Notice2024-08931
Proposed Inclusion of Terrain Factors in the Definition of Rural Area for Federal Office of Rural Health Policy Grants
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
April 26, 2024
Issuing agencies
Health and Human Services DepartmentHealth Resources and Services Administration
Abstract
HRSA's Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) utilizes clear, consistent, and data-driven methods of defining rural areas in the United States for the purposes of determining eligibility for its rural health grant programs. FORHP monitors ongoing national research and, as appropriate, considers updates to its definition. Because access to needed health care is likely to be reduced when roads are most difficult to traverse, with this notice, FORHP proposes to modify the definition of rural areas by integrating the new Road Ruggedness Scale (RRS) released in 2023 by the Economic Research Service (ERS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which characterizes topographic variability, or ruggedness, of roads. This proposal does not impact rural areas included in the current FORHP definition. This notice seeks public comment on FORHP's proposal. This notice also includes a technical clarification explaining how FORHP will use Census data to identify outlying Metropolitan Statistical Area counties that qualify as rural in future updates given the U.S. Census Bureau's 2020 Census terminology changes that removed the categories of Urban Clusters and Urbanized Areas.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 82 (Friday, April 26, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 82 (Friday, April 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32451-32453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-08931]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
Proposed Inclusion of Terrain Factors in the Definition of Rural
Area for Federal Office of Rural Health Policy Grants
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HRSA's Federal Office of Rural Health Policy (FORHP) utilizes
clear, consistent, and data-driven methods of defining rural areas in
the United States for the purposes of determining eligibility for its
rural health grant programs. FORHP monitors ongoing national research
and, as appropriate, considers updates to its definition. Because
access to needed health care is likely to be reduced when roads are
most difficult to traverse, with this notice, FORHP proposes to modify
the definition of rural areas by integrating the new Road Ruggedness
Scale (RRS) released in 2023 by the Economic Research Service (ERS) of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which characterizes topographic
variability, or ruggedness, of roads. This proposal does not impact
rural areas included in the current FORHP definition. This notice seeks
public comment on FORHP's proposal. This notice also includes a
technical clarification explaining how FORHP will use Census data to
identify outlying Metropolitan Statistical Area counties that qualify
as rural in future updates given the U.S. Census Bureau's 2020 Census
terminology changes that removed the categories of Urban Clusters and
Urbanized Areas.
[[Page 32452]]
DATES: Submit comments no later than May 28, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#31434443505d415e5d58524871594342501f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b494e495a574b54575258427b5349485a155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greta Stuhlsatz, Statistician, Policy
Research Division, FORHP, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland
20857; (301) 443-0835; and <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dba9aea9bab7abb4b7b2b8a29bb3a9a8baf5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="addfd8dfccc1ddc2c1c4ced4edc5dfdecc83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 711 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 912) directs
FORHP to advise the Secretary of HHS on policies affecting rural
hospitals and health care and coordinating activities within HHS that
relate to rural health care. Since the 1990s, FORHP has administered
grants that support activities related to increasing access to health
care in rural areas. FORHP's authorizing statute does not, however,
include a definition of ``rural area.'' To carry out this charge, FORHP
monitors ongoing national research and analysis efforts related to
defining geographic areas and rurality. As new methods and data become
available, FORHP may consider revisions to the definition.
Historically, there have been two principal definitions of
``rural'' that were in use by the Federal Government: The U.S. Census
Bureau urban-rural classification (<a href="https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html">https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html</a>) and the Office
of Management and Budget's definition of metropolitan, also called
metro, areas (<a href="https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/metro-micro.html">https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/metro-micro.html</a>). Neither definition defined ``rural'' directly, but rather
defined areas as either ``urban,'' with all other territory being
``rural,'' or as ``metro,'' with all other territory being ``non-
metro.''
Current FORHP Definition of Rural Area
FORHP currently designates the following areas as rural for
purposes of FORHP's grant programs: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See the notice ``Revised Geographic Eligibility for Federal
Office of Rural Health Policy Grants,'' 85 FR 59806 (Sept. 23,
2020), for a full description of the methods and data sources used
to develop FORHP's definition of rural areas. See the notice
``Response to Comments on Revised Geographic Eligibility for Federal
Office of Rural Health Policy Grants,'' 86 FR 2418 (Jan. 12, 2021),
for FORHP's current definition of rural areas. See Defining Rural
Population, <a href="https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/what-is-rural">https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/what-is-rural</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) All non-metro counties,
(2) All outlying metro counties without an Urbanized Area,
(3) All metro census tracts with Rural Urban Commuting Area (RUCA)
codes 4-10, and
(4) Metro census tracts of at least 400 square miles in area with
population density of 35 or less per square mile with RUCA codes 2-3.
