Rule2024-06199
International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision to U.S. Munitions List Category XI-High-Energy Storage Capacitors
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 25, 2024
Effective
April 24, 2024
Issuing agencies
State Department
Abstract
The Department of State (the Department) published an interim final rule on April 27, 2023, effective May 21, 2023, amending the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove from U.S. Munitions List (USML) Category XI certain high-energy storage capacitors and to clearly identify the high-energy storage capacitors that remain in USML Category XI. After reviewing the comments received in response to that interim final rule, the Department is now further amending USML Category XI to remove additional high-energy storage capacitors and to more clearly identify those that remain in USML Category XI.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 58 (Monday, March 25, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 58 (Monday, March 25, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20546-20548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-06199]
[[Page 20546]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 12223]
RIN 1400-AF27
International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision to U.S.
Munitions List Category XI--High-Energy Storage Capacitors
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State (the Department) published an interim
final rule on April 27, 2023, effective May 21, 2023, amending the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to remove from U.S.
Munitions List (USML) Category XI certain high-energy storage
capacitors and to clearly identify the high-energy storage capacitors
that remain in USML Category XI. After reviewing the comments received
in response to that interim final rule, the Department is now further
amending USML Category XI to remove additional high-energy storage
capacitors and to more clearly identify those that remain in USML
Category XI.
DATES: Effective date: April 24, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Rasmussen, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone (202)
663-2217; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3b7b7a7b0b08680879c9e9681a09681859a9096b38087928796dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="692d2d3d2a2a1c1a1d06040c1b3a0c1b1f000a0c291a1d081d0c470e061f">[email protected]</span></a> SUBJECT: ITAR Amendment--
High-Energy Storage Capacitors (RIN 1400-AF27)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of State's Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) administers the ITAR (22 CFR parts 120
through 130) to regulate the export, reexport, retransfer, and
temporary import of, and brokering activities related to certain items
and services. The articles and information subject to the jurisdiction
of the Department of State under the ITAR (i.e., ``defense articles'')
are identified on the USML at ITAR section 121.1. Items not subject to
the ITAR or to the exclusive licensing jurisdiction of any other
department or agency of the U.S. Government are subject to the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR parts 730 through 774, which
includes the Commerce Control List (CCL) in Supplement No. 1 to part
774). The EAR is administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security
(BIS), U.S. Department of Commerce. This rule does not modify the list
of defense articles and defense services controlled for purposes of
permanent import by the Attorney General, as enumerated on the U.S.
Munitions Import List at 27 CFR part 447.
The Department seeks to control on the USML those articles and
services that provide a critical military or intelligence advantage,
or, in the case of weapons, have an inherently military function. The
Department undertakes these revisions pursuant to the discretionary
statutory authority afforded the President in section 38(a)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778(a)(1)) and delegated to
the Secretary of State in Executive Order 13637, to control the export
and temporary import of defense articles and defense services in
furtherance of world peace and the security and foreign policy of the
United States, and to designate those items which constitute the USML.
The Department, informed by comments received from the public and
consultations with its interagency partners, determined the articles
removed from the USML by this rule no longer warrant control under the
ITAR.
On April 27, 2023, the Department published an interim final rule
at 88 FR 25488, with an effective date of May 21, 2023 (the interim
final rule), to remove from USML Category XI certain high-energy
storage capacitors that it assessed have broad commercial application,
are available internationally, and do not provide a critical military
or intelligence advantage. Specifically, the interim final rule added a
voltage criterion to paragraph (c)(5) of USML Category XI, limiting
that paragraph to capacitors ``capable of operating at greater than one
hundred twenty-five volts (125 V).''
In the interim final rule, the Department requested comments from
the interested community, focusing on certain questions about the new
voltage criterion. The Department now responds to those comments and
further amends the ITAR, and more specifically the USML, through this
final rule.
