Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by two engine fan blade-out (FBO) events that resulted in the separation of engine inlet cowl and fan cowl parts from the airplane damaging the fuselage, which caused loss of pressurization and subsequent emergency descent. The FBO events also resulted in cracks in the primary exhaust nozzle, potentially resulting in the departure of the primary exhaust nozzle and damaging a stabilizer or striking the fuselage and window. This proposed AD would require an inspection or maintenance records check to determine if the primary exhaust nozzle has an affected part number and, for affected primary exhaust nozzles, an installation of bridge brackets onto the primary exhaust nozzle, or as an option, an installation of a serviceable primary exhaust nozzle. This proposed AD would also require revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new airworthiness limitations. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 86080-86084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27101]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2023-2235; Project Identifier AD-2023-01009-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900,
and -900ER series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by two
engine fan blade-out (FBO) events that resulted in the separation of
engine inlet cowl and fan cowl parts from the airplane damaging the
fuselage, which caused loss of pressurization and subsequent emergency
descent. The FBO events also resulted in cracks in the primary exhaust
nozzle, potentially resulting in the departure of the primary exhaust
nozzle and damaging a stabilizer or striking the fuselage and window.
This proposed AD would require an inspection or maintenance records
check to determine if the primary exhaust nozzle has an affected part
number and, for affected primary exhaust nozzles, an installation of
bridge brackets onto the primary exhaust nozzle, or as an option, an
installation of a serviceable primary exhaust nozzle. This proposed AD
would also require revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate new airworthiness limitations.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 26,
2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
<bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
<bullet> Fax: 202-493-2251.
<bullet> Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
<bullet> Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> under
Docket No. FAA-2023-2235; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
<bullet> For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
<bullet> You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available at
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a> by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2023-2235.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Cortez-Muniz, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone:
206-231-3958; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e68a938f95c887c885899492839ccb8b93888f9ca6808787c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d9b5acb0aaf7b8f7bab6abadbca3f4b4acb7b0a399bfb8b8f7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2023-2235; Project Identifier
AD-2023-01009-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
<a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Luis
Cortez-Muniz, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone: 206-231-3958; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#711d0418025f105f121e0305140b5c1c041f180b311710105f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7519001c065b145b161a0701100f5818001b1c0f351314145b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>. Any commentary that the FAA receives that
[[Page 86081]]
is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public
docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA received two reports of engine events that resulted in the
separation of engine inlet cowl and fan cowl parts from the airplane.
One event occurred in August 2016 on a Boeing Model 737-700 series
airplane powered by a CFM56-7B engine. The left engine failed due to
the FBO but the airplane landed successfully. The second event occurred
on April 17, 2018, on a Boeing Model 737-700 series airplane powered by
a CFM56-7B engine. In that event, an FBO occurrence resulted in the
release of fan cowl parts and the engine cowling departing the
airplane. The fan cowl parts damaged the fuselage, which caused loss of
pressurization and subsequent emergency descent. Although the airplane
landed safely, there was one passenger fatality. In that event, the
suspected cause of the FBO occurrence was a low-cycle fatigue crack in
the dovetail of fan blade number 13 of engine number 1. The broken fan
blade hit the engine fan case at a critical location causing a
significant impulse, displacement, and imbalance of the fan rotor
effecting the structural integrity of the engine cowling.
In response to these events, the FAA issued two AD actions for the
CFM International S.A. (CFM) Model CFM56-7B engines. The FAA issued
emergency AD 2018-09-51, Amendment 39-19287 (83 FR 23794, May 23, 2018)
(AD 2018-09-51), which requires a one-time ultrasonic inspection of the
concave and convex sides of the fan blade dovetail. The FAA also issued
AD 2018-26-01, Amendment 39-19531 (83 FR 66090, December 26, 2018) (AD
2018-26-01), which requires initial and repetitive inspections of the
concave and convex sides of the fan blade dovetail to detect cracking
and replacement of any blades found. The FAA issued AD 2018-09-51 to
address fan blade failure due to cracking, which could result in an
engine in-flight shutdown (IFSD), uncontained release of debris, damage
to the engine, damage to the airplane, and possible airplane
decompression. The FAA issued AD 2018-26-01 to address failure of the
fan blade, which could result in the engine inlet cowl disintegrating
and debris penetrating the fuselage, causing a loss of pressurization,
and prompting an emergency descent.