FORHP's current definition finds that 19.7 percent of the
population, or approximately 60.8 million people, live in rural areas,
and classifies 86 percent of the land area of the United States as
rural (based on 2010 Census data; all data will be updated when updated
RUCA codes are available using data from the 2020 Census). Information
on whether individual addresses are within a rural area can be
identified in a search tool at the HRSA Data Warehouse.\2\ HRSA updates
the search tool as needed to assist rural health grant applicants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ HRSA Data Warehouse: <a href="https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/rural-health">https://data.hrsa.gov/tools/rural-health</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding Rugged Terrain Data to the Definition of Rural Area
FORHP's definition of rural area was last updated in 2021.\3\ At
that time, some commenters suggested that FORHP should further modify
the definition of rural area to account for difficult and mountainous
terrain because travel on roads through such terrain is more difficult
and time-consuming. FORHP did not have national data that could
consistently identify areas of difficult terrain.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Response to Comments on Revised Geographic Eligibility for
Federal Office of Rural Health Policy Grants.'' 86 FR 2418 (Jan. 12,
2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2023, the ERS published a report, Characterizing Rugged Terrain
in the United States,\4\ which describes the measurement of topographic
variation using the Terrain Ruggedness Index. The ERS conducted a study
to analyze how population, population density, and income vary by
ruggedness and rurality. The ERS produced two scales:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Research Report No. ERR-322, August 2023. Available at
<a href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=107027">https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=107027</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Area Ruggedness Scale (ARS) measures the changes in
elevation for all terrain and classifies census tracts as: (1) level,
(2) nearly level, (3) slightly rugged, (4) moderately rugged, (5)
highly rugged, and (6) extremely rugged. This characterizes overall
ruggedness in the entire tract.
(2) The RRS measures the changes in elevation beneath roads and
classifies census tracts as: (1) level, (2) nearly level, (3) slightly
rugged, (4) moderately rugged, and (5) highly rugged. This
characterizes overall ruggedness along roads in the tract.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ARS and RRS data are available at <a href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/area-and-road-ruggedness-scales/">https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/area-and-road-ruggedness-scales/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The RRS, or roads-only scale, helps to study the impact of rugged
terrain on travel by vehicle. Based on the ERS analysis of the RRS,
population density was highest, on average, for nearly level census
tracts (5,514 people per square mile) and lowest for highly rugged
census tracts (3,390 people per square mile).
Table 1--RRS Categories and Census Tracts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percent of
RRS category census tracts census tracts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1--Level................................ 47,740 65.6
2--Nearly level......................... 16,297 22.4
3--Slightly rugged...................... 5,518 7.6
4--Moderately rugged.................... 1,956 2.7
5--Highly rugged........................ 1,254 1.7
-------------------------------
Total............................... 72,765 100.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORHP is proposing to expand its definition of rural by
incorporating the RRS into the definition for purposes of FORHP's grant
programs. All areas included in the current definition would remain
included. The RRS focuses on roads and the difficulty of travelling in
mountainous terrain, while the ARS more generally classifies the
topography of the tract's terrain. Access to needed health care is
likely to be reduced when the roads are most difficult to traverse.
FORHP proposes including census tracts of at least 20 square miles in
area in metro counties
[[Page 32453]]
with RRS 5 (highly rugged) and RUCA code 2 or 3 in our definition of
rural area (tracts with RUCA codes 4-10 regardless of RRS are already
included). Some small area tracts within or on the edge of cities can
have rugged terrain (e.g., State or local parks), but they are very
small size and adjacent to major population centers.
FORHP estimates that including census tracts that are at least 20
square miles in area with RRS 5 and RUCA 2-3 in the definition of rural
area would add 84 census tracts and approximately an additional 304,834
people to the 60,758,275 people currently living in FORHP-designated
rural areas, an increase of 0.5 percent in the total number of people
living in rural areas. The number of eligible census tracts by State is
included in table 2.
