Notice2024-26512
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of Türkiye: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
November 14, 2024
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) during the period of review (POR) January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 89960-89962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-489-840]
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye:
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers/exporters of
common alloy aluminum sheet (aluminum sheet) from the Republic of
T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) during the period of review (POR) January
1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.
DATES: Applicable November 14, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3148.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 3, 2024, Commerce published the preliminary results of this
administrative review.\1\ On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain
deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven days.\2\ On July
31, 2024, we extended the time limit for these final results to
November 6, 2024.\3\ For a description of the events that occurred
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the Republic of
T[uuml]rkiye: Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2022, 89 FR 36754 (May 3, 2024) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,'' dated July 31, 2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing
Duty Order on Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from the Republic of
T[uuml]rkiye; 2022,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted
by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order <SUP>5</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Bahrain, India, and the
Republic of Turkey: Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 22144 (April
27, 2021) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The products covered by the Order are aluminum sheet from
T[uuml]rkiye. For a
[[Page 89961]]
full description of the scope of the Order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed is
attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on comments received from interested parties and record
information, we made certain changes from the Preliminary Results for
Assan Al[uuml]minyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. and Kibar D[inodot][scedil]
Ticaret A.[Scedil]. (Kibar Dis) (collectively, Assan) and the companies
not selected for individual review. These changes are explained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For each subsidy program found countervailable, Commerce finds that
there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution
that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.\6\ For a description of the methodology underlying all of
Commerce's conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Companies Not Selected for Individual Review
The Act and Commerce's regulations do not directly address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the Act.
Generally, Commerce looks to section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for determining the all-others rate in an
investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies
that were not selected for individual examination in an administrative
review. Section 777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ``the individual
countervailable subsidy rates determined under subparagraph (A) shall
be used to determine the all-others rate under section 705(c)(5) {of
the Act{time} .'' Under section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others
rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of the
countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely {on
the basis of facts available{time} .''
Accordingly, to determine the rate for companies not selected for
individual examination, Commerce's practice is to weight average the
net subsidy rates for the selected mandatory respondents, excluding
rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available.\7\ In this case, Commerce found a de minimis rate for
Teknik. Therefore, the only rate that is not zero, de minimis or based
entirely on facts otherwise available is the rate calculated for Assan.
Consequently, the rate calculated for Assan is also assigned as the
rate for the non-selected companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of the
13th (2008) Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,75 FR 37386,
37387 (June 29, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The companies for which a review was requested, which were not
selected as mandatory respondents or found to be cross-owned with a
mandatory respondent, are: ASAS Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.; Kibar
Dis Ticaret A.S; Kibar Holding A.S.; Kibar Americas, Inc.; P.M.S. Metal
Profil Aluminum Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.; and TAC Metal Ticaret A.S.
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following net countervailable subsidy rates
exist for the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This rate is applicable to Assan and its cross-owned
companies Kibar Holding A.S., and Kibar D[inodot][scedil] Ticaret
A.S.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate (percent ad
Producer/exporter valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assan Al[uuml]minyum Sanayi ve Ticaret 1.14.
A.S.\8\
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S............... 0.19 (de minimis).
Non-Selected Companies Under Review....... 1.14.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations and analysis
performed for these final results of review within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b), Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
In accordance with section 751(a)(1) and (a)(2)(C) of the Act,
Commerce also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for the companies
listed above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of
the final results of this administrative review. Because the rate
calculated for Teknik is de minimis, no cash deposit will be required
on shipments of the subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the
final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, we will
instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated
countervailing duties at the all-others rate or the most recent
company-specific rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These
cash deposit requirements, effective upon publication of these final
results, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply
[[Page 89962]]
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing the final results and publishing this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 6, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Revise its Analysis of the
Bank and Insurance Transaction Tax
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Revise Certain Assan's Sale
Denominators
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Omitted Two Countervailable
Subsidies Received by Assan
Comment 4: Whether to Defer Examination of Two Subsidy Programs
Comment 5: Whether to Revise Assan's Ad Valorem Rate
Comment 6: Whether to Recalculate Rediscount Loans Benefit
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-26512 Filed 11-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on November 14, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.