Notice2023-16581
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Sales, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2021-2022
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
August 3, 2023
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that Your Standing International, Inc. (YSI), Shang Jeng Nail Co., Ltd. (Shang Jeng), World Kun Company Limited (World Kun), and the non- individually-examined companies for which a review was requested made sales of certain steel nails (nails) from Taiwan at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. Commerce also preliminarily finds that three companies, Concord International Engineering & Trading Co., Ltd. (Concord International), Wiresmith Industrial Co., Ltd. (Wiresmith), and Create Trading Co., Ltd. (Create Trading) had no reviewable sales of nails from Taiwan during the POR, and four other companies made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 148 (Thursday, August 3, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 148 (Thursday, August 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51291-51295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16581]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-854]
Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments, Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Sales, and
Partial Rescission of Review; 2021-2022
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds
that Your Standing International, Inc. (YSI), Shang Jeng Nail Co., Ltd.
(Shang Jeng), World Kun Company Limited (World Kun), and the non-
individually-examined companies for which a review was requested made
sales of certain steel nails (nails) from Taiwan at prices below normal
value (NV) during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2021, through
June 30, 2022. Commerce also preliminarily finds that three companies,
Concord International Engineering & Trading Co., Ltd. (Concord
International), Wiresmith Industrial Co., Ltd. (Wiresmith), and Create
Trading Co., Ltd. (Create Trading) had no reviewable sales of nails
from Taiwan during the POR, and four other companies made no shipments
of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable August 3, 2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faris Montgomery, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 13, 2015, Commerce published the antidumping duty order on
nails from Taiwan.\1\ On September 6, 2022, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an administrative review of the
Order.\2\ Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), on March 8, 2023, Commerce determined that it was
not practicable to complete the preliminary results of this review
within 245 days and extended the deadline for the preliminary results
of this review by 117 days, until July 28, 2023.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of Korea,
Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 2015)
(Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 54463 (September 6, 2022) (Initiation
Notice).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Extension of Deadline for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 8,
2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a detailed description of the events that followed the
initiation of this review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\4\
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is available via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
<a href="https://access.trade.gov">https://access.trade.gov</a>. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx">https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx</a>.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan; 2021-2022,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this Order are certain steel nails from
Taiwan. The certain steel nails subject to the Order are currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05,
7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18,
7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40,
7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80,
7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. Certain
steel nails subject to this Order also may be classified under HTSUS
subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS subheadings.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and for
customs purposes,
[[Page 51292]]
the written product description, available in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, remains dispositive.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the publication of
the notice of initiation of the requested review. Because all requests
for administrative review of Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.
were withdrawn by interested parties within 90 days of the date of
publication of the Initiation Notice, Commerce is rescinding this
review with respect to this company, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1). The administrative review remains active with respect to
140 companies.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a) of the Act. Export price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. NV is calculated in accordance with section 773
of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying these
preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
Commerce received no-shipment certifications from four companies:
Astrotech Steels Private Limited (Astrotech); Region Systems Sdn. Bhd
(Region Systems); Region Industries Co., Ltd. (Region Industries); and
Region International Co. Ltd. (Region International). To confirm these
companies' no-shipment claims, Commerce issued a no-shipment inquiry to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and received no contradictory
information.\5\ Therefore, we preliminarily determine that these four
companies did not have any shipments of subject merchandise during the
POR. Consistent with Commerce's practice, we will not rescind the
review with respect to these companies, but, rather, will complete the
review and issue appropriate assessment instructions based on the final
results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``No Shipment Inquiry for Various Companies
During the Period 07/01/2021 through 06/30/2022,'' dated July 19,
2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Sales
Wiresmith and Create Trading are resellers of subject merchandise
that reported that they had no reviewable sales or shipments during the
POR. The resellers provided sales documentation, such as invoices and
packing lists from their unaffiliated suppliers, as well as accounting
records as evidence in support of their claims. Additionally, mandatory
respondent Concord International provided timely responses to
Commerce's antidumping duty questionnaire and supplemental
questionnaires. Concord International reported in its questionnaire
responses that its unaffiliated supplier had knowledge that the steel
nails they produced and sold to it were destined for the United States.