Since AD 2018-09-51 and AD 2018-26-01 were issued, the FAA has
determined further rulemaking is necessary to reduce the probability of
unsecured nacelle components, should an engine fan blade failure occur.
As evidenced by Exemption No. 19212, dated July 13, 2022 (Docket No.
FAA-2023-2235), Boeing developed modifications to the inlet cowl, fan
cowl, and exhaust nozzle that must be accomplished prior to July 31,
2028. Boeing petitioned and the FAA later agreed to amend Exemption No.
19212 to 19212A, which added a requirement that solutions to address
potential maintenance errors must be incorporated prior to December 31,
2029. However, to implement these design changes, the FAA must issue
rulemaking to address the unsafe condition.
This proposed AD would address the unsafe condition related to the
primary exhaust nozzle that was also a result of the FBO events. During
an FBO event, primary exhaust nozzles that are not strengthened could
depart the engine, potentially damaging a stabilizer or striking the
fuselage and window. This condition, if not addressed, could result in
loss of control of the airplane, or in a rapid decompression and hazard
to window-seated passengers aft of the wing.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin
737-78-1106 RB, dated September 1, 2023. This service information
specifies procedures for a maintenance records check, or an inspection
of the engine to identify if the engine has a primary exhaust nozzle
with an affected part number. For affected primary exhaust nozzles, the
service information specifies procedures for installing bridge brackets
onto the primary exhaust nozzle, or as an option, installing a
serviceable exhaust nozzle onto the engine.
The service information also requires revision of the operator's
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, by incorporating
certain airworthiness limitations (AWLs).
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.
Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information already described, except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service Information''
and except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD. For information on the procedures
and compliance times, see this service information at <a href="http://regulations.gov">regulations.gov</a>
under Docket No. FAA-2023-2235.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new airworthiness limitations.
Compliance with these limitations is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(j) of this proposed AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information
The Effectivity of Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin
737-78-1106 RB inadvertently excluded Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes having line numbers 1245,
1614, 1810, 1839, 1885, 1934, 1979, 1991, 2080, 2157, 2232, 2531, 2822,
3071, 3189, and 3319. Those airplanes are affected by the identified
unsafe condition; for those airplanes, this proposed AD would require
accomplishment of the applicable actions specified in Boeing Special
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB, September 1, 2023. The
FAA has confirmed with Boeing that the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB,
September 1, 2023, are applicable to the expanded group of airplanes.
Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB,
dated September 1, 2023, identifies ``System Airworthiness Limitation
NO. 2--Fan Blade Out Conditions,'' and ``System Airworthiness
Limitation NO. 3--Fan Blade Out Conditions'' as the airworthiness
limitations that must be incorporated. In addition to those
limitations, the FAA has determined that ``System Airworthiness
Limitation NO. 4--Engine Nacelle Maintenance Errors'' must also be
incorporated as
[[Page 86082]]
specified in paragraph (h) of this proposed AD. System Airworthiness
Limitation NO. 4 specifically provides the limitation that mandates
solutions to maintenance errors that must be accomplished prior to
December 31, 2029, as required by Exemption No. 19212A.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 1,215 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect for affected part 2 work-hours x $85 $0................ $170.............. $206,550.
numbers or maintenance records per hour = $170.
check.
Bridge bracket installation *... Up 23 work-hours x Up $63,200........ Up to $65,155..... Up to $79,163,325
$85 per hour = **.
