Notice2023-27084
Technical Correction to PTE 2016-10, Exemption From Certain Prohibited Transaction Restrictions: Royal Bank of Canada (Together With Its Current and Future Affiliates, RBC or the Applicant)
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
December 11, 2023
Issuing agencies
Labor DepartmentEmployee Benefits Security Administration
Abstract
This document makes a technical correction to Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2016-10 granted to the Royal Bank of Canada (D-11868) on October 28, 2016.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85931-85932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27084]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Technical Correction to PTE 2016-10, Exemption From Certain
Prohibited Transaction Restrictions: Royal Bank of Canada (Together
With Its Current and Future Affiliates, RBC or the Applicant)
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice of technical correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document makes a technical correction to Prohibited
Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2016-10 granted to the Royal Bank of Canada
(D-11868) on October 28, 2016.
DATES:
Issuance date: These technical corrections are issued on December
11, 2023 without further action or notice.
Exemption Date: PTE 2016-10 will remain in effect for the period
beginning on the Conviction Date (as corrected herein) until the
earlier of: (1) the date that is twelve months following the Conviction
Date; or (2) the effective date of a final agency action made by the
Department in connection with an application for long-term exemptive
relief for the covered transactions described in PTE 2016-10.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Joseph Brennan of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8456. (This is not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 28, 2016, the Department published PTE 2016-10 in the
Federal Register.\1\ PTE 2016-10 is a temporary administrative
exemption that permits certain entities (the RBC Qualified Professional
Asset Managers (QPAMs)) with specified relationships to Royal Bank of
Canada (Bahamas) Limited (RBCTC Bahamas) to continue to rely upon the
relief provided by the Department's QPAM Exemption \2\ for a one-year
period, notwithstanding a potential judgment of conviction against
RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 81 FR 75147 (October 28, 2016).
\2\ PTE 84-14 49 FR 9494, March 13, 1984, as corrected at 50 FR
41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23,
2005) and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010), hereinafter
referred to as PTE 84-14 or the QPAM exemption.
\3\ Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 prevents an entity that may
otherwise meet the definition of a QPAM from utilizing the exemptive
relief provided by PTE 84-14 for itself and its client plans, if
that entity or an ``affiliate'' thereof, or any owner, direct or
indirect, of a five percent or more interest in the QPAM has within
10 years immediately preceding the transaction, been either
convicted or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a
result of criminal activity described in that section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department granted PTE 2016-10 to protect Covered Plans \4\
from the harm that may arise if and when RBCTC were convicted in the
District Court of Paris.\5\ Therefore, PTE 2016-10, as initially
granted, defined the term ``Conviction'' as ``the potential judgment of
conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud to
be entered in France in the District Court of Paris, French Special
Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French Investigative Judge No. JIRSIF/11/
12.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A ``Covered Plan'' is a plan subject to part 4 of title 1 of
ERISA (``ERISA-covered plan'') or a plan subject to Section 4975 of
the Code (``IRA''), with respect to which an RBC QPAM relies on PTE
84-14, or with respect to which an RBC QPAM (or any RBC affiliate)
has expressly represented that the manager qualifies as a QPAM or
relies on the QPAM class exemption. A Covered Plan does not include
an ERISA-covered Plan or IRA to the extent the RBC QPAM has
expressly disclaimed reliance on QPAM status or PTE 84-14 in
entering into its contract, arrangement, or agreement with the
ERISA-covered plan or IRA.
\5\ RBC's exemption request (D-11868) is available by contacting
EBSA's Public Disclosure Room at (202) 693-8673.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In January 2017, the trial court in France acquitted RBCTC of the
aiding and abetting the tax fraud charge, so the exemptive relief
provided in PTE 2016-01 was unnecessary. However, RBCTC recently
informed the Department that the French prosecutor has appealed the
lower court's acquittal and the case is now being heard de novo as a
new trial by a French appellate court. According to RBCTC, the alleged
crime, the parties, and the case numbers remain the same as the
District Court of Paris case that is defined as the ``Conviction'' in
PTE 2016-01. RBCTC has requested confirmation from the Department that
the relief provided in PTE 2016-10 would be available for one year, if
RBCTC were ultimately convicted by the French appellate court.
As noted above, PTE 2016-10 is intended to protect Covered Plans
from harm if RBCTC were convicted for the alleged crime in France. This
same harm would arise whether RBCTC is convicted for the same crime,
stemming from the same conduct, in a French appellate court or ``the
District Court of Paris.'' Therefore, to ensure that Covered Plans are
protected from any harm that would arise from the appellate court's
conviction of RBCTC, the Department is revising the definition of
``Conviction'' in PTE 2016-10 to refer to ``the potential judgment of
conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud to
be entered in France in the Court of Appeal, French
[[Page 85932]]
Special Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French Investigative Judge No.
JIRSIF/11/12 or another court of competent jurisdiction.''
RBC represents to the Department that to the best of RBC's
knowledge, there have been no material changes since September 2, 2015,
the date of RBC's application for PTE 2016-10, that are relevant to
that application or the technical corrections set forth herein, other
than changes in RBC's number of clients and assets under management RBC
makes these representations with the caveat that, as a large global
financial institution, it has been subject to a variety of legal
proceedings, including civil claims and lawsuits, regulatory
examinations, investigations, audits, and requests for information. To
the best of its knowledge at this time, however, RBC does not believe
that the outcome of any current investigation or other such proceeding
would cause the exemption to be unavailable. Moreover, no affiliate of
RBC has been convicted of any crime described in section I(g) of the
QPAM Exemption and, to the best of RBC's knowledge, neither RBC nor any
affiliate has entered into a deferred prosecution or non-prosecution
agreement since September 2, 2015.
The Department notes that it is making this technical correction
based upon RBC's certified representation that since September 2, 2015:
(1) there have in fact been no material changes other than those
changes noted above; (2) no affiliate of RBC has been convicted of any
crime described in section I(g) of the QPAM Exemption, other than the
conviction covered under PTE 2016-10; and (3) neither RBC nor any
affiliate of RBC has entered into a deferred prosecution or non-
prosecution agreement. If, at any time, RBC discovers any of these
representations is no longer true, RBC must immediately contact the
Department and submit a written statement that provides the Department
with the complete details on the circumstances discovered.
The Department is not taking a position regarding whether the
outcome of any proceedings will cause the exemption to be unavailable
and also notes that the availability of PTE 2016-10 is conditioned upon
RBC's compliance with all of the conditions included therein, including
the condition that expressly states: ``During the effective period of
this temporary exemption, RBC: (1) Immediately discloses to the
Department any Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or Non-
Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) that RBC or an affiliate enters into
with the U.S Department of Justice, to the extent such DPA or NPA
involves conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411
of ERISA.'' As noted in the preceding paragraph, if RBC discovers that
RBC or any RBC affiliate has entered into a DPA or NPA at any time
since September 2, 2015, RBC must inform the Department promptly upon
RBC or its affiliates' discovery of such fact.
Technical Correction
Section II(a) of PTE 2016-10 is amended to read as follows:
``(a) The term ``Conviction'' means the potential judgment of
conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud
to be entered in France in the Court of Appeal, French Special
Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French Investigative Judge No. JIRSIF/11/
12 or another court of competent jurisdiction''
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of December 2023.
George Christopher Cosby,
Director, Office of Exemption Determinations Employee Benefits Security
Administration U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2023-27084 Filed 12-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on December 11, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.