Voltage Rating and ``Capable of Operating''
The Department received four comments from the public, all of which
recommended that the Department define the voltage criterion according
to ``voltage rating'' or ``rated voltage,'' rather than ``capable of
operating.'' One commenter asserted that ``voltage rating'' is the
industry standard term and noted that the use of ``voltage rating''
would provide consistency with the way that capacitor voltages are
specified on the CCL under Export Control Classification Numbers
(ECCNs) 3A001.e.2 and 3A201.a. Two other commenters asserted that
``rated voltage'' is the industry standard term, and one cited the
Electronic Components Industry Association (ECIA) definition of ``rated
voltage'' as ``the voltage at which an electrical component can operate
for extended periods without loss of its basic properties.'' Another
commenter recommended ``voltage rating'' but also suggested the term
``steady state voltage rating.'' The Department affirms that the
voltage criterion should not be conflated with transient, or surge,
voltage ratings.
All commenters opposed the use of the phrase ``capable of
operating'' to specify the voltage threshold, asserting that ``capable
of operating'' is unclear because it does not reflect terminology
widely used in the electronics industry and most capacitors are
``capable of operating'' for a limited time in conditions for which
they were not designed, although they may incur damage in doing so. One
commenter further asserted that it is inherently unclear whether a
voltage criterion defined in terms of ``capable of operating'' would
vary based upon a customer's circuit design margins and the application
into which the capacitor is integrated. In contrast, industry
practitioners already understand that ``rated voltage'' and ``voltage
rating'' apply to the capacitor itself, and do not depend on end use.
The Department affirms its intent is to regulate such capacitors based
on their performance capability, regardless of limitations imposed by
the circuit in which they are currently installed.
The Department accepts these comments and will implement the term
``rated voltage'' to specify the voltage criterion in place of the
phrase ``capable of operating,'' which does not have a broadly accepted
definition. The Department notes that rated voltage is commonly
provided in manufacturers' product literature worldwide, thereby giving
persons other than the manufacturer valuable information in assessing
the capabilities of the capacitors. Furthermore, one commenter asserted
that the maximum voltage a capacitor can withstand is not generally
assessed during product development, which focuses upon the recommended
operating conditions and the limit provided in the specification. Thus,
a criterion specified in terms of ``capable of operating'' may require
manufacturers to expend resources to perform testing that they would
not otherwise conduct.
Accordingly, the Department has decided to specify the voltage
criterion in paragraph (c)(5)(i) of USML Category XI in terms of
``rated voltage.''
[[Page 20547]]
Definition of Rated Voltage
The interim final rule also asked whether a sufficient definition
of ``voltage rating'' would be ``the value, based on the capacitor's
design, testing, and evaluation, that describes the maximum amount of
continuous voltage that will not damage the capacitor.'' All commenters
assessed that this definition was accurate, with one recommending
adding an operating duration, temperature, and maximum failure rate to
ensure consistency across manufacturers and to prevent manufacturers
from, for example, increasing the temperature to claim a lower rated
voltage.
One commenter suggested including a note clarifying that rated
voltage does not include short-term transient or surge operating
conditions. Another commenter assessed that adding a temperature
criterion ``would complicate the verbiage'' of paragraph (c)(5), but it
suggested that if a temperature criterion is added, the Department
should use the term ``rated temperature,'' where rated temperature is
``the maximum temperature at which a capacitor can be used without
voltage derating (or degradation).'' Another commenter simply explained
that manufacturers rate their capacitors at different temperatures
according to the intended end use application.
The interim final rule additionally asked whether a criterion such
as ``will not reduce the capacitor's full energy life below 10,000
discharges'' would address the fact that each charge and discharge
cycle likely inflicts some damage on a capacitor. Commenters did not
support this suggestion, finding the criterion itself or the suggested
discharge threshold irrelevant to their capacitors.
