Rule2023-20348
Ohio Regulatory Program
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
September 20, 2023
Effective
October 20, 2023
Issuing agencies
Interior DepartmentSurface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Abstract
We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Ohio regulatory program (the Ohio program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Ohio's proposed amendment is prompted by requirements within the Ohio statute that all agencies must review their administrative rules every five years. Consistent with this requirement, the Ohio Reclamation Commission (the Commission), proposes an amendment to its procedural rules in order to ensure an orderly, efficient, and effective appeals process.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64807-64810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20348]
[[Page 64807]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[SATS No. OH-261-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2019-0007; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 234S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 23XS501520]
Ohio Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule, approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Ohio regulatory program (the
Ohio program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Ohio's proposed amendment is prompted by
requirements within the Ohio statute that all agencies must review
their administrative rules every five years. Consistent with this
requirement, the Ohio Reclamation Commission (the Commission), proposes
an amendment to its procedural rules in order to ensure an orderly,
efficient, and effective appeals process.
DATES: The effective date is October 20, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Owens, Acting Field Office
Director, Pittsburgh Field Office, 3 Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, PA
15220. Telephone: (412) 937-2827, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5a7aab2a0abb685aab6a8b7a0eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6e637b69627f4c637f617e69226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Ohio Program
Section 503(a) of the Act, State Programs, permits a state to
assume primacy for the regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within its
borders by demonstrating that its program includes, among other things,
state laws and regulations that govern surface coal mining and
reclamation operations in accordance with the Act and consistent with
the Federal regulations. See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7).
On the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Ohio program on August 16, 1982. You can
find background information on the Ohio program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval of the Ohio program in the August 10, 1982, Federal Register
(47 FR 34717). You can also find later actions concerning the Ohio
program and program amendments at 30 CFR 935.10, State Regulatory
Program Approval; and 935.11, Conditions of State Regulatory Program
Approval; and 935.15, Approval of Ohio Regulatory Program Amendments.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated June 13, 2018 (Administrative Record OH-2197-01),
Ohio sent us an amendment regarding its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.) to clarify existing definitions and to provide additional
definitions related to work of the Commission. This submittal was
prompted by requirements of Sections 106.03 and 119.04 of the Ohio
Revised Code (ORC) that all state agencies must review their
administrate rules every five years.
For background purposes, the Commission is an adjudicatory board
established pursuant to ORC 1513.05. The Commission is the office to
which administrative appeals may be filed by any person claiming to be
aggrieved or adversely affected by a decision of the Ohio Department of
Natural Resources, Chief of the Division of Mineral Resources
Management (DMRM), relating to mining and reclamation issues. Following
an adjudicatory hearing, the Commission affirms, vacates, or modifies
the DMRM Chief's decision. The Commission is comprised of eight members
appointed by the Governor of Ohio. Members represent a variety of
interests relevant to mining and reclamation issues. The Commission
adopts rules to govern its procedures. The Commission's rules are found
in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) at OAC 1513-3-01 through 1513-3-
22, and are the subject of the current amendment.
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the February 25,
2020 Federal Register (85 FR 10636) (Administrative Record No. OH-
2197). In the same document, we opened the public comment period and
provided an opportunity for a public hearing or meeting on the adequacy
of the amendment. No meeting or hearing was requested, and no public
comments were received. The public comment period ended on March 11,
2020.
III. OSMRE's Findings
We made the following findings concerning the amendment under SMCRA
and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. In making
these findings, we compared Ohio's provisions to 43 CFR part 4, which
governs administrative proceedings and appeals relevant to OSMRE's
actions under the Federal regulatory program. We are approving the
amendments as described below. The full text of this program amendment
is available at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
A. Ohio's revisions to OAC 1513-3-01 consist of additions and
modifications to the definitions outlined herein. As a result,
renumbering was also made to facilitate the addition of new terms.
1. ``Amicus curiae''. Ohio seeks to add this term as paragraph (B),
describing it to mean a ``friend of the court.'' The amendment also
explains the participation of a non-party amicus curiae is addressed
under OAC 1513-3-07 (F).
