Notice2024-14000
Applications for New Awards; Stronger Connections Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Grant Program
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 26, 2024
Issuing agencies
Education Department
Abstract
The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2024 for new awards for the Stronger Connections Technical Assistance and Capacity Building (SCTAC) grant program.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53407-53413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-14000]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Stronger Connections Technical
Assistance and Capacity Building Grant Program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2024 for new awards for the
Stronger Connections Technical Assistance and Capacity Building (SCTAC)
grant program.
DATES: Applications Available: June 26, 2024. Deadline for Transmittal
of Applications: August 26, 2024. Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: October 24, 2024.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/07/2022-26554/common-instructions-for-applicants-to-department-of-education-discretionary-grant-programs">www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/07/2022-26554/common-instructions-for-applicants-to-department-of-education-discretionary-grant-programs</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hamed Negron-Perez, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 4B111, Washington, DC 20202-
6132. Telephone: (202) 219-1674. Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1340504752505376773d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82d1c1d6c3c1c2e7e6ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.
If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability and
wish to access telecommunications relay services, please dial 7-1-1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the SCTAC grant program is to
advance the mental health and well-being of early learners (as defined
in this notice), school-age children and youth, and educators and other
school staff, by making grants to State educational agencies (SEAs) to
provide technical assistance and capacity building to high-need local
educational agencies (LEAs) (as defined in this notice).
Assistance Listing Number (ALN): 84.424H.
OMB Control Number: 1894-0006.
Background: The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA) allocated
$1 billion in funding to States through the Stronger Connections Grant
(SCG) program; SEAs, in turn, subgranted these funds competitively to
high-need LEAs to design and enhance initiatives to promote safer, more
inclusive, and positive school environments for all students,
educators, and school staff including through personnel and programs to
support student mental health.
The SCTAC grant program is being established with BSCA funds from
the two percent reservation for technical assistance and capacity
building under section 4103(a)(3) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). This funding is available to
SEAs to provide technical assistance and capacity building services to
high-need LEAs for evidence-based (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) and
culturally and linguistically inclusive programs and activities related
to mental health and well-being for early learners, school-age children
and youth, and educators and other school staff. We encourage SEAs
receiving SCTAC funds to prioritize high-need LEAs that did not receive
a Stronger Connections subgrant from the SEA for technical assistance
and capacity building services under this program.
``Raise the Bar: Lead the World'' is the Department's call to
action to transform education and unite around what works--based on
decades of experience and research--to advance educational equity and
excellence. As part of our Raise the Bar efforts to boldly improve
learning conditions, the Department continues to invest in every
student's mental health and well-being.
Recent studies show that children who experience unaddressed mental
health issues are more likely to face challenges in school, such as
being more likely to repeat a grade and experience chronic absenteeism,
and less likely to graduate high school.\1\ Amid the pandemic, data
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that 1
in 3 high school students experienced poor mental health, 1 in 6
adolescents experienced a major depressive episode, and 20 percent of
teens seriously considered suicide.\2\ The suicide rate among Black
youth similarly is increasing faster than for any other race or ethnic
group.\3\ Of teens seriously considering suicide, rates are alarmingly
high for LGBTQ students, with 45% of LGBTQ youth surveyed indicating
they seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Larson, S., Chapman, S., Spetz, J., & Brindis, C.D. Chronic
childhood trauma, mental health, academic achievement, and school-
based health center mental health services. J Sch Health. 2017; 87:
675-686. Retrieved from: <a href="https://escholarship.org/content/qt6th2r852/qt6th2r852.pdf">https://escholarship.org/content/qt6th2r852/qt6th2r852.pdf</a>.
\2\ Youth Risk Behavior Survey: Data Summary and Trends Report.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011-2021. Retrieved
from: <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/YRBS_Data-Summary-Trends_Report2023_508.pdf">https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/pdf/YRBS_Data-Summary-Trends_Report2023_508.pdf</a>.
