Safety Zone; Submarine Power Cables Stone Laying Project, Straits of Mackinac, MI
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of Tug Nancy Anne, Tug Champion, Tug General, Tug WM. Boyd, Tug Shirley Ann, crew boat Timmy V., barges Koko II, Koko III, Koko IV, MM 141, MM 142, D Barge 2002, D Barge 2006, and D Barge 2007. The safety zone is needed to protect the vessels while laying stones to protect exposed sections of 138kV Submarine Power Cables in the Straits of Mackinac, MI. Entry of vessels into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Northern Great Lakes.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 86 (Thursday, May 2, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 86 (Thursday, May 2, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35714-35716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-09536]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0278]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Submarine Power Cables Stone Laying Project, Straits
of Mackinac, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of Tug Nancy Anne, Tug
Champion, Tug General, Tug WM. Boyd, Tug Shirley Ann, crew boat Timmy
V., barges Koko II, Koko III, Koko IV, MM 141, MM 142, D Barge 2002, D
Barge 2006, and D Barge 2007. The safety zone is needed to protect the
vessels while laying stones to protect exposed sections of 138kV
Submarine Power Cables in the Straits of Mackinac, MI. Entry of vessels
into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Northern Great Lakes.
DATES: This rule is effective from May 1, 2024, 12 a.m. through October
1, 2024, 11:59 p.m. local time. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from May 1, 2024 until May 4, 2024. Comments and
related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June
18, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-
2024-0278 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LT Rebecca Simpson, Sector Northern Great Lakes Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 906-635-3223, email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#196a6a74696b7c6f7c776d707677596c6a7a7e37747075"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcafafb1acaeb9aab9b2a8b5b3b29ca9afbfbbf2b1b5b0">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
[[Page 35715]]
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable.
It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because this safety zone
must be established by May 1, 2024, and we lack sufficient time to
provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments
before issuing the rule.
For the same reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, a 30 day
delay of the effective date would be contrary to public interest
because action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with the stone laying project over submarine power cables
and the potential hazard from other vessels transiting the Straits of
Mackinac at the same time this project is being conducted.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector Northern Great Lakes (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the stone laying
project over submarine power cables starting May 1, 2024, will be a
safety concern for anyone within a 500-yard radius of the industrial
construction equipment, including Tug Nancy Anne, Tug Champion, Tug
General, Tug WM. Boyd, Tug Shirley Ann, crew boat Timmy V., barges Koko
II, Koko III, Koko IV, MM 141, MM 142, D Barge 2002, D Barge 2006, and
D Barge 2007. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone
while the stone laying operation is being conducted.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 12 a.m. on May 1, 2024
until 11:59 p.m. on October 1, 2024. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters within the Mackinac Regulated Navigation Area within
500 yards of vessels and machinery being used to lay stone over exposed
138kV submarine power cables. The duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while the stone is being laid. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission
from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration
and location of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which would impact a small, designated
area of the Straits of Mackinac. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Local Notice to Mariners about the safety zone, and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In
[[Page 35716]]
particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the
expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone to cover all navigable waters within the Mackinac Regulated
Navigation Area within 500 yards of vessels and machinery being used to
lay stone over 138kV submarine power cables. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60a of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. We seek any comments
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0278 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0278 Safety Zone; Tugs Nancy Anne, Champion, General,
WM. Boyd, Shirley Ann, crew boat Timmy V., and barges Koko II, Koko
III, Koko IV, MM 141, MM 142, D Barge 2002, D Barge 2006, and D Barge
2007 operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters within 500 yards of the Tug Nancy Anne, Tug Champion, Tug
General, Tug WM. Boyd, Tug Shirley Ann, crew boat Timmy V., barges Koko
II, Koko III, Koko IV, MM 141, MM 142, D Barge 2002, D Barge 2006, and
D Barge 2007 while laying stone over the Submarine Power cables within
the Straits of Mackinac RNA.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Northern Great Lakes (COTP) in the enforcement of
the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Channel 16 or telephone at (906) 635-3233. Those
in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
Dated: April 24, 2024.
J.R. Bendle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Northern Great
Lakes.
[FR Doc. 2024-09536 Filed 5-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.