Proposed Rule2024-18386
Air Quality Plans; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department; Source-Specific SIP Revision
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 19, 2024
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of a source-specific revision to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department's (MCAQD or "Department") portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision consists of certain permit conditions related to emissions offsets generated from the replacement of existing diesel-fueled solid waste collection trucks promulgated by the MCAQD and submitted by the State of Arizona for inclusion in the Maricopa County portion of the Arizona SIP under the Clean Air Act (CAA or "Act"). The permit conditions have been submitted for SIP approval to ensure that they are federally enforceable, which is the basis for qualifying certain emissions reductions as creditable offsets under the CAA. We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 160 (Monday, August 19, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67012-67014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-18386]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0199; FRL-12188-01-R9]
Air Quality Plans; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department; Source-Specific SIP Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of a source-specific revision to the Maricopa County Air
Quality Department's (MCAQD or ``Department'') portion of the Arizona
State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision consists of certain
permit conditions related to emissions offsets generated from the
replacement of existing diesel-fueled solid waste collection trucks
promulgated by the MCAQD and submitted by the State of Arizona for
inclusion in the Maricopa County portion of the Arizona SIP under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''). The permit conditions have been
submitted for SIP approval to ensure that they are federally
enforceable, which is the basis for qualifying certain emissions
reductions as creditable offsets under the CAA. We are taking comments
on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 18, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2024-0199 at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. For comments submitted at
<a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
<a href="http://Regulations.gov">Regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions
(audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The
written comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit <a href="http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">http://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christa Cichoski, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (415) 972-3930; or by
email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ceada7ada6a1bda5a7e0ada6bca7bdbaaf8eabbeafe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed8e848e85829e8684c38e859f849e998cad889d8cc38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What SIP revision did the State submit?
B. What is the purpose of the submitted source-specific SIP
revision?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. What is the background for this proposal?
B. How is the EPA evaluating the source-specific SIP revision?
C. Does the source-specific SIP revision meet the evaluation
criteria?
D. Proposed Action and Public Comment
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What SIP revision did the State submit?
On August 3, 2022, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) submitted three source-specific SIP revisions on behalf of the
MCAQD. The SIP revisions consist of portions of the following three
operating permits: Facility ID F001645 was issued P0008308, Facility ID
F001646 was issued P0008309, and Facility ID F000443 was issued
P0008316. On February 3, 2023, the SIP submittal was deemed complete by
operation of law. On April 3, 2024, via a letter dated March 29,
2024,\1\ the ADEQ submitted corrected copies of these same permit
conditions to correct minor typographical errors. The permits are now
numbered: P0011602, P0011603, P0011601, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that the Maricopa County letter to ADEQ is dated
April 1, 2024, which is after the March 29, 2024 date of the ADEQ
letter. The MCAQD has clarified that their letter contained a
typographical error and should have been dated March 29, 2024. See
email dated June 20, 2024, from Kimberly Butler (MCAQD) to Laura
Yannayon (EPA Region 9), which documents this clarification. A copy
is provided in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. What is the purpose of the submitted source-specific SIP revision?
The submitted permit conditions ensure that emission reduction
credits granted to Waste Management of Arizona, Inc. (Waste Management)
for replacing existing diesel-fired solid waste collection trucks with
compressed natural gas (CNG)-fired solid waste collection trucks meet
the offset integrity criteria contained in 40 CFR part
51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1)(i), which requires such emission reductions to
be surplus, permanent, quantifiable, and federally enforceable.
Approval of these portions of the permits into the Maricopa portion of
the Arizona SIP will provide the necessary federal enforceability for
these permit conditions.
[[Page 67013]]
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. What is the background for this proposal?
Waste Management replaced 225 diesel-fueled solid waste collection
trucks with 225 CNG-fueled solid waste collection trucks, which reduced
annual emissions of NO<INF>X</INF> from the four collection fleets
based at three transfer stations within the Maricopa County ozone
nonattainment area.
On July 8, 2021, Waste Management submitted an emission reduction
credit (ERC) application to the Department to certify these emission
reductions for use as offsets. The Department evaluated the submittal
and determined the emission reductions qualified as surplus,
quantifiable, and permanent. The Department further determined that the
emission reductions would qualify as federally enforceable if the three
transfer station air quality permits associated with the four
collection fleets were submitted to the EPA as source-specific SIP
revisions and approved into the applicable SIP.
In August 2021, the Department issued Waste Management permits
P0008308, P0008309, and P0008316, which included permit conditions to
ensure the emission reductions are surplus, permanent, quantifiable and
enforceable.\2\ The permits were revised to include a condition that
the replaced diesel-fueled trucks be either permanently disabled or
permanently removed from the nonattainment area and a condition that
CNG trucks can only be replaced in the future with trucks that are
certified to a NO<INF>X</INF> emission limit equivalent to, or less
than, that of current CNG trucks. In addition, the permits were revised
to include monitoring and recordkeeping requirements to make the
reductions enforceable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ These permits were subsequently renumbered as permits
P0011602, P0011603, P0011601, respectively, when corrected copies
were submitted on April 3, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the Department revised these permits, the Department issued
mobile ERC (MERC) Certificates to Waste Management for 33.6 tons/year
of emission reduction credits. To ensure the federal enforceability of
these emission reductions, the EPA directed the Department to submit
the permit conditions related to the emission reduction credits for
approval into the Maricopa portion of the Arizona SIP. The Maricopa
County Board of Supervisors approved submittal of the Waste Management
permit conditions as SIP revisions on July 27, 2022.
