Notice2024-14069
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the GSD Rules (i) Regarding the Separate Calculation, Collection and Holding of Margin for Proprietary Transactions and That for Indirect Participant Transactions, and (ii) To Address the Conditions of Note H to Rule 15c3-3a
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 27, 2024
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53690-53692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14069]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-100401; File No. SR-FICC-2024-007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Modify the GSD Rules (i) Regarding
the Separate Calculation, Collection and Holding of Margin for
Proprietary Transactions and That for Indirect Participant
Transactions, and (ii) To Address the Conditions of Note H to Rule
15c3-3a
June 21, 2024.
I. Introduction
On March 14, 2024, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change SR-FICC-2024-007 pursuant to Section 19(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
\2\ thereunder to modify FICC's Government Securities Division
(``GSD'') Rulebook (``GSD Rules'') to calculate, collect, and hold
margin for proprietary transactions of a Netting Member separately from
margin that the Netting Member submits to FICC on behalf of indirect
participants and to address conditions of Note H to Rule 15c3-3a under
the Exchange Act (the ``Proposed Rule Change'').\3\ The Proposed Rule
Change was published for public comment in the Federal Register on
March 28, 2024.\4\ The Commission has received comments regarding the
substance of the changes proposed in the Proposed Rule Change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99149 (Dec. 13,
2023), 89 FR 2714 (Jan. 16, 2024) (S7-23-22) (``Adopting Release,''
and the rules adopted therein as ``Treasury Clearing Rules''). See
also 17 CFR 240.15c3-3a.
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99844 (March 22, 2024),
89 FR 21603 (March 28, 2024) (File No. SR-FICC-2024-007) (``Notice
of Filing''). FICC also filed a related Advance Notice with the
Commission pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of Title VIII of the Dodd-
Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, entitled the
Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 and Rule
19b-4(n)(1)(i) under the Exchange Act. 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1). 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) and 17 CFR 240.19b-4, respectively. The Advance
Notice was published in the Federal Register on March 28, 2024.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 99845 (Mar. 22, 2024), 89 FR
21586 (Mar. 28, 2024) (File No. SR-FICC-2024-802).
\5\ Comments on the Proposed Rule Change are available at
<a href="https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007.htm">https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-ficc-2024-007/srficc2024007.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 24, 2024, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,\6\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to
approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the Proposed Rule Change.\7\ The Commission is
instituting proceedings, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the
Exchange Act,\8\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the
Proposed Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100022 (Apr. 24, 2024),
89 FR 34289 (Apr. 30, 2024) (File No. SR-FICC-2023-007).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of the Proposed Rule Change
A. Background
FICC, through its GSD, is a central counterparty and provider of
clearance and settlement services for the U.S. government securities
markets. FICC manages its credit exposures to its Netting Members
through the collection of margin to mitigate potential losses from a
member default.
On December 13, 2023, the Commission adopted amendments to the
standards applicable to covered clearing agencies, such as FICC.\9\
These amendments require covered clearing agencies that clear
transactions in U.S. Treasury securities (``Treasury CCAs'') to
calculate, collect, and hold margin for direct participants and their
customers separately.\10\ The Commission also amended its broker-dealer
customer protection rule (``Rule 15c3-3'') \11\ and the reserve
formulas thereunder (``Rule 15c3-3a'') \12\ to permit margin required
and on deposit with Treasury CCAs to be included under certain
conditions as a debit in the broker-dealer reserve formulas.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See supra note 3.
\10\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(6)(i).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3.
\12\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3a.
\13\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the GSD Rules \14\ allow Netting Members to record
proprietary transactions that a Netting Member enters into for its own
benefit in the same account as transactions Netting Members submit on
behalf of non-member market participants (``indirect participants'')
through the prime brokerage/correspondent clearing services.\15\
Transactions submitted on behalf of an indirect participant through the
correspondent clearing/prime broker services currently can be netted
against a Netting Member's proprietary transactions for purposes of
calculating the Netting Member's margin requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The GSD Rules are available at https://www.dtcc.com/~/
media/Files/Downloads/legal/rules/ficc_gov_rules.pdf. Terms not
otherwise defined herein are defined in the GSD Rules.
