Rule2024-17333
Kentucky Regulatory Program
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 8, 2024
Effective
September 9, 2024
Issuing agencies
Interior DepartmentSurface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Abstract
We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Kentucky regulatory program (hereinafter, the Kentucky program), under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). We are approving Kentucky's revision to its regulations regarding the qualifications of members of the Kentucky Reclamation Guaranty Fund Commission.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 153 (Thursday, August 8, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 153 (Thursday, August 8, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64787-64790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17333]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 917
[SATS No. KY-264-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2022-0008; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 245S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 24XS501520]
Kentucky Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Kentucky regulatory program
(hereinafter, the Kentucky program), under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). We are approving
Kentucky's revision to its regulations regarding the qualifications of
members of the Kentucky Reclamation Guaranty Fund Commission.
DATES: The effective date is September 9, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Castle, Field Office
Director, Telephone 859-260-3900, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f598969486819990b59a86988790db929a83"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb96989a888f979ebb948896899ed59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Kentucky Program
Subject to OSMRE's oversight, section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within its
borders by demonstrating that its program includes, among other things,
State laws and regulations that govern surface coal mining and
reclamation operations in accordance with the Act and consistent with
the Federal regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Kentucky program, effective May 18, 1982. You can find background
information on the Kentucky program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Kentucky program in the May 18, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR
21434). You can also find later actions concerning the Kentucky program
and program amendments at 30 CFR 917.11, 917.12, 917.13, 917.15,
917.16, and 917.17.
On July 18, 1986, we approved the creation of Kentucky's bond pool
commission, which from 1986 to 2013 oversaw Kentucky's initial
alternative bonding system known as the voluntary bond pool fund. 51 FR
26002 (July 18, 1986). In May 2012, we concluded that the State
regulatory authority was not effectively implementing, administering,
enforcing, and maintaining its reclamation bond program, and we
initiated the regulatory process to correct the identified regulatory
program issues. See 30 CFR part 733. In response to our part 733
letter, Kentucky submitted various amendments. One amendment, which we
approved in large part in 2018, repealed the voluntary bond pool fund
and replaced it with the Kentucky Reclamation Guaranty Fund. See 83 FR
3948 (Jan. 29, 2018). Those amendments also replaced the bond pool fund
commission with the Kentucky Reclamation Guaranty Fund Commission
(KRGFC or commission). Id. The purpose of the KRGFC is to review
membership applications and ratings; notify members of tonnage fees
required; revoke or reinstate membership; employ a certified public
accountant to audit the bond pool fund; authorize necessary
expenditures from the fund; and report the financial status of the fund
to the governor annually. The KRGFC provisions also specified the
composition of the KRGFC membership and qualifications that those
members must meet.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated April 18, 2022 (Administrative Record No. KY-2008),
Kentucky sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). This submission proposes to revise the qualifications
for members appointed to the seven-member KRGFC. Currently, the
governor appoints three members to the KRGFC that are representatives
of the coal industry. The coal industry representatives are permittees
that participate in the fund and are selected based on the amount of
coal produced and subsequently sold annually. Three tiers were created,
based on tons of coal sold, to represent a large, a medium, and a small
operator. One member from each tier was to be selected. The revision
would allow the governor to appoint a member from a lower tier when no
permittee that participates in the fund meets the production level of
an upper tier. Kentucky's submission also removes requirements that are
no longer relevant to the operation of the KRGFC and makes minor
revisions.
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the May 23, 2023,
Federal Register (88 FR 33016) (Administrative Record KY-2008). In the
same document, we opened the public comment period and provided an
opportunity for a public hearing or meeting on the adequacy of the
amendment. We did not hold a public hearing or meeting as neither was
requested. The public comment period ended on June 22, 2023. We
received two comments from concerned individuals that are addressed
below in the PUBLIC COMMENTS section.
