Notice2023-27528
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 15, 2023
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87012-87017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27528]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-99132; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2023-078]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Fee Schedule
December 11, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 8, 2023, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 87013]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to
amend its Fee Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is provided
in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (<a href="http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/">http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/</a>), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule applicable to its
equities trading platform (``EDGX Equities'') as follows: (1) by
introducing Add Volume Tier 7; (2) by modifying the Market Quality
Tier; (3) by introducing a new Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier; (4) by
modifying Remove Volume Tier 3; and (5) by introducing a new Retail
Volume Tier. The Exchange proposes to implement these changes effective
December 1, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on
December 1, 2023 (SR-CboeEDGX-2023-074). On December 8, 2023, the
Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted SR-CboeEDGX-2023-077. On
December 8, 2023, the Exchange withdrew that filing and submitted
this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the
Exchange is only one of 16 registered equities exchanges, as well as a
number of alternative trading systems and other off-exchange venues
that do not have similar self-regulatory responsibilities under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''), to which market
participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available
information,\4\ no single registered equities exchange has more than
14% of the market share. Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly
competitive market, no single equities exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of order flow. The Exchange in
particular operates a ``Maker-Taker'' model whereby it pays rebates to
members that add liquidity and assesses fees to those that remove
liquidity. The Exchange's Fee Schedule sets forth the standard rebates
and rates applied per share for orders that provide and remove
liquidity, respectively. Currently, for orders in securities priced at
or above $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00160 per
share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of $0.0030 per
share for orders that remove liquidity.\5\ For orders in securities
priced below $1.00, the Exchange provides a standard rebate of $0.00009
per share for orders that add liquidity and assesses a fee of 0.30% of
the total dollar value for orders that remove liquidity.\6\
Additionally, in response to the competitive environment, the Exchange
also offers tiered pricing which provides Members opportunities to
qualify for higher rebates or reduced fees where certain volume
criteria and thresholds are met. Tiered pricing provides an incremental
incentive for Members to strive for higher tier levels, which provides
increasingly higher benefits or discounts for satisfying increasingly
more stringent criteria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary, Month-to-Date (November 28, 2023), available at <a href="https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/">https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/market_statistics/</a>.
\5\ See EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Standard Rates.
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add Volume & Market Quality Tiers
Under footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently offers
various Add/Remove Volume Tiers. In particular, the Exchange offers six
Add Volume Tiers that each provide an enhanced rebate for Members'
qualifying orders yielding fee codes B,\7\ V,\8\ Y,\9\ 3,\10\ and
4,\11\ where a Member reaches certain add volume-based criteria.\12\
First, the Exchange is proposing to introduce a new Add Volume Tier 7
to provide Members an additional manner in which they could receive an
enhanced rebate if certain criteria is met. The proposed criteria for
proposed Add Volume Tier 7 is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Fee code B is appended to orders adding liquidity to EDGX in
Tape B securities.
\8\ Fee code V is appended to orders adding liquidity to EDGX in
Tape A securities.
\9\ Fee code Y is appended to orders adding liquidity to EDGX in
Tape C securities.
\10\ Fee code 3 is appended to orders adding liquidity to EDGX
in the pre and post market in Tapes A or C securities.
\11\ Fee code 4 is appended to orders adding liquidity to EDGX
in the pre and post market in Tape B securities.
\12\ The Exchange notes that unless otherwise noted on the fee
schedule, enhanced rebates or reduced fees offered under footnote 1
are only available to securities priced at or above $1.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Add Volume Tier 7 provides a rebate of $0.0034 per share
for securities priced at or above $1.00 to qualifying orders (i.e.,
orders yielding fee B, V, Y, 3, or 4) where: (1) Member has a total
remove ADV \13\ >=0.40% of the TCV \14\ or Member has a total remove
ADV >=40,000,000; and (2) Member has a Hidden, Primary Peg ADV \15\
>=1,000,000; and (3) Member has a Hidden Midpoint ADV (i.e., yielding
fee codes DM \16\ or MM \17\) >=5,000,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of shares added to, removed from, or routed by, the Exchange, or any
combination or subset thereof, per day. ADV is calculated on a
monthly basis.
