Conformance of Cost Accounting Standards to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for Operating Revenue and Lease Accounting
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), Cost Accounting Standards Board (CAS Board or the Board), is releasing this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to elicit public comments on proposed changes to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) to conform them with changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) related to operating revenue and lease accounting. This proposed rule follows issuance of an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) 85 FR 70572 (November, 5, 2020), and a Staff Discussion Paper (SDP) 84 FR 9143 (March 13, 2019).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 53572-53575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13806]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Office of Federal Procurement Policy
48 CFR Parts 9903 and 9904
Conformance of Cost Accounting Standards to Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles for Operating Revenue and Lease Accounting
AGENCY: Cost Accounting Standards Board, Office of Federal Procurement
Policy, Office of Management and Budget.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), Cost
Accounting Standards Board (CAS Board or the Board), is releasing this
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to elicit public comments on
proposed changes to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) to conform them
with changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) related
to operating revenue and lease accounting. This proposed rule follows
issuance of an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) 85 FR
70572 (November, 5, 2020), and a Staff Discussion Paper (SDP) 84 FR
9143 (March 13, 2019).
DATES: Comments must be in writing and must be received by August 26,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Respondents are strongly encouraged to submit comments
electronically to ensure timely receipt. Electronic comments may be
submitted to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6898b848587958486a9aba4e8a3a9b6e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="317e7c7372706273715e5c531f545e411f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>. Be sure to include your name, title,
organization, and reference case 2021-01. If you must submit by regular
mail, please do so at Office of Federal Procurement Policy, 725 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: John L. McClung.
Privacy Act Statement: The CAS Board proposes the rule to elicit
public views pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1502. Submission of comments is
voluntary. The information will be used to inform sound decision-
making. Please note that all comments received in response to this
document may be posted or released in their entirety, including any
personal and business confidential information provided. Do not include
any information you would not like to be made publicly available.
Additionally, the OMB System of Records Notice, OMB Public Input System
of Records, OMB/INPUT/01, 88 FR 20913 (available at
<a href="http://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/07/2023-07452/privacy-act-of-1974-system-of-records">www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/07/2023-07452/privacy-act-of-1974-system-of-records</a>), includes a list of routine uses associated
with the collection of this information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John L. McClung, Manager, Cost
Accounting Standards Board (telephone: 202-881-9758; email:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d07020503430143000e0e0118030a5f2d02000f4308021d430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f9fcfbfdbdffbdfef0f0ffe6fdf4a1d3fcfef1bdf6fce3bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 820 of Public Law 114-328 directed the Board to conform CAS
to GAAP to the maximum extent practicable. In accordance with 41 U.S.C.
1502(c), the Board is required to consult with interested persons
concerning the advantages, disadvantages, and improvements anticipated
in the pricing and administration of Government contracts as a result
of the adoption of a proposed Standard, prior to the promulgation of
any new or revised CAS.
On March 13, 2019, the Board published a Staff Discussion Paper
(SDP) (84 FR 9143) to solicit views with respect to the Board's
statutory requirement to review and conform CAS requirements, where
practicable, to GAAP. Respondents were invited to comment, among other
things, on whether and how CAS may need to be modified to conform to
changes to GAAP that occurred after a related CAS was promulgated. More
specifically, the SDP asked what recommended actions, if any, the Board
should take regarding the changes in GAAP for operating revenue and
lease accounting rules. The Board recognized that since the initial
promulgation of CAS 403 (38 FR 26680, Dec. 14, 1972), numerous changes
have been made to GAAP. This growth in GAAP content presents
opportunities to modify or eliminate overlapping CAS requirements where
GAAP standards may be applied reasonably as a substitute for CAS.
Furthermore, some changes in GAAP may create inconsistencies not
contemplated during the initial promulgations of CAS requiring action
by the Board.
