Notice2023-16817
Certain Pea Protein From the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 7, 2023
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 150 (Monday, August 7, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 150 (Monday, August 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52116-52120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16817]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-155]
Certain Pea Protein From the People's Republic of China:
Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable August 1, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Barton or T.J. Worthington,
AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0012
or (202) 482-4567, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On July 12, 2023, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)
received a countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of
certain pea protein (pea protein) from the People's Republic of China
(China) filed in proper form on behalf of PURIS Proteins, LLC (the
petitioner), a domestic producer of pea protein.\1\ The CVD petition
was accompanied by an antidumping duty (AD) petition concerning imports
of pea protein from China.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Pea
Protein from China,'' dated July 12, 2023 (Petition).
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 17, 18, and 25, 2023, Commerce requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition.\3\ On July
18, 2023, the petitioner filed requests for extensions of time to
respond to the supplemental questionnaires.\4\ On July 21 and 26, 2023,
the petitioner timely filed responses to these requests for additional
information.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated
July 17, 2023 (Volume I Supplemental Questionnaire); see also
Commerce's Letter, ``Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 18, 2023;
and Memorandum, ``Phone Call with Counsel to the Petitioner,'' dated
July 25, 2023 (Scope Memorandum).
\4\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Request for Extension to Respond
to Volume I Supplemental Questionnaire,'' dated July 18, 2023; and
``Request for Extension to Respond to Volume III Supplemental
Questionnaire,'' dated July 18, 2023.
\5\ See Petitioner's Letters, ``Response of Petitioner to Volume
I Supplemental Questionnaire,'' dated July 21, 2023 (General Issues
Supplement); ``Response of Petitioner to Volume III Supplemental
Questionnaire,'' dated July 21, 2023; and ``Certain Pea Protein from
China/Petitioner's Response to Second Supplemental Questionnaire,''
dated July 26, 2023 (Scope Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of China
(GOC) is providing countervailable subsidies, within the meaning of
sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of pea protein in
China, and that such imports are materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, the domestic industry producing in the United
States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are initiating CVD
investigations, the Petition is supported by information reasonably
available to the petitioner.
Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry because the petitioner is an interested party as
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act.\6\ Commerce also finds that
the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Petition at Volume I (pages 2-3). PURIS Proteins, LLC is
an interested party, as defined in sections 771(9)(C) and (D) of the
Act, respectively.
\7\ See ``Determination of Industry Support for the Petition''
section, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52117]]
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on July 12, 2023, the period of
investigation (POI) is January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is pea protein from
China. For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see
the appendix to this notice.
Comments on Scope of the Investigation
On July 17 and 25, 2023, Commerce requested information from the
petitioner regarding the proposed scope to ensure that the scope
language in the Petition is an accurate reflection of the products for
which the domestic industry is seeking relief.\9\ On July 21 and 26,
2023, the petitioner provided clarifications and revised the scope.\10\
The description of merchandise covered by this investigation, as
described in the appendix to this notice, reflects these
clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Volume I Supplemental Questionnaire at 3-4; see also
Scope Memorandum.
\10\ See General Issues Supplement at 1-8 and Exhibits I-S2 and
I-S3; see also Scope Supplement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for parties to raise issues regarding product
coverage (i.e., scope).\11\ Commerce will consider all scope comments
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary
determination. If scope comments include factual information, all such
factual information should be limited to public information.\12\ To
facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that
scope comments be submitted by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on August 21,
2023, which is 20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice.
Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual information, must be
filed by 5 p.m. ET on August 31, 2023, which is ten calendar days from
the initial comment deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27296,
27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble); see also 19 CFR 351.312.
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information that the parties
consider relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during
that time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party may contact Commerce and
request permission to submit the additional information. All scope
comments must also be filed on the record of the concurrent AD
investigation.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's (E&C) Antidumping Duty and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an
exception applies.\13\ An electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS
can be found at: <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx</a> and a handbook
can be found at: <a href="https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook_on_Electronic_Filing_Procedures.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified the GOC of the receipt of the Petition and provided an
opportunity for consultations with respect to the Petition.\14\ The GOC
did not request consultations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on
Certain Pea Protein from the People's Republic of China,'' dated
July 13, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which
is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has
been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic
like product,\15\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\16\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\17\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that pea protein, as
defined in the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product, and
we have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like
product.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Petition at Volume I (pages 13-20 and Exhibits I-17
through I-26); see also General Issues Supplement at 9-15.
