Notice2024-24905

Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
October 25, 2024

Issuing agencies

Federal Communications Commission

Abstract

As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collections. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85208-85209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24905]



[[Page 85208]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[OMB 3060-1299; FR ID 257124]


Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal 
Communications Commission

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, 
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the 
Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the 
general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to 
comment on the following information collections. Comments are 
requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the 
Commission, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the 
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any 
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject 
to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.

DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before December 
24, 2024. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments but 
find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this 
notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50000211103633337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a2a283b3a1c1919541d150c">[email&#160;protected]</span></a> and to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ac9ebfee2f3a4dde3e6e6e3ebe7f9caece9e9a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="044765706c7d2a536d68686d656977446267672a636b72">[email&#160;protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 3060-1299.
    Title: Section 20.23(b)(1), (3)-(5), (7); (c)(1)-(2), (3), 
(3)(iii)-(iv), (4)(i)-(ii), (v); and (d), Contraband wireless devices 
in correctional facilities.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, and state, 
local or tribal.
    Estimated Number of Respondents and Responses: 54 respondents and 
4,740 responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 1-10 hours.
    Frequency of Response: One-time application and self-certification 
response, one-time DCFO authorization request response, on occasion 
qualifying request response, on occasion reversal response, 
recordkeeping requirement, third party notification requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. 
Statutory authority for the currently approved information collection 
is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 
309, 310, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 
U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 301, 302a, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310, 
and 332.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 21,767 hours.
    Total Annual Costs: No costs.
    Needs and Uses: On July 13, 2021, the Commission released a Second 
Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 
Promoting Technological Solutions to Combat Contraband Wireless Devices 
in Correctional Facilities, GN Docket No. 13-111, in which the 
Commission took further steps to facilitate the deployment and 
viability of technological solutions used to combat contraband wireless 
devices in correctional facilities. In the Second Report and Order, the 
Commission adopted a framework requiring the disabling of contraband 
wireless devices detected in correctional facilities upon satisfaction 
of certain criteria. The Commission further addressed issues involving 
oversight, wireless provider liability, and treatment of 911 calls. 
Finally, the Commission adopted rules requiring advance notice of 
certain wireless provider network changes to promote and maintain 
contraband interdiction system effectiveness.
    In establishing rules requiring wireless providers to disable 
contraband wireless devices in correctional facilities and adopting a 
framework to enable designated correctional facility officials (DCFOs) 
relying on an authorized Contraband Interdiction System (CIS) to submit 
qualifying requests to wireless providers to disable contraband 
wireless devices in qualifying correctional facilities, the Commission 
found that a rules-based process will provide a valuable additional 
tool for departments of corrections to address contraband wireless 
device use. The framework includes a two-phase authorization process: 
(1) CIS applicants will submit applications to the Wireless 
Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) describing the legal and technical 
qualifications of the systems; and (2) CIS applicants will perform on-
site testing of approved CISs at individual correctional facilities and 
file a self-certification with the Commission. After both phases are 
complete, DCFOs will be authorized to submit qualifying requests to 
wireless providers to disable contraband devices using approved CISs at 
each correctional facility. In addition, the Commission adopted rules 
requiring wireless providers to notify certain types of CIS operators 
of major technical changes to ensure that CIS effectiveness is 
maintained. The Commission found that these rules will provide law 
enforcement with the tools necessary to disable contraband wireless 
devices, which, in turn, will help combat the serious threats posed by 
the illegal use of such devices.
    The new information collection in 47 CFR 20.23(b)(1) regarding the 
application to obtain new CIS certification will be used by the Bureau 
to determine whether to certify a system and ensure that the systems 
are designed to support operational readiness and minimize the risk of 
disabling a non-contraband device, and ensure, to the greatest extent 
possible, that only devices that are in fact contraband will be 
identified for disabling. Bureau certification will also enable 
targeted industry review of solutions by allowing interested 
stakeholders to provide feedback on the application for certification, 
including the proposed test plan.
    The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(b)(3) include the requirement 
that the CIS operator must file with the Bureau a self-certification 
that complies with paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of section 20.23, confirming 
that the testing at that specific correctional facility is complete and 
successful, and the CIS operator must serve notice of the testing on 
all relevant wireless providers prior to testing and provide such 
wireless providers a reasonable opportunity to participate in the 
tests. Self-certification will help the Bureau to ensure that 
qualifying requests identify contraband wireless devices accurately and 
in accordance with legal requirements. In addition to being used by the 
Bureau, the self-certification will be relied upon by the DCFO in 
conjunction with