Public comments received on the SDP, amongst other things, urged
the Board to prioritize efforts to address changes in GAAP related to
operating revenue and lease accounting. In response to these comments,
the Board issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on
November 5, 2020 (85 FR 70572) that described changes to the CAS that,
if adopted, would (i) align CAS with GAAP on the handling of operating
revenue and (ii) clarify CAS definitions to make clear that GAAP
changes on lease accounting are not recognized for CAS purposes.
This NPRM addresses the public comments received in response to the
ANPRM and also reflects research accomplished by the Board in response
to the ANPRM. The NPRM is issued by the Board in accordance with the
requirements of 41 U.S.C. 1502(c).
II. Operating Revenue
A. Overview. The definitions of operating revenue in CAS and
revenue in GAAP are currently different. The GAAP definition of
``revenue,'' found at Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606-10-20, reads as follows:
Inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or
settlements of its liabilities (or a combination of both) from
delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or other
activities that constitute the entity's ongoing major or central
operations.
The CAS 403-30(a)(3) definition of ``operating revenue'' reads as
follows:
. . . amounts accrued or charge[d] to customers, clients, and
tenants, for the sale of products manufactured or purchased for
resale, for services, and for rentals of property held primarily for
leasing to others. It includes both reimbursable costs and fees
under cost-type contracts and percentage-of-completion sales
accruals except that it includes only the fee for management
contracts under which the contractor essentially acts as an agent of
the Government in the erection or operation of Government-owned
facilities. It excludes incidental interest, dividends, royalty, and
rental income, and proceeds from the sale of assets used in the
business.
In the ANPRM, the Board stated its belief that the definition in
GAAP is essentially equivalent to the CAS, but noted that when a
contractor essentially acts as an agent of the Government in the
erection or operation of Government-owned facilities, CAS limits the
measurement of operating revenue to only the fee earned for managing
the contract. The Board also noted that GAAP does not provide such a
limitation. The ANPRM included language that, if adopted, would remove
the definition of operating revenue from CAS 403 and rely on the
definition of revenue in GAAP, but retain the CAS 403 criterion
regarding only utilizing the ``fee for management contracts under which
the contractor essentially acts as an agent of the Government in the
erection or operation of
[[Page 53573]]
Government-owned facilities.'' Finally, the ANPRM asked whether changes
to cost accounting practices to conform Operating Revenue to ASC 606
should be considered to be a required change, a unilateral change, or
desirable change in accordance with 48 CFR 9903.201-4(a)(4)(i), (ii),
or (iii), respectively.
B. Public comments. The Board received three sets of public
comments in response to the ANPRM. These comments came from industry
associations with inputs from member companies.
Comment: All commenters agree with relying on GAAP for operating
revenue. However, they believe the Board's desire to retain the CAS 403
criterion regarding only utilizing the ``fee for management contracts
under which the contractor essentially acts as an agent of the
Government in the erection or operation of Government-owned
facilities,'' was unnecessary. The commenters pointed out the
additional conceptual framework GAAP includes related to the principal
versus agent relationship in contracts with customers.
Response: While GAAP does not provide an express limitation in
measuring revenue under this specific type of government contract, the
Board agrees that it does recognize a conceptual framework consistent
with the intent of the CAS 403 limitation. In determining revenue,
GAAP, specifically FASB ASC 606--Revenue from contracts with customers,
requires an entity to consider whether it is acting as a principal or
an agent for each specified good or service promised to a customer. ASC
606-10-55-38 reads as follows:
An entity is an agent if the entity's performance obligation is
to arrange for the provision of the specified good or service by
another party. An entity that is an agent does not control the
specified good or service provided by another party before that good
or service is transferred to the customer. When (or as) an entity
that is an agent satisfies a performance obligation, the entity
recognizes revenue in the amount of any fee or commission to which
it expects to be entitled in exchange for arranging the specified
goods or services to be provided by the other party. An entity's fee
or commission might be the net amount of consideration that the
entity retains after paying the other party the consideration
received in exchange for the goods or services to be provided by
that party.
