Notice2024-26167
Certain Aluminum Foil From People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2022-2023
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
November 12, 2024
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain producers and/or exporters made sales of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. Additionally, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review with respect to one company.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88972-88975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26167]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-053]
Certain Aluminum Foil From People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination
of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2022-2023
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
certain producers and/or exporters made sales of certain aluminum foil
(aluminum foil) at less than normal value during the period of review
(POR), April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. Additionally, Commerce is
rescinding this administrative review with respect to one company.
DATES: Applicable November 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 88973]]
Background
On May 2, 2024, Commerce published the Preliminary Results and
invited interested parties to comment.\1\ On July 22, 2024, Commerce
tolled certain deadlines in this administrative proceeding by seven
days.\2\ On August 9, 2024, we extended the deadline for these final
results until November 5, 2024.\3\ For a full summary of the events
that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\4\ Commerce conducted this review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2022-2023, 89 FR 35801
(May 2, 2024) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Time Limit for Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2022-2023,'' dated August
9, 2024.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of China; 2022-
2023,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order <SUP>5</SUP>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People's Republic of
China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 17362 (April 19, 2018) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise covered by the Order is aluminum foil from China.
For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum and are listed in Appendix I. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
Rescission of Review, in Part
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined that
SK Global America, Inc. (SK Global) was not eligible for a separate
rate because it was not a producer or exporter of subject
merchandise.\6\ However, because SK Global is located in the United
States,\7\ we find that an administrative review should not have been
initiated for SK Global. Accordingly, we are rescinding this review
with respect to SK Global.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Results PDM at 12.
\7\ See SK Global America, Inc.'s Letter, ``Separate Rate
Application,'' dated July 31, 2023.
\8\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes From the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested
parties, we made certain changes to the margin calculations for: (1)
Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Limited
(Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.);
Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou Dingsheng Import
and Export Co., Ltd.); Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Hangzhou
Teemful Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Inner Mongolia Liansheng New Energy
Material Co., Ltd.; and Inner Mongolia Xinxing New Energy Material Co.,
Ltd. (collectively, Dingsheng); and (2) Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination
Materials Co., (HK) Limited, Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock
Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd., Jiangsu
Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd. (collectively Zhongji).\9\
Additionally, we made changes to the separate rate eligibility
determination for Lotte Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Lotte).\10\ For a
discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum, ``Dingsheng Final Results Analysis
Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum.
\10\ In the Preliminary Results, we stated that we were
rescinding the administrative review with respect to Lotte because
all requests for review had been withdrawn. See Preliminary Results,
89 FR at 35802. However, all requests for review of Lotte were not
withdrawn; therefore, Lotte is still under review, and we have
considered its separate rate eligibility for these final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Anhui
Zhongji Battery Foil Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Anhui Zhongji),
Anhui Maximum Aluminum Industries Company Ltd. (Anhui Maximum), Manakin
Industries, LLC (Manakin), and Xiamen Xiashun Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd.
(Xiashun) did not have any shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR. We received no information to contradict
this determination. Therefore, we continue to find that Anhui Zhongji,
Anhui Maximum, Manakin, and Xiashun had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR and will issue appropriate liquidation
instructions that are consistent with our ``automatic assessment''
clarification for these final results.
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that the following
companies demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate: (1)
Dingsheng; (2) Zhongji; (3) Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Ltd. (Dong-IL); (4)
Dongwon Systems Corp. (Dongwon); (5) Eastern Valley Co., Ltd. (Eastern
Valley); (6) Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (Granges Aluminum);
(7) Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Shenyan);
(8) Suzhou Manakin Aluminum Processing Technology Co., Ltd. (Suzhou
Manakin Aluminum); and (9) Suzhou Manakin Trading Co., Ltd. (Suzhou
Manakin Trading).\11\ For these final results, we continue to determine
that the companies listed above are eligible for a separate rate, and
that 15 companies \12\ are ineligible for a separate rate.
Additionally, for these final results, we also find that Lotte is
eligible for a separate rate.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Preliminary Results PDM at the ``Separate Rate
Determinations'' section for more details.
\12\ See Appendix II of this notice for a complete listing of
these companies.
\13\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The China-Wide Entity
In accordance with Commerce's policy, the China-wide entity will
not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce
self-initiates, a review of the China-wide entity.\14\ Because no party
requested a review of the China-wide entity, and Commerce did not self-
initiate a review of the entity, the China-wide entity is not under
review, and the weighted-average dumping margin for the China-wide
entity (i.e., 105.80 percent) is not subject to change.\15\ Because 15
companies did not demonstrate their eligibility for a separate rate, we
continue to determine the 15 companies to be part of the China-wide
entity, and they will be subject to the China-wide entity rate.\16\
[[Page 88974]]
For a listing of these companies, see Appendix II of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November
4, 2013).
\15\ See Order, 84 FR at 2814.