Based on the information provided by Wiresmith, Create Trading, and
Concord International, we preliminarily determine that these three
companies were not the first parties in the transaction chain to have
knowledge that the subject merchandise was destined for the United
States and, thus, Wiresmith, Create Trading, and Concord International
are not considered the exporters of subject merchandise during the POR
for purposes of this review. Specifically, the record demonstrates that
Wiresmith, Create Trading, and Concord International's respective
unaffiliated suppliers had knowledge that the steel nails they produced
and sold to the resellers were destined for the United States. Thus, we
preliminarily determine that Wiresmith, Create Trading, and Concord
International had no reviewable sales of subject merchandise during the
POR.
Commerce finds that, based on the clarification in the 2003
Assessment of Antidumping Duties \6\ notice regarding the reseller
policy, we will not rescind the review in these circumstances but,
rather, complete the review with respect to the resellers and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP after the completion of the review.\7\
Specifically, we preliminarily find it appropriate in this case to
instruct CBP at the completion of the review to liquidate any existing
entries of subject merchandise produced and exported by the resellers'
respective unaffiliated suppliers at the rate applicable to the
unaffiliated producers, or the all-others rate if there is no rate for
the unaffiliated producers.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment of Antidumping Duties).
\7\ Id.
\8\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
77610, 77612 (December 19, 2008); Certain Pasta from Turkey: Notice
of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76
FR 23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011), unchanged in Pasta from Turkey:
Notice of Final Results of the 14th Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 76 FR 68399 (November 4, 2011); see also Certain Steel Nails
from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Partial
Rescission of Review; 2020-2021, 87 FR 35734, 35736 (June 13, 2022),
unchanged in Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2020-2021, 87 FR 63034, 63035 (October 18, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Available
Pursuant to section 776(a)(1) and 776(a)(2)(A)-(C) of the Act,
Commerce is preliminarily relying upon facts otherwise available to
assign estimated dumping margins to mandatory respondents Shang Jeng
and World Kun because both companies were unresponsive to our requests
for information, thereby withholding necessary information that was
requested by Commerce, failing to provide the information requested by
the specified deadlines in the form and manner requested, and
significantly impeding the conduct of the review. Further, Commerce
preliminarily finds that Shang Jeng and World Kun failed to cooperate
by not acting to the best of their ability to comply with requests for
information and, thus, Commerce is applying an adverse inference in
selecting among the facts available, in accordance with section 776(b)
of the Act. As adverse facts available, we are assigning these
companies a rate of 78.17 percent, which is the highest rate applied in
any segment of this proceeding. For a full description of the
methodology underlying our conclusions regarding the application of
adverse facts available, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i)(3) of the Act, Commerce intends to
verify the information reported by companies in this administrative
review for consideration in the final results.
Rate for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a weighted-average dumping margin to be determined for
companies not selected for individual examination when Commerce limits
its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section
777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5)
of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others
rate in an antidumping duty investigation, for guidance when
determining the weighted-average dumping margin for companies which
were not selected for individual examination in an administrative
review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of
[[Page 51293]]
the Act, the all-others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated weighted average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers individually investigated,
excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined
entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .''
In this review, the preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for
YSI is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise
available, whereas other selected mandatory respondents' preliminary
weighted-average dumping margins are based entirely on facts available.
Therefore, Commerce has preliminarily assigned a weighted-average
dumping margin to the non-examined companies that is equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin for YSI in accordance with its
practice.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See, e.g., Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from
Taiwan: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-1019, 86 FR 28554,
28555 (May 27, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily find that the following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the period July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022:\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your Standing International, Inc............................ 23.16
Shang Jeng Nail Co., Ltd.................................... 78.17
World Kun Company Limited................................... 78.17
Non-Examined Companies \10\................................. