Rule2024-22495
Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation Updates, and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements; Correction
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
October 1, 2024
Effective
October 1, 2024
Issuing agencies
Health and Human Services DepartmentCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Abstract
This document corrects technical and typographical errors in the final rule that appeared in the August 6, 2024 Federal Register titled "Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation Updates, and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements".
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 79764-79767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22495]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 418
[CMS-1810-CN]
RIN 0938-AV29
Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate
Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation Updates, and Hospice
Quality Reporting Program Requirements; Correction
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors in
the final rule that appeared in the August 6, 2024 Federal Register
titled ``Medicare Program; FY 2025 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate
Update, Hospice Conditions of Participation Updates, and Hospice
Quality Reporting Program Requirements''.
DATES: This correction is effective on October 1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For questions regarding the hospice wage index, contact Chantelle
Caldwell, (410) 786-8743.
For general questions about hospice payment policy, contact the
hospice mailbox at: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0961667a79606a6c796665606a70496a647a2761617a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="650d0a16150c0600150a090c061c250608164b0d0d164b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2024-16910 of August 6, 2024 (89 FR 64202), there were a
number of technical and typographical errors that are identified and
corrected in this correcting document. The provisions in this
correction document are effective as if they had been included in the
final rule that appeared in the August 6, 2024 Federal Register.
Accordingly, the corrections are effective October 1, 2024.
II. Summary of Errors
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
On page 64207, we made a typographical error in the reported core-
based statistical area (CBSA) name and wage index value for CBSA 25980,
Hinesville, Georgia. We reported the CBSA name as Hinesville-Fort
Stewart, Georgia instead of Hinesville, Georgia, and the FY 2025
hospice wage index value as 0.8872, instead of 0.8886.
On page 64210, in Table 3, titled ``Urban Counties that Would
Change to Rural Status'', we inadvertently omitted FIPS county 09015
Windham County from the list of counties that were previously urban but
would gain rural status beginning in FY 2025. Table 3 contains the FIPS
codes, county name, current CBSA number and name of the counties that
will gain rural status in FY 2025. Windham County was previously
designated in CBSA 49340 Worchester, MA-CT. However, beginning in FY
2025 this county is redesignated into rural Connecticut (rural area
99907). Accordingly, we are adding FIPS 09015 Windham County to the
list of counties that will gain rural status beginning in FY 2025. We
also reported a total of 53 counties and county equivalents that are
currently considered urban that would be considered rural beginning in
FY 2025. Therefore, with the addition of Windham County to the list, we
are correcting that number to 54 counties and county equivalents.
Windham County is also experiencing a change to its county name
beginning in FY 2025, as described in the FY 2025 hospice final rule
(89 FR 64209) and will transition from FIPS county 09015 Windham County
to 09150 Northeastern Connecticut planning region.
On page 64222, in Table 8, titled ``Counties That Will Use a Wage
Index Transition Code'', we inadvertently omitted FIPS county 09150
``Northeastern Connecticut Planning Region'' from the list of counties
that will use a transition code on hospice claims for FY 2025 instead
of the CBSA number. Table 8 contains the FIPS codes, county name,
current CBSA number and name, the redesignated FY 2025 CBSA number and
name and the corresponding ``500XX'' transition code that must be
submitted on hospice claims for FY 2025 to ensure that hospice
providers who provide services in certain counties receive that
county's appropriate wage index value. The omission of the Northeastern
planning region from Table 8 and the subsequent unassigned transition
code for that region resulted in two wage index values being assigned
to statewide rural area 99907 in the FY 2025 hospice final wage index
file located at: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers/hospice/hospice-wage-index">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers/hospice/hospice-wage-index</a>. However, for hospice claims
processing, each CBSA or statewide rural area can have only one wage
index value assigned to that CBSA or statewide rural area. Therefore,
hospices that serve beneficiaries in the Northeastern Connecticut
planning region must use transition code 50030, instead of the rural
statewide code 99907, on hospice claims beginning in FY 2025.
Accordingly, we are adding FIPS county 09150 ``Northeastern Connecticut
Planning Region'' to the list of counties in Table 8 that will use a
transition code on hospice claims for FY 2025 instead of the CBSA
number.