\14\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply.
\15\ The Exchange notes that it also proposes to add a
definition for Hidden, Primary Peg ADV to the Definitions section of
the fee schedule, ``Hidden, Primary Peg ADV'' means ADV in non-
displayed orders that include a Primary Peg instruction as defined
in EDGX Equities Rule 11.6(j)(2).
\16\ Fee code DM is appended to orders adding liquidity to EDGX
using MidPoint Discretionary order within discretionary range.
\17\ Fee code MM is appended to non-displayed orders adding
liquidity to EDGX using Mid-Point Peg.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the Exchange proposes to modify the criteria of the
existing Market Quality Tier. Currently, the criteria for the Market
Quality Tier is as follows:
<bullet> The Market Quality Tier provides a rebate of $0.0028 per
share for securities priced at or above $1.00 to qualifying orders
(i.e., orders yielding fee B, V, Y, 3, or 4) where: (1) Member adds an
ADV >=0.25% of the TCV; and (2) Member adds an ADV >=0.10% of the TCV
as
[[Page 87014]]
Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA,\18\ HI,\19\ MM or
RP.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Fee code HA is appended to non-displayed orders adding
liquidity to EDGX.
\19\ Fee code HI is appended to non-displayed orders adding
liquidity to EDGX that receive price improvement.
\20\ Fee code RP is appended to non-displayed orders adding
liquidity to EDGX using Supplemental Peg.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, the Exchange proposes to amend the second prong of criteria in
the Market Quality Tier. The proposed criteria is as follows:
<bullet> The Market Quality Tier provides a rebate of $0.0028 per
share for securities priced at or above $1.00 to qualifying orders
(i.e., orders yielding fee B, V, Y, 3, or 4) where: (1) Member adds an
ADV >=0.25% of the TCV; and (2) Members adds an ADV >=0.12% of the TCV
as Non-Displayed orders that yield fee codes DM, HA, HI, MM or RP.
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers
In addition to the Add/Remove Volume Tiers offered under footnote
1, the Exchange also offers three Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers that
each provide an enhanced rebate for Members' qualifying orders yielding
fee codes DM, HA, MM, and RP, where a Member reaches certain volume-
based criteria offered in each tier. The Exchange now proposes to
introduce Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier 4. The proposed criteria for
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier 4 is as follows:
<bullet> Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier 4 provides a rebate of
$0.0025 per share for securities priced at or above $1.00 to qualifying
orders (i.e., orders yielding fee DM, HA, MM, or RP) where: (1) Member
has a total remove ADV >=0.40% of the TCV or Member has a total remove
ADV >=40,000,000; and (2) Member has a Hidden, Primary Peg ADV
>=1,000,000; and (3) Member has a Hidden Midpoint ADV (i.e., yielding
fee codes DM or MM) >=5,000,000.
The Exchange also proposes to make minor grammatical changes to the
introductory text associated with the Non-Displayed Add Volume Tiers.
These changes are non-substantive in nature.
Remove Volume Tiers
In addition to the Add/Remove Volume Tiers and Non-Displayed Add
Volume Tiers offered under footnote 1, the Exchange also offers three
Remove Volume Tiers that each assess a reduced fee for Members'
qualifying orders yielding fee codes BB,\21\ N,\22\ and W \23\ where a
Member reaches certain add volume-based criteria. The Exchange now
proposes to amend Remove Volume Tier 3. Currently, the criteria for
Remove Volume Tier 3 is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Fee code BB is appended to orders that remove liquidity
from EDGX in Tape B securities.
\22\ Fee code N is appended to orders that remove liquidity from
EDGX in Tape C securities.