\3\ Akkas, Faranza, A. Corr. Black Adolescent Suicide Rate
Reveals Urgent Need to Address Mental Health Care Barriers. April
2024. Retrieved from: <a href="https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2024/04/22/black-adolescent-suicide-rate-reveals-urgent-need-to-address-mental-health-care-barriers">https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2024/04/22/black-adolescent-suicide-rate-reveals-urgent-need-to-address-mental-health-care-barriers</a>.
\4\ <a href="https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/">https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These data are consistent with research findings about the mental
health and well-being of early learners as well. According to the CDC,
17.4 percent of children aged 2-8 years had a diagnosed mental,
behavior, or developmental disorder.\5\ This same report showed an
increase to 22 percent for children living below 100 percent of the
Federal poverty level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Cree, R.A., Bitsko, R.H., Robinson, L.R., et al. Health
Care, Family, and Community Factors Associated with Mental,
Behavioral, and Developmental Disorders and Poverty Among Children
Aged 2-8 Years--United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2018;67:1377-1383. Retrieved from: http:\\<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6750a1">dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6750a1</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Educators and other school staff are also facing mental health and
well-being challenges. According to the Department's National Center
for Education Statistics February 2024 School Pulse Panel, 91 percent
of public school principals or vice principals reported some level of
concern about the mental health of the teachers or staff at their
school and 41 percent reported being ``moderately'' or ``extremely''
concerned about this issue.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education
Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, School Pulse
Panel. February 2024. Retrieved from: <a href="https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/spp/results.asp">https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/spp/results.asp</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Educator mental health and well-being carry implications for
educator retention, and thus downstream effects on student educational
opportunity and achievement, making it a critical priority for States
and LEAs. A recent study found that 23 percent of teachers
[[Page 53408]]
said they were likely to leave their job by the end of the 2022-2023
school year and Black teachers, who are more likely to teach in under
resourced schools without the necessary student and educator support,
were significantly more likely to intend to leave than their peers.\7\
The same study found that teachers who reported poor well-being as a
reason for likely leaving their job were more likely than their
counterparts to say that they intended to leave their job.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Doan, S., Steiner, E., Pandey, R., & Woo, A. (June 2023).
Teacher Well-Being and Intentions to Leave: Findings from the 2023
State of the American Teacher Survey. Rand Corporation. Retrieved
from: <a href="https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA1100/RRA1108-8/RAND_RRA1108-8.pdf">https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA1100/RRA1108-8/RAND_RRA1108-8.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SCTAC program is designed to build SEA capacity to address the
particular needs of the high-need LEAs in their State. In responding to
the areas identified in the absolute priority, we encourage projects
that provide technical assistance and capacity building to high-need
LEAs to address chronic absenteeism and increase student engagement and
school belonging, for example, by implementing strong student
connection and engagement activities or school climate improvement
strategies. One evidence-based example that SEAs may consider, for
example, is mentorship programs that focus on small-group counseling
and help youth to build skills and competencies on choosing non-violent
behaviors and using de-escalation and violence reduction strategies.\8\
The Department is also interested in activities that enhance supportive
services for youth impacted by community violence such as through
trauma recovery, restorative practices, and community violence
intervention and prevention strategies. For example, programs that use
a trauma-informed approach to support social emotional wellbeing have
been reported to decrease depression and increase self-confidence in
participants.\9\ When considering these different programs and
activities, we encourage applicants to propose projects that include
strategies specific to supporting young people, with a focus on those
most historically underserved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from:
<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/youth-violence/prevention/index.html">https://www.cdc.gov/youth-violence/prevention/index.html</a>.
\9\ <a href="https://www.youth-guidance.org/wow/">https://www.youth-guidance.org/wow/</a>.