\15\ Indirect participants currently may access GSD's clearing
services indirectly through a Netting Member through two indirect
participation models: the correspondent clearing/prime broker
services and the Sponsored Service. For the Sponsored Service,
Netting Members are approved to be ``Sponsoring Members'' to sponsor
certain institutional firms (``Sponsored Members'') into GSD
membership. FICC's existing prime broker/correspondent clearing
services are an alternative to the Sponsored Service, where a
Netting Member may submit to FICC eligible transactions on behalf of
its customer (an ``Executing Firm'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Proposed Rule Change
The Proposed Rule Change seeks to address the Commission's new
margin and account separation requirements and the conditions for
including margin in the broker-dealer reserve formulas discussed in
part II.A above.\16\ First, the Proposed Rule Change would provide for
the separate and independent calculation, collection, and holding of
(i) margin deposited by a Netting Member to support its proprietary
transactions and (ii) margin deposited by a Netting Member to support
the transactions of an indirect participant. Specifically, FICC would
do so by providing for the establishment of proprietary accounts to
record the transactions that the Netting Member enters into for its own
benefit and of separate indirect participant accounts to record
transactions that the Netting Member submits on behalf of an indirect
participant. FICC would also provide that a Netting Member's Margin
Portfolio, which is utilized to determine a Netting Member's margin
requirement, cannot include both proprietary and indirect participant
accounts. As a result, the transactions a Netting Member submits to
FICC on behalf of an indirect participant would no longer be netted
against a Netting Member's proprietary transactions for purposes of
calculating a Netting Member's margin requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change would also clarify the types of accounts
in which Netting Members may record transactions to clarify the purpose
and use of these accounts.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ FICC's ``Accounts'' are not custodial accounts in which
FICC holds assets, but rather a mechanism for FICC to record and
group transactions. These records are utilized by FICC in its
calculation of a Netting Member's margining, settlement, and other
obligations. Proprietary Accounts would include ``Dealer Accounts,''
which would be available for all Netting Members, and ``Cash Broker
Accounts'' and ``Repo Broker Accounts,'' which would only be
available for Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Members. Non-Proprietary
Accounts would include, in the case of a Sponsoring Member,
Sponsoring Member Omnibus Accounts for purposes of recording
Sponsored Member Trades, and, in the case of an Agent Clearing
Member, Agent Clearing Member Omnibus Accounts for purposes of
recording Agent Clearing Transactions of its Executing Firm
Customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53691]]
Second, FICC states that the Proposed Rule Change would allow for
the segregation of certain customer margin in a manner that satisfies
the conditions for a broker-dealer to record a debit in the customer or
PAB reserve formula under recently added Note H to Rule 15c3-3a.\18\
Specifically, FICC would permit a Netting Member, including a non-
broker-dealer Netting Member, to designate any of its indirect
participants accounts for segregation. For any account so designated,
FICC would calculate the margin requirements applicable to the account
on a gross basis (i.e., FICC would not net the transactions of one
indirect participant against the transactions of another indirect
participant). FICC would also segregate the margin deposited for
transactions in that account from any margin for a Netting Member's
proprietary positions, both on FICC's own books and records and at
FICC's custodians. FICC would only be able to use such segregated
margin to satisfy the obligations of the customer for whom such margin
is held. FICC would not be able to apply such margin to the proprietary
obligations of the Netting Member that deposited it with FICC or to the
obligations of any other Netting Member or participant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3a. See Notice of Filing, supra note 4, at
89 FR 21603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICC would also provide specific procedures to allow Netting
Members to obtain the return of excess segregated margin. FICC notes
that these changes would allow broker-dealer Netting Members to collect
margin from customers and deposit it with FICC and to provide all
customers, including those that access FICC through non-broker-dealers,
and to be able to segregate margin they deposit.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Id. at 21606.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICC is also proposing a minimum $1 million cash margin requirement
for each Segregated Indirect Participant, similar to the $1 million
minimum cash margin requirement currently applicable to each Netting
Member. FICC believes that this minimum margin amount is appropriate
because FICC's analysis has shown a heightened risk of backtesting
deficiencies for members with lower deposits, and segregated customer
margin would not be available to address losses from other direct or
indirect participants.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id. at 21611.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Third, the Proposed Rule Change would seek to align the description
of FICC's margin methodology with the revised account types,
consolidate the terms relating to margin calculation in a single,
easily identifiable schedule, and make certain changes to the
methodology to increase precision and predictability. Further, the
Proposed Rule Change would provide a method for allocating net
unsettled positions to individual indirect participants for calculating
margin requirements.
In addition, the Proposed Rule Change would revise and clarify the
calculation of the excess capital premium component of the Clearing
Fund, to cap such amount at two times the amount by which a Netting
Member's VaR Charge exceeds its Netting Member Capital, clarify the
capital amounts that are used in the calculation of such amount, limit
FICC's discretion to waive the amount, and provide that FICC may
calculate the premium based on updated available information. The
Proposed Rule Change would also take steps to ensure that the excess
capital premium does not result in differential treatment of indirect
participants simply because of the particular capital level of the
Netting Member providing access to FICC's clearance and settlement
systems.
Lastly, the Proposed Rule Change would modify the terms relating to
brokered transactions to require that only transactions that an Inter-
Dealer Broker Netting Member executes on the Inter-Dealer Broker
Netting Member's own trading platform benefit from favorable loss
allocation treatment.\21\ FICC believes that these changes would
improve FICC's risk management and promote access by ensuring that its
differential treatment of different parties and transactions has a
sound risk management justification.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Rule 4, Section 7 (``Notwithstanding the foregoing,
however, an Inter-Dealer Broker Netting Member, or a Non-IDB Repo
Broker with respect to activity in its Segregated Repo Account,
shall not be subject to an aggregate loss allocation in an amount
greater than $5 million pursuant to this Section 7 for losses and
liabilities resulting from an Event Period.''), supra note 14.
\22\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 4, at 89 FR 21604.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove the
Proposed Rule Change and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration
The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act to determine whether the Proposed Rule
Change should be approved or disapproved.\23\ Institution of
proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy
issues raised by the Proposed Rule Change. Institution of proceedings
does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with
respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, the Commission seeks and
encourages interested persons to comment on the Proposed Rule Change,
which would provide the Commission with arguments to support the
Commission's analysis as to whether to approve or disapprove the
Proposed Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act,\24\ the
Commission is providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under
consideration. The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for
additional analysis of, and input from commenters with respect to, the
Proposed Rule Change's consistency with Section 17A of the Exchange Act
\25\ and the rules thereunder, including the following provisions:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Id.
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 15c3-3 under the Exchange Act,\26\ which permits
permit margin required and on deposit at a U.S. Treasury securities CCA
to be included as a debit item in a registered broker-dealer's customer
reserve formula, subject to the conditions specified in the rule;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act,\27\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency are
designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions, as well as to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in the clearance and settlement of
securities transactions; and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 17ad-22(e)(4)(i) under the Exchange Act,\28\ which
requires that a covered clearing agency establish, implement, maintain,
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to
effectively identify, measure, monitor, and manage
[[Page 53692]]
its credit exposures to participants and those arising from its
payment, clearing, and settlement processes by maintaining sufficient
financial resources to cover its credit exposure to each participant
fully with a high degree of confidence;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(4)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 17ad-22(e)(6)(i) under the Exchange Act,\29\ which
requires that a covered clearing agency establish written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to calculate, collect, and hold margin
amounts from a direct participant for its proprietary positions in
Treasury securities separately and independently from margin calculated
and collected from that direct participant in connection with U.S.
Treasury securities transactions by an indirect participant that relies
on the services provided by the direct participant to access the
covered clearing agency's payment, clearing, or settlement facilities;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(6)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 17ad-22(e)(18)(iv)(C) under the Exchange Act,\30\
which requires that a covered clearing agency establish, implement,
maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably
designed to establish objective, risk-based, and publicly disclosed
criteria for participation, which, when the covered clearing agency
provides central counterparty services in transactions in U.S. Treasury
securities, ensure that it has appropriate means to facilitate access
to clearance and settlement services of all eligible secondary market
transactions in U.S. Treasury securities, including those of indirect
participants;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(18)(iv)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 17ad-22(e)(19) under the Exchange Act,\31\ which
requires that a covered clearing agency establish, implement, maintain,
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to
identify, monitor, and manage the material risks to the covered
clearing agency arising from arrangements in which firms that are
indirect participants in the covered clearing agency rely on the
services provided by direct participants to access the covered clearing
agency's payment, clearing, or settlement facilities;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Rule 17ad-22(e)(23)(ii) under the Exchange Act,\32\ which
requires that a covered clearing agency establish, implement, maintain,
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to
provide sufficient information to enable participants to identify and
evaluate the risks, fees, and other material costs they incur by
participating in the covered clearing agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 240.17ad-22(e)(23)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments
The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the Proposed Rule Change. In particular, the Commission invites
the written views of interested persons concerning whether the Proposed
Rule Change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) \33\ and Rules
15c3-3, 17Ad-22(e)(4)(i), (e)(6)(i), (e)(18)(iv)(C), (e)(19), and
(e)(23)(ii) \34\ of the Exchange Act, or any other provision of the
Exchange Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there
do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that
would be facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and
arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(g)
under the Exchange Act,\35\ any request for an opportunity to make an
oral presentation.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\34\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-3 and 17ad-22(e)(4)(i), (e)(6)(i),
(e)(18)(iv)(C), (e)(19), and (e)(23)(ii).
\35\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(g).
\36\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act grants to the
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on
Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency of
FICC's statements in support of the Proposed Rule Change, which are set
forth in the Notice of Filing \37\ in addition to any other comments
they may wish to submit about the Proposed Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ See Notice of Filing, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abd9dec7ce86c8c4c6c6cec5dfd8ebd8cec885ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="087a7d646d256b6765656d667c7b487b6d6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-FICC-2024-007 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-FICC-2024-007. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the Proposed Rule Change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the Proposed Rule Change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of FICC and on FICC's
website (<a href="http://www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings">www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings</a>).
Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2024-007 and
should be submitted on or before July 18, 2024. Rebuttal comments
should be submitted by August 1, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-14069 Filed 6-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 27, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.