[[Page 85209]]

qualifying requests for disabling at a particular correctional 
facility. The serving of notice to the wireless providers will give 
them awareness and an opportunity to participate in the process.
    The new information collections in 47 CFR 20.23(b)(4) requires that 
wireless providers objecting to the certification filing submit 
objections to the Bureau within five business days and serve the DCFO 
and the CIS operator, which allows all stakeholders to participate in 
the process and raise objections. Section 20.23(b)(5) requires that CIS 
operators retest and recertify their systems at least every three years 
and comply with the same requirements as for initial self-
certification. This requirement will enable the Bureau to ensure the 
ongoing accuracy and reliability of a given CIS at a particular 
facility. Section 20.23(b)(7) requires that a CIS operator retain 
records for at least five years and provide them upon request to the 
Bureau, which will support the Bureau's efforts to identify issues with 
CIS operations, resolve interference issues, and resolve complaints 
related to misidentification of contraband devices.
    The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(c)(1)-(2) include the 
requirement that individuals that seek to be recognized on the 
Commission's DCFO list must sent a letter to the Contraband 
Ombudsperson in order for the Commission to approve that person for the 
qualified DCFO list and provide certainty to wireless providers that 
disabling requests are made by duly authorized individuals. Qualifying 
requests that include the required information will be used by wireless 
carriers to prevent use of contraband devices on their network and on 
other wireless provider networks.
    The new collections 47 CFR 20.23(c)(3)(iii)-(iv) provide that, upon 
receiving a disabling request from a DCFO, the wireless provider must 
verify the request, may reject the request and must notify the DCFO 
whether it is accepting or rejecting the request. This process ensures 
that a wireless provider responds to a DCFO within a reasonable 
timeframe--while giving the provider an opportunity to determine if 
there is an error--and to give the DCFO time to respond quickly if the 
request has been rejected. The wireless provider may contact the 
customer of record to notify them of the disabling and involve them in 
the process.
    The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(c)(4) provide that a wireless 
provider may reverse a disabled device where it determines that the 
device was erroneously identified as contraband, and the wireless 
provider must notify the DCFO of the reversal. The wireless provider 
may choose to involve the DCFO in the review and reversal process. The 
DCFO must also provide notice to the Contraband Ombudsperson of the 
number of erroneously disabled devices. This process ensures the 
integrity of the contraband device disabling process by giving the 
wireless provider the opportunity to reverse a disabled device--with 
the ability to extend review to the DCFO--and by creating safeguards to 
make sure that the process is efficient and reliable.
    The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(d) regarding notification from 
CMRS licensees to MAS operators of technical changes to their network 
are required so that MAS operators are given sufficient time to make 
necessary adjustments to maintain the effectiveness of their 
interdiction systems. In order to ensure that issues regarding 
notification to solutions providers of more frequent, localized 
wireless provider network changes are appropriately considered, CMRS 
licensees and MAS operators must negotiate in good faith to reach an 
agreement for notification for those types of network adjustments not 
covered by the notice requirement. CMRS licensees must provide notice 
of technical changes associated with an emergency immediately after the 
exigency to ensure that MAS operators continue to be notified of 
network changes that could impact MAS effectiveness.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-24905 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on October 25, 2024.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.