The relationship of a contractor performing on Government-owned-
contractor-operated (GOCO) facilities contracts is similar enough to
that of an agent as described in ASC 606-10-55-38, that the Board
expects a government contractor would record revenue the same using the
GAAP, as it would under CAS. For these reasons, the NPRM proposes to
delete the definition of operating revenue in its entirety from CAS 403
and rely on the definition of revenue in GAAP.
Comment: All commenters believed the proposed changes related to
operating revenue fall under the definition of a required change. They
all also believed the Board should view this topic more broadly to all
CAS/GAAP efforts and suggested the Board exempt CAS/GAAP conformance
efforts from the cost impact process by adding to the existing
exemption for External Restructuring (see 48 CFR 9903.201-8). The main
rationale provided was that the CAS/GAAP conformance efforts are not
expected to have a material impact on the government or contractor;
however, the administrative burden associated with preparing and
evaluating cost impact proposals could be significant with minimal to
no impacts.
Response: The Board agrees that the proposed changes fall under the
definition of a required change. Because the CAS and GAAP definitions
of operating revenue are essentially the same, the Board does not
anticipate any material impact to the Government or contractors as a
result of this change. The Board also appreciates the need for careful
consideration of the cost and benefits associated with CAS/GAAP
conformance efforts, and the potential role the cost impact process may
play in executing changes. However, the Board does not believe it would
be prudent to make an across-the-board determination that all future
CAS/GAAP conformance efforts are required changes, and also exempt from
the cost impact process in advance of performing due diligence on each
case to determine that the changes are consistent with its Guiding
Principles--i.e., that they minimize burden on contractors, protect the
interests of the Federal Government, and materially achieve uniformity
and consistency in cost accounting, without bias or prejudice to either
party. For operating revenue, the Board has provisionally determined
that the change is required and an exemption from the cost impact
process is clearly warranted due to the efficiency gained without
prejudice to either party. More specifically, there would be a
quantifiable administrative burden on both parties to execute the
required cost impact process and, in this case, the administrative
burden on both parties would clearly outweigh the minimal benefit
derived by either party from the cost impact process.
C. NPRM. Based on public comment and additional research conducted
by the Board, the Board continues to believe that the definition of
operating revenue in CAS and revenue in GAAP are essentially
equivalent. Based on the additional research on ASC 606-10-55-38
discussed above, the Board now further believes that entities would
operate as agents for the government when performing under a GOCO
facilities contract. On this basis, the Board has provisionally
concluded that the CAS 403 definition of operating revenue has become
unnecessary to protect the Government's interests and may be deleted in
its entirety to allow for reliance on GAAP and other CAS Standards. The
Board has also provisionally concluded that accounting changes related
to conformance of the CAS definition of operating revenue to GAAP ASC
606 is a required change as described at 48 CFR 9903.201-4(a).
These actions would be consistent with the Board's guiding
principles for conforming CAS to GAAP because it would eliminate CAS
content to minimize the burden on contractors while protecting the
interests of the Federal Government. Furthermore, the Board's
provisional conclusion of relying on GAAP for the definition of
operating revenue in CAS 403 would align with the guiding principles to
rely on coverage in GAAP, when it would materially achieve uniformity
and consistency in cost accounting without bias or prejudice to either
party, rely on other CAS Standards which may protect the Government's
interests, and eliminate CAS coverage no longer necessary.
Therefore, the Board is proposing a rule that would (i) modify CAS
403 to rely on GAAP for revenue and (ii) exempt properly disclosed
changes related to this conformance effort from the contract price and
cost adjustment requirements of part 9903. The NPRM would also remove
the term ``operating'' in relation to revenue in CAS 403. The Board
believes this change is necessary to avoid confusion and make clear
that the definition of revenue in GAAP is consistent with ``operating
revenue''' as historically used in CAS. Additional research by the
Board revealed that the CAS standard predated the codification of GAAP
by FASB. Operating Revenue was defined to exclude other forms of
revenue (or income) beyond the contractor's normal operations. As noted
above, this change is consistent with the definition of revenue in GAAP
which makes clear revenue is generated by ``activities that constitute
the entity's ongoing major or central operations.''