\23\ Fee code W is appended to orders that remove liquidity from
EDGX in Tape A securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Remove Volume Tier 3 provides a reduced fee of $0.00275
per share for securities priced at or above $1.00 to qualifying orders
(i.e., orders yielding fee codes BB, N, or W) and a reduced fee of
0.28% of total dollar value for securities priced below $1.00 where:
(1) Member has an ADAV >=0.30% of the TCV; and (2) Member has a total
remove ADV >=0.40% of the TCV; and (3) Member adds Retail Pre Market
Order ADV (i.e., yielding fee code ZO) >=3,000,000.
Now, the Exchange proposes to amend the second prong of criteria in
Remove Volume Tier 3. The proposed criteria is as follows:
<bullet> Proposed Remove Volume Tier 3 provides a reduced fee of
$0.00275 per share for securities priced at or above $1.00 to
qualifying orders (i.e., orders yielding fee codes BB, N, or W) and a
reduced fee of 0.28% of total dollar value for securities priced below
$1.00 where: (1) Member has an ADAV >=0.30% of the TCV; and (2) Member
has a total remove ADV >=0.40% of the TCV or Member has a total remove
ADV >=40,000,000; and (3) Member adds Retail Pre Market Order ADV
(i.e., yielding fee code ZO) >=3,000,000.
Retail Volume Tiers
Pursuant to footnote 2 of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange offers
Retail Volume Tiers which provide Retail Member Organizations
(``RMOs'') \24\ an opportunity to receive an enhanced rebate from the
standard rebate for Retail Orders \25\ that add liquidity (i.e.,
yielding fee code ZA or ZO). Currently, the Retail Volume Tiers offer
two Retail Volume Tiers where a Member is eligible for an enhanced
rebate for qualifying orders (i.e., yielding fee code ZA or ZO) meeting
certain add volume-based criteria. The Exchange now proposes to
introduce Retail Volume Tier 3. The proposed criteria for Retail Volume
Tier 3 is as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(1). A ``Retail Member Organization''
or ``RMO'' is a Member (or a division thereof) that has been
approved by the Exchange under this Rule to submit Retail Orders.
\25\ See EDGX Rule 11.21(a)(2). A ``Retail Order'' is an agency
or riskless principal order that meets the criteria of FINRA Rule
5320.03 that originates from a natural person and is submitted to
the Exchange by a Retail Member Organization, provided that no
change is made to the terms of the order with respect to price or
side of market and the order does not originate from a trading
algorithm or any other computerized methodology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Proposed Retail Volume Tier 3 provides an enhanced rebate
of $0.0037 per share for securities priced above $1.00 to qualifying
orders (i.e., orders yielding fee ZA or ZO) where: (1) Member has a
total remove ADV >=0.40% of the TCV or Member has a total remove ADV
>=40,000,000; and (2) Member has a Hidden, Primary Peg ADV >=1,000,000;
and (3) Member has a Hidden Midpoint ADV (i.e., yielding fee codes DM
or MM) >=5,000,000.
Together, the proposed addition of Retail Volume Tier 3, proposed
addition of Add Volume Tier 7, proposed amendment to the Market Quality
Tier, proposed addition of Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier 4, and
proposed amendment to Remove Volume Tier 3 are each intended to provide
Members an alternative opportunity to earn an enhanced rebate or a
reduced fee by increasing their order flow to the Exchange, which
further contributes to a deeper, more liquid market and provides even
more execution opportunities for active market participants.
Incentivizing an increase in liquidity adding or removing volume,
through enhanced rebate or reduced fee opportunities, encourages
liquidity adding Members on the Exchange to contribute to a deeper,
more liquid market, and liquidity executing Members on the Exchange to
increase transactions and take execution opportunities provided by such
increased liquidity, together providing for overall enhanced price
discovery and price improvement opportunities on the Exchange. As such,
increased overall order flow benefits all Members by contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
The Exchange also proposes to make minor grammatical changes to the
introductory text associated with the Retail Volume Tiers. These
changes are non-substantive in nature.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\26\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \27\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and
[[Page 87015]]
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \28\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers as well as Section 6(b)(4) \29\
as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\28\ Id.