B. How is the EPA evaluating the source-specific SIP revision?
In analyzing this source-specific SIP submittal, we reviewed it for
compliance with the substantive CAA requirements for SIPs in general as
set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2), the permit requirements for
nonattainment areas in CAA section 173, and the requirements for
offsets in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1)(i). We also evaluated the
submittal and our action to ensure consistency with the requirements
related to SIP revisions in CAA sections 110(l) and 193.
C. Does the source-specific SIP revision meet the evaluation criteria?
The EPA's implementing regulations regarding the requirements that
emission reductions must meet to be used as offsets are found at 40 CFR
51.165(a)(3). Generally, offsets are creditable if they are permanent,
surplus, quantifiable, and federally enforceable. We refer to this
group of requirements as the ``offset integrity criteria.'' We reviewed
the permit conditions in all three permits pertaining to the emission
reductions to ensure they met the offset integrity criteria. While the
conditions in each permit are numbered differently, they all consist of
the same nine conditions, with the only difference being the quantity
of ERCs granted in each permit. For convenience, we cite the permit
condition numbers of Maricopa County Air Quality Permit P0011602 below.
All of the offset integrity criteria, except for federal
enforceability, can be evaluated based on a review of the permit terms
and conditions. Federal enforceability is a status of those terms and
conditions, determined by who has the authority to enforce the terms
and conditions. While terms and conditions issued under SIP-approved
New Source Review (NSR) permit programs normally provide federal
enforceability, that is not the case for requirements applicable to
mobile sources, which are not regulated under NSR. By including these
permit conditions as source-specific SIP revisions, the EPA's approval,
if finalized, will allow for federal enforceability of the permit terms
and conditions. This section will discuss each offset integrity
criterion in further detail.
1. Permanent
Emissions reductions used as offsets are required to be permanent,
meaning the reductions continue for the life of the stationary source
using the emission reductions as offsets. For MERCs, permanence is
accomplished by including provisions to require the removal or
destruction of the existing higher-emitting vehicles (or their engines)
and by preventing the subsequent replacement of the newer lower-
emitting vehicles with higher-emitting vehicles. To ensure the
permanency of these MERCs, the MCAQD included permit conditions to
ensure that the diesel-fueled trucks that were replaced were removed
from the nonattainment area. To ensure that the trucks do not operate
in the nonattainment area, the MCAQD included a requirement that the
location and usage of the replaced trucks be continuously monitored. In
addition, the permit requires any future replacements of the new CNG-
fueled solid waste collection trucks meet an emissions rate that is the
same or lower than the CNG-fueled trucks.
2. Surplus
The permit specifies that the MERC quantity shall exclude emission
reductions otherwise required by the CAA. This provision ensures that
the emissions reductions that are quantified and credited are surplus
to all other requirements of the CAA.
3. Quantifiable Emissions
The permit specifies the calculation methodology and emission
factors that were used to quantify the emission reductions. The
requirement to use the emission factors and methodology specified in
the permit ensures that emission calculations are consistent, accurate,
and quantifiable.
4. Federally Enforceable
Emissions reductions are enforceable if the emissions reductions
are independently verifiable and enforceable as a practical matter.
Each permit provides practical enforceability of the emissions
reductions by imposing specific emission limits and monitoring and
recordkeeping requirements. In order to be federally enforceable, the
specific Waste Management permit conditions are being approved into the
Maricopa County portion of the Arizona SIP as source-specific SIP
revisions.
Additional information regarding our analysis is provided in the
TSD included in the docket for this action.
D. Proposed Action and Public Comment
Pursuant to section 110(k)(3) of the Act, we are proposing approval
of the source-specific SIP revisions submitted by ADEQ on behalf of the
MCAQD. This proposed approval action is based on our determination that
the submittal satisfies the applicable statutory and
[[Page 67014]]
regulatory provisions governing regulation of offsets under CAA section
173 and 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1)(i), as explained above. As
discussed in our TSD, we also found that the source-specific SIP
revisions met the requirements of sections 110(l) and 193 of the Act.
If we finalize this action as proposed, our action will be codified
through revisions to 40 CFR 52.120 (Identification of Plan).
We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until
September 18, 2024.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the three source-specific SIP revisions identified in Section
I.A. of this preamble, submitted on April 3, 2024. These source-
specific SIP revisions will incorporate specific provisions from
permits issued by the MCAQD to ensure certain emission reductions are
surplus, permanent, quantifiable, and federally enforceable. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> and in hard copy at the EPA Region IX
Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
<bullet> Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
<bullet> Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
<bullet> Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
<bullet> Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
<bullet> Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it proposes to approve a state program;
<bullet> Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
<bullet> Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
The State did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of
achieving EJ for people of color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 12, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2024-18386 Filed 8-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 19, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.