Notice2024-27044
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, Strengthening Community Colleges Training Grant Program Round 4 (SCC4) Evaluation, New Collection
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
November 20, 2024
Issuing agencies
Labor Department
Abstract
The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on respondents is properly assessed. Currently, the Department of Labor is soliciting comments concerning the collection of data for an evaluation of the fourth round of the Strengthening Community Colleges Training Grants Program. A copy of the proposed Information Collection Request (ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the addressee section of this notice.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 91802-91804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27044]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, Strengthening Community Colleges Training
Grant Program Round 4 (SCC4) Evaluation, New Collection
AGENCY: Office of Employment and Training Administration, Chief
Evaluation Office, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (DOL), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and
federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95). This program helps to ensure that
requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements on
respondents is properly assessed. Currently, the Department of Labor is
soliciting comments concerning the collection of data for an evaluation
of the fourth round of the Strengthening Community Colleges Training
Grants Program. A copy of the proposed Information Collection Request
(ICR) can be obtained by contacting the office listed below in the
addressee section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before January 21, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either one of the following
methods:
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e3d16171b183b081f120b1f0a171110311818171d1b3e1a111250191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7132191814173407101d041005181e1f3e171718121431151e1d5f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>; Mail or Courier: Suchitra
Akmanchi, Chief Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
S-2312, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. Instructions:
Please submit one copy of your comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the agency name and OMB Control
Number identified above for this information collection. Comments,
including any personal information provided, become a matter of public
record. They will also be summarized and/or included in the request for
OMB approval of the information collection request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suchitra Akmanchi by email at
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84c7ecede1e2c1f2e5e8f1e5f0edebeacbe2e2ede7e1c4e0ebe8aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43002b2a26250635222f3622372a2c2d0c25252a202603272c2f6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at (202) 693 8935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background: The Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) and the Employment
and Training Administration (ETA) in the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
are partnering to commission an evaluation of the fourth round of the
Strengthening Community Colleges Training Grants Program (SCC4). The
program, which awarded grants to sixteen community college grantees,
aims to enable community colleges to adopt and enhance evidence-based
career pathways programs that lead to equitable access to employment
opportunities in good jobs aligned with locally in-demand industries.
The SCC4 evaluation will shed light on which programs are effective for
which types of students, why they are effective, and the core
components that support success. In addition, SCC4 will build on
existing evidence regarding successful programs in community college
settings and advance the understanding of how career pathways programs
promote equitable outcomes. The SCC4 Evaluation includes two
components: (1) an impact study to measure the effects of SCC4 grant
program strategies on participant outcomes and (2) an implementation
study to understand program implementation. The impact study will
include both a quasi-experimental design (QED) and a randomized
controlled trial (RCT) each with a subset of grantees. Impact study
grantees were identified during an evaluability assessment in summer
2024, during which they were assessed on a series of criteria including
the potential number of enrolled students, interest in and feasibility
of random assignment of students to treatment and control service
groups, and a notable difference in the services available to treatment
and control group students. Five community college sites from four
grantees will be included in the RCT portion of the study. Twelve
grantees will be included in the QED study. The implementation study
will include all sixteen grantees and examine the context of SCC4
programs, including how grantees integrate employer perspectives and
student voice to shape programming. The evaluation will occur over four
years (2024 to 2028). The evaluation will rely on rigorous study
procedures and high-quality data. To facilitate these studies, the
evaluation will use several instruments, which will be used during site
visits, phone calls, and surveys with SCC4-involved staff and
participating students.
This Federal Register Notice provides the opportunity to comment on
the following proposed data collection instruments that the evaluation
will use:
Impact Study:
1. Participant baseline survey and consent form. Survey of 6,000
impact study participants to collect basic demographic information,
interest in receiving support services, and current employment and
earnings information.
2. Participant follow-up survey. Follow-up survey of 1,800 impact
study participants focused on job quality, job characteristics, and
overall well-being.