\10\ Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from:
<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aces/index.html">https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/aces/index.html</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants may propose projects that also support the mental
health, well-being, and academic development of early learners, for
example, by providing technical assistance and capacity building
services on how to remove barriers and increase access to social,
emotional, and mental health supports; provide support to caregivers;
strengthen family engagement activities; enhance home visits to
encourage school and attendance readiness; and establish participatory
approaches with families and community partners.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Retrieved from: <a href="https://www.samhsa.gov/early-childhood-mental-health-programs">https://www.samhsa.gov/early-childhood-mental-health-programs</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We also welcome applications that propose to support educator
mental health and well-being so that they are well positioned to
support their students. For example, SEAs may consider proposing
projects to better understand and address experiences, particularly in
the school building, that impact educator mental health and well-being.
SEAs may also propose projects that provide technical assistance
and capacity building to high-need LEAs on youth mental health programs
that include peer-to-peer support programs, such as mental health
``first aid'' programs (as defined in this notice). Studies of youth
mental health first aid have shown positive results in terms of
providing youth peers, and adults who work closely with youth, the
ability to recognize the signs, symptoms, and risk factors of mental
health and substance use challenges.\12\ Additionally, youth peer-to-
peer support programs, such as peer counseling, youth mental health
peer ambassadors, student-led clubs, and restorative justice programs,
are additional promising practices. Broader studies of peer-to-peer
programs show a variety of positive outcomes including reduced re-
hospitalization rates, better quality of life outcomes, higher
engagement rates, and improved whole health.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Research and Evaluation of Youth Mental Health First Aid.
National Council for Mental Wellbeing. Retrieved from: <a href="https://www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024.01.05_YouthMHFA_Research-One-pager-1.pdf">https://www.mentalhealthfirstaid.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024.01.05_YouthMHFA_Research-One-pager-1.pdf</a>.
\13\ Evidence for Peer Support (2018). Mental Health America.
Retrieved from: <a href="https://www.mhanational.org/sites/default/files/Evidence%20for%20Peer%20Support%20May%202018.pdf">https://www.mhanational.org/sites/default/files/Evidence%20for%20Peer%20Support%20May%202018.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These important activities can help high-need LEAs create safe,
welcoming, and inclusive learning environments that support student
mental health and wellbeing which is foundational to improving academic
and other outcomes for all students.
This notice invites applications for SCTAC grants. The Department
developed budget ranges for each potential applicant by ranking every
State according to the State's share of their Stronger Connections
Grant, Title IV, Part A funds (see the ``Award Information'' section of
this notice for more information). SEAs should develop budgets that are
appropriate to their proposed projects and consistent with the budget
range established for their State. Department staff will review
applications to determine if an SEA met the absolute priority,
addressed the application requirements, and proposed a budget
consistent with their State's established budget range. Peer reviewers
will review applications to determine the extent to which applicants
met the established selection criteria.
Priorities: This competition has one absolute priority. We are
establishing this priority for this grant competition in accordance
with section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA),
20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2024 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Projects to provide technical assistance and capacity building to
high-need LEAs to support inclusive, evidence-based programs and
activities related to mental health and well-being for early learners,
school-age children and youth, or educators and other school staff.
To meet this priority, applicants must propose a project that would
provide technical assistance and capacity building to high-need LEAs to
help them establish or expand evidence-based, inclusive practices in
one or more of the following areas:
(a) Student attendance and engagement programs designed to reduce
rates of chronic absenteeism and improve attendance, engagement,
connectedness, and wellbeing that include, for example:
(1) Increasing family engagement and communication, including
through a variety of approaches to communication, such as through the
use of texting to share real-time data on attendance, to more targeted
engagement, such as through home visits to identify additional student
and family supports that might be needed;
(2) Improving school climate and implementing anti-bullying
efforts;
(3) Providing student mentorship programs, such as student success
coaches and mentors, and supportive peer groups;
[[Page 53409]]
(4) Adopting early warning intervention systems and multi-tiered
systems of support; and
(5) Establishing school and local educational agency attendance and
engagement teams and providing them with real time and actionable data.