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. The Exchange believes that
its proposal to: (1) introduce new Add Volume Tier 7; (2) modify the
Market Quality Tier; (3) introduce new Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier 4;
(4) modify Remove Volume Tier 3; and (5) introduce new Retail Volume
Tier 3 reflects a competitive pricing structure designed to incentivize
market participants to direct their order flow to the Exchange, which
the Exchange believes would enhance market quality to the benefit of
all Members. Specifically, the Exchange's proposal to introduce
slightly more difficult criteria to its Market Quality Tier and Remove
Volume Tier is not a significant departure from existing criteria, is
reasonably correlated to the enhanced rebate or reduced fee offered by
the Exchange and other competing exchanges,\30\ and will continue to
incentivize Members to submit order flow to the Exchange. Additionally,
the Exchange notes that relative volume-based incentives and discounts
have been widely adopted by exchanges,\31\ including the Exchange,\32\
and are reasonable, equitable and non-discriminatory because they are
open to all Members on an equal basis and provide additional benefits
or discounts that are reasonably related to (i) the value to an
exchange's market quality and (ii) associated higher levels of market
activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or growth
patterns. Competing equity exchanges offer similar tiered pricing
structures, including schedules of rebates and fees that apply based
upon members achieving certain volume and/or growth thresholds, as well
as assess similar fees or rebates for similar types of orders, to that
of the Exchange. Further, the Exchange believes that its proposal to
incentivize Hidden, Primary Peg ADV \33\ and Hidden Midpoint ADV \34\
will encourage Members to submit additional non-displayed orders to the
Exchange using pegged order types. The Exchange believes that non-
displayed, Primary Peg \35\ orders will reduce the number of cancel/
replace messages submitted by Members to the Exchange and non-displayed
MidPoint Peg \36\ orders will encourage greater liquidity with the
potential for price improvement on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See MIAX Pearl Equities Exchange Fee Schedule, Remove
Volume Tier, available at <a href="https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_12012023.pdf">https://www.miaxglobal.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_Pearl_Equities_Fee_Schedule_12012023.pdf</a> See also MEMX Equities
Fee Schedule, Liquidity Removal Tier, available at <a href="https://info.memxtrading.com/equities-trading-resources/us-equities-fee-schedule/">https://info.memxtrading.com/equities-trading-resources/us-equities-fee-schedule/</a>.
\31\ See e.g., BZX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/Remove
Volume Tiers.
\32\ See e.g., EDGX Equities Fee Schedule, Footnote 1, Add/
Remove Volume Tiers.
\33\ Supra note 15.
\34\ Supra notes 16-17.
\35\ See EDGX Equities Rule 11.6(j)(2). A ``Primary Peg'' order
is an order with instructions to peg to the NBB, for a buy order, or
the NBO, for a sell order.
\36\ See EDGX Equities Rule 11.8(d). A MidPoint Peg Order is a
non-displayed Market Order or Limit Order with an instruction to
execute at the midpoint of the NBBO, or, alternatively, pegged to
the less aggressive of the midpoint of the NBBO or one minimum price
variation inside the same side of the NBBO as the order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes its proposal to: (1) introduce
new Add Volume Tier 7; (2) modify the Market Quality Tier; (3)
introduce new Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier 4; (4) modify Remove Volume
Tier 3; and (5) introduce new Retail Volume Tier 3 is reasonable
because the revised tiers will be available to all Members and provide
all Members with an additional opportunity to receive an enhanced
rebate or a reduced fee. The Exchange further believes the proposed
modifications to its Add Volume Tier, Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier,
and Retail Volume Tier will provide a reasonable means to encourage
liquidity adding displayed orders and liquidity adding non-displayed
orders, respectively, in Members' order flow to the Exchange and to
incentivize Members to continue to provide liquidity adding volume to
the Exchange by offering them an additional opportunity to receive an
enhanced rebate or reduced fee on qualifying orders. Further, the
Exchange wishes to encourage the use of the Primary Peg and MidPoint
Peg order types by introducing criteria specific to Hidden, Primary Peg
ADV and Hidden Midpoint ADV. While the proposed criteria in the Market
Quality Tier and Remove Volume Tier 3 are slightly more difficult than
the current criteria found in those tiers, the proposed criteria is not
a significant departure from existing criteria, is reasonably
correlated to the enhanced rebate or reduced fee offered by the
Exchange, and will continue to incentivize Members to submit order flow
to the Exchange. An overall increase in activity would deepen the
Exchange's liquidity pool, offers additional cost savings, support the
quality of price discovery, promote market transparency and improve
market quality, for all investors.
