Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From Türkiye: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) from the Republic of T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 87 (Friday, May 3, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 87 (Friday, May 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36759-36761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-09621]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-489-839]
Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From T[uuml]rkiye: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily
determines that common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) from the Republic of
T[uuml]rkiye (T[uuml]rkiye) was sold in the United States at less than
normal value during the period of review (POR) April 1, 2022, through
March 31, 2023. Interested parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable May 3, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3148.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 27, 2021, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on
common alloy aluminum sheet from T[uuml]rkiye.\1\ On June 12, 2023, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(i), Commerce initiated an
administrative review of the Order, covering eight producers/exporters:
Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.; Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret
A.S. (Assan); Kibar Americas, Inc.; Kibar Dis Ticaret A.S.; Panda
Aluminyum A.S.; PMS Metal Profil Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.; TAC
Metal Ticaret Anonim Sirketi; and Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.
(Teknik).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Bahrain, Brazil,
Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania,
Serbia, Slovenia, Southern Africa, Spain, Taiwan and the Republic of
Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 22139 (April 27, 2021)
(Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 88 FR 38021 (June 12, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), on December 11, 2023, Commerce determined that it
was not practicable to complete the preliminary results of this review
within 245 days and extended the deadline for the preliminary results
of this review until April 26, 2024.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated December
11, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a detailed description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is available via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Common Alloy
Aluminum Sheet from T[uuml]rkiye; 2022-2023,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order is CAAS from T[uuml]rkiye.
Products subject to the Order are currently classified under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings
7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3096, 7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3095,
7606.91.6095, 7606.92.3035, and 7606.92.6095. Further, merchandise that
falls within the scope of the Order may also be entered into the United
States under HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3015,
7606.12.3025, 7606.12.3035, 7606.12.3091, 7606.91.3055, 7606.91.6055,
7606.92.3025, 7606.92.6055, 7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise subject to this scope is
dispositive. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a) of the Act. We calculated constructed export price in accordance
with section 772 of the Act and normal value in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying
these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of the Review
We preliminarily determine the following weighted-average dumping
margins for the period April 1, 2022, through March 31, 2023:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight-
average
Exporter or producer dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S................... 1.49
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S............................. 2.59
Non-Selected Companies.................................. 2.04
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Companies Not Individually Examined
Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when
calculating the all-others rate, Commerce will exclude any zero and de
minimis weighted-average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-
average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly,
Commerce's usual practice has been to average the margins for selected
respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available. In this review, we calculated a weighted-
average dumping margin of 1.49 percent for Assan and 2.59 percent for
Teknik. In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce
has assigned the average of these two calculated weighted-average
dumping margins, 2.04 percent, to the non-selected companies in these
preliminary results.
Disclosure and Public Comment
Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results of review to interested parties within five days of
the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs to Commerce no
later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\5\
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed not later than seven days after the date for filing
[[Page 36760]]
case briefs.\6\ Interested parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument:
(1) a statement of the issue; and (2) a table of authorities.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative Protective
Order, Service, and Other Procedures in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings,88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29,
2023) (APO and Service Final Rule).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As provided under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior
proceedings, we have encouraged interested parties to provide an
executive summary of their brief that should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes. In this review, we instead request that
interested parties provide, at the beginning of their briefs, a public
executive summary for each issue raised in their briefs.\8\ Further, we
request that interested parties limit their executive summary of each
issue to no more than 450 words, not including citations. We intend to
use the executive summaries as the basis of the comment summaries
included in the issues and decision memorandum that will accompany the
final results in this administrative review. We request that interested
parties include footnotes for relevant citations in the executive
summary of each issue. Note that Commerce has amended certain of its
requirements pertaining to the service of documents in 19 CFR
351.303(f).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ We use the term ``issue'' here to describe an argument that
Commerce would normally address in a comment of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\9\ See APO and Service Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically filed hearing request must be received
successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within
30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should
contain: (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; (3) whether any participant is a foreign
national; and (4) a list of issues the party intends to discuss. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective
case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, Commerce
intends to hold the hearing at a date and time to be determined.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120
days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of
this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP
no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory
injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication).
If Assan's or Teknik's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero
or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of
this review, Commerce intends to calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer's examined sales to the total entered
value of those sales. Where we do not have entered values for all U.S.
sales to a particular importer, we will calculate an importer-specific,
per-unit assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total
quantity of those sales.\11\ To determine whether an importer-specific,
per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem
ratio based on estimated entered values. If either Assan's or Teknik's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis or where an
importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\12\ See 19 CFR 352.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice,
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Assan or
Teknik for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined
for the United States, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate those
entries at the all-others rate in the original less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation (i.e., 4.85 percent) if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the company-specific cash deposit rate for
Assan and Teknik will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this review for each respondent
(except, if that rate is de minimis, then the cash deposit rate will be
zero); (2) for producers or exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which they were
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or a
prior segment of the proceeding but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 4.85 percent, the all-others rate
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\14\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Order, 85 FR at 17866.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
[[Page 36761]]
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: April 26, 2024.
Ryan Majerus,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the
non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation
V. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
VI. Discussion of the Methodology
VII. Currency Conversion
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2024-09621 Filed 5-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.