(b) Programs for early learners that support their mental health,
well-being, and academic development through activities such as--
(1) Increasing access for early learners to social, emotional, and
mental health supports, and reducing barriers to access for underserved
students; and
(2) Building strong partnerships among parents, families,
caregivers, social service organizations, mental health care personnel,
personnel providing services to students served under section 619 of
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and community-
based organizations serving pre-kindergarten, kindergarten, and early
grade students to improve the environment, relationships, engagement,
attendance, and experiences that impact children's early development.
(c) Programs to improve educator and school staff mental health and
wellbeing, so that these individuals may better support students and
are more likely to remain in the profession, through activities such
as--
(1) Developing methods, measurement tools, or interventions for
high-need LEAs to understand, and to address the factors, including
school-related factors, that impact educator mental health and well-
being. This includes developing the methods and tools for
disaggregating data by, for example, teacher race/ethnicity and years
of experience), to get a complete understanding of the factors and who
is impacted.
(2) Strengthening social, emotional, and behavioral competencies
among adults;
(d) Peer-to-peer mental health or youth mental health programs
supported by schools or qualified local organizations to reduce the
impact of unaddressed mental health challenges such as those caused by
exposure to community violence and to increase student belonging and
connection, including, for example--
(1) Implementing peer-to-peer programs that raise awareness around
core mental health concepts and destigmatize mental health care,
provide training for students to identify protective \14\ and risk
factors related to mental health and well-being, and connect students
to resources and professionals for additional support; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ A characteristic at the biological, psychological, family,
or community (including peers and culture) level that is associated
with a lower likelihood of problem outcomes or that reduces the
negative impact of a risk factor on problem outcomes. Retrieved
from: <a href="https://youth.gov/youth-topics/youth-mental-health/risk-and-protective-factors-youth">https://youth.gov/youth-topics/youth-mental-health/risk-and-protective-factors-youth</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Implementing youth mental health first aid programs to train
students on how to identify, understand, and respond to signs of common
mental health and well-being challenges.
(e) Improving data collection, use, and reporting as it relates to
implementation and performance management of an SEA's SCG program.
Definitions: The following definitions apply to the FY 2024 SCTAC
grant program competition and any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded applications for this competition.
We are establishing definitions of ``high-need LEA,'' ``early
learner,'' and ``mental health first aid'' in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). The definitions of ``local
educational agency'' and ``State educational agency'' are from section
8101 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7801). The definitions ``baseline,''
``demonstrates a rationale,'' ``evidence-based,'' ``experimental
study,'' ``logic model,'' ``moderate evidence,'' ``project component,''
``quasi-experimental design study,'' ``relevant outcome,'' and ``What
Works Clearinghouse Handbooks (WWC Handbooks)'' are from 34 CFR 77.1.
These definitions apply to the FY 2024 SCTAC grant program competition
and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications for this competition.
Baseline means the starting point from which performance is
measured and targets are set.
Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes.
Early learner means any person from birth to age 8 who is eligible
for a free public education in the State.
Evidence-based means the proposed project component is supported by
one or more of strong evidence, moderate evidence, promising evidence,
or evidence that demonstrates a rationale.
Experimental study means a study that is designed to compare
outcomes between two groups of individuals (such as students) that are
otherwise equivalent except for their assignment to either a treatment
group receiving a project component or a control group that does not.
Randomized controlled trials, regression discontinuity design studies,
and single-case design studies are the specific types of experimental
studies that, depending on their design and implementation (e.g.,
sample attrition in randomized controlled trials and regression
discontinuity design studies), can meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)
standards without reservations as described in the WWC Handbooks (as
defined in this notice):
(i) A randomized controlled trial employs random assignment of, for
example, students, teachers, classrooms, or schools to receive the
project component being evaluated (the treatment group) or not to
receive the project component (the control group).
(ii) A regression discontinuity design study assigns the project
component being evaluated using a measured variable (e.g., assigning
students reading below a cutoff score to tutoring or developmental
education classes) and controls for that variable in the analysis of
outcomes.
