Air Plan Approval; Colorado; Interim Final Determination To Stay and Defer Sanctions in the Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Area
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
In the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is proposing approval and conditional approval of portions of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Colorado dated May 3, 2024. The submission relates to Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulation Number 7 (Reg. 7) and Regulation Number 21 (Reg. 21), and addresses Colorado's SIP obligation to require sources to meet reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), which includes requiring adequate reporting by sources. In this action, EPA is making an interim final determination based on that proposed approval and conditional approval. The effect of this interim final determination is that the imposition of sanctions that were triggered by EPA's May 9, 2023 limited disapproval are now deferred. Although this action is effective upon publication, EPA will take comment on this interim final determination.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63818-63821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-17087]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2024-0225; FRL-12122-02-R8]
Air Plan Approval; Colorado; Interim Final Determination To Stay
and Defer Sanctions in the Denver Metro/North Front Range 2008 Ozone
Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is
proposing approval and conditional approval of portions of a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Colorado dated
May 3, 2024. The submission relates to Colorado Air Quality Control
Commission Regulation Number 7 (Reg. 7) and Regulation Number 21 (Reg.
21), and addresses Colorado's SIP obligation to require sources to meet
reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for
nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS), which includes requiring adequate reporting by
sources. In this action, EPA is making an interim final determination
based on that proposed approval and conditional approval. The effect of
this interim final determination is that the imposition of sanctions
that were triggered by EPA's May 9, 2023 limited disapproval are now
deferred. Although this action is effective upon publication, EPA will
take comment on this interim final determination.
DATES: This interim final determination is effective August 6, 2024.
However, comments will be accepted until September 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2024-0225, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
[[Page 63819]]
you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on
the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional
submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit <a href="https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets">https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets</a>.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically in
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Please email or call the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section if you need to make
alternative arrangements for access to the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abby Fulton, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado, 80202-1129, telephone number: (303) 312-6563, email address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#badccfd6ced5d494dbd8d8c3fadfcadb94ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1771627b637879397675756e5772677639707861">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
I. Background
On May 9, 2023, EPA took final action approving portions of the
2008 8-hour ozone Serious area attainment plan for the Denver Metro/
North Front Range (DMNFR) Area submitted by the State of Colorado on
March 22, 2021, and portions of additional state implementation plan
(SIP) submissions made by the State related to those requirements on
May 8, 2019; May 13, 2020; March 22, 2021; May 18, 2021; and May 20,
2022.\1\ The State made these SIP submissions to meet Serious ozone
nonattainment plan requirements for the DMNFR Area, to address
reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for certain
source categories in the DMNFR Area, and to adopt volatile organic
compounds (VOC) standards for consumer products and architectural and
industrial maintenance coatings. In the May 9, 2023 action, EPA also
finalized a limited approval and limited disapproval of parts of the
SIP submissions made on May 14, 2018; May 13, 2020; March 22, 2021; May
18, 2021; and May 20, 2022, with respect to certain RACT categories and
VOC controls,\2\ and finalized a limited conditional approval and
limited disapproval of specific provisions intended to meet RACT
requirements and control VOC emissions.\3\ The limited disapproval
portions of the May 9, 2023 final rule resulted from the Agency's
determination that although the rules met RACT requirements with
respect to stringency, they lacked adequate periodic reporting
requirements as required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA
regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 88 FR 29827, table 1, 29829-29830 (May 9, 2023).
\2\ Id. at 29830-29831, table 2 (listing portions subject to
limited approval and limited disapproval), table 3 (RACT
categories).