2. ``Ex parte communication''. Ohio seeks to add this term as
paragraph (J), describing it to mean ``a communication between the
commission and one party to an appeal, without the inclusion of other
parties to the appeal.'' The amendment also explains that ex parte
contacts and communications are addressed and prohibited under OAC
1513-3-03 (G).
3. ``In camera''. Ohio seeks to add this term as paragraph (N),
describing it to mean ``in private rather than in open hearing.'' The
amendment also references OAC 1513-3-16 (C) for in camera procedures.
4. ``Pro hac vice''. Ohio seeks to add this term as paragraph (S),
describing it to mean ``for one particular case''. In accordance with
OAC 1513-3-03 (A) and (C), it explains the ability of an out-of-state
attorney to appear in an appeal before the commission.
5. ``Subpoena ad testificandum''. Ohio seeks to add this term as
paragraph (V), describing it to mean ``a subpoena for the appearance
and testimony of a witness.'' The definition also references the use of
this term at OAC 1513-3-02 (I).
6. ``Subpoena duces tecum''. Ohio seeks to add this term as
paragraph (W), describing it to mean ``a subpoena requiring a witness
to produce documents or other items at hearing''. The definition also
references use of this term at OAC 1513-3-02 (I).
B. Ohio made typographical, editorial, and other minor revisions to
the following sections: OAC 1513-3-01(I) (the definition of
``discovery'') and (T) (the definition of ``Regular business hours'');
OAC 1513-3-02 Internal Regulations; OAC 1513-3-04 Appeals to the
Reclamation Commission; OAC
[[Page 64808]]
1513-3-05 Filing Service of Papers; OAC 1513-3-06 Computation and
Extension of Time; OAC 1513-3-11 Motions; OAC 1513-3-14 Site Views an
Location of Hearings; OAC 1513-3-16 Conduct of Evidentiary Hearings;
and OAC 1513-3-22 Appeals from Commission Decisions.
OSMRE Finding: While the definitions of ``amicus curiae,'' ``ex
parte communication,'' ``in camera,'' ``pro hac vice,'' ``subpoena ad
testificandum,'' and ``subpoena duces tecum'' are not defined terms in
the equivalent Federal regulations at 43 CFR part 4, they are used at
43 CFR 4.3 and 4.27. Ohio's definition of ``amicus curiae'' and ``ex
parte communication'' are not inconsistent with the use of those terms
within 43 CFR part 4. The remaining terms do not appear in 43 CFR part
4 or other relevant regulations of the Department. However, Ohio's
definition of ``in camera'' is not inconsistent with the process for
protecting certain materials from disclosure described at 43 CFR 4.31.
Likewise, Ohio's definition of ``pro hac vice'' is not inconsistent
with the standards for who may practice before the Department at 43 CFR
1.3 and 4.3. Finally, Ohio's definitions for ``subpoena ad
testificandum'' and ``subpoena duces tecum'' are not inconsistent with
the Department's subpoena provisions at 43 CFR 4.26. Therefore, we
approve the addition of these definitions.
Any revisions that we have not specifically discussed concerning
non-substantive wording or editorial changes, including the addition of
paragraph (A)(4) to OAC 1513-3-06 (providing a citation to a provision
defining state holidays), can be found in the full text of the program
amendment available at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">www.regulations.gov</a>.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment; however, none were
received.
Federal Agency Comments
On October 1, 2018, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section
503(b) of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendment from various
Federal agencies with an actual or potential interest in the Ohio
program (Administrative Record No. OH-2197). We did not receive any
comments.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to obtain a written
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that Ohio proposed to make
in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. Therefore,
we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on October 1,
2018, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments from the EPA
on the amendment (Administrative Record No. OH-2197). The EPA responded
on November 2, 2018, that the proposed program amendment does not fall
under the purview of the EPA's Clean Water Act (Administrative Record
OH-2197-05).