(iii) A single-case design study uses observations of a single case
(e.g., a student eligible for a behavioral intervention) over time in
the absence and presence of a controlled treatment manipulation to
determine whether the outcome is systematically related to the
treatment.
High-need LEA has the meaning ascribed it by the SEA under its
Stronger Connections Grant program.
Local educational agency means a public board of education or other
public authority legally constituted within a State for either
administrative control or direction of, or to perform a service
function for, public elementary schools or secondary schools in a city,
county, township, school district, or other political subdivision of a
State, or of or for a combination of school districts or counties that
is recognized in a State as an administrative agency for its public
elementary schools or secondary schools.
(a) The term includes any other public institution or agency having
administrative control and direction of a public elementary school or
secondary school.
(b) The term includes an elementary or secondary school funded by
the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) but only to the extent that
including the school makes the school eligible for programs for which
specific eligibility is not provided to the school in another provision
of law and the school does not have a student population that is
smaller than the student population of the LEA receiving assistance
under the
[[Page 53410]]
ESEA with the smallest student population, except that the school shall
not be subject to the jurisdiction of any SEA other than the BIE.
(c) The term includes educational service agencies and consortia of
those agencies.
(d) The term includes the SEA in a State in which the SEA is the
sole educational agency for all public schools.
Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
Mental health first aid means the skills needed to recognize and
respond to signs and symptoms of mental health and substance use
challenges and know how to connect individuals to additional resources,
including professional help.
Moderate evidence means that there is evidence of effectiveness of
a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample
that overlaps with the populations or settings proposed to receive that
component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
(i) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 3.0,
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``strong evidence base''
or ``moderate evidence base'' for the corresponding practice guide
recommendation;
(ii) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1,
3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``positive effect''
or ``potentially positive effect'' on a relevant outcome based on a
``medium to large'' extent of evidence, with no reporting of a
``negative effect'' or ``potentially negative effect'' on a relevant
outcome; or
(iii) A single experimental study (as defined in this notice) or
quasi-experimental design study (as defined in this notice) reviewed
and reported by the WWC using version 2.1, 3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC
Handbooks, or otherwise assessed by the Department using version 4.1 of
the WWC Handbook, as appropriate, and that--
(A) Meets WWC standards with or without reservations;
(B) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
(C) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1, 3.0,
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks; and
(D) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State,
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at
least 350 students or other individuals across sites. Multiple studies
of the same project component that each meet requirements in paragraphs
(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of this definition may together satisfy this
requirement.
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Promising evidence means that there is evidence of the
effectiveness of a key project component in improving a relevant
outcome, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
(i) A practice guide prepared by WWC reporting a ``strong evidence
base'' or ``moderate evidence base'' for the corresponding practice
guide recommendation;
(ii) An intervention report prepared by the WWC reporting a
``positive effect'' or ``potentially positive effect'' on a relevant
outcome with no reporting of a ``negative effect'' or ``potentially
negative effect'' on a relevant outcome; or
(iii) A single study assessed by the Department, as appropriate,
that--
(A) Is an experimental study, a quasi-experimental design study, or
a well-designed and well-implemented correlational study with
statistical controls for selection bias (e.g., a study using regression
methods to account for differences between a treatment group and a
comparison group); and
(B) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome.
Quasi-experimental design study means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an experimental study by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important
respects. This type of study, depending on design and implementation
(e.g., establishment of baseline equivalence of the groups being
compared), can meet WWC standards with reservations, but cannot meet
WWC standards without reservations, as described in the WWC Handbooks.
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program.
State educational agency (SEA) means the agency primarily
responsible for the State supervision of public elementary schools and
secondary schools.