\3\ Id. at 29830-29831, table 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 10, 2023, the State submitted a Petition for
Reconsideration asking EPA to reconsider the limited disapproval
portions of the May 9, 2023 final rule. EPA responded to the Petition
for Reconsideration in a letter dated August 31, 2023, informing the
State that EPA was granting the petition as to the limited disapproval
portions of the May 9, 2023 final rule.\4\ Since granting the petition
for reconsideration, EPA has offered Colorado the opportunity to
explain more fully how the State's regulations provide for adequate
reporting, to inform EPA of various actions taken by the Colorado Air
Pollution Control Division to enhance access to public records and
information, and to consider what changes to existing regulations would
improve reporting requirements to address deficiencies. As a result of
these discussions, Colorado resubmitted Reg. 7 and Reg. 21 with
additional explanations to support proposed approval of some provisions
and a commitment to make changes to support proposed conditional
approval of others.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See letter from EPA Regional Administrator KC Becker to
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser (Aug. 31, 2023), in the docket
for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under section 110(k)(4) of the CAA, EPA may conditionally approve a
SIP submission based on a commitment from the State to adopt specific
enforceable measures within one year from the date of approval. On May
3, 2024, the State of Colorado resubmitted portions of the prior SIP
submissions that were the subject of the limited disapproval and also
submitted a letter committing to undertake additional steps to improve
public access to regulatory compliance information and clarify existing
SIP reporting requirements (``Commitment Letter'').\5\ In its
Commitment Letter, the State committed to submit the necessary SIP
revisions to EPA by May 31, 2025.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``Resubmittal of SIP revisions following Reconsideration.
II. EPA Docket ID Nos.: EPA-R08-OAR-2022-0632; EPA-R08-OAR-2022-
0857; and FRL-10362-02-R8'' commitment letter. Available in the
docket for this action.
\6\ ``Resubmittal of SIP revisions following Reconsideration.
EPA Docket ID Nos.: EPA-R08-OAR-2022-0632; EPA-R08-OAR-2022-0857;
and FRL-10362-02-R8'' commitment letter. Available in the docket for
this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA has
proposed to conditionally approve portions of Colorado's May 3, 2024
submittal, pending timely submittal of the specified rule revisions by
May 31, 2025. The underlying SIP provisions that we are proposing to
conditionally approve are already part of the SIP due to our May 9,
2023 limited approval and thus are federally enforceable by the State
and EPA, notwithstanding our conclusion that the current reporting
requirements may limit potential enforceability by others under CAA
section 304 citizen suit authority.
II. What action is EPA taking?
We are making an interim final determination to defer application
of CAA section 179 sanctions associated with the May 9, 2023 limited
disapproval. Under 40 CFR 52.31(d)(2)(i), if the State has submitted a
revised plan to correct the deficiencies identified in the May 9, 2023
limited disapproval, and EPA proposes to fully or conditionally approve
the plan and issues an interim final determination that the revised
plan corrects the identified deficiencies, application of the new
source offset and highway sanctions shall be deferred. If not deferred,
the offset sanction would apply on December 8, 2024, and the highway
sanction would apply on June 8, 2025, in the DMNFR Area.
Based on the proposed approval and conditional approval of portions
of Colorado's May 3, 2024 submittal set forth in this document, it is
more likely than not that Colorado has met the requirement to establish
that these provisions have reporting requirements for certain source
categories, or has committed to make revisions for other source
categories that will include reporting requirements, adequate to comply
with the relevant CAA requirements under section 110 and EPA
regulations at 40 CFR 51.211(a), as well as to make the provisions
legally and practicably enforceable by citizens as authorized under CAA
section 304. Therefore, EPA is making this interim final determination
based on our
[[Page 63820]]
concurrent proposal to approve and conditionally approve Colorado's May
3, 2024 SIP submission that corrects and commits to correct the
deficiencies identified in our May 9, 2023 limited disapproval with
respect to the adequacy of reporting requirements of the identified
provisions.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 88 FR 29827.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This interim final determination is consistent with the
requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) \8\ for federal
agency rulemaking. Generally, under the APA, agency rulemaking
affecting the rights of individuals must comply with certain minimum
procedural requirements, including publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register and providing an opportunity for the
public to submit written comments on the proposal before the rulemaking
can have final effect.\9\ While in this matter EPA is not providing an
opportunity for public comment before the deferral of CAA section 179
sanctions is effective, EPA is providing an opportunity, after the
fact, for the public to comment on the interim final determination. EPA
will consider any comments received in determining whether to reverse
the interim final determination. Additionally, EPA is providing an
opportunity to comment on the proposed approval and conditional
approval, within a separate action, that are the basis for this interim
final determination, so the public has an opportunity to comment on
that action before any sanctions clock could be permanently terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.
