Notice2024-05946
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend its Fee Schedule
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
March 21, 2024
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 56 (Thursday, March 21, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 56 (Thursday, March 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20279-20282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99745; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2024-017]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend its Fee Schedule
March 15, 2024.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 1, 2024, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX Options'')
proposes to amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (<a href="http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/">http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/</a>), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the
[[Page 20280]]
places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule for its equity
options platform (``EDGX Options'') relating to logical connectivity
fees.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on
January 2, 2024 (SR-CboeEDGX-2024-006). On March 1, 2024, the
Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By way of background, the Exchange offers a variety of logical
ports, which provide users with the ability within the Exchange's
System to accomplish a specific function through a connection, such as
order entry, data receipt or access to information. The Exchange
currently assesses, among other things, the following logical port
connectivity fees on a monthly basis: $500 per port for Logical Ports;
\4\ $500 per port for Multicast PITCH Spin Server Ports (``Spin
Ports'') and GRP Ports; \5\ and $600 per port for Ports with Bulk
Quoting Capabilities \6\ (``Bulk Ports''). The Exchange proposes to
increase the monthly fees for the forgoing ports to the following
rates: $750 per port for Logical Ports, Spin Ports and GRP Ports and
$1,000 per port for Bulk Ports. The Exchange notes the proposed fee
change better enables it to continue to maintain and improve its market
technology and services and also notes that the proposed fee amount,
even as amended, continues to be in line with, or even lower than,
amounts assessed by other exchanges for similar connections, including
the Exchange's affiliated options exchanges.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Logical Ports include FIX and BOE ports (used for order
entry), drop logical port (which grants users the ability to receive
and/or send drop copies) and ports that are used for receipt of
certain market data feeds.
\5\ Spin Ports and GRP Ports are used to request and receive a
retransmission of data from the Exchange's Multicast PITCH data
feeds.
\6\ Bulk Quoting Capabilities Ports provide users with the
ability to submit and update multiple bids and offers in one message
through logical ports enabled for bulk-quoting.
\7\ See, e.g., Cboe C2 Options Exchange Fee Schedule, Options
Logical Port Fees, Cboe BZX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, Options
Logical Port Fees and Cboe Exchange Fees Schedule, Logical
Connectivity Fees; see also The Nasdaq Stock Market Options Pricing
Schedule, Section 3 Nasdaq Options Market--Ports and Other Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) \11\ of the Act, which
requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Members and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ Id.
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed fee is reasonable as it is still
in line with, or even lower than, amounts assessed by other exchanges
for similar connections.\12\ Indeed, the Exchange believes assessing
fees that are a lower rate than fees assessed by other exchanges for
analogous connectivity (which were similarly adopted via the rule
filing process and filed with the Commission) is reasonable.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed fee increase is
reasonable in light of recent and anticipated connectivity-related
upgrades and changes. The Exchange and its affiliated exchanges
recently launched a multi-year initiative to improve Cboe Exchange
Platform performance and capacity requirements, including for its U.S.
options markets, to increase competitiveness, support growth and
advance a consistent world class platform. The goal of the project,
among other things, is to provide faster and more consistent order
handling and matching performance for options, while ensuring quicker
processing time and supporting increasing volumes. For example, the
Exchange is currently performing order handler and matching engine
hardware upgrades to advance this goal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See, e.g., Cboe C2 Options Exchange Fee Schedule, Options
Logical Port Fees, Cboe BZX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, Options
Logical Port Fees and Cboe Exchange Fees Schedule, Logical
Connectivity Fees see also The Nasdaq Stock Market Options Pricing
Schedule, Section 3 Nasdaq Options Market--Ports and Other Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also notes market participants may continue to choose
the method of connectivity based on their specific needs, and no
broker-dealer is required to become a Member of, let alone connect
directly to, the Exchange. There is also no regulatory requirement that
any market participant connect to any one particular exchange.
Moreover, direct connectivity is not a requirement to participate on
the Exchange. The Exchange also believes substitutable products and
services are available to market participants, including, among other
things, other options exchanges to which a market participant may
connect in lieu of the Exchange, indirect connectivity to the Exchange
via a third-party reseller of connectivity, and/or trading of any
options product, such as within the Over-the-Counter (OTC) markets,
which do not require connectivity to the Exchange. Indeed, there are
currently 17 registered options exchanges that trade options (13 of
which are not affiliated with Cboe), some of which have similar or
lower connectivity fees.\13\ Based on publicly available information,
no single options exchange has more than approximately 17% of the
market share.\14\ Further, low barriers to entry mean that new
exchanges may rapidly enter the market and offer additional substitute
platforms to further compete with the Exchange and the products it
offers. For example, there are 4 exchanges that have been added in the
U.S. options markets in the last 5 years (i.e., Nasdaq MRX, LLC, MIAX
Pearl, LLC, MIAX Emerald LLC, and most recently MEMX LLC), with a fifth
options exchange anticipated to added in 2024 (MIAX Sapphire, LLC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Id.