Strong evidence means that there is evidence of the effectiveness
of a key project component in improving a relevant outcome for a sample
that overlaps with the populations and settings proposed to receive
that component, based on a relevant finding from one of the following:
(i) A practice guide prepared by the WWC using version 2.1, 3.0,
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``strong evidence base''
for the corresponding practice guide recommendation;
(ii) An intervention report prepared by the WWC using version 2.1,
3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks reporting a ``positive effect''
on a relevant outcome based on a ``medium to large'' extent of
evidence, with no reporting of a ``negative effect'' or ``potentially
negative effect'' on a relevant outcome; or
(iii) A single experimental study reviewed and reported by the WWC
using version 2.1, 3.0, 4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks, or otherwise
assessed by the Department using version 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks, as
appropriate, and that--
(A) Meets WWC standards without reservations;
(B) Includes at least one statistically significant and positive
(i.e., favorable) effect on a relevant outcome;
(C) Includes no overriding statistically significant and negative
effects on relevant outcomes reported in the study or in a
corresponding WWC intervention report prepared under version 2.1, 3.0,
4.0, or 4.1 of the WWC Handbooks; and
(D) Is based on a sample from more than one site (e.g., State,
county, city, school district, or postsecondary campus) and includes at
least 350 students or other individuals across sites. Multiple studies
of the same project component that each meet requirements in paragraphs
(iii)(A), (B), and (C) of this definition may together satisfy the
requirement in this paragraph (iii)(D).
What Works Clearinghouse Handbooks (WWC Handbooks) means the
standards and procedures set forth in the WWC Standards Handbook,
Versions 4.0 or 4.1, and WWC Procedures Handbook, Versions 4.0 or 4.1,
or in the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbook, Version 3.0 or Version
2.1 (all incorporated by
[[Page 53411]]
reference, see Sec. 77.2). Study findings eligible for review under
WWC standards can meet WWC standards without reservations, meet WWC
standards with reservations, or not meet WWC standards. WWC practice
guides and intervention reports include findings from systematic
reviews of evidence as described in the WWC Handbooks documentation.
Note: The What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards
Handbook (Version 4.1), as well as the more recent What Works
Clearinghouse Handbooks released in August 2022 (Version 5.0), are
available at <a href="https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks">https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks</a>.
Application Requirements: We are establishing the following
application requirements for the FY 2024 grant competition and any
subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applications for this competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1)
of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Applicants must include the following in their applications:
(1) A description of the criteria the SEA will use to identify the
high-need LEAs that will receive technical assistance and capacity
building services under this program.
(2) A plan (i.e., description of key activities, milestones,
timeline, resources, performance measures, and partnerships) for
providing the proposed technical assistance and capacity building
services to high-need LEAs.
(3) A plan for developing and disseminating the technical
assistance and capacity building products and resources the SEA
develops, as applicable.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, requirements, and
definitions. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the Secretary
to exempt from rulemaking requirements regulations governing the first
grant competition under a new or substantially revised program
authority. This is the first grant competition for this program under
section 4103(a)(3) of the ESEA and therefore qualifies for this
exemption. In order to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has
decided to forgo public comment on the priority, requirements, and
definitions under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These requirements and
definitions will apply to the FY 2024 grant competition and any
subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Program Authority: Section 4103(a)(3) of the ESEA; Public Law 117-
159 (enacted June 25, 2022), Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, Division
B, Title II, School Improvement Programs.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 97,
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the
Department in 2 CFR part 3474.
Note: The Department will implement the provisions included in the
OMB final rule, OMB Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance, which
amends 2 CFR parts 25, 170, 175, 176, 180, 182, 183, 184, and 200, on
October 1, 2024. Grant applicants that anticipate a performance period
start date on or after October 1, 2024 should follow the provisions
stated in the OMB Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance (89 FR
30046) when preparing an application. For more information about these
updated regulations please visit: <a href="https://www.cfo.gov/resources/uniform-guidance/">https://www.cfo.gov/resources/uniform-guidance/</a>.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian Tribes.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Available Funds: $10,930,000.
Project Period: Up to 36 months. Budgets should be developed for a
single project period of up to 36 months.