\9\ See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)-(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The basis for allowing such an interim final action stems from the
APA, which provides that the notice and opportunity for comment
requirements do not apply when the Agency ``for good cause finds'' that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' \10\ EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking
before the effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. EPA has reviewed the State's SIP submission and
the additional information that the State has provided, and for the
reasons explained further in its proposed action EPA believes that it
is more likely than not that the State's submission (1) provides for
adequate reporting requirements and (2) commits to correct the other
deficiencies that were the basis for the limited disapproval that
started the sanctions clocks. Accordingly, CAA sanctions would not
serve their intended purpose of encouraging the state to develop a
better SIP. EPA also believes that the risk of an inappropriate
deferral is comparatively small, given the limited scope and duration
of a deferral has and given that sanctions would become effective
pursuant to 40 CFR 52.31(d)(2)(i) in the event EPA reverses its
determination that the State has corrected the deficiencies.
Consequently, EPA finds that the ``good cause'' exception to the APA
notice and comment requirement applies, and that notice and comment
procedures are not required before the deferral and stay of sanctions
become effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA is also invoking the ``good cause'' exception to the 30-day
publication requirement of the APA. Section 553(d)(1) of the APA
provides that final rules shall not become effective until 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register ``except . . . a substantive
rule which grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction.'' \11\ The purpose of this provision is to ``give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior before the final
rule takes effect.'' \12\ However, when the agency grants or recognizes
an exemption or relieves a restriction, affected parties do not need a
reasonable time to adjust because the effect is not adverse. Because
this rule relieves a restriction, in that it defers imposition of
sanctions upon the state, EPA finds that there is good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(1) for this action to become effective on the date of
publication of this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
\12\ Omnipoint Corp. v. Fed. Commc'n Comm'n, 78 F.3d 620, 630
(D.C. Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Gavrilovic, 551 F.2d
1099, 1104 (8th Cir. 1977) (quoting legislative history).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained above, EPA is making this interim final determination
based on our concurrent proposal to approve and conditionally approve
Colorado's May 3, 2024 SIP submission that corrects and commits to
correct the deficiencies identified in our May 9, 2023 limited
disapproval with respect to the adequacy of reporting requirements of
certain provisions. If the conditional approval converts to a
disapproval due to the State's failure to meet its commitment, then the
offset sanction under CAA section 179(b)(2) would apply in the affected
area on the later of the date: (1) when the approval becomes a
disapproval or EPA issues such a proposed or final disapproval,
whichever is applicable; or (2) 18 months following the finding that
started the original sanctions clock.\13\ Subsequently, the highway
sanction under CAA section 179(b)(1) would apply in the affected area
six months after the date the offset sanction applies.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 40 CFR 52.31(d)(2)(i). In this case, the finding that
started the original sanctions clock was the May 9, 2023 limited
disapproval.
\14\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action defers sanctions and imposes no additional
requirements.
<bullet> This action is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
<bullet> This rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
<bullet> This action is certified as not having a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
<bullet> This action does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
<bullet> This action does not have federalism implications. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship
between the national government and the states, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
<bullet> This rule does not have tribal implications, as specified
in Executive Order 13175 because it will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
<bullet> This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045,
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not an
economically significant regulatory action.
<bullet> This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it
is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
<bullet> This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
Therefore, the EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
[[Page 63821]]
<bullet> EPA believes that this action does not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, low-income populations, and/or
indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
<bullet> This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act,
and EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. However, section 808
provides that any rule for which the issuing agency for good cause
finds that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, shall take effect at
such time as the agency promulgating the rule determines. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). EPA has made such a good cause finding, including the reasons
thereof, and established an effective date of August 6, 2024. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under
section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by October 7, 2024. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: July 29, 2024.
KC Becker,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2024-17087 Filed 8-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.