\18\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to this case and information regarding industry support, see
Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Certain Pea
Protein from the People's Republic of China (China Initiation
Checklist) at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry Support for the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petition Covering Certain Pea
Protein from the People's Republic of China (Attachment II). This
checklist is dated concurrently with this notice and on file
electronically via ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether the petitioner has standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data
contained in the Petition
[[Page 52118]]
with reference to the domestic like product as defined in the ``Scope
of the Investigation,'' in the appendix to this notice. To establish
industry support, the petitioner provided its 2022 production of the
domestic like product and compared this to the estimated total 2022
production of pea protein by the U.S. industry.\19\ We relied on data
provided by the petitioner for purposes of measuring industry
support.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Petition at Volume I (page 4 and Exhibits I-2 through
I-6); see also General Issues Supplement at 8 and Exhibit I-S4.
\20\ See Petition at Volume I (page 4 and Exhibits I-2 through
I-6); see also General Issues Supplement at 8 and Exhibit I-S4. For
further discussion, see Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation
Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petition, the General Issues
Supplement, and other information readily available to Commerce
indicates that the petitioner has established industry support for the
Petition.\21\ First, the Petition established support from domestic
producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not
required to take further action in order to evaluate industry support
(e.g., polling).\22\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have
met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product.\23\ Finally, the domestic
producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry
support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic
producers (or workers) who support the Petition account for more than
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by
that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition.\24\ Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petition
was filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Petition at Volume I (page 4 and Exhibits I-2 through
I-6); see also General Issues Supplement at 8 and Exhibit I-S4. For
further discussion, see Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation
Checklist.
\22\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist;
see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
\23\ See Attachment II of the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because China is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from China materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner
alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold
provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Petition at Volume I (pages 21-22 and Exhibits I-6 and
I-29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by the adverse impact on the domestic industry's sales
volumes, market share levels, and return on investments; significant
volume of subject imports; underselling and price depression and/or
suppression; lost sales and revenues; and layoffs.\27\ We assessed the
allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury, threat
of material injury, causation, as well as negligibility, and we have
determined that these allegations are properly supported by adequate
evidence, and meet the statutory requirements for initiation.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ Id. at Volume I (pages 21-41 and Exhibits I-4, I-6, I-29
through I-32, and I-34 through I-41.
\28\ See China CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment III,
Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and
Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Certain Pea Protein from the People's Republic of China
(Attachment III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon the examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that they meet the requirements of section 702 of
the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to determine
whether imports of pea protein from China benefit from countervailable
subsidies conferred by the GOC. Based on our review of the Petition, we
find that there is sufficient information to initiate a CVD
investigation on 23 of 25 programs alleged by the petitioner. For a
full discussion of the basis for our decision to initiate an
investigation of each program, see the China CVD Initiation Checklist.
A public version of the initiation checklist for this investigation is
available on ACCESS. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our
preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the date of this
initiation.
Respondent Selection
The petitioner identified 18 companies in China as producers and/or
exporters of pea protein.\29\ Commerce intends to follow its standard
practice in CVD investigations and calculate company-specific subsidy
rates in this investigation. In the event that Commerce determines that
the number of companies is large, and it cannot individually examine
each company based upon Commerce's resources, Commerce intends to
select mandatory respondents based on quantity and value (Q&V)
questionnaires issued to the potential respondents. Commerce normally
selects mandatory respondents in CVD investigations using U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) entry data for U.S. imports under the
appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings listed in the scope of the investigation. However, for this
investigation, the main HTSUS subheadings under which the subject
merchandise would enter (3504.00.1000, 3504.00.5000, and 2106.10.0000)
are basket categories under which non-subject merchandise may enter.
Therefore, we cannot rely on CBP entry data in selecting respondents.