$1,955.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The option to install a serviceable primary exhaust nozzle would cost up to $65,155 per product.
** Not all airplanes will have an affected primary exhaust nozzle so the fleet cost will be significantly lower.
The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate. Therefore, the agency estimates the average total cost per
operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2023-2235; Project Identifier AD-
2023-01009-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by January 26, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Airplanes identified in Boeing Special Attention
Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB, dated September 1, 2023.
(2) Airplanes having line numbers 1245, 1614, 1810, 1839, 1885,
1934, 1979, 1991, 2080, 2157, 2232, 2531, 2822, 3071, 3189, and
3319.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78, Exhaust.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by two engine fan blade-out (FBO) events
that resulted in the separation of engine inlet cowl and fan cowl
parts from the airplane damaging the fuselage, which caused loss of
pressurization and subsequent emergency descent. The FBO events also
resulted in cracks in the primary exhaust nozzle, which could result
in the departure of the primary exhaust nozzle. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address primary exhaust nozzles that are not
strengthened, which during an FBO event, could depart the engine,
potentially damaging a stabilizer or striking the fuselage and
window. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in loss
of control of the airplane, or in a rapid decompression and hazard
to window-seated passengers aft of the wing.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing
Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB, dated
September 1, 2023, do all applicable actions identified in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB, dated September 1,
2023.
Note 1 to paragraph (g): Guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by this AD can be found in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-78-1106, dated September 1, 2023, which is referred to
in Boeing Special Attention Requirements
[[Page 86083]]
Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB, dated September 1, 2023.
(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
Where Tables 1 and 2 of Boeing Special Attention Requirements
Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB specify incorporating 737-600/700/700C/800/
900/900ER Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) document D626A001-9-01
``System Airworthiness Limitation NO. 2--Fan Blade Out Conditions,''
and ``System Airworthiness Limitation NO. 3--Fan Blade Out
Conditions'' into the operators' maintenance program, this AD
requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, by incorporating the information specified in Figure 1
to the introductory text of paragraph (h) of this AD into the
airworthiness limitations within 90 days after the effective date of
this AD, or before further flight after accomplishing any of the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (3) of this AD,
whichever occurs first.
Figure 1 to the Introductory Text of Paragraph (h)--System
Airworthiness Limitations
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12DE23.000
(1) The Condition 1, (Option 1) or Condition 3 (Option 1)
actions specified in Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin
737-78-1106 RB, dated September 1, 2023.
(2) The Condition 1, (Option 2) or Condition 3 (Option 2) action
specified in Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-
1106 RB, dated September 1, 2023.
(3) The determination that the primary exhaust nozzles are not
affected as specified in Condition 2 or Condition 4 of Boeing
Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106 RB, dated
September 1, 2023.
(i) No Alternative Actions
After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative
actions may be used unless the actions are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)
of this AD. Information may be emailed to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1988ce0efec8cf2c4c0d5d5cdc48ce0e2ee8ce0eceee28cf3c4d0d4c4d2d5d2e1c7c0c08fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d04107c7370106e585c49495158107c7e72107c70727e106f584c48584e494e7d5b5c5c135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, AIR-
520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, to make those
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Luis Cortez-Muniz,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; telephone: 206-231-3958; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1bda4b8a2ffb0ffb2bea3a5b4abfcbca4bfb8ab91b7b0b0ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80ecf5e9f3aee1aee3eff2f4e5faadedf5eee9fac0e6e1e1aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Requirements Bulletin 737-78-1106
RB, dated September 1, 2023.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; website <a href="http://myboeingfleet.com">myboeingfleet.com</a>.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th
[[Page 86084]]
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this material at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, visit <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations">www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations</a> or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1274603c7b7c61627771667b7d7c527c7360733c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="badcc894d3d4c9cadfd9ced3d5d4fad4dbc8db94ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.
Issued on December 1, 2023.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-27101 Filed 12-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.