Maximum Awards: An SEA may initially request no more than the
maximum amount (as noted below in the designated category ranges) for
its project period. If funds remain available after funding each
successful applicant at its requested amount, the Department may, to
the extent appropriate, increase the awards for successful applicants.
If available funds are insufficient to fully award each successful
applicant at its requested amount, the Department will ratably reduce
the awards for all successful applicants. The budget ranges are as
follows:
Category 1--$500,000-$1,000,000: California, Texas, New York,
Florida.
Category 2--$250,000-$500,000: Illinois, Pennsylvania, Georgia,
Ohio, North Carolina, Michigan, New Jersey.
Category 3--$120,000-250,000: Arizona, Louisiana, Tennessee,
Virginia, Maryland, South Carolina, Alabama, Kentucky, Indiana,
Washington, Missouri, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Oklahoma.
Category 4--$60,000-$150,000: Arkansas, Minnesota, Colorado,
Nevada, Connecticut, Oregon, New Mexico, Kansas, Iowa, West Virginia.
Category 5--$50,000-$100,000: Alaska, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho,
Maine, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island,
South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming, Bureau of Indian Education,
District of Columbia, Puerto Rico.
Category 6--$25,000-$50,000: The Outlying Areas of Guam, American
Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs, as defined in 20 U.S.C. 7801(49); and
the Bureau of Indian Education. (Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA)
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This competition involves supplement-
not-supplant funding requirements. Grantees must use SCTAC funds to
supplement, and not supplant, other non-Federal funds that would
otherwise be used to pay for activities authorized under the SCTAC
program.
c. Indirect Cost Rate Information: This program uses a restricted
indirect cost rate. For more information regarding indirect costs, or
to obtain a negotiated indirect cost rate, please see <a href="http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html">www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/intro.html</a>.
d. Administrative Cost Limitation: This program does not include
any program-specific limitation on administrative expenses. All
administrative expenses must be reasonable and necessary and conform to
Cost Principles described in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E of the Uniform
Guidance.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
4. Equitable Services: (a) Grantees must ensure that equitable
services are provided to eligible students and teachers in non-public
schools as required under section 8501 of the ESEA, including through
timely and meaningful consultation with representatives of non-public
schools.
(b) The SEA must ensure that a public agency will maintain control
of SCTAC funds used to provide services and assistance to non-public
school students and teachers.
(c) The SEA must ensure that a public agency will have title to
materials,
[[Page 53412]]
equipment, and property purchased with SCTAC funds.
(d) The SEA must ensure that services to non-public school students
and teachers with SCTAC funds will be provided by a public agency
directly, or through contract with, another public or private entity.
Note: This section (4) is not applicable to the BIE.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. In
addition, we remind applicants that sections 4001(a) and 4001(b) of the
ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7101) apply to this program. Section 4001(a) requires
entities receiving funds under this program to obtain prior, written,
informed consent from the parent of each child who is under 18 years of
age to participate in any mental-health assessment or service that is
funded under this program and conducted in connection with an
elementary or secondary school. Section 4001(b) prohibits the use of
funds for medical services or drug treatment or rehabilitation, except
for integrated student supports, specialized instructional support
services, or referral to treatment for impacted students, which may
include students who are victims of, or witnesses to, crime or who
illegally use drugs. This prohibition does not preclude the use of
funds to support mental health counseling and support services,
including those provided by a mental health services provider outside
of school, so long as such services are not medical.
IV. Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on December 7, 2022 (87 FR 75045) and available at <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/07/2022-26554/common-instructions-for-applicants-to-department-of-education-discretionary-grant-programs">https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/07/2022-26554/common-instructions-for-applicants-to-department-of-education-discretionary-grant-programs</a>, which contain requirements and information on how to
submit an application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this competition.
3. Recommended Page Limit: The project narrative is where you, the
applicant, address the absolute priority and application requirements.