This correction does not represent a change in policy and is
consistent with the finalized transition policy outlined in the FY 2025
Hospice final rule (89 FR 64220-64224), where beginning in FY 2025,
certain counties must use a 500XX transition code on hospice claims
instead of the statewide rural area or CBSA code in circumstances where
a county was redesignated into a new CBSA or rural area and has a
different wage index than the constituent counties that make up that
CBSA or rural area due to the calculation of the 5-percent cap.
On page 64239, we made a typographical error. We inadvertently
included the word ``Proposed'' in the title of Section III.D.2, which
therefore incorrectly read: ``Implementation of Two Process Quality
Measures Based on Proposed HOPE Data Collection''. As HOPE is finalized
as of the FY 2025 final rule, it should not be referred to as
``proposed''. Therefore, the title of this Section III.D.2 is corrected
to read: ``Implementation of Two Process Quality Measures Based on HOPE
Data Collection.''
On page 64240, we made a typographical error in the sentence ``CMS
maintains to avoid creating unnecessary burden for hospice providers.''
The sentence is corrected to read: ``CMS maintains its commitment to
avoid creating unnecessary burden for hospice providers.''
On page 64242, we made a typographical error in the sentence
``Theses (SFVs) may be performed by RNs or LPNs/LVNs.'' The sentence is
corrected to read: ``These SFVs may be performed by RNs or LPNs/LVNs.''
On page 64244, under the undesignated heading ``Public Availability
of Data Submitted'', we made two typographical errors. We stated the
following: ``We are finalizing the decision that the data from the
first quarter Q4 CY 2025, if HOPE data
[[Page 79765]]
collection begins in October 2025, it will not be used for assessing
validity and reliability of the quality measures.'' This sentence is
corrected to read: ``We are finalizing the decision that the data from
the first quarter--Q4 CY 2025, if HOPE data collection begins in
October 2025--will not be used for assessing validity and reliability
of the quality measures.''
We also inadvertently used the word ``proposed'' in our discussion
of HOPE-based quality measures. HOPE-based quality measures are
finalized as of the FY 2025 final rule; therefore, they should not be
referred to as ``proposed''. The sentence incorrectly read: ``In light
of all the steps required prior to data being publicly reported, we
finalize the decision that public reporting of the proposed quality
measures will be implemented no earlier than FY 2028, allowing ample
time for data analysis, review of measures' appropriateness for use for
public reporting, and allowing hospices the required time to review
their own data prior to public reporting.''
As HOPE-based quality measures are finalized as of the FY 2025
final rule; they should not be referred to as ``proposed''. Therefore,
this sentence is corrected to read: ``In light of all the steps
required prior to data being publicly reported, we finalize the
decision that public reporting of the HOPE-based quality measures will
be implemented no earlier than FY 2028, allowing ample time for data
analysis, review of measures' appropriateness for use for public
reporting, and allowing hospices the required time to review their own
data prior to public reporting.''
On page 64260, we made a typographical error inadvertently stating
that under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to
provide ``60-day notice'' in the Federal Register and solicit public
comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval.
Instead, we are required to provide a ``30-day notice.''
In addition, on page 64260, the sentence that reads ``The OMB
control number will remain 0938-1153.'' and the parenthetical phrase
that reads ``(set out in the PRA accompanying this Rule, as well as the
HOPE Guidance Manual finalized in this Rule)'' are removed.
On page 64261, we referred readers to the HOPE Beta testing report
and the PRA package associated with the rule. The ``PRA package''
should have been referred to as the ``information collection request''.
In addition, we inadvertently omitted the expiration date for the
information collection request. The sentence is corrected to read:
``For additional information regarding the calculation of HOPE time and
cost burdens, please refer to the HOPE Beta Testing Report found on the
HOPE web page at <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/hospice/hope">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/hospice/hope</a> and
the information collection request (OMB control number 0938-1153/
Expiration date: 1/31/2026) associated with this rule found at <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/paperwork-reduction-act-1995/pra-listing">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/paperwork-reduction-act-1995/pra-listing</a>.''
On page 64262, we made a typographical error within Table 18. The
cell ``HUV Timepoint'' is corrected to read: ``HUV Timepoints.''
B. Summary of Errors and Corrections Posted on the CMS Website
As discussed above, we inadvertently omitted FIPS county number
09150 Northeastern Connecticut planning region from the list of
counties that must use a 500XX transition code beginning in FY 2025.
