Proposed Rule2023-17373
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 15, 2023
Issuing agencies
Personnel Management Office
Abstract
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing a rule to abolish the Allegheny, Pennsylvania, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and redefine Cuyahoga County, Ohio, to the Macomb, Michigan, NAF wage area; Trumbull County, OH, to the Niagara, New York, NAF wage area; Allegheny and Butler Counties, PA, to the Cumberland, PA, NAF wage area; Harrison County, West Virginia, to the Prince William, Virginia, NAF wage area; and Westmoreland County, PA, will no longer be defined. These changes are necessary because NAF FWS employment in the survey area is now below the minimum criterion of 26 wage employees to maintain a wage area, and the local activities no longer have the capability to conduct local wage surveys.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 15, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55421-55423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17373]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 15, 2023 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 55421]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
[Docket ID: OPM-2023-0017]
RIN 3206-AO60
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Allegheny, Pennsylvania,
as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing a rule
to abolish the Allegheny, Pennsylvania, nonappropriated fund (NAF)
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and redefine Cuyahoga County, Ohio,
to the Macomb, Michigan, NAF wage area; Trumbull County, OH, to the
Niagara, New York, NAF wage area; Allegheny and Butler Counties, PA, to
the Cumberland, PA, NAF wage area; Harrison County, West Virginia, to
the Prince William, Virginia, NAF wage area; and Westmoreland County,
PA, will no longer be defined. These changes are necessary because NAF
FWS employment in the survey area is now below the minimum criterion of
26 wage employees to maintain a wage area, and the local activities no
longer have the capability to conduct local wage surveys.
DATES: Send comments on or before September 14, 2023.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:
<bullet> Federal Rulemaking Portal: <a href="https://www.regulations.gov">https://www.regulations.gov</a>.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
All submissions received must include the agency name and docket
number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and
other submissions from members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public viewing at <a href="http://www.regulations.gov">http://www.regulations.gov</a>
as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers
or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202)
606-2858 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dfdecf4a0e1e8ecfbe8a0fde2e1e4eef4cde2fde0a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2656475f0b4a434750430b56494a4f455f6649564b08414950">[email protected]</span></a>.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Allegheny, Pennsylvania, NAF FWS wage
area is presently composed of one survey county, Allegheny County, PA,
and five area of application counties: Cuyahoga and Trumbull Counties,
OH; Butler and Westmoreland Counties, PA; and Harrison County, WV.
Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, the OPM
may establish a NAF wage area when there are a minimum of 26 NAF wage
employees in the survey area, a local activity has the capability to
host annual local wage surveys, and the survey area has at least 1,800
private enterprise employees in establishments within survey
specifications. The Department of Defense (DOD) notified OPM that there
has been a continuing decline of NAF FWS employment in the survey area
and the local activities no longer have the capability to conduct local
wage surveys. Currently, 11 DOD NAF FWS employees and 13 Department of
Veterans Affairs NAF FWS employees work in Allegheny County.
Since Cuyahoga and Trumbull Counites, OH; Allegheny and Butler
Counties, PA; and Harrison County, WV, will have continuing NAF
employment and do not meet the regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219
to be separate survey areas, they must be defined as areas of
application to other wage areas. Section 532.219 lists the regulatory
criteria OPM considers when defining FWS wage area boundaries. This
regulation allows consideration of the following criteria: proximity of
largest activity in each county, transportation facilities and
commuting patterns, and similarities of the counties in overall
population, private employment in major industry categories, and kinds
and sizes of private industrial establishments.
In selecting a wage area to which Cuyahoga County, OH, should be
redefined, proximity favors the Macomb, MI, NAF wage area. All other
criteria are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is defining
Cuyahoga County as an area of application to the Macomb NAF wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which Trumbull County, OH, should be
redefined, proximity favors the Niagara, NY, NAF wage area. All other
criteria are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is defining
Trumbull County as an area of application to the Niagara NAF wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which Alleghany County, PA, should be
redefined, proximity favors the Cumberland, PA, NAF wage area. All
other criteria are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is
defining Alleghany County as an area of application to the Cumberland
NAF wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which Butler County, PA, should be
redefined, proximity favors the Cumberland, PA, NAF wage area. All
other criteria are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is
defining Butler County as an area of application to the Cumberland NAF
wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which Harrison County, WV, should be
redefined, proximity favors the Prince William, VA, NAF wage area. All
other criteria are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is
defining Harrison County as an area of application to the Prince
William NAF wage area.
OPM is removing Westmoreland County from the wage area definition.
There are no longer NAF FWS employees working in Westmoreland County.
