Rule2023-18324
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mill Neck Creek, Bayville, NY
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 25, 2023
Effective
August 25, 2023
Issuing agencies
Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
Abstract
The Coast Guard is temporarily modifying the operating schedule that governs the Bayville Highway Bridge across the Mill Neck Creek, mile 0.1, at Bayville, NY. This action is necessary to allow the bridge owner to complete the remaining replacements and repairs.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58102-58104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18324]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2022-0891]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mill Neck Creek, Bayville, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary interim rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is temporarily modifying the operating
schedule that governs the Bayville Highway Bridge across the Mill Neck
Creek, mile 0.1, at Bayville, NY. This action is necessary to allow the
bridge owner to complete the remaining replacements and repairs.
DATES: This temporary interim rule is effective from August 25, 2023,
through January 31, 2024.
[[Page 58103]]
Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before September 25, 2023.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. Type the
docket number (USCG-2022-0891) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. In the Document Type column, select ``Supporting & Related
Material''.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Stephanie E. Lopez, Bridge Management Specialist, First
Coast Guard District; telephone (212) 514-4335, email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#44173021342c252a2d216a016a082b34213e04313727236a292d28"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="62311607120a030c0b074c274c2e0d12071822171101054c0f0b0e">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. This bridge is operating under single leaf openings and
will continue to operate in this way until rehabilitation work can be
completed in January 2024.
On May 10, 2022, the Coast Guard issued a General Deviation which
allowed the bridge owner, Nassau County, to deviate from the current
operating schedule in 33 CFR 117.800 to conduct major mechanical
rehabilitation of the bridge. Due to delays in procuring materials, the
project has run past the end date of April 12, 2023, of the General
Deviation. The bridge cannot be brought back to operating condition
until the completion of the mechanical rehabilitation. Therefore, there
is insufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing the modification.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making it effective in less than 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register. For reasons presented above, delaying the
effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest because the bridge is currently incapable of normal
operations and will not be back into full operation until the
rehabilitation work can be completed.
We are soliciting comments on this rulemaking. If the Coast Guard
determines that changes to the temporary interim rule are necessary, we
will publish a temporary final rule or other appropriate document.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule under
authority in 33 U.S.C. 499. The Coast Guard is modifying the operating
schedule that governs the Bayville Highway Bridge across the Mill Neck
Creek, mile 0.1, Bayville, New York. The Bayville highway bridge has a
vertical clearance, in the closed position, of 9 feet at mean high
water and unlimited vertical clearance when opened.
The existing drawbridge regulation, 33 CFR 117.800, states that the
draw of the Bayville highway bridge, mile 0.1, shall open on signal
from May 1 through October 31 and at all other times at least two-hour
advance notice. Nassau County, the bridge owner, has requested to
operate under single leaf openings so they may continue rehabilitation
on the bridge while providing minimal impact on marine traffic.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule, which permits a temporary
deviation from the operating schedule that governs the Bayville Highway
Bridge across the Mill Neck Creek, mile 0.1, Bayville, New York. The
rule is necessary to accommodate the completion of the bridge
mechanical repairs. This rule allows the bridge to operate under single
leaf openings until January 31, 2024. Vessels that can transit under
the bridge without an opening may do so.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this temporary interim rule after considering numerous
statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This temporary interim rule has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, the temporary interim rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge through a single leaf operation as
well as all vessels that do not require an opening may transit.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A.
above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment explaining
why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would
economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork
[[Page 58104]]
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph L49, of
Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule.
VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal Decision-
Making Portal at <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>. To do so, go to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, type USCG-2022-0891 in the search box and click
``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the ``Search Results''
column, and click on it. Then click on the ``Comment'' option. If your
material cannot be submitted using <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>, contact
the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document for alternate instructions.
To view documents mentioned in this rule as being available in the
docket, find the docket as described in the previous paragraph, and
then select ``Supporting & Related Material'' in the Document Type
column. Public comments will also be placed in our online docket and
can be viewed by following instructions on the <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> Frequently Asked Questions web page. We review all
comments received, but we will only post comments that address the
topic of the rule. We may choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate,
or duplicate comments that we receive. Additionally, if you click on
the ``Dockets'' tab and then the rule, you should see a ``Subscribe''
option for email alerts. Selecting this option will enable
notifications when comments are posted, or if/when a final rule is
published.
We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a> will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and DHS Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
Sec. 117.800 [Stayed]
0
2. Stay Sec. 117.800.
0
3. Add Sec. 117.T800 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.T800 Mill Neck Creek.
The draw shall operate on single leaf operations from August 25,
2023, to 11:59 p.m. on January 31, 2024.
Dated: August 20, 2023.
J.W. Mauger,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2023-18324 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 25, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.