[[Page 53574]]
The Board seeks comment on the NPRM and requests specific input on
whether there are any instances where an entity might not consider
itself an agent, based on ASC 606-10-55-38, when performing on a GOCO
contract.
III. Lease Accounting
A. Overview. Since the initial promulgations of CAS 414 and 417,
changes have been made to GAAP related to lease accounting that have
caused confusion about which assets should be included in the
calculations of Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCM). Specifically,
the GAAP requirements to treat ``right of use'' assets, that were
formerly known as operating leases, as assets and liabilities require
clarification from the Board to avoid confusion or inconsistent
treatment. In the ANPRM, the Board proposed clarifications to the CAS
definition and handling of tangible capital assets to make clear that
GAAP requirements to classify ``right of use'' assets on an entity's
balance sheet should not be recognized as assets for the purpose of
computing FCCM in CAS 414 and CAS 417.
B. Public comments. The Board received three sets of public
comments to the ANPRM from industry associations with inputs from
member companies. All of the comments essentially addressed the same
issue regarding the need for further clarification.
Comment: All commenters agreed with the need for the definitional
changes of both tangible and intangible assets to include financing
leases and exclude operating leases. However, they believed the Board's
proposed language may still be too ambiguous to achieve the desired
goal of avoiding confusion or inconsistent treatment. One commenter
further explained that the proposed changes to the definitions of
tangible and intangible capital assets associate all right-of-use (ROU)
assets with operating leases and that this linkage may not hold true
because leases in general are associated with ROU assets. For example,
ROU assets from financing leases may be reported within the property,
plant, and equipment asset category; whereas, ROU assets from operating
leases may be reported as a separate asset category. To avoid
confusion, commenters urged the Board to modify the definitions of
tangible and intangible assets to exclude only ROU operating lease
assets. By making this change, ROU assets for operating leases will be
inherently recognized as a separate asset category for CAS purposes--
neither tangible nor intangible.
Response: The Board appreciates these comments and has considered
the recommendations in the proposed rule to provide additional clarity.
C. NPRM. Based on public comment, the Board is proposing a rule
that would make clarifications to CAS addressing which assets should be
included in the calculations of Facilities Capital Cost of Money
(FCCM). The NPRM adopts language in the ANPRM with additional
clarification. Specifically, the Board is proposing to revise the
definition of intangible capital assets shown at 48 CFR 9904.414-
30(a)(4) and 9904.417-30(a)(1), as well as the definition of tangible
capital assets shown at 48 CFR 9904.403-30(a)(5), 9904.404-30(a)(4),
9904.409-30(a)(3), 9904.414-30(a)(5), and 9904.417-30(a)(2), and add
clarifying language in appendix A. to 9904.414, in the Instructions for
Form CASB CMF. The Board seeks public comment on the NPRM.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 9903 and 9904
Government procurement, Cost Accounting Standards.
Christine J. Harada,
Senior Advisor Office of Federal Procurement Policy, and Chair, Cost
Accounting Standards Board, performing by delegation the duties of the
Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy proposes to amend Chapter 99 of Title 48 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PARTS 9903--CONTRACT COVERAGE
0
1. The authority citation for part 9903 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 111-350, 124 Stat. 3677, 41 U.S.C. 1502.
Sec. 9903.301 [Amended]
0
2. Section 9903.301 is amended in paragraph (a) by removing the
definition ``operating revenue''.
PART 9904--COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
0
3. The authority citation for part 9904 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 100-679, 102 Stat. 4056, 41 U.S.C. 422.