That error was subsequently included in the FY 2025 Hospice wage index
file exclusively on the CMS website at: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers/hospice/hospice-wage-index">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers/hospice/hospice-wage-index</a>. In Tab 2
of the FY 2025 Hospice Wage Index file labeled ``CT Counties'', we are
correcting the erroneous assignment of the Northeastern Connecticut
planning region to CBSA 99907 for FY 2025, to reflect the newly
assigned wage index transition code 50030. We are also correcting the
omission of the Northeastern Planning Region from Tab 3 of the file
labeled ``Transition Codes'', noting the addition of this region to the
list of counties that must use a 500XX transition code instead of the
statewide rural area code or CBSA number on the hospice claim beginning
in FY 2025.
Given these errors, we are republishing the FY 2025 Hospice Wage
Index file accordingly on the CMS website at: <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers/hospice/hospice-wage-index">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/fee-for-service-providers/hospice/hospice-wage-index</a>
effective October 1, 2024.
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
the agency is required to publish a notice of the proposed rulemaking
in the Federal Register before the provisions of a rule take effect.
Similarly, section 1871(b)(1) of the Act requires the Secretary to
provide for notice of the proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register
and provide a period of not less than 60 days for public comment. In
addition, section 553(d) of the APA, and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of
the Act mandate a 30-day delay in effective date after issuance or
publication of a rule. Sections 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) of the APA
provide for exceptions from the notice and comment and delay in
effective date APA requirements; in cases in which these exceptions
apply, sections 1871(b)(2)(C) and 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act provide
exceptions from the notice and 60-day comment period and delay in
effective date requirements of the Act as well. Section 553(b)(B) of
the APA and section 1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act authorize an agency to
dispense with normal rulemaking requirements for good cause if the
agency makes a finding that the notice and comment process is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. In
addition, both section 553(d)(3) of the APA and section
1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act allow the agency to avoid the 30-day delay
in effective date where such delay is contrary to the public interest
and an agency includes a statement of support. We believe that this
correcting document does not constitute a rule that would be subject to
the notice and comment or delayed effective date requirements. This
correcting document corrects technical and typographical errors in the
preamble, addenda, payment rates, and tables included or referenced in
the FY 2025 Hospice final rule but does not make substantive changes to
the policies or payment methodologies that were adopted in the FY 2025
Hospice final rule. As a result, this correcting document is intended
to ensure that the information in the FY 2025 Hospice final rule
accurately reflects the policies adopted in that document.
In addition, even if this were a rule to which the notice and
comment procedures and delayed effective date requirements applied, we
find that there is good cause to waive such requirements. Undertaking
further notice and comment procedures to incorporate the corrections in
this correcting document into the final rule or delaying the effective
date would be contrary to the public interest because it is in the
public's interest for providers to receive appropriate payments in as
timely a manner as possible, and to ensure that the FY 2025 Hospice
final rule reflects our policies. Furthermore, such procedures would be
unnecessary, as we are not altering our payment methodologies or
policies, but rather, we are simply correctly implementing
[[Page 79766]]
the policies that we previously proposed, requested comment on, and
subsequently finalized. This correcting document is intended solely to
ensure that the FY 2025 Hospice final rule accurately reflects these
payment methodologies and policies. For these reasons, we believe we
have good cause to waive the notice and comment and delayed effective
date requirements.
IV. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2024-16910 of August 6, 2024 (89 FR 64202) make the
following corrections:
1. On page 64207, second column, second full paragraph:
a. In lines 17 and 18, ``Hinesville-Fort Stewart, Georgia'' is
corrected to read ``Hinesville, Georgia''.
b. In lines 19 and 20, ``Hinesville-Fort Stewart, Georgia'' is
corrected to read ``Hinesville, Georgia''.
c. In line 20, the figure ``0.8872'' is corrected to read:
``0.8886''.
2. On page 64209, second column, paragraph below Table 2, ``53
counties (and county equivalents)'' is corrected to read ``54 counties
and county equivalents''.
3. On page 64210, Table 3 is corrected by adding an entry at the
beginning of the table for FIPS County code ``09015'' to read as
follows:
Table 3--Urban Counties That Would Change to Rural Status
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIPS county code County name State Current CBSA Current CBSA name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09015..................... WINDHAM.............. CT 49340 Worchester, MA-CT.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. On page 64222, Table 8 is corrected by adding an entry at the
beginning of the table for FIPS code ``09150''code to read as follows:
Table 8--Counties That Will Use a Wage Index Transition Code
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2025
FIPS code County name FY 2024 FY 2024 CBSA name FY 2025 FY 2025 CBSA name transition
CBSA CBSA code
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09150........... NORTHEASTERN 49340 Worchester, MA-CT. 99907 CONNECTICUT....... 50030
CONNECTICUT.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. On page 64239, in the first column, the header ``2.
