Military Ocean Terminal Concord, California; Restricted Area
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is amending its regulations to modify an existing permanent restricted area within waters along the shoreline of the Military Ocean Terminal Concord (MOTCO), on the south shore of Suisun Bay, north of the City of Concord, Contra Costa County, California. The amendment was requested by U.S. Army Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC) to expand the boundaries of the MOTCO restricted area in order to provide an adequate security buffer for MOTCO shoreline infrastructure and operational needs.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 57 (Friday, March 22, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 57 (Friday, March 22, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20318-20319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05890]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Military Ocean Terminal Concord, California; Restricted Area
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is amending its
regulations to modify an existing permanent restricted area within
waters along the shoreline of the Military Ocean Terminal Concord
(MOTCO), on the south shore of Suisun Bay, north of the City of
Concord, Contra Costa County, California. The amendment was requested
by U.S. Army Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
(SDDC) to expand the boundaries of the MOTCO restricted area in order
to provide an adequate security buffer for MOTCO shoreline
infrastructure and operational needs.
DATES: Effective date: April 22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO (David Olson),
441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Olson, Headquarters,
Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202-
761-4922.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In response to this request by the SDDC, and
pursuant to its authorities in Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of 1917 (40 Stat 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the Army
Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat 892; 33 U.S.C. 3), the Corps is
amending paragraph (a) of 33 CFR 334.1110 to expand the boundaries of
the existing MOTCO restricted area. The existing boundary at the
western terminus is shifted approximately 700 yards west along the
shoreline so that it encompasses the mouth of Hastings Slough and
eliminates a potential route of unauthorized encroachment into the
MOTCO installation. Along the central and eastern parts of the
restricted area, the existing boundary is shifted bayward to the edge
of an existing navigation channel (Roe Island Channel, Port Chicago
Reach, and Middle Ground West Reach). The revised eastern boundary
follows the southern edge of the navigation channel, and will not
encroach into or impact vessel traffic in the navigation channel. The
eastern shoreline terminus remains at its original location.
The proposed rule to expand the existing MOTCO restricted area was
published in the January 11, 2023, edition of the Federal Register (88
FR 1532) and the <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> docket number was COE-2022-0012. No
comments were received in response to the proposed rule. The January
11, 2023, proposed rule included coordinates of reference points A
through G along the revised boundary. Minor adjustments to the
coordinates of boundary points D and E have been made in this final
rule to locate the points just outside the boundaries of the adjacent
navigation channel, and ensure that the restricted area does not
encroach on the navigation channel. Additional formatting changes were
made to the coordinates of other points to ensure data consistency. All
coordinates are now shown in decimal degrees to four decimal places,
which did not alter the locations of the points that were not changed
by this final rule.
Procedural Requirements
a. Regulatory Planning and Review. This final rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January
21, 2011) and it was not submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget for review.
b. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. This final rule has
been reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice-and-
comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities (i.e., small businesses and small governments). The Corps
expects that the changes to the boundaries of this restricted area will
have no appreciable economic impact on the public, will result in no
anticipated navigational hazards, and will not interfere with existing
waterway traffic. Small entities can still utilize navigable waters
outside of the restricted area. The Corps therefore certifies that this
final rule would have no significant economic impact on small entities.
c. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act. The Corps
has determined that this rule will not have a significant impact on the
quality of the human environment and, therefore, preparation of an
environmental impact statement is not required. An environmental
assessment was prepared for the final rule and may be reviewed by
contacting the Corps' San Francisco District office at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20636573706e0d72670d694e464f6055534143450e41524d590e4d494c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6625233536284b34214b2f0800092613150705034807140b1f480b0f0a">[email protected]</span></a>.
d. Unfunded Mandates Act. The final rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private sector and, therefore, is not a
federal private sector mandate, and is not subject to the requirements
of Section 202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-
4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). The Corps has also found under
Section 203 of the Act, that small governments will not be
significantly or uniquely affected by this rulemaking.
e. Congressional Review Act. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. The Corps will submit a
report containing the final rule and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
[[Page 20319]]
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Classified information, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Security
measures, Transportation, Waterways.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Corps amends 33 CFR
Part 334 as follows:
PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR part 334 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33
U.S.C. 3).
0
2. Amend Sec. 334.1110 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 334.1110 Military Ocean Terminal Concord; restricted area.
(a) The area. (1) Beginning at point A on the shore west of the
mouth of a small slough (known as Hastings Slough) and passing east of
buoy R ``6'' bearing 60[deg]30' for 2,860 yards, through Point B on the
eastern end of the two Seal Islands, to point C on the southern edge of
the Roe Island Channel near buoy R ``16A''; thence in a generally
easterly direction running along the southern edge of the Roe Island
Channel, Port Chicago Reach and Middle Ground West Reach (points D and
E) to point F directly north of the eastern shore boundary (point G);
thence 180[deg] to point G on the shore line; thence following the high
water shore line in a general westerly direction to the point of
beginning. The coordinates for the points in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section are provided in Table 1.
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point A (shoreline)............................. 38.0513 -122.0576
Point B......................................... 38.0579 -122.0430
Point C......................................... 38.0630 -122.0307
Point D......................................... 38.0611 -122.0205
Point E......................................... 38.0593 -122.0010
Point F......................................... 38.0594 -121.9882
Point G (shoreline)............................. 38.0521 -121.9882
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) The datum for these coordinates is NAD-83.
* * * * *
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division, Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2024-05890 Filed 3-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.