0
4. Section 9904.403-30 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph
(a)(3) and revising paragraph (a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 9904.403-30 Definitions.
(a) * * *
(5) Tangible capital asset means an asset that has physical
substance, more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by an
enterprise for continued use or possession beyond the current
accounting period for the services it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-use assets that were formerly known as
operating leases.
* * * * *
Sec. 9904.403-40 [Amended]
0
5. Section 9904.403-40 is amended by removing the word ``operating'' in
paragraph (c)(2) wherever it appears.
0
6. Section 9904.403-50 is amended by revising subparagraph (c)(1)(ii)
to read as follows:
Sec. 9904.403-50 Techniques for application.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) The percentage of the segment's revenue to the total revenue
of all segments. For this purpose, the method used for determining
revenue for financial accounting shall be used. The revenue, however,
of any segment shall include amounts charged to other segments and
shall be reduced by amounts charged by other segments for purchases.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 9904.404-30 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read
as follows:
Sec. 9904.404-30 Definitions.
(a) * * *
(4) Tangible capital asset means an asset that has physical
substance, more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by an
enterprise for continued use or possession beyond the current
accounting period for the service it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-use assets that were formerly known as
operating leases.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 9904.409-30 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(3) to read
as follows:
Sec. 9904.409-30 Definitions.
(a) * * *
(3) Tangible capital asset means an asset that has physical
substance, more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by an
enterprise for continued use or possession beyond the current
accounting period for the services it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-
[[Page 53575]]
use assets that were formerly known as operating leases.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 9904.414-30 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(4) and (5)
to read as follows:
Sec. 9904.414-30 Definitions.
(a) * * *
(4) Intangible capital asset means an asset that has no physical
substance, has more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by
an enterprise for continued use or possession beyond the current
accounting period for the benefits it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-use assets that were formerly known as
operating leases.
(5) Tangible capital asset means an asset that has physical
substance, more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by an
enterprise for continued use or possession beyond the current
accounting period for the services it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-use assets that were formerly known as
operating leases.
* * * * *
0
10. Appendix A to 9904.414 is amended by revising the paragraph under
the undesignated center heading ``Recorded, Leased Property,
Corporate,'' to read as follows:
Appendix A to 9904.414--Instructions for Form CASB CMF
* * * * *
Recorded, Leased Property, Corporate
The net book value of facilities capital items in this column
shall represent the average balances outstanding during the cost
accounting period. This applies both to items that are subject to
periodic depreciation or amortization and also to such items as land
that are not subject to periodic write-offs. Unless there is a major
fluctuation, it is adequate to ascertain the net book value of these
assets at the beginning and end of each cost accounting period, and
to compute anaverage of the beginning and ending values.
``Recorded'' facilities are the capital items owned bythe
contractor, carried on the books of the business unit, and used in
its regular business activity. ``Leased property'' is the
capitalized value of leases for which constructive costs of
ownership are allowed in lieu of rental costs under Government
procurement regulations. Leases classified as right-of-use assets
for financial accounting purposes that were formerly known as
operating leases, are excluded from facilities capital items
reported on this form. Corporate or group facilities are the
business unit's allocable share of corporate-owned and leased
facilities. The net book value of items of facilities capital which
are held or controlled by the home office shall be allocated to the
business unit on a basis consistent with the home office expense
allocation.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 9904.417-30 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and
(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 9904.417-30 Definitions.
(a) * * *
(1) Intangible capital asset means an asset that has no physical
substance, has more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by
an enterprise for continued use or possession beyond the current
accounting period for the benefits it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-use assets that were formerly known as
operating leases.
(2) Tangible capital asset means an asset that has physical
substance, more than minimal value, and is expected to be held by an
enterprise for continued use of possession beyond the current
accounting period for the services it yields. It includes assets
classified as finance leases for financial accounting purposes and
excludes those right-of-use assets that were formerly known as
operating leases.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-13806 Filed 6-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.