Notice2024-20671
Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
September 12, 2024
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the "Final Results of Sunset Reviews" section of this notice.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 177 (Thursday, September 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74206-74207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-20671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-883, A-549-837, A-588-878]
Glycine From India, Japan, and Thailand: Final Results of the
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty (AD) orders on glycine from India, Japan, and Thailand
would be likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at
the levels indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Reviews'' section
of this notice.
DATES: Applicable September 12, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office
VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 21, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD
orders on glycine from India and Japan and subsequently published the
AD order for the same product from Thailand on October 18, 2019.\1\ On
May
[[Page 74207]]
1, 2024, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the first
sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR
29170 (June 21, 2019); and Glycine from Thailand: Antidumping Duty
Order, 84 FR 55912 (October 18, 2019) (collectively, Orders).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 88 FR 50110
(May 1, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 13, 2024, Commerce received notices of intent to participate
in these reviews from Deer Park Glycine, LLC of Deer Park, Texas, which
is a subsidiary of GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., and Chattem
Chemicals, Inc. of Chattanooga, Tennessee (collectively, the domestic
interested parties), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)).\3\ The domestic interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the
domestic like product in the United States.\4\ In May, 2024, Commerce
received adequate substantive responses from the domestic industry
parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ We received no substantive responses from
respondent interested parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letter, ``Domestic
Interested Parties' Notification of Intent to Participate,'' dated
May 13, 2024.
\4\ Id.
\5\ See Domestic Interested Parties' Letters, ``Sunset Review
(1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from India:
Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation, dated May 20, 2024; ``Domestic Interested Parties'
Substantive Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 20,
2024; ``Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Glycine from Thailand: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive
Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 21, 2024; and
``Sunset Review (1st Review) of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Glycine from Japan: Domestic Interested Parties' Substantive
Response to the Notice of Initiation,'' dated May 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On June 21, 2024, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade
Commission that it did not receive substantive responses from any
respondent interested parties.\6\ As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on May 1,
2024,'' dated June 21, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain deadlines in these
administrative proceedings by seven days.\7\ The deadline for these
final results of sunset reviews is September 5, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,'' dated July 22, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by these Orders are glycine from India, Japan,
and Thailand. For a full description of the scope of the Orders, see
the Issues and Decision.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Glycine from India, Japan, and
Thailand,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews
is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\9\ A
list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
included as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at <a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be directly accessed
at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to
the continuation or recurrence of dumping and that the magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighed-average dumping
margins up to 13.61 percent for India, 86.22 percent for Japan, and
227.17 percent for Thailand.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to interested parties
subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 5, 2024.
Abdelali Elouaradia,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margins of Dumping Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-20671 Filed 9-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on September 12, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.