III. OSMRE's Findings
We made the following findings concerning the amendment under SMCRA
and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. We are
approving the amendment as described below. The full text of this
program amendment is available at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
We are approving the following changes to KRS 350.506:
A. Section 1. Kentucky deleted the date by which the Governor was
to appoint the first six appointed member of the commission, which was
``July 1, 2013.''
B. Section 1(a). Kentucky revised this provision to require that
the three members of the commission who are representative of the coal
industry must be permittees that participate in the fund and to
reinforce that they are tiered to represent the size of the operator
measured in tons of coal sold.
C. Section 1(a)(3). Kentucky deleted subparagraph (b), which
specified that if no operator from the largest tier is available to sit
on the commission, a member shall be selected from the middle tier.
Kentucky replaced subparagraph (b) with the following coda to
subsection (a)(3): ``If no permittee that participates in the fund
meets the qualifications stated in subparagraph 2 or in subparagraph 3
of this paragraph, then a qualified permittee shall be selected in a
lower tier.''
D. Section 2(a). Kentucky deleted this provision, which dictated
the term of years for the Governor's initial appointments to the
commission and
[[Page 64788]]
renumbered subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
E. Section 1(5). Kentucky revised this provision to delete the
requirement that the commission meet monthly during the first year,
leaving in place the requirement that it meet every three months
thereafter.
OSMRE Finding: As we noted in our initial approvals of both the
voluntary bond pool commission and the KRGFC, no comparable Federal
regulations exist addressing the creation or management of alternative
bonding programs. Section 509(c) of SMCRA provides for alternative
bonding systems stating that ``the Secretary may approve as part of a
State or Federal program an alternative system that will achieve the
objectives and purposes of the bonding program pursuant to this
section.'' The Federal rules at 30 CFR 800.11(e) provide that OSMRE may
approve an alternative bonding system if the system assures that the
regulatory authority will have available sufficient money to complete
the reclamation plan for any areas in default at any time and provides
an economic incentive for the permittee to comply with all reclamation
provisions. We find that the proposed changes, which affect minor
aspects of commission make-up and governance, some of which are now
obsolete, are not inconsistent with section 509(c) of SMCRA or with the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 800.11(e) and are hereby approved.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment and received two. The
first was from a private citizen recommending the qualifications of the
board members to consist of only scientists studying fossil fuel
consumption and its effects. As we discussed above, should a State
elect to establish an alternative bonding system, its means of
implementing the alternative bonding system is at the State's
discretion so long as it complies with the general requirements of
section 509 of SMCRA and 30 CFR 800.11(e). Therefore, the specific
qualifications of the KRGFC members are beyond the scope of this
rulemaking.
The second public comment was from the Kentucky Resources Council,
Inc. (Council). The Council agrees that the proposed revisions to the
commission membership qualifications are acceptable in efforts to
support changing coal industry demographics. Further, the Council
recommends that an annual review of the Kentucky Permanent Regulatory
Program, which would include the assurance of adequate funding in the
event of bond forfeiture or permittee bankruptcy, fall under OSMRE's
oversight function. Oversight of Kentucky's bonding program has always
been and will continue to be one of our responsibilities.
Federal Agency Comments
On July 13, 2022, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b)
of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendment from various agencies
with an actual or potential interest in the Kentucky program
(Administrative Record KY-2008-1). The Natural Resources Conservation
Service sent a ``no comment letter''; and we did not receive any
comments from other agencies.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) None of the revisions that Kentucky proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards.
Therefore, we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on
July 13, 2022, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments
from the EPA on the amendment (Administrative Record No. KY-2008-1).
EPA did not respond to our request.
State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic
properties. On July 13, 2022, we requested comments on the Kentucky
amendments (Administrative Record No. KY-2008-1). We did not receive
comments from the SHPO or ACHP.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we are approving KY-264 submitted to
us on April 18, 2022 (Administrative Record No. KY-2008). To implement
this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations at 30 CFR part
917 that codify decisions concerning the Kentucky program. In
accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 533), this
rule will take effect 30 days after the date of publication.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference With
Connotationally Protected Property Rights
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications that would result in private
property being taken for government use without just compensation under
the law. Therefore, a taking implication assessment is not required.