Instead, we intend to issue Q&V questionnaires to each potential
respondent for which the petitioner has provided a complete address.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See General Issues Supplement at 1 and Exhibit I-S1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporters/producers of pea protein from China that do not receive
Q&V questionnaires by mail may still submit a response to the Q&V
questionnaire and can obtain the Q&V questionnaire from E&C's website
at <a href="https://www.trade.gov/ec-adcvd-case-announcements">https://www.trade.gov/ec-adcvd-case-announcements</a>. Responses to the
Q&V questionnaire must be submitted by the relevant Chinese producers/
exporters no later than 5 p.m. ET on August 15, 2023, which is two
weeks from the signature date of this notice. All Q&V responses must be
filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must
be received successfully, in its entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00
p.m. ET on the deadline noted above. Commerce intends to finalize its
decision regarding respondent selection within 20 days of publication
of this notice.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version
[[Page 52119]]
of the Petition has been provided to the GOC via ACCESS. Furthermore,
to the extent practicable, Commerce will attempt to provide a copy of
the public version of the Petition to each exporter named in the
Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable
indication that imports of pea protein from China are materially
injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\30\ A
negative ITC determination will result in the investigation being
terminated.\31\ Otherwise, this CVD investigation will proceed
according to statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
\31\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence
placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual
information described in (i)-(iv). Section 351.301(b) of Commerce's
regulations requires any party, when submitting factual information, to
specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information
is being submitted \32\ and, if the information is submitted to rebut,
clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to
provide an explanation identifying the information already on the
record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or
correct.\33\ Time limits for the submission of factual information are
addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific time limits based
on the type of factual information being submitted. Interested parties
should review the regulations prior to submitting factual information
in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301.\34\ For submissions that are
due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be
considered untimely if it is filed after 10 a.m. ET on the due date.
Under certain circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different
time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for
submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such
a case, Commerce will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the
deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must
be filed to be considered timely. An extension request must be made in
a separate, stand-alone submission; Commerce will grant untimely filed
requests for the extension of time limits only in limited cases where
we determine, based on 19 CFR 351.302, that extraordinary circumstances
exist. Parties should review Commerce's regulations concerning factual
information prior to submitting factual information in this
investigation.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See 19 CFR 351.302.
\35\ See 19 CFR 301; see also Extension of Time Limits; Final
Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), available at: <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm">https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\36\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\37\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\37\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at:
<a href="https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf">https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
administrative protective order in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Parties wishing to participate in this investigation should ensure that
they meet the requirements of 19 CFR 351.103(d) (e.g., by filing the
required letters of appearance). Note that Commerce has temporarily
modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing
business proprietary information, until further notice.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: August 1, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The product within the scope of this investigation is high
protein content (HPC) pea protein, which is a protein derived from
peas (including, but not limited to, yellow field peas and green
field peas) and which contains at least 65 percent protein on a dry
weight basis. HPC pea protein may also be identified as, for
example, pea protein concentrate, pea protein isolate, hydrolyzed
pea protein, pea peptides, and fermented pea protein. Pea protein,
including HPC pea protein, has the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
registry number 222400-29-5.
The scope covers HPC pea protein in all physical forms,
including all liquid (e.g., solution) and solid (e.g., powder)
forms, regardless of packaging or the inclusion of additives (e.g.,
flavoring, suspension agents, preservatives).
The scope also includes HPC pea protein described above that is
blended, combined, or mixed with non-subject pea protein or with
other ingredients (e.g., proteins derived from other sources,
fibers, carbohydrates, sweeteners, and fats) to make products such
as protein powders, dry beverage blends, and protein fortified
beverages. For any such blended, combined, or mixed products, only
the HPC pea protein component is covered by the scope of this
investigation. HPC pea protein that has been blended, combined, or
mixed with other products is included within the scope, regardless
of whether the blending, combining, or mixing occurs in third
countries.
HPC pea protein that is otherwise within the scope is covered
when commingled (i.e., blended, combined, or mixed) with HPC pea
protein from sources not subject to this investigation. Only the
subject component of the commingled product is covered by the scope.
A blend, combination, or mixture is excluded from the scope if
the total HPC pea protein content of the blend, combination, or
mixture (regardless of the source or sources) comprises less than 5
percent of the blend, combination, or mixture on a dry weight basis.
All products that meet the written physical description are
within the scope of the investigation unless specifically excluded.
The following products, by way of example, are outside and/or
specifically excluded from the scope of the investigation:
<bullet> burgers, snack bars, bakery products, sugar and gum
confectionary products, milk,
[[Page 52120]]
cheese, baby food, sauces and seasonings, and pet food, even when
such products are made with HPC pea protein.
<bullet> HPC pea protein that has gone through an extrusion
process to alter the HPC pea protein at the structural and
functional level, resulting in a product with a fibrous structure
which resembles muscle meat upon hydration. These products are
commonly described as textured pea protein or texturized pea
protein.
<bullet> HPC pea protein that has been further processed to
create a small crunchy nugget commonly described as a pea protein
crisp.
<bullet> protein derived from chickpeas.
The merchandise covered by the scope is currently classified
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
categories 3504.00.1000, 3504.00.5000, and 2106.10.0000. Such
merchandise may also enter the U.S. market under HTSUS category
2308.00.9890. Although HTSUS categories and the CAS registry number
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2023-16817 Filed 8-4-23; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 7, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.