Notice2024-11343

CG Railway, LLC-Operation Exemption-Rail Ferry Service

Primary source

Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.

Published
May 23, 2024

Issuing agencies

Surface Transportation Board

Full Text

<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 101 (Thursday, May 23, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 101 (Thursday, May 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45728-45729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-11343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. FD 36775]


CG Railway, LLC--Operation Exemption--Rail Ferry Service

    CG Railway, LLC (CGR), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 for after-the-fact 
authority to operate a rail ferry service between the Port of Mobile, 
Ala., and the U.S. maritime boundary line in the Gulf of Mexico.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ By decision served April 4, 2024, in another proceeding, the 
Board directed CGR to indicate whether it had ever received Board 
authority to operate the rail car ferry service and, if not, to seek 
after-the-fact authority or explain why it believed authorization is 
not needed. GM[eacute]xico Transportes, S.A.B. de C.V.--Acquis. of 
Control Exemption--CG Ry., FD 36701, slip op. at 5 (STB served Apr. 
4, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the verified notice, CGR provides a rail ferry service 
between the Port of Mobile and the Port of Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz in 
Mexico. CGR states that it began its rail ferry service in 2001 out of 
the Port of Mobile after receiving Board authorization for the lease 
and operation of certain tracks from the Terminal Railway Alabama State 
Docks (TASD) in Mobile, Ala.,\2\ and that CGR's rail operations in 
Mobile are currently conducted pursuant to an exemption received in 
2007 to lease from TASD and operate 0.583 miles of rail line.\3\ CGR 
states, however, that

[[Page 45729]]

while it sought and obtained Board authorization for its operations of 
track within the Port of Mobile, its prior notices of exemption did not 
request, and thus GCR did not receive, authorization for operation of 
the rail ferry service. CGR represents that it is the common carrier 
responsible for the operation of the rail ferry service,\4\ and now 
seeks after-the-fact authorization to operate the service between the 
Port of Mobile and the U.S. maritime boundary line in the Gulf of 
Mexico.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Cent. Gulf Ry.--Lease & Operation Exemption--Terminal 
Ry. Ala. State Docks, FD 33891 (STB served July 6, 2000).
    \3\ See CG Ry.--Lease & Operation Exemption--Terminal Ry. Ala. 
State Docks, FD 35009 (STB served Apr. 12, 2007). As described in 
the verified notice that CGR filed in Docket No. FD 35009, this line 
is different from the line that was the subject of the notice in 
Docket No. FD 33891.
    \4\ The Verified Notice explains that CGR holds itself out as 
the common carrier for the rail service and is responsible for all 
commercial activities in support of the rail ferry service. CGR also 
provides details concerning its arrangements for chartering and 
operating the rail ferry vessels.
    \5\ CGR is not seeking retroactive effectiveness for the 
exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    GCR certifies that the operation of the rail ferry service does not 
involve any interchange commitments. CGR further certifies that its 
projected revenues as a result of the rail ferry service will not 
result in the creation of a Class I or Class II rail carrier. However, 
CGR states that its annual revenues exceed, and are expected to 
continue to exceed, $5 million. Pursuant to 49 CFR 1150.42(e), if a 
carrier's projected annual revenues will exceed $5 million, it must, at 
least 60 days before the exemption becomes effective, post a notice of 
its intent to undertake the proposed transaction at the workplace of 
the employees on the affected lines, serve a copy of the notice on the 
national offices of the labor unions for those employees, and certify 
to the Board that it has done so. According to the verified notice, CGR 
posted the required 60-day notice at the workplaces of CGR employees 
and certified to the Board that it had done so on May 7, 2024.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ CGR states that none of CGR's employees are represented by a 
union.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The earliest this exemption may become effective is July 6, 2024 
(60 days after the certification under 49 CFR 1150.42(e) was filed).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ CGR believes that a partial waiver of the 60-day notice 
period would be appropriate, where after-the-fact authority is being 
sought and no operational changes will result, but CGR states that 
it is not seeking such a waiver and that it understands that the 
exemption would not be effective until 60 days after its 
certification was filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than June 28, 2024 
(at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
    All pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 36775, must be filed with 
the Surface Transportation Board either via e-filing on the Board's 
website or in writing addressed to 395 E Street SW, Washington, DC 
20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading must be served on 
CGR's representative, Eric M. Hocky, Clark Hill PLC, Two Commerce 
Square, 2001 Market Street, Suite 2620, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
    According to CGR, this action is categorically excluded from 
environmental review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(1)(i) and from historic 
reporting requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b)(1).
    Board decisions and notices are available at <a href="http://www.stb.gov">www.stb.gov</a>.

    Decided: May 20, 2024.

    By the Board, Mai T. Dinh, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2024-11343 Filed 5-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P


</pre></body>
</html>
Indexed from Federal Register on May 23, 2024.

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.