State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP that may have an effect on historic properties. On
October 1, 2018, we requested comments on Ohio's amendment
(Administrative Record No. OH-2197). We did not receive comments from
the SHPO or ACHP.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we are approving Ohio's program
amendment submission sent to us on June 13, 2018 (Administrative Record
No. OH-2197-01). To implement this decision, we are amending the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR part 935, that codify decisions
concerning the Ohio program. In accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act, this rule will take effect 30 days after the date of
publication. Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that the State's program
demonstrate that the State has the capability of carrying out the
provisions of the Act and meeting its purposes. SMCRA requires
consistency of State and Federal standards.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications that would result in public property
being taken for government use without just compensation under the law.
Therefore, a takings implication assessment is not required. This
determination is based on an analysis of the corresponding Federal
regulations.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated October
12, 1993, the approval of State program amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13563, which
reaffirms and supplements Executive Order 12866, retains this
exemption.
Executive Order 13771--Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
State program amendments are not regulatory actions under Executive
Order 13771 because they are exempt from review under Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has reviewed this rule as required
by Section 3 of Executive Order 12988. The Department determined that
this Federal Register document meets the criteria of Section 3 of
Executive Order 12988, which is intended to ensure that the agency
review its legislation and proposed regulations to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; that the agency write its legislation and
regulations to minimize litigation; and that the agency's legislation
and regulations provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard, and promote simplification and burden
reduction. Because Section 3 focuses on the quality of Federal
legislation and regulations, the Department limited its review under
this Executive order to the quality of this Federal Register document
and to changes to the Federal regulations. The review under this
Executive order did not extend to the language of the program amendment
that the State of Ohio drafted.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule has potential Federalism implications as defined under
Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 13132 directs
agencies to ``grant the States the maximum administrative discretion
possible'' with respect to Federal statutes and regulations
administered by the States. Ohio, through its approved regulatory
program, implements and administers
[[Page 64809]]
SMCRA and its implementing regulations at the state level. This rule
approves an amendment to the Ohio program submitted and drafted by the
State and, thus, is consistent with the direction to provide maximum
administrative discretion to States.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Tribes through a commitment
to consultation with Tribes and recognition of their right to self-
governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule under
the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Tribes or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Tribes.
Therefore, consultation under the Department's tribal consultation
policy is not required. The basis for this determination is that our
decision is on the Ohio program does not regulate Indian lands or
surface coal mining activities on Indian lands. Indian lands, as that
term is defined under 30 U.S.C. 1291(9) are regulated independently
under the Federal Indian lands program.
Executive Order 13211--Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered significant
under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 and is not
significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order
13211, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
Executive Order 13045--Protection of Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because this is
not an economically significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866; and this action does not address environmental
health or safety risks disproportionately affecting children.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consistent with sections 501(a) and 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1251(a) and 1292(d), respectively) and the U.S. Department of the
Interior Departmental Manual, part 516, section 13.5(A), State program
amendments are not major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (15 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) directs OSMRE to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. (OMB
Circular A-119 at p. 14). This action is not subject to the
requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those
requirements would be inconsistent with SMCRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not include requests and requirements of an
individual, partnership, or corporation to obtain information and
report it to a Federal agency. As this rule does not contain
information collection requirements, a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal, which is the subject
of this rule, is based upon corresponding Federal regulations for which
an economic analysis was prepared, and certification made that such
regulations would not have a significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In making the determination as to
whether this rule would have a significant economic impact, the
Department relied upon the data and assumptions for the corresponding
Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based on an analysis of the
corresponding Federal regulations, which were determined not to
constitute a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments, or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal Governments or the private sector. This determination
is based on an analysis of the corresponding Federal regulations, which
were determined not to impose an unfunded mandate. Therefore, a
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic--Appalachian Region.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 935 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 935--OHIO
0
1. The authority citation for part 935 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 935.15 is amended in the table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 935.15 Approval of Ohio regulatory program amendment.
* * * * *
[[Page 64810]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final
date publication Citation/description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
June 13, 2018................. September 20, OAC 1513-3-01
2023. Definitions.
Addition of
definitions of
``Amicus curiae'',
``Ex parte
communication'',
``In camera'', ``Pro
hac vice'',
``Subpoena ad
testificandum'',
``Subpoena duces
tecum''. OAC 1513-3-
06(A)(4) Computation
and Extension of
Time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2023-20348 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on September 20, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.