Rule2024-02153
Chlorpyrifos; Reinstatement of Tolerances
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
February 5, 2024
Effective
February 5, 2024
Issuing agencies
Environmental Protection Agency
Abstract
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending its regulations to reflect the current legal status of the chlorpyrifos tolerances following a court order vacating the Agency's revocation of those tolerances. EPA is issuing this as a final action that is effective upon publication since this action simply conforms the regulations to reflect the tolerances that have already been legally reinstated by the court's order.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 89 Issue 24 (Monday, February 5, 2024)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7625-7627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02153]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0523; FRL-5993-06-OCSPP]
Chlorpyrifos; Reinstatement of Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending its
regulations to reflect the current legal status of the chlorpyrifos
tolerances following a court order vacating the Agency's revocation of
those tolerances. EPA is issuing this as a final action that is
effective upon publication since this action simply conforms the
regulations to reflect the tolerances that have already been legally
reinstated by the court's order.
DATES: Effective on February 5, 2024.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0523, is available online at
<a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Additional instructions for visiting the
docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is
available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Biggio, Pesticide Re-
Evaluation Division (7508M), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 202-566-0700; email address:
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b544b4b58737774696b6269727d746852756a6e7269727e685b7e6b7a357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcb3acacbf9490938e8c858e959a938fb5928d89958e95998fbc998c9dd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general. It may be of
specific interest to persons who are an agricultural producer, food
manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer identified under North American
Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes 111, 112, 311, and
32532. The NAICS codes are provided to assist in determining interest.
However, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action.
II. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA is taking this action pursuant to the authority in section
408(e)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a(e)(1).
III. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is revising the tolerance regulations (40 CFR part 180) to
reflect the reinstatement of tolerances for chlorpyrifos, in compliance
with a decision and order dated November 2, 2023, from the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the matter of Red River Valley
Sugarbeet Growers Ass'n v. Regan, 85 F.4th 881 (8th Cir. 2023).
Specifically, EPA is amending 40 CFR 180.342 to reflect the current
legal status of the tolerances for chlorpyrifos.
IV. Why is EPA taking this action?
In April 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
ordered EPA to issue a final rule either revoking all chlorpyrifos
tolerances or modifying the chlorpyrifos tolerances, provided EPA could
make a determination that those modified tolerances met the safety
standard mandated by the FFDCA. See League of United Latin American
Citizens, et al. v. Regan, 996 F.3d 673 (9th Cir. 2021). The Ninth
Circuit ordered EPA to issue that final rule within 60 days of the
issuance of the mandate.
As a result of the very short timeframe, EPA found that, based on
the available data and anticipated exposure from registered uses of
chlorpyrifos, it could not determine that there was a reasonable
certainty of no harm from aggregate exposure, including food, drinking
water, and residential exposure. Consequently, in the Federal Register
of August 30, 2021 (86 FR 48315; FRL-5993-04-OCSPP), EPA issued a final
rule amending 40 CFR 180.342 to revoke all tolerances for residues of
chlorpyrifos. That rule included revocation of tolerances for residues
of chlorpyrifos on specific food and feed commodities (180.342(a)(1));
on all food commodities treated in food handling and food service
establishments in accordance with prescribed conditions (180.342(a)(2)
and (a)(3)); and on specific commodities when used under regional
registrations (180.342(c)). The final rule allowed the tolerances to
remain in effect for six months, until February 28, 2022, at which time
the tolerances expired. Gharda Chemicals International, Inc. (Gharda),
one of the chlorpyrifos registrants, and several grower groups, among
others, filed objections to the Agency's final rule revoking
chlorpyrifos tolerances. The Agency denied those objections in an order
issued in the Federal Register on February 28, 2022 (87 FR 11222 (FRL-
5993-05-OCSPP)).
Gharda and several grower groups challenged EPA's order denying
objections and the tolerance revocation rule in the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. On November 2, 2023, the Eighth Circuit
issued its decision, vacating EPA's final rule and remanding the matter
to EPA for further proceedings. No request for rehearing was filed. On
December 28, 2023, the mandate issued, finalizing the court's judgment,
and effectuating the vacatur of the Agency's rule revoking tolerances.
Because the Eighth Circuit vacated EPA's rule revoking chlorpyrifos
tolerances, those tolerances are legally currently in effect. EPA is
issuing this final rule to amend the tolerance regulations to reflect
the current legal status of the tolerances for chlorpyrifos by removing
the introductory sentence currently in 40 CFR 180.342 that contains the
revocation statement and expiration date.
[[Page 7626]]
V. Why is this a final rule?
Under FFDCA section 408(e)(2), 21 U.S.C. 346a(e)(2), EPA must
provide a period of not less than 60 days for public comment on a
proposed rule modifying a pesticide tolerance. However, the Agency may
provide a shorter period for public comment so long as the Agency for
good cause determines that it would be in the public interest to do so.
Additionally, section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
provides that when an agency for good cause finds that notice and
public comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment.
EPA has determined that there is good cause for issuing this final
rule without opportunity for notice and comment. The Agency finds that
notice and comment are unnecessary for these rule amendments under 5
U.S.C. 553(b) because this ministerial rule does not alter the legal
status or otherwise effect any substantive change to these tolerances;
it merely amends the CFR to reflect the legal status of these
tolerances in light of the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit. Because the Eighth Circuit vacated EPA's 2021
revocation rule, these tolerances are currently in effect. The Agency
lacks discretion to depart from this mandate.
VI. Can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to a final rule issued under FFDCA section 408(e)(1), and
may also request a hearing on those objections; however, due to the
ministerial nature of this rule, which is merely amending the
regulations to reflect the Eighth Circuit's order, EPA notes that it is
making no substantive determinations about these tolerances and
therefore any such issues are beyond the scope of this rulemaking.
Because no relevant issues of material fact exist with respect to the
issuance of this ministerial final rule, EPA believes that it is
unlikely that there would be ``reasonable grounds'' for objection or
basis for an evidentiary hearing under section 408(g) of the FFDCA.
Any person who wants to file an objection or request a hearing on
this regulation must do so in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0523 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
April 5, 2024. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0523, by one of
the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
<bullet> Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets</a>.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/dockets">https://www.epa.gov/dockets</a>.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action amends the tolerance regulation for chlorpyrifos to
reflect the current legal status of those tolerances as reinstated by
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. As a ministerial
action, this action is not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), as
amended by Executive Order 14094, entitled Modernizing Regulatory
Review (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023). As a result, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), and Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
In addition, this action is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The RFA applies only to
rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to
notice and comment requirements because the Agency has invoked the
``good cause'' exemption under APA section 553(b) and FFDCA section
408(e)(2).
This action does not contain any information collections or impose
additional burdens that require approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) or Executive
Order 14096, entitled Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All (88 FR 25251, April 26, 2023).
This rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes; nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the State or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply to this rule. This rule does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1531-
1538).
In addition, since this action does not involve any technical
standards, the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272 note, does not apply to this action.
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at <a href="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations-and-executive-orders">https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations-and-executive-orders</a>.
[[Page 7627]]
VIII. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 30, 2024.
Michal Freedhoff,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
Sec. 180.342 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 180.342, by removing the introductory text.
[FR Doc. 2024-02153 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on February 5, 2024.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.