to cellular telephone data plans--that
use it to reward the loyalty of their best customers that provide high
levels of business activity and incent other customers to increase the
extent of their business activity. It is also a pricing model that the
Exchange and its competitors have long employed with the assent of the
Commission. It is fair because it enhances price discovery and improves
the overall quality of the equity markets.
The Exchange believes that the proposal to add a new credit for
members providing additional displayed liquidity (other than
Supplemental Orders) as described above, is not unfairly
discriminatory. The new credit is not intended to advantage any
particular member and will be applied uniformly to all members that
meet the qualifying criteria. Moreover, the proposal stands to improve
the overall market quality of the Exchange, to the benefit of all
market participants, by incentivizing members to increase the extent of
their liquidity adding activity.
Any participant that is dissatisfied with the proposal is free to
shift their order flow to competing venues that provide more generous
pricing or less stringent qualifying criteria.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that its proposal will place any
category of Exchange participant at a competitive disadvantage.
As noted above, the Exchange's proposal to add a new credit for
members that add displayed liquidity is intended to have market-
improving effects, to the benefit of all members. Any member can
satisfy the criteria to qualify for the new credit.
The Exchange notes that its members are free to trade on other
venues to the extent they believe that the Exchange's fee schedule is
not attractive. As one can observe by looking at any market share
chart, price competition between exchanges is fierce, with liquidity
and market share moving freely between exchanges in reaction to fee and
credit changes.
Intermarket Competition
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its credits and fees to remain competitive with
other exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been
exempted from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to
exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their credit and own
fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to
which credit or fee changes in this market may impose any burden on
competition is extremely limited.
The proposed new credit is reflective of this competition because,
as a threshold issue, even as one of the largest U.S. equities
exchanges by volume, the Exchange has less than 20% market share, which
in most markets could hardly be categorized as having enough market
power to burden competition. Moreover, price competition between
exchanges is fierce, with liquidity and market share moving freely
between exchanges in reaction to credit and fee changes. This is an
addition to free flow of order flow to and among off-exchange venues
which comprises more than 40% of industry volume in recent months.
The Exchange's proposal to add a new credit is pro-competitive in
that the Exchange intends for the credit to increase liquidity addition
activity on the Exchange, thereby rendering the Exchange more
attractive and vibrant to participants.
In sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
change will impair the ability of members or competing order execution
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2250574e470f414d4f4f474c5651625147410c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="750700191058161a1818101b0106350610165b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-066 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-066. This
file number should be included on the
[[Page 92269]]
subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website
(<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable
information in submissions; you should submit only information that you
wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold
entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject
to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number
SR-NASDAQ-2024-066 and should be submitted on or before December 12,
2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephanie J. Fouse,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-27218 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on November 21, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.