\14\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Volume Summary
(December 20, 2023), available at <a href="https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/">https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As for market participants that determine to continue to maintain
membership or to join the Exchange for business purposes, those
business reasons presumably result in revenue capable of covering the
proposed fee. Further, for such market participants that choose to
connect to the Exchange, the Exchange believes the proposed fees
continue to provide flexibility with
[[Page 20281]]
respect to how to connect to the Exchange based on each market
participants' respective business needs. For example, the amount and
type of logical ports are determined by factors relevant and specific
to each market participant, including its business model, costs of
connectivity, how its business is segmented and allocated and volume of
messages sent to the Exchange. Moreover, the Exchange notes that it
does not have unlimited system capacity and the proposed fees are also
designed to encourage market participants to be efficient with their
respective logical port usage and discourage the purchasing of large
amounts of superfluous ports. There is also no requirement that any
market participant maintain a specific number of logical ports and a
market participant may choose to maintain as many or as few of such
ports as each deems appropriate. Further, market participants may
reduce or discontinue use of these ports in response to the proposed
fees. Indeed, when the Exchange last increased pricing for logical
ports, some market participants did in fact reduce the number of
logical ports they maintained. Particularly, for example, Logical Port
quantities were reduced by approximately 20% .This demonstrates that if
an exchange sets a fee too high for connectivity, market participant
can and do choose to disconnect, or reduce, their connectivity from the
Exchange. The Exchange also does not assess any termination fee for a
market participant to drop its connectivity or membership, nor is the
Exchange aware of any other costs that would be incurred by a market
participant to do so.
As noted above, there is no regulatory requirement that any market
participant connect to any one options exchange, nor that any market
participant connect at a particular connection speed or act in a
particular capacity on the Exchange, or trade any particular product
offered on an exchange. Moreover, membership is not a requirement to
participate on the Exchange. Indeed, the Exchange is unaware of any one
options exchange whose membership includes every registered broker-
dealer. By way of example, while the Exchange has 51 members that trade
options, Cboe BZX has 61 members that trade options, and Cboe C2 has 52
Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'') (i.e., members). There is also no
firm that is a Member of EDGX Options only. Further, based on
previously publicly available information regarding a sample of the
Exchange's competitors, NYSE American Options has 71 members,\15\ and
NYSE Arca Options has 69 members,\16\ MIAX Options has 46 members \17\
and MIAX Pearl Options has 40 members.\18\ Accordingly, excessive fees
would simply serve to reduce demand for these products, which market
participants are under no regulatory obligation to utilize.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See <a href="https://www.nyse.com/markets/american-options/membership#directory">https://www.nyse.com/markets/american-options/membership#directory</a>.
\16\ See <a href="https://www.nyse.com/markets/arca-options/membership#directory">https://www.nyse.com/markets/arca-options/membership#directory</a>.
\17\ See <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/page-files/MIAX_Options_Exchange_Members_April_2023_04282023.pdf">https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/page-files/MIAX_Options_Exchange_Members_April_2023_04282023.pdf</a>.
\18\ See <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/page-files/MIAX_Pearl_Exchange_Members_01172023_0.pdf">https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/page-files/MIAX_Pearl_Exchange_Members_01172023_0.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee change is not
unfairly discriminatory because it would be assessed uniformly across
all market participants that purchase the respective logical ports. All
Members have the option to select any connectivity option, and there is
no differentiation among Members with regard to the fees charged for
the services offered by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes the
proposed fee change will not impact intramarket competition because it
will apply to all similarly situated market participants equally (i.e.,
all market participants that choose to purchase the relevant logical
ports).
The Exchange believes the proposed fees will not impact intermarket
competition because they are also in line with, or even lower than some
fees for similar connectivity on other exchanges, and therefore may
stimulate intermarket competition by attracting additional firms to
connect to the Exchange or at least should not deter interested
participants from connecting directly to the Exchange. Further, if the
changes proposed herein are unattractive to market participants, the
Exchange can, and likely will, see a decline in usage of these ports as
a result. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can determine whether or not to connect directly to
the Exchange based on the value received compared to the cost of doing
so. Indeed, market participants have numerous alternative venues that
they may participate on and direct their order flow, including 13 (soon
to be 14) non-Cboe affiliated options markets, as well as off-exchange
venues, where competitive products are available for trading. Moreover,
the Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS,
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \19\ The fact that this
market is competitive has also long been recognized by the courts. In
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow
is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''.\20\ Accordingly, the Exchange
does not believe its proposed change imposes any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\20\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \21\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
\22\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if
[[Page 20282]]
it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) necessary or
appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change
should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#651710090048060a0808000b1116251600064b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f785829b92da94989a9a92998384b7849294d9909881">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-CboeEDGX-2024-017 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2024-017. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2024-017 and should
be submitted on or before April 11, 2024.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-05946 Filed 3-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on March 21, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.