Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Prairie du Chien, WI
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters on the Upper Mississippi River between 636-635, east of Island number one hundred seventy-two. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by high-speed power vessels. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sector Upper Mississippi River.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 117 (Monday, June 17, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51219-51221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-13301]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0366]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Prairie du Chien, WI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
[[Page 51220]]
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters on the Upper Mississippi River between 636-635, east
of Island number one hundred seventy-two. The safety zone is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created by high-speed power vessels. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port, Sector Upper Mississippi River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on June 21, 2024, through 6
p.m. on June 23, 2024. The rule is subject to enforcement from 6 a.m.
through 6 p.m. each day.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-
2024-0366 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email MST1 Benjamin Conger, Sector Upper Mississippi River
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-
2550, email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c98baca7a3a8a4a0a7e78de78aa6a7aeacbb89bcbaaaaee7a4a0a5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eeac8b80848f838780c0aac0ad8180898b9cae9b9d8d89c0838782">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable due to the date the event is taking place. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish this safety
zone by June 21, 2024, and lacks sufficient time to provide a
reasonable comment period and to consider those comments before issuing
the rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
due to the date the event is taking place. Delaying the effective date
of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to public interest
because we must establish the safety zone by June 21, 2024, in order to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the
potential safety hazards associated with the high-speed power vessel
racecourse event occurring on that date.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi River (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards associated with Great Lakes
Watercross Race, on June 21, 2024, will be a safety concern for anyone
within the marked area of the racecourse. This rule is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable
waters within the safety zone while the race is being conducted.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 6 a.m. through 6 p.m. each
day on June 21 to June 23, 2024. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters within the Great Lakes Watercross Race, on the Upper
Mississippi River, between Mile Markers 635 to 636 east of Island
number one hundred seventy-two. The duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while the race is conducted. No vessel or person will
be permitted to transit the safety zone without obtaining permission
from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the limited
duration and narrowly tailored geographic areas of the safety zone.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by the
safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant because
the local waterways users will be notified to ensure the safety zone
will result in minimal impact. In addition, normal marine traffic will
be minimally impacted as race officials will allow traffic to pass
between races. The navigation channel west of Island number one hundred
seventy-two will not be impacted by the safety zone and will remain
open. The vessels desiring to transit through or around the temporary
safety zone may do so upon express permission from the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
[[Page 51221]]
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. that will prohibit entry
between Mile Markers 635-636 east of Island number one hundred seventy-
two. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01,
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0366 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0366 Safety Zone; Upper Mississippi River, Mile Markers
635-636 east of Island number one hundred seventy-two, Prairie du
Chien, WI.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters within the Upper Mississippi River, Mile Markers 635-636 east of
Island number one hundred seventy-two, Prairie du Chien, WI.
(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative. A designated representative is a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)
assigned to units under the operational control of the USCG Sector
Upper Mississippi River.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through USCG Sector Upper
Mississippi River at 314-269-2332. Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period: This safety zone will be subject to
enforcement from 6 a.m. through 6 p.m. each day from June 21 to June
23, 2024.
Dated: June 11, 2024.
A.R. Bender,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi
River.
[FR Doc. 2024-13301 Filed 6-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.