The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to its Add/Remove
Volume Tiers, Market Quality Tier, Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier, and
Retail Volume Tier are reasonable as they do not represent a
significant departure from the criteria currently offered in the Fee
Schedule. The Exchange also believes that the proposal represents an
equitable allocation of fees and rebates and is not unfairly
discriminatory because all Members will be eligible for the proposed
new tiers and have the opportunity to meet the tiers' criteria and
receive the corresponding enhanced rebate if such criteria is met.
Without having a view of activity on other markets and off-exchange
venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule
change would definitely result in any Members qualifying the new
proposed tiers. While the Exchange has no way of predicting with
certainty how the proposed changes will impact Member activity, based
on the prior months volume, the Exchange anticipates that at least one
Member will be able to satisfy proposed Add Volume Tier 7, at least two
Members will be able to satisfy the proposed Market Quality Tier, at
least one Member will be able to satisfy proposed Non-Displayed Add
Volume Tier 4, at least one Member will be able to satisfy proposed
Remove Volume Tier 3, and at least 1 Member will be able to satisfy
proposed Retail Volume Tier 3. The Exchange also notes that proposed
changes will not adversely impact any Member's ability to qualify for
enhanced rebates offered under other tiers. Should a Member not meet
the proposed new criteria, the
[[Page 87016]]
Member will merely not receive that corresponding enhanced rebate.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes that the proposed changes would encourage the
submission of additional order flow to a public exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, execution incentives and enhanced execution
opportunities, as well as price discovery and transparency for all
Members. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
competition among orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of
individual stocks for all types of orders, large and small.''
The Exchange believes the proposed rule changes do not impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Particularly, the proposed
changes to the Exchange's Add/Remove Volume Tiers, Market Quality Tier,
Non-Displayed Add Volume Tier, and Retail Volume Tier will apply to all
Members equally in that all Members are eligible for each of the Tiers,
have a reasonable opportunity to meet the Tiers' criteria and will
receive the enhanced rebate on their qualifying orders if such criteria
is met. The Exchange does not believe the proposed changes burden
competition, but rather, enhances competition as it is intended to
increase the competitiveness of EDGX by amending an existing pricing
incentive and adopting pricing incentives in order to attract order
flow and incentivize participants to increase their participation on
the Exchange, providing for additional execution opportunities for
market participants and improved price transparency. Greater overall
order flow, trading opportunities, and pricing transparency benefits
all market participants on the Exchange by enhancing market quality and
continuing to encourage Members to send orders, thereby contributing
towards a robust and well-balanced market ecosystem.
Next, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes does not
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market.
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, including other equities exchanges, off-
exchange venues, and alternative trading systems. Additionally, the
Exchange represents a small percentage of the overall market. Based on
publicly available information, no single equities exchange has more
than 14% of the market share.\37\ Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power in the execution of order flow. Indeed,
participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchange
and off-exchange venues if they deem fee levels at those other venues
to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the
importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and,
also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ``has
been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \38\ The fact that this market is competitive has also
long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers' . . . .''.\39\ Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its
proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ Supra note 3.
\38\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
\39\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \40\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \41\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\41\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7200071e175f111d1f1f171c0601320117115c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="245651484109474b4949414a5057645741470a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-078 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-078. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the
[[Page 87017]]
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include
personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may
redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material
that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions
should refer to file number SR-CboeEDGX-2023-078 and should be
submitted on or before January 5, 2024.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-27528 Filed 12-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 15, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.