\16\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 38021 (June 12, 2023); see also
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, 88 FR 51271 (August 3, 2023) (which included a previously
omitted company, ``Manakin Industries, LLC,'' as a respondent in
this administrative review), stating ``All firms listed below that
wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative
reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate,
either a separate rate application or certification, as described
below.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Administrative Review
We determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023:
\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Commerce calculated the rate for non-reviewed respondents
using a weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping
margins calculated for the examined respondents using each company's
publicly ranged values for the merchandise under consideration. With
two respondents under examination, Commerce normally calculates: (A)
a weighted-average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins
calculated for the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the
examined respondents; and (C) a weighted-average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins calculated for the examined
respondents using each company's publicly ranged U.S. sales values
for the merchandise under consideration. Commerce then compares (B)
and (C) to (A) and selects the rate closest to (A) as the most
appropriate rate for all other producers and exporters. See, e.g.,
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53662
(September 1, 2010), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
at Comment 1. As complete publicly ranged sales data were available,
Commerce based the all-others rate on the publicly ranged sales data
of the mandatory respondents. For a complete analysis of the data,
see the Non-Reviewed Respondents Calculation Memorandum.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Trading 60.61
Co., Limited (Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong
Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.)/Hangzhou Dingsheng Import
& Export Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou Dingsheng Import and
Export Co., Ltd.)/Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co.,
Ltd./Hangzhou Teemful Aluminium Co., Ltd./Inner
Mongolia Liansheng New Energy Material Co./Inner
Mongolia Xinxing New Energy Material Co., Ltd......
Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., (HK) 75.65
Limited/Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Stock
Co., Ltd./Jiangsu Huafeng Aluminium Industry Co.,
Ltd./Jiangsu Zhongji Lamination Materials Co., Ltd.
Dong-IL Aluminium Co., Ltd.......................... 63.25
Dongwon Systems Corp................................ 63.25
Eastern Valley Co., Ltd............................. 63.25
Granges Aluminum (Shanghai) Co., Ltd................ 63.25
Lotte Aluminium Co., Ltd............................ 63.25
Shanghai Shenyan Packaging Materials Co., Ltd....... 63.25
Suzhou Manakin Aluminum Processing Technology Co., 63.25
Ltd................................................
Suzhou Manakin Trading Co., Ltd..................... 63.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), we intend to disclose to parties in
this proceeding the calculations performed for these final results
within five days of the publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Assessment Rates
Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in
this review, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.212(b). We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of these final
results in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the
U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within
90 days of publication).
Where Dingsheng and Zhongji reported reliable entered values, we
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\18\ Where Commerce
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the total
amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total sales
quantity associated with those transactions, Commerce will direct CBP
to assess importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rates based on
the resulting per-unit rates.\19\ Where an importer- (or customer-)
specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis (i.e.,
0.50 percent), Commerce will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate
duties at the time of liquidation.\20\ Where an importer- (or customer-
) specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce
will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\19\ Id.
\20\ Id.
\21\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for subject merchandise exported
by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of
review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed
above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity; and (4)
for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain
in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review
[[Page 88975]]
period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in
Commerce's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or
countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties, and/or an increase in the amount of antidumping
duties by the amount of the countervailing duties.
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an APO
of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in
this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results of review are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: November 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes to the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Selection of Surrogate Country
Comment 2: Surrogate Value (SV) for Dingsheng's Self-Produced
Recycled Scrap Input and its By-Product Recycled Aluminum
Comment 3: Calculation of Zhongji's Factors of Production (FOPs)
Comment 4: Zhongji's Freight and Movement Distance
Comment 5: Dingsheng's Freight Costs and Processing Costs in
Thailand
Comment 6: SV for Electricity
Comment 7: Deduct Additional Expenses Reported for Certain U.S.
Sales
Comment 8: Export-Contingent Countervailing Duty (CVD) Offset
Comment 9: Double Remedies Adjustment
Comment 10: Separate Rate for Lotte
Comment 11: Separate Rate for SK Global America, Inc. (SK
Global)
VI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Determined To Be Part of the China-Wide Entity
1. Alcha International Holdings Limited
2. Aluminum Corporation of China Limited
3. Dingheng New Materials Co., Ltd.
4. Henan Mingtai Al. Industrial
5. Hunan Suntown Marketing Limited
6. Jiangsu Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.
7. SAM-A Aluminum Co., Ltd.
8. Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
9. Shanghai Huafon Aluminium Corporation
10. Shanghai Shenhuo Aluminium Foil Co., Ltd
11. Shanghai Sunho Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd.
12. Suntown Technology Group Corporation Limited (Suntown Technology
Group Co., Ltd.)
13. Walson (HK) Trading Co., Limited
14. Yinbang Clad Materials Co., Ltd.
15. Zhejiang Yongjie Aluminum Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2024-26167 Filed 11-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on November 12, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.