Safety Zone; Gallagher Station, Ohio River, New Albany, IN
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all navigable waters from mile marker 607 to 612 of the Ohio River in New Albany, IN. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by the demolition at Duke Energy Gallagher Station. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Ohio Valley.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83783-83785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24283]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0896]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Gallagher Station, Ohio River, New Albany, IN
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters from mile marker 607 to 612 of the Ohio River in
New Albany, IN. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by
the demolition at Duke Energy Gallagher Station. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Sector Ohio Valley.
[[Page 83784]]
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 a.m. on October 19, 2024,
through 11 a.m. on November 9, 2024. We will enforce the zone from 8:30
a.m. to 11 a.m. on October 19, 2024. However, if the zone is not needed
on October 19, 2024, then it will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 11 a.m.
on November 9, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-
2024-0896 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Bryan Crane, U.S. Coast Guard. Sector Ohio
Valley, Waterways Division; telephone: 502-779-5335, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aaf9efe9e5e2fc87fdfde7eadfd9c9cd84c7c3c6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="386b7d7b77706e156f6f75784d4b5b5f16555154">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under the authority
in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' The Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because the demolition
safety team recently increased the safety exclusion zone to now
encompass the navigational channel. This safety zone must be
established by October 19, 2024, and there is insufficient time to
request public comments and respond to these comments before the safety
zone must be established. As such, it is impracticable to publish a
NPRM.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because prompt action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the Gallagher
Station demolition.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) has determined
that potential hazards associated with the demolition on October 19,
will be a safety concern for anyone within mile marker 607 to 612 of
the Ohio River in New Albany, IN. In the case that the demolition
cannot take place on October 19, 2024, an alternate date of November 9,
2024, will be used for the safety zone and the demolition. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from 8:30 a.m. on
October 19, 2024, through 11 a.m. on November 9, 2024. The safety zone
will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. on October 19, 2024. In the
case that the demolition cannot take place on October 19, 2024, then it
will be enforced on an alternate date of November 9, 2024. The duration
of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in these navigable waters while the demolition is taking
place. Debris and a large dust cloud is expected to be present which
would impose a major hazard to navigation. Due to the proximity of the
McAlpine lock, multiple recreational boat ramps, and the topography of
the river in this area, a 5-mile river closure was determined to be
necessary. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. This action involves a
safety zone to protect persons and vessels from potential hazards
created by the demolition. This action impacts a 5-mile stretch of the
Ohio River for only two and a half hours. If no hazards exist after the
demolition takes place, the COTP may allow vessels to transit the area
earlier than the proposed closure time. Moreover, the Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about
the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission from the
COTP to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain
[[Page 83785]]
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting only 2.5 hours that will prohibit entry from mile
marker 607 to 612 on the Ohio River. The time of this closure may be
shortened if the designated representative determines that it is safe
for vessels to transit the area. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0896 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0896 Safety Zone; Ohio River; New Albany, IN.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Ohio river from mile marker 607.0 through 612.0.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative;
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Ch. 16. Those in the safety zone must comply with
all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement periods: This section will be enforced from 8:30
a.m. to 11 a.m. on October 19, 2024, or in the case the demolition
cannot take place on that date, then it will be enforced from 8:30 a.m.
to 11 a.m. on an alternate date of November 9, 2024.
Dated: October 15, 2024.
Heather R. Mattern,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2024-24283 Filed 10-16-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.