This determination is based on an analysis of the Federal regulations
that set minimum performance standards for alternative bonding systems.
Executive Orders 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review, 13563--
Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 14094--Modernizing
Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094,
provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance dated October 12, 1993 (OMB Memo M-94-
3), the approval of State program amendments are exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order
14094. Executive Order 13563, which reaffirms and supplements Executive
Order 12866, retains this exemption.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has reviewed this rule as required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988. The Department determined that
this Federal Register document meets the criteria of section 3 of
Executive Order 12988, which is intended to ensure that the agency
review its legislation and proposed regulations to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; that the agency write its legislation and
regulations to minimize litigation; and that the agency's legislation
and regulations provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard, and promote simplification and burden
reduction. Because section 3 focuses on the quality of Federal
legislation and regulations, the Department limited its review under
this Executive Order to the quality of this Federal Register document
and to changes to the Federal regulations. The review under this
Executive Order did not extend to the language of the State regulatory
program amendment that Kentucky drafted.
[[Page 64789]]
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule has potential Federalism implications as defined under
section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 13132 directs
agencies to ``grant the States the maximum administrative discretion
possible'' with respect to Federal statutes and regulations
administered by the States. Kentucky, through its approved regulatory
program, implements and administers SMCRA and its implementing
regulations at the state level. This rule approves an amendment to the
Kentucky program submitted and drafted by the State, and thus is
consistent with the direction to provide maximum administrative
discretion to States.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Tribes through a commitment
to consultation with Tribes and recognition of their right to self-
governance and Tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule under
the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Tribes. The basis for this
determination is that our decision on the Kentucky program does not
include Indian lands as defined by SMCRA or other Tribal lands and it
does not affect the regulation of activities on Indian lands or other
Tribal lands. Indian lands under SMCRA are regulated independently
under the applicable approved Federal Indian program. The Department's
consultation policy also acknowledges that our rules may have Tribal
implications where the State proposing the amendment encompasses
ancestral lands in areas with minable coal. We are currently working to
identify and engage appropriate Tribal stakeholders to devise a
constructive approach for consulting on these amendments.
Executive Order 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered significant
under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 and is not
significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order
13211, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consistent with sections 501(a) and 72(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1251(a) and 1292(d), respectively) and the U.S. Department of the
Interior Departmental Manual, part 516, section 13.5(A), State program
amendments are not major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not include requests and requirements of an
individual, partnership, or corporation to obtain information and
report it to a Federal agency. As this rule does not contain
information collection requirements, a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal, which is the subject
of this rule, is based upon the Federal regulations that set minimum
performance standards for alternative bonding systems for which an
economic analysis was prepared, and certification made that such
regulations would not have a significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In making the determination as to
whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the
Department relied upon the data and assumptions for the corresponding
Federal regulations. The Federal regulations were also promulgated to
provide flexibility to ensure the availability of surety bonding to
small operators.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based on an analysis of the
corresponding Federal regulations, which were determined not to
constitute a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local or
Tribal governments, or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. This determination
is based on an analysis of the Federal regulations that set minimum
performance standards for alternative bonding systems, which were
determined not to impose an unfunded mandate. Therefore, a statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic--Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 917 is amended
as follows:
PART 917--KENTUCKY
0
1. The authority citation for part 917 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 917.15 is amended by adding a new entry to the table in
paragraph (a) in chronological order by ``Date of final publication''
to read as follows:
Sec. 917.15 Approval of Kentucky regulatory program amendments
(a) * * *
[[Page 64790]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final Citation/
date publication description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
April 18, 2022................ August 8, 2024........ KRS 350.506
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-17333 Filed 8-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 8, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.