Electric Reliability Organization Performance Assessments; Withdrawal
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is withdrawing a notice of proposed rulemaking, which proposed to amend its regulations pursuant to section 215 of the Federal Power Act to require the Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization (ERO) to submit performance assessments every three years; to include in its performance assessment a detailed discussion of any areas of the ERO's responsibilities and activities, or a Regional Entity's delegated functions, beyond those required by the Commission's regulations, that the Commission has identified at least 90 days prior to the expected performance assessment submission date; and to formalize the method for the ERO and Regional Entities to receive and respond to recommendations by the users, owners, and operators of the Bulk-Power System, and other interested parties for improvement of the ERO's operations, activities, oversight, and procedures.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 129 (Friday, July 5, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55529-55530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14667]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
18 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. RM21-12-000]
Electric Reliability Organization Performance Assessments;
Withdrawal
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of proposed rulemaking and termination of
rulemaking proceeding.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is
withdrawing a notice of proposed rulemaking, which proposed to amend
its regulations pursuant to section 215 of the Federal Power Act to
require the Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization
(ERO) to submit performance assessments every three years; to include
in its performance assessment a detailed discussion of any areas of the
ERO's responsibilities and activities, or a Regional Entity's delegated
functions, beyond those required by the Commission's regulations, that
the Commission has identified at least 90 days prior to the expected
performance assessment submission date; and to formalize the method for
the ERO and Regional Entities to receive and respond to recommendations
by the users, owners, and operators of the Bulk-Power System, and other
interested parties for improvement of the ERO's operations, activities,
oversight, and procedures.
DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal
Register at 86 FR 7518 on January 29, 2021, is withdrawn as of July 5,
2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Gildea (Technical Information), Office of Electric Reliability,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, (202) 502-8420, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600d09030801050c4e07090c04050120060512034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cca1a5afa4ada9a0e2aba5a0a8a9ad8caaa9beafe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>
Leigh Anne Faugust (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, (202) 502-6396, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#59353c303e31773f382c3e2c2a2d193f3c2b3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="610d040806094f0700140614121521070413024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Termination of
Rulemaking Proceeding
1. On January 19, 2021, the Commission issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) proposing to revise its regulations regarding the
Electric Reliability Organization's (ERO) performance assessments
pursuant to section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA).\1\ The
Commission received seven comments in response to the NOPR.\2\ After
reviewing the comments received, the Commission has decided to retain
its existing regulations regarding the ERO's performance assessments.
For the reasons set forth below, we are exercising our discretion to
withdraw the NOPR and terminate this rulemaking proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Revisions to Regulations on Elec. Reliability Org.
Performance Assessments, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 86 FR 7518
(Jan. 29, 2021), 174 FERC ] 61,031 (2021).
\2\ The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)
and Regional Entities, jointly; the Western Interconnection Regional
Advisory Body (WIRAB); the ISO/RTO Council; the American Public
Power Association, Edison Electric Institute, Electric Power Supply
Association, the Large Public Power Council, National Rural Electric
Cooperative Association, and Transmission Access Policy Study Group,
jointly (Joint Trade Associations); Public Citizen, Inc. (Public
Citizen); and the Foundation for Resilient Societies (Resilient
Societies).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
A. Commission Regulations on the ERO Performance Assessment
2. Section 215 of the FPA requires the Commission to issue
regulations that, among other things, provide for the certification of
an entity as the ERO if it meets certain criteria.\3\ On February 3,
2006, the Commission issued Order No. 672, which amended the
Commission's regulations to implement the requirements of FPA section
215.\4\ The specific requirements for the ERO performance assessments
are set out in the Commission's regulations in Sec. 39.3(c).\5\ On
July 20, 2006, the Commission certified NERC as the ERO.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 16 U.S.C. 824o.
\4\ Rules Concerning Certification of the Elec. Reliability
Org.; and Procedures for the Establishment, Approval, and
Enforcement of Elec. Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, 71 FR
8662 (Feb. 17, 2006), 114 FERC ] 61,104, at P 186, order on reh'g,
Order No. 672-A, 114 FERC ] 61,328 (2006).
\5\ 18 CFR 39.3(c) (2023).
\6\ N. Am. Elec. Reliability Corp., 116 FERC ] 61,062, order on
reh'g and compliance, 117 FERC ] 61,126 (2006), aff'd sub nom. Alcoa
Inc. v. FERC, 564 F.3d 1342 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (ERO Certification
Order) (certifying NERC as the ERO responsible for the development
and enforcement of mandatory Reliability Standards).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. NOPR
3. In its NOPR, the Commission proposed to amend its regulations
regarding the ERO performance assessments. First, the Commission
proposed to require the ERO to submit assessments of its performance
every three years instead of every five years. Second, the Commission
proposed to add a requirement for the ERO to include in its performance
assessment a detailed discussion of any areas of the ERO's
responsibilities and activities, or a Regional Entity's delegated
functions, beyond those required by the Commission's regulations, that
the Commission has identified at least 90 days prior to the expected
performance assessment submission date. Finally, the Commission
proposed to formalize the method for the ERO and Regional Entities to
receive and respond to recommendations by the users, owners, and
operators of the Bulk-Power System, and other interested parties for
improvement of the ERO's operations, activities, oversight, and
procedures.