Implementation of Two Process Quality Measures Based on Proposed HOPE
Data Collection'' is corrected to read
``2. Implementation of Two Process Quality Measures Based on HOPE
Data Collection''.
6. On page 64240, third column, first full paragraph, in lines 4
through 6, the sentence ``CMS maintains to avoid creating unnecessary
burden for hospice providers.'' is corrected to read ``CMS maintains
its commitment to avoid creating unnecessary burden for hospice
providers.''
7. On page 64242, third column, last partial paragraph, in lines 11
and 12, the sentence ``Theses (SFVs) may be performed by RNs or LPNs/
LVNs.'' is corrected to read ``These SFVs may be performed by RNs or
LPNs/LVNs.''
8. On page 64244, second column:
a. First partial paragraph, the final sentence, ``We are finalizing
the decision that the data from the first quarter Q4 CY 2025, if HOPE
data collection begins in October 2025, it will not be used for
assessing validity and reliability of the quality measures.'', is
corrected to read ``We are finalizing the decision that the data from
the first quarter--Q4 CY 2025, if HOPE data collection begins in
October 2025--will not be used for assessing validity and reliability
of the quality measures.''
b. Second full paragraph, in lines 7 through 17, the sentence that
reads ``In light of all the steps required prior to data being publicly
reported, we finalize the decision that public reporting of the
proposed quality measures will be implemented no earlier than FY 2028,
allowing ample time for data analysis, review of measures'
appropriateness for use for public reporting, and allowing hospices the
required time to review their own data prior to public reporting.'' is
corrected to read ``In light of all the steps required prior to data
being publicly reported, we finalize the decision that public reporting
of the HOPE-based quality measures will be implemented no earlier than
FY 2028, allowing ample time for data analysis, review of measures'
appropriateness for use for public reporting, and allowing hospices the
required time to review their own data prior to public reporting.''
9. On page 64260:
a. First column, first partial paragraph under the heading ``IV.
Collection of Information Requirements'', in lines 2 and 3, ``60-day''
is corrected to read ``30-day''.
b. Third column, first partial paragraph:
i. In lines 3 and 4, the sentence that reads ``The OMB control
number will remain 0938-1153.'' is removed.
ii. In lines 11 through 14, the parenthetical phrase ``(set out in
the PRA accompanying this Rule, as well as the HOPE Guidance Manual
finalized in this Rule)'' is removed.
10. On page 64261:
a. First column, first partial paragraph, in lines 1 through 11,
the sentence that reads ``For additional information regarding the
calculation of HOPE time and cost burdens, please refer to the HOPE
Beta Testing Report found on the HOPE web page at <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/hospice/hope">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/hospice/hope</a> and the PRA package associated with this
rule found at <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/paperwork-reduction-act-1995/pra-listing">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/paperwork-reduction-act-1995/pra-listing</a>.'' is corrected to
read ``For additional information regarding the calculation of HOPE
time and cost burdens, please refer to the HOPE Beta Testing Report
found on the HOPE web page at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/
[[Page 79767]]
quality/hospice/hope and the information collection request (OMB
control number 0938-1153/Expiration date: 1/31/2026) associated with
this rule found at <a href="https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/paperwork-reduction-act-1995/pra-listing">https://www.cms.gov/medicare/regulations-guidance/legislation/paperwork-reduction-act-1995/pra-listing</a>.''
b. Third column, lines 15 through 21, the sentence that reads
``This increase in incremental burden is explained further in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) section of this Rule, and is also
discussed in detail in the Information Collection Request and PRA
accompanying this Rule.'' is corrected to read ``This increase in
incremental burden is explained further in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis (RIA) section of this rule, and is also discussed in detail in
the information collection request accompanying this rule (OMB control
number (0938-1153/Expiration date: 1/31/2026).''
11. On page 64262, in Table 18, titled ``Summary of Changes in
Burden'', the entry ``HUV Timepoint'' is corrected to read ``HUV
Timepoints''.
Elizabeth J. Gramling,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2024-22495 Filed 9-27-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on October 1, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.