Under 5 U.S.C. 5343(a)(1)(B)(i), NAF wage areas ``shall not extend
beyond the immediate locality in which the particular prevailing rate
employees are employed.'' Therefore, Westmoreland County should not be
defined as part of a NAF wage area.
The Macomb wage area would consist of one survey county (Macomb
County, MI) and 15 area of application counties (Alpena, Calhoun,
Crawford, Grand Traverse, Huron, Iosco, Kent, Leelanau, Ottawa,
Saginaw, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties, MI; and Cuyahoga, Lucas, and
Ottawa Counties, OH).
The Niagara wage area would consist of one survey county (Niagara
County, NY) and four area of application counties (Trumbull County, OH;
Erie and Genesee Counties, NY, and Erie County, PA).
The Cumberland wage area would consist of one survey county
[[Page 55422]]
(Cumberland County, PA) and four area of application counties
(Allegheny, Blair, Butler, and Franklin Counties, PA).
The Prince William wage area would consist of one survey county
(Prince William County, VA) and two area of application counties
(Fauquier County, VA, and Harrison County, WV).
The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national labor-
management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning
the pay of FWS employees, recommended these changes by consensus. These
changes would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay
period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final
regulations.
Expected Impact of This Rule
Section 5343 of title 5, U.S. Code, provides OPM with the authority
and responsibility to define the boundaries of NAF FWS wage areas. Any
changes in wage area definitions can have the long-term effect of
increasing pay for Federal employees in affected locations. OPM expects
this final rule to impact approximately 26 NAF FWS employees.
Considering the small number of employees affected, OPM does not
anticipate this rulemaking will substantially impact local economies or
have a large impact in local labor markets. However, OPM is requesting
comment in this rulemaking regarding the impact. As this and future
wage area changes may impact higher volumes of employees in
geographical areas and could rise to the level of impacting local labor
markets, OPM will continue to study the implications of such impacts in
this or future rules as needed.
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is therefore not subject to review under E.O. 12866 and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
OPM certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Federalism
OPM has examined this proposed rule in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that this proposed rule
will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and
responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in
Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not impose any reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
0
2. In appendix D to subpart B, amend the table by revising the wage
area listing for the States of Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, and
Virginia to read as follows:
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas
* * * * *
Michigan
Macomb
Survey Area
Michigan:
Macomb
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Michigan:
Alpena
Calhoun
Crawford
Grand Traverse
Huron
Iosco
Kent
Leelanau
Ottawa
Saginaw
Washtenaw
Wayne
Ohio:
Cuyahoga
Lucas
Ottawa
* * * * *
NEW YORK
Jefferson
Survey Area
New York:
Jefferson
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New York:
Albany
Oneida
Onondaga
Ontario
Schenectady
Steuben
Kings-Queens
Survey Area
New York:
Kings
Queens
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New Jersey:
Essex
Hudson
New York:
Bronx
Nassau
New York
Richmond
Suffolk
Niagara
Survey Area
New York:
Niagara
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New York:
Erie
Genesee
Ohio:
Trumbull
Pennsylvania:
Erie
Orange
Survey Area
New York:
Orange
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
New York:
Dutchess
[[Page 55423]]
Westchester
* * * * *
PENNSYLVANIA
Cumberland
Survey Area
Pennsylvania:
Cumberland
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Pennsylvania:
Alleghany
Blair
Butler
Franklin
York
Survey Area
Pennsylvania:
York
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Pennsylvania:
Lebanon
* * * * *
VIRGINIA
Alexandria-Arlington-Fairfax
Survey Area
Virginia (city):
Alexandria
Virginia (counties):
Arlington
Fairfax
Area of Application. Survey area.
Chesterfield-Richmond
Survey Area
Virginia (city):
Richmond
Virginia (county):
Chesterfield
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Virginia (cities):
Bedford
Charlottesville
Salem
Virginia (counties):
Caroline
Nottoway
Prince George
West Virginia:
Pendleton
Hampton-Newport News
Survey Area
Virginia (cities):
Hampton
Newport News
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Virginia (city):
Williamsburg
Virginia (county):
York
Norfolk-Portsmouth-Virginia Beach
Survey Area
Virginia (cities):
Norfolk
Portsmouth
Virginia Beach
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
North Carolina:
Pasquotank
Virginia (cities):
Chesapeake
Suffolk
Virginia (counties):
Accomack
Northampton
Prince William
Survey Area
Virginia:
Prince William
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Virginia:
Fauquier
West Virginia:
Harrison
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2023-17373 Filed 8-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 15, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.