Only tracts that meet all criteria--RRS 5 and RUCA 2-3 with an area
over 20 square miles--would be newly eligible under this proposed
update. Tracts with RRS 5 and RUCA code 1 could not be classified as
rural areas as tracts with RUCA code 1 contain populations from urban
areas with over 50,000 residents. Additionally, the RUCA code 1 tracts
located in metro counties are part of the metropolitan area core and
have primary commuting flow within the urban area.\6\ For example, San
Francisco, California has 31 census tracts with RRS 5 and RUCA code 1,
and these small areas with rugged terrain inside the metropolitan area
core are not rural in character.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See the description of Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes at
<a href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes">https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes</a>.
Table 2--Number of Census Tracts With RRS 5 and RUCA Code 2 or 3 and
Area Over 20 Sq. Miles, by State
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State New tracts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CA...................................................... 24
OR...................................................... 16
NC...................................................... 12
WA...................................................... 9
TN...................................................... 7
CO...................................................... 6
WV...................................................... 6
MT...................................................... 2
AK...................................................... 1
MD...................................................... 1
---------------
Total............................................... 84
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Data in this table are based on 2010 census tract geographies. For
a complete list of impacted census tracts see: <a href="https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/what-is-rural/data-files">https://www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/about-us/what-is-rural/data-files</a>.
FORHP's proposal to modify our definition of rural area for
purposes of FORHP's grant programs reflects efforts to be responsive to
stakeholder feedback and target programs towards the intended
communities. Other rural definitions for other purposes may be set by
statute or regulation or be designed to meet different program goals.
Notification of FORHP's Technical Clarification in Response to the U.S.
Census Bureau's 2020 Census Terminology Changes Removing Urban Clusters
and Urbanized Areas
Prior to the 2020 Census, the U.S. Census Bureau designated two
categories of urban areas--Urban Clusters (with a population of 2,500
to 49,999) and Urbanized Areas (with a population of 50,000 or more).
With the elimination of these sub-categories to differentiate urban
areas with large and small populations, the U.S. Census Bureau now only
designates urban areas (population of 5,000 and up or housing units of
2,000 or more) and does not sub-categorize urban areas by size. FORHP's
rural definition excludes outlying metro counties with an Urbanized
Area. To retain the distinction between urban areas with population
over and under 50,000 in FORHP's definition of rural area, FORHP will
identify and categorize urban areas based on population size. With this
technical clarification, the definition, ``all outlying metro counties
with no urban population from an urban area of 50,000 or more people,''
will replace ``all outlying metro counties without an urbanized area.''
FORHP will use the urban area population counts published by the
U.S. Census Bureau in the list of qualifying urban areas for the 2020
Census (<a href="https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html">https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/urban-rural.html</a>) to sub-categorize urban areas as less than
50,000 people (e.g., a population of 49,999 or fewer) and as 50,000 or
more people in the next update to rural area data files. Consistent
with our current definition, FORHP will consider outlying metro
counties without population from urban areas with 50,000 or more people
as rural areas, and the entire county would be considered a rural area
for our grant programs.
There are 327 outlying metro counties in the Office of Management
and Budget's Bulletin No. 23-01, released July 21, 2023, that have no
population part of an urban area with 50,000 or more people. Outlying
metro counties with any population from urban areas with 50,000 or more
people would not be considered rural areas, however census tracts
within those counties would be considered rural areas if they meet the
RUCA criteria or the RUCA and RRS criteria, as applicable.
Proposed FORHP Definition of Rural Area Incorporating the RRS and the
Technical Clarification in Response to Census Terminology Changes
FORHP proposes to designate the following areas as rural for
purposes of FORHP's grant programs:
(1) Non-metro counties,
(2) Outlying metro counties with no urban population from an urban
area of 50,000 or more people,
(3) Census tracts in metro counties with RUCA codes 4-10,
(4) Census tracts in metro counties of at least 400 square miles in
area with population density of 35 or less per square mile with RUCA
codes 2-3, and
(5) Census tracts in metro counties with RRS 5 and RUCA codes 2-3
that are at least 20 square miles in area.
Request for Public Comment
FORHP is proposing to modify the current definition of rural area
for purposes of FORHP's grant programs. FORHP seeks comments from the
public on the proposed use of the RRS to identify rural areas as
described above.
This request for comments is issued solely for information and
planning purposes; it does not constitute a Request for Proposal,
applications, proposal abstracts, or quotations. This request does not
commit the Government to contract for any supplies or services or make
a grant or cooperative agreement award or take any other official
action. Further, HRSA is not seeking proposals through this request for
comments and will not accept unsolicited proposals.
Carole Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-08931 Filed 4-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on April 26, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.