4. The Commission explained in the NOPR that it believed that the
proposals would provide better continuity in its review of the ERO's
operations, activities, oversight, procedures, and evaluation of the
effectiveness of each Regional Entity in the performance of delegated
functions. Further, the Commission explained that shorter performance
assessment cycles could provide an opportunity for timelier
identification and implementation of potential improvements to ERO
performance and improve the efficiency of the overall performance
assessment process.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ NOPR, 174 FERC ] 61,031 at P 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Notice of the NOPR was published in the Federal Register, 86 FR
7518 (Jan. 29, 2021), with comments due by March 1, 2021.
C. Comments
6. In their joint comments, NERC and the Regional Entities oppose
all proposed modifications. They assert that the proposed changes would
place undue burden on ERO staff by directing their focus away from key
activities that ``would outweigh any potential benefits.'' \8\ They
explain that the existing five-year performance assessment cycle
provides ``greater opportunity to demonstrate evolution of
[[Page 55530]]
the ERO than a three-year cycle'' \9\ and allows NERC initiatives to
come to fruition and be evaluated.\10\ NERC and the Regional Entities
explain that, due to the time it takes to coordinate with the Regional
Entities, incorporate stakeholder feedback, present the draft to the
NERC Board of Trustees for approval, and meet with Commission staff on
specific questions, a three-year cycle would mean the process would
begin two years after the prior assessment ends.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ NERC and Regional Entities Joint Comments at 2.
\9\ Id. at 6.
\10\ Id. at 8.
\11\ Id. at 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Regarding the proposed 90-day advance notice of Commission
requested information, NERC and the Regional Entities believe that the
NOPR proposal does not consider ``numerous, existing opportunities for
coordination and timely feedback from industry, FERC Commissioners, and
Commission staff.'' \12\ They re-affirm their commitment to the
existing oversight process to provide the Commission with ``all
information necessary for [the Commission's] evaluation'' of the ERO's
ongoing compliance with its certification criteria through the
performance assessments.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Id. (referencing NERC and Regional Entities Joint Comments,
App. A listing such opportunities (e.g., board meetings, stakeholder
meetings, and technical and Reliability Standards working groups)).
\13\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Finally, NERC and the Regional Entities oppose a formal
solicitation of stakeholder feedback and recommendations. They say they
already provide ``extensive opportunities for stakeholder feedback on
ERO operations, activities, oversight, and procedures, including areas
for improvement.'' \14\ NERC and the Regional Entities explain that
they solicit public comment on the draft performance assessment two to
three months prior to its filing--asserting that the draft performance
assessment is the ``best vehicle to solicit comments . . . because such
a posting ensures that comments are grounded in specific activities and
issues material to ERO certification and effectiveness.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Id. at 13.
\15\ Id. at 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. WIRAB, Joint Trade Associations, Public Citizen, and Resilient
Societies support the proposed changes to the Commission's
regulations.\16\ The ISO/RTO Council supports the formal solicitation
of public feedback.\17\ Commenters generally agree that the proposed
changes would support the early identification of emerging trends,
challenges, and opportunities regarding the ERO's assurance of Bulk-
Power System reliability and allow necessary changes to be made in a
timelier manner.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See WIRAB Comments at 3; Joint Trade Associations Comments
at 3-4; Public Citizen Comments at 2-3; and Resilient Societies
Comments at 1.
\17\ ISO/RTO Council Comments at 2.
\18\ See, e.g., WIRAB Comments at 3; Resilient Societies
Comments at 4-5; Joint Trade Associations Comments at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Discussion
10. The Commission withdraws the NOPR and terminates this
proceeding. We appreciate the feedback that the Commission received in
response to the NOPR. Considering NERC and the Regional Entities'
concerns regarding the scope and implementation of the proposal and the
increased burden on the ERO, that NERC will need to expend significant
resources to address multiple Commission directives, and that the
Commission will need to expend significant resources considering those
responsive proposals,\19\ we do not believe that modifying the
periodicity or procedural requirements for the ERO performance
assessments is an efficient use of ERO or Commission resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See, e.g., Reliability Standards to Address Inverter-Based
Resources, Order No. 901, 88 FR 74250 (Oct. 30, 2023), 185 FERC ]
61,042 (2023), (directing revisions to Reliability Standards for
inverter-based resources); Transmission Sys. Planning Performance
Requirements for Extreme Weather, Order No. 896, 88 FR 41262 (June
23, 2023), 183 FERC ] 61,191 (2023) (directing revisions to
Reliability Standards for transmission system planning); N. Am.
Elec. Reliability Corp., 187 FERC ] 61,196 (2024) (directing
revisions to Reliability Standards to address generator cold weather
preparedness).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Therefore, we exercise our discretion to withdraw the NOPR and
terminate this rulemaking proceeding.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See, e.g., Revised Public Utility Filing Requirements for
Elec. Quarterly Reports,169 FERC ] 61,236 (2019) (order withdrawing
NOPR and terminating rulemaking proceeding); see also, e.g., Fast-
Start Pricing in Markets Operated by Reg'l Transmission Org. and
Indep. Sys. Operators, 161 FERC ] 61,293 (2017) (order withdrawing
NOPR and terminating rulemaking proceeding).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission orders: The NOPR is hereby withdrawn and Docket No.
RM21-12-000 is hereby terminated.
By the Commission. Commissioner Rosner is not participating.
Issued: June 27, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-14667 Filed 7-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.