We recommend that you (1) limit the application narrative to the
equivalent of no more than 10 pages and (2) use the following
standards:
<bullet> A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
<bullet> Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
<bullet> Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
<bullet> Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit applies to the project narrative.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
from 34 CFR 75.210. The maximum score for all selection criteria is 100
points. The points assigned to each criterion are indicated in
parentheses. Non-Federal peer reviewers will evaluate and score each
application program narrative against the following selection criteria:
(a) Quality of the project design (up to 60 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(Up to 30 points)
(2) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs. (Up to 30 points)
(b) Quality of the management plan (Up to 30 points)
The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the adequacy of the
management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on
time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities,
timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks.
(c) Adequacy of resources (Up to 10 points)
The Secretary considers the adequacy of the resources for the
proposed project. In determining the adequacy of resources for the
proposed project, the Secretary considers the potential for continued
support of the project after Federal funding ends, including, as
appropriate, the demonstrated commitment of appropriate entities to
such support.
2. Review and Selection Process: Non-Federal peer reviewers will
review applications to determine the extent to which the applications
address the selection criteria.
We remind potential applicants that, in reviewing applications in
any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under
34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying
out a previous award, such as the applicant's use of funds, achievement
of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The
Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a
timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this program, the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions, and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you receive an award under
this grant program that, over the course of the project period, may
exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000), under
2 CFR 200.205(a)(2), we must make a judgment about your integrity,
business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards--that
is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make an award. In
doing so, we must consider any information about you that is in the
[[Page 53413]]
integrity and performance system (currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for Award Management. You may review and
comment on any information about yourself that a Federal agency
previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
5. In General: In accordance with the Guidance for Federal
Financial Assistance located at 2 CFR part 200, all applicable Federal
laws, and relevant Executive guidance, the Department will review and
consider applications for funding pursuant to this notice inviting
applications in accordance with:
(a) Selecting recipients most likely to be successful in delivering
results based on the program objectives through an objective process of
evaluating Federal award applications (2 CFR 200.205);
(b) Prohibiting the purchase of certain telecommunication and video
surveillance services or equipment in alignment with section 889 of the
National Defense Authorization Act of 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232) (2 CFR
200.216);
(c) Providing a preference, to the extent permitted by law, to
maximize use of goods, products, and materials produced in the United
States (2 CFR 200.322); and
(d) Terminating agreements in whole or in part to the greatest
extent authorized by law if an award no longer effectuates the program
goals or agency priorities (2 CFR 200.340).
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN), or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We also may notify you
informally.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice. We reference the regulations
outlining the terms and conditions of a grant in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice. The Grant Award Notification (GAN)
also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding. This does not apply if you have an
exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to <a href="http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html">www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html</a>.
4. Performance Measures: For the purpose of Department reporting
under 34 CFR 75.110, we have established the following performance
measures for the SCTAC grant program:
(a) The number of technical assistance and capacity-building
services provided to assist high-need LEAs.
(b) The number and percentage of high-need LEAs reporting that the
technical assistance provided was high-quality, relevant, and useful.
(c) The number and percentage of high-need LEAs reporting an
increase in capacity as a result of technical assistance and capacity
building services provided.
These measures constitute the Department's indicators of success
for this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant for a grant
under this program to consider these measures in conceptualizing the
approach and evaluation for its proposed project. Each grantee must
provide, in its performance reports, data about its progress in meeting
these measures.
Consistent with 34 CFR 75.591, grantees funded under this program
must comply with the requirements of any evaluation of the program
conducted by the Department or an evaluator selected by the Department.
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities
can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an
accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an
accessible format that may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or text
format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print,
audiotape, compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at <a href="http://www.govinfo.gov">www.govinfo.gov</a>. At this site, you can view this
document, as well as all other Department documents published in the
Federal Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF, you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access Department documents published in the Federal
Register by using the article search feature at
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov">www.federalregister.gov</a>. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Adam Schott,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Programs, Delegated
the Authority to Perform the Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2024-14000 Filed 6-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 26, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.