Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band; Expanding Use of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or Other Expanded Use
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Issuing agencies
Abstract
In this document, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) of the Federal Communications Commission denies the request of Eutelsat S.A., Hispasat, S.A, Intelsat License LLC, Ovzon LLC, and SES Americom, Inc. (collectively, the "Satellite Operators") for an extension of the reply comment deadline for the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NRPM) that were published as proposed rules in the Federal Register.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 179 (Monday, September 18, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63890-63891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20088]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 15, 25, 27, 74, 78, and 101
[WT Docket No. 20-443; GN Docket No. 22-352; DA 23-802; FR ID 171502]
Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band; Expanding Use
of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or Other Expanded Use
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; denial of extension of reply comment deadline.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
[[Page 63891]]
(WTB) of the Federal Communications Commission denies the request of
Eutelsat S.A., Hispasat, S.A, Intelsat License LLC, Ovzon LLC, and SES
Americom, Inc. (collectively, the ``Satellite Operators'') for an
extension of the reply comment deadline for the Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NRPM)
that were published as proposed rules in the Federal Register.
DATES: A request for extension of the FNPRM and NPRM comment and reply
comment deadlines, filed on August 23, 2023, was denied on August 31,
2023. The deadline for filing reply comments (in response to the FNPRM
and NPRM) was September 8, 2023 as published at 88 FR 43502 (July 10,
2023) and 88 FR 43938 (July 10, 2023).
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Simon Banyai of the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#45362c282a2b6b27242b3c242c052326266b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="23504a4e4c4d0d41424d5a424a634540400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 418-1443.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau's Order, WT Docket No. 20-443; GN Docket No.
22-352; DA 23-802, adopted and released on August 31, 2023. The full
text of this document is available at <a href="https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-23-802A1.pdf">https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-23-802A1.pdf</a>. Text and Microsoft Word formats are also
available (replace ``.pdf'' in the link with ``.txt'' or ``.docx'',
respectively). Alternative formats are available for people with
disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), by
sending an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c8aeababfdf8fc88aeababe6afa7be"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afc9cccc9a9f9befc9cccc81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a> or call the Commission's Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-
0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
1. On May 19, 2023, the Commission released a Report and Order and
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (in WT Docket No. 20-443) and
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order (in GN Docket No. 22-352).\1\
In the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM), the Commission
investigates the potential to expand terrestrial fixed use or to permit
unlicensed use in the 500 megahertz of mid-band spectrum at 12.2-12.7
GHz (12.2 GHz band). In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the
Commission proposes to repurpose some or all of the 12.7-13.25 GHz
(12.7 GHz band) for mobile broadband or other expanded use. Comments in
response to the FNPRM and the NPRM were due on August 9, 2023, while
reply comments were due on September 8, 2023. On August 8, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) denied a prior joint request \2\ to
extend by 45 days the comment and reply in this proceeding.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band;
Expanding Use of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or
Other Expanded Use, WT Docket No. 20-443, GN Docket No. 22-352, FCC
23-36, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 2023 WL 3686032 (2023
12 GHz Item). The FNPRM and the NPRM were subsequently published
separately in the Federal Register. See Expanding Flexible Use of
the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band, 88 FR 43502 (July 10, 2023) (FNPRM);
Expanding Use of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or
Other Expanded Use, 88 FR 43938 (July 10, 2023) (NPRM).
\2\ Joint Request for Extension of Comment Deadline of the
Satellite Industry Association (SIA), together with Eutelsat S.A.,
Hispasat, S.A, Intelsat License LLC, Ovzon LLC, SES Americom, Inc.,
Space Exploration Technologies Corp., and WorldVu Satellites
Limited, WT Docket No. 20-443, GN Docket No. 22-352 (filed Aug. 4,
2023) (First Joint Request).
\3\ Expanding Flexible Use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz Band; Expanding
Use of the 12.7-13.25 GHz Band for Mobile Broadband or Other
Expanded Use, WT Docket No. 20-443, GN Docket No. 22-352, Order, DA
23-671, 2023 WL 5125009 (Aug. 8, 2023) (Denial of the First Joint
Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. On August 23, 2023, the Satellite Operators filed a joint
request to extend the reply comment deadline by 30-days--from September
8, 2023, to October 10, 2023.\4\ The Satellite Operators argue
additional time would benefit all parties by enabling closer review of
several technical studies and analyses filed with the comments in the
proceeding.\5\ They assert they plan to use the extension to prepare
and submit a technical study that responds to the various technical
arguments raised by commenters.\6\ They argue the Commission has
previously found extensions to be justified when technically complex
issues were raised in a proceeding like this one.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Joint Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline of
Intelsat License LLC, SES Americom, Inc., Hispasat, S.A., Eutelsat
S.A., and Ovzon LLC (collectively, the ``Satellite Operators''), WT
Docket No. 20-443, GN Docket No. 22-352 (filed Aug. 23, 2023)
(Second Joint Request).
\5\ Id. at 1 & n.2 (citing comments attaching technical analyses
filed by NTIA, Nokia, DIRECTV, LLC, WorldVu Satellites Limited, and
DISH Network Corp.).
\6\ Id. at 2.
\7\ Id at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau denies the Satellite
Operators' joint request for extension of the reply comment deadline in
this proceeding. As set forth in section 1.46 of the Commission's
rules, it is the Commission's policy that extensions of time shall not
be routinely granted.\8\ In this proceeding, the deadline for comments
was set for 30 days after publication of a summary of the item in the
Federal Register, with reply comments due 30 days after the comment
date.\9\ These are not unusual timeframes for comment and reply cycles
in a Commission rulemaking proceeding. Moreover, the issues present in
Commission rulemakings are often technically complex in nature; the
presence of complex technical issues alone does not provide
justification for an extension. Furthermore, the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau finds that the Satellite Operators have
neither identified specific technical issues that require additional
time for analysis nor explained with particularity why such analysis
cannot be completed by the current reply comment deadline. In addition,
the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau notes that this proceeding has
been designated permit-but-disclose,\10\ and parties may subsequently
submit additional analyses in accordance with the Commission's ex parte
rules.\11\ For these reasons, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
denies this Second Joint Request. Reply comments in the proceeding were
due September 8, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 47 CFR 1.46(a).
\9\ See 2023 12 GHz Item at *1. As noted in the Bureau's Denial
of the First Joint Request, commenters had access to the underlying
rulemaking document for almost three months prior to the initial
comment deadline. See Denial of the First Joint Request at *2, para.
3.
\10\ 2023 12 GHz Item at *54, para. 148.
\11\ See 47 CFR 1.200 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ordering Clause
4. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to section 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), and sections
0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 0.131, 0.331,
and 1.46, the Joint Request for Extension of Reply Comment Deadline
filed by Intelsat License LLC, SES Americom, Inc., Hispasat, S.A.,
Eutelsat S.A., and Ovzon LLC is denied.
Federal Communications Commission.
Blaise Scinto,
Chief, Broadband Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2023-20088 Filed 9-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.