3. Service receipt logs. As part of the impact study data, grantee
staff will track information frequency and type of the services they
provide to participants. Fifteen grantee staff across the five
participating impact study sites, will be responsible for inputting
information into these logs.
Implementation Study:
The implementation study will use the following data collections to
understand the education and economic
[[Page 91803]]
context surrounding the program, the organization and administrative
structure, recruitment and enrollment, partnerships, employer
engagement and work-based learning, integrated academic and career
learning, academic and career counseling, wrap-around services, and
program sustainability.
4. Grantee survey. Survey of a lead contact each of the 16 grantees
to collect program information on service delivery models, staffing,
partnerships, and the implementation of the main program elements.
5. Semi-structured interview guide for college administrators and
program directors. During the two rounds of site visits to impact study
sites and phone calls with non-impact study sites calls, we will
conduct one-on-one or small group, semi-structured interviews with up
to 80 college administrators and program directors.
6. Semi-structured interview guide for instructors and faculty.
During the two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone
calls with non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small
group, semi-structured interviews with up to 64 instructors and faculty
for SCC4 programs.
7. Semi-structured interview guide for SCC4 participants. During
the two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone calls
with non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small group,
semi-structured interviews with up to 64 SCC4 participants.
8. Semi-structured interview guide for college staff. During the
two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone calls with
non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small group,
semi-structured interviews with up to 80 college staff providing
services to SCC4 students, such as staff in student support services or
the admissions office.
9. Semi-structured interview guide for external constituents.
During the two rounds of site visits with impact study sites and phone
calls with non-impact study sites, we will conduct one-on-one or small
group, semi-structured interviews with up to 80 external constituents
who may interact with SCC4 students, or support implementation of SCC4
programs, such as employer partners.
II. Desired Focus of Comments: Currently, the Department of Labor
is soliciting comments concerning the above data collection for the
Sectoral Strategies and Employer Engagement Portfolio Program
Evaluation. DOL is particularly interested in comments that do the
following:
[cir] evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
[cir] evaluate the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions;
[cir] enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
[cir] minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology--for example, permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
III. Current Actions: At this time, DOL is requesting clearance for
the participant baseline survey and consent form, the participant
follow-up survey, service receipt logs, the grantee survey, and semi-
structured interview guides.
Type of review: New information collection request.
OMB Control Number: 1290-0NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Comments submitted in response to this request will be summarized
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget
approval of the information collection request; they will also become a
matter of public record.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Frequency of Total number burden per Estimated
Instrument respondents response responses response total annual
(hour) burden (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant baseline survey..... \1\ 6,000 1 6,000 .16 320
Participant follow-up survey.... \2\ 1,800 1 1,800 .33 198
Service receipt logs............ \3\15 2,600 39,000 .05 650
Grantee survey.................. \4\ 16 1 16 .5 3
College administrator and \5\ 80 2 160 .75 40
program director interviews....
Instructors and faculty \6\ 64 2 128 .75 32
interviews.....................
Participant interviews.......... \7\ 64 2 128 .75 32
College staff interviews........ \8\ 80 2 160 .75 32
External constituent interviews. \9\ 80 2 160 .75 40
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 8,199 .............. 47,552 .............. 1,347
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Assumes a total of 6,000 impact study participants over the three-year clearance period.
\2\ Assumes a sample of 6,000 with a 30 percent response rate for a total of 1,800 impact study participants
over the three-year clearance period.
\3\ Assumes 3 staff per 5 impact study sites over the three-year clearance period.
\4\ Assumes 1 program director per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\5\ Assumes 5 college administrator or program directors per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\6\ Assumes 4 instructors and faculty per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\7\ Assumes 4 SCC4 participants per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period
\8\ Assumes 5 college staff per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
\9\ Assumes 5 external constituents per 16 grantees over the three-year clearance period.
[[Page 91804]]
Alix Gould-Werth,
Chief Evaluation Officer,U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2024-27044 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-HX-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on November 20, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.