Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Safe Disposition of Life-Limited Aircraft Parts
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information collection. The collection involves maintaining and recording "the status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance. The information to be collected is necessary for maintaining and recording that the part is airworthy.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 51 (Thursday, March 14, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 51 (Thursday, March 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 18700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-05454]
[[Page 18700]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. 2023-1859]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Safe Disposition of Life-
Limited Aircraft Parts
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves maintaining and recording ``the
status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller,
rotor, and appliance. The information to be collected is necessary for
maintaining and recording that the part is airworthy.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted by May 13, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
By Electronic Docket: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a> (Enter docket number into
search field).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy.A.Shafer by email at:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc9eada2a8b5e28de29fa4adaaa9be8caaadade2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c597a4aba1bceb84eb96ada4a3a0b785a3a4a4eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>; phone: 217-971-8378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Comments Invited: You are asked to
comment on any aspect of this information collection, including (a)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for FAA's
performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA
to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized without
reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will
summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.
OMB Control Number: 2120-0665.
Title: Safe Disposition of Life-Limited Aircraft Parts.
Form Numbers: N/A.
Type of Review: Renewal of an Information Collection.
Background: The FAA has found life-limited parts that exceeded
their life-limits installed on type-certificated products during
accident investigations and in routine surveillance. Although such
installation of life-limited parts violates existing FAA regulations,
concerns have arisen regarding the disposition of these life-limited
parts when they have reached their life limits. Concerns over the use
of life-limited aircraft parts led Congress to pass a law requiring the
safe disposition of these parts. The Wendell H. Ford Investment and
Reform Act for the 21st Century (Pub. L. 106-181), added section 44725
to title 49, United States Code.
Current Requirements: The type design of an aircraft, aircraft
engine, or propeller includes the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA), which includes the Airworthiness Limitations that
describe life limits for parts installed on the product. See, for
instance, 14 CFR 21.3(c) and 21.50. In order for an aviation product to
comply with its type design, the life-limited parts installed on it
must fall within the acceptable ranges described in the Airworthiness
Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.
For this reason, installation of a life-limited part after the
mandatory replacement time has been reached would be a violation of the
maintenance regulations. Section 43.13(b) requires that maintenance
work be completed so that the product worked on ``will be at least
equal to its original or properly altered condition. * * *'' The
product is not at least equal to its original or properly altered
condition if a life-limited part has reached or exceeded its life
limit. Existing regulations require that specific markings be placed on
all life-limited parts at the time of manufacture. This includes
permanently marking the part with a part number (or equivalent) and a
serial number (or equivalent). See 14 CFR 45.14. Persons who install
parts must have adequate information to determine a part's current life
status. In particular, documentation problems may mislead an installer
concerning the life remaining for a life-limited part. This rule
further provides for the data needs of subsequent installers to ensure
they know the life remaining on a part and prevent the part being used
beyond its life limit. Existing regulations provide for records on
life-limited parts that are installed on aircraft. The regulations
require that each owner or operator under Sec. 91.417(a)(2)(ii) and
each certificate holder under Sec. 121.380(a)(2)(iii) or Sec.
135.439(a)(2)(ii), maintain records showing ``the current status of
life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and
appliance.'' These regulations do not govern the disposition of the
part when it is removed from the aircraft. If the part is intended to
be reinstalled, however, a record of the life status of the part will
be needed at the time of reinstallation to show that the part is within
its life limit and to create the required record under Sec. Sec.
91.417(a)(2)(ii), 121.380(a)(2)(iii), or 135.439(a)(2)(ii), as
applicable. Therefore, when a life-limited part is removed from an
aircraft and that part is intended to be reinstalled in an aircraft,
industry practice is to make a record of the part's status at the time
of removal. Repair stations, air carriers, and fixed base operators
(FBO's) have systems in place to keep accurate records of such parts to
ensure that they can reinstall the parts and have the required records
to show that the part is airworthy. If the part is not intended to be
reinstalled, however, under existing regulations and practice there is
no record required or routinely made when a part is removed from an
aircraft. The part may be at the end of its life limit and not eligible
for installation. Or the part may not have reached the end of its life
limit but is so close that reinstallation would not be practicable. In
these cases, industry practices vary. For instance, the part might be
put in a bin and later sold as scrap metal, it might be used as a
training aid, or it might be mutilated. This renewal of the OMB control
action requires the continued information collection.
Respondents: 8,000.
Frequency: As identified in previous rulemaking proposals for an
annual frequency of information collection requirements is 100,000
procedures.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes per procedure.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: As identified in previous rule
making estimates for this information collection the FAA refined its
estimate of annual burden and has determined that there is no more than
a minimal paperwork burden on any respondent for the record keeping and
reporting requirements of 30 minutes duration, at $54 per hour per
procedure.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 11, 2024.
David A. Hoyng,
Aviation Safety, Flight Standards Office of Safety Standards, Aircraft
Maintenance Division (FS300).
[FR Doc. 2024-05454 Filed 3-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.