Based on this feedback, the Department is amending the Note to
paragraph (c)(5) of Category XI to define ``rated voltage'' as ``the
value, based on the capacitor's design, testing, and evaluation, that
describes the maximum amount of continuous voltage that will not damage
the capacitor.'' The Department also adds a sentence clarifying that
rated voltage does not include short-term transient or surge operating
conditions. Furthermore, the Department clarifies that ``rated
voltage'' shall be assessed for this criterion at an operating
temperature of 85 degrees Celsius ([deg]C) or less. This clarification
is intended to ensure consistency across manufacturers in evaluating
the threshold. Since capacitor voltage ratings lower as temperatures
rise, voltage ratings below 500 V at temperatures at or below 85 [deg]C
may be utilized to assess the voltage criterion, as may voltage ratings
above 500 V at temperatures above 85 [deg]C; however, voltage ratings
below 500 V at temperatures above 85 [deg]C must be temperature
corrected to 85 [deg]C or lower to assess the voltage criterion.
Voltage Threshold
One commenter reported that wet tantalum capacitors with a rated
voltage of 150 V are being developed for use in commercial
applications. The commenter also asserted that some medical
applications, such as defibrillators, use wet tantalum capacitors with
a voltage rating at or above 250 V.
The Department determined it is appropriate to raise the voltage
threshold in excess of a rated voltage of 500 V. The Department
assesses that continuing to use the greater than 125 V threshold from
the interim final rule would result in unnecessary controls on
capacitors utilized in commercial applications that are comparable to
those available internationally without multilateral export control
restrictions. Moreover, the Department recognizes that the rated
voltage of such capacitors is likely to increase over time. Most
significantly, during its review, the Department did not identify any
capacitors with a rated voltage of 500 V or less that continue to
provide a critical military or intelligence advantage such that they
continue to warrant control on the USML.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
This rulemaking is exempt from section 553 (Rulemaking) and section
554 (Adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1) as a military or foreign affairs function of the
United States. However, the Department elected to solicit comments on
an interim final rule and has responded to those comments in this final
rule without prejudice to its determination that controlling the export
and temporary import of defense articles and services is a military or
foreign affairs function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the notice-and-comment rulemaking
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
The Department assesses that this rule is not a major rule under
the criteria of 5 U.S.C. 804.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking does not have sufficient federalism implications to
require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order
12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributed
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has been
deemed a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed this rulemaking in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and
reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt
tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
[[Page 20548]]
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose or revise any information
collections subject to 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 121
Arms and munitions, Classified information, Exports.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of State
amends Title 22, Chapter I, Subchapter M, part 121 as follows:
PART 121--THE UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Sec.
1514, Pub. L. 105-261, 112 Stat. 2175; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129, 3
CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 223.
0
2. In Sec. 121.1, under Category XI, revise paragraph (c)(5) as
follows:
Sec. 121.1 The United States Munitions List.
* * * * *
Category XI--Military Electronics
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) High-energy storage capacitors that:
(i) Have a rated voltage of greater than five hundred volts (500
V);
(ii) Have a repetition rate greater than or equal to six (6)
discharges per minute;
(iii) Have a full energy life greater than or equal to 10,000
discharges at greater than 0.2 Amps per Joule peak current; and
(iv) Have any of the following:
(A) Volumetric energy density greater than or equal to 1.5 J/cc; or
(B) Mass energy density greater than or equal to 1.3 kJ/kg;
Note to paragraph (c)(5): Volumetric energy density is Energy
per unit Volume. Mass energy density is Energy per unit Mass,
sometimes referred to as Gravimetric energy density or Specific
energy. Energy (E = \1/2\CV\2\, where C is Capacitance and V is the
rated voltage) in these calculations must not be confused with
useful energy or extractable energy. Rated voltage is the value,
based on the capacitor's design, testing, and evaluation, that
describes the maximum amount of continuous voltage, at an operating
temperature less than or equal to 85 degrees Celsius (85 [deg]C),
that will not damage the capacitor. Rated voltage does not include
short-term transient or surge operating conditions.
* * * * *
Bonnie D. Jenkins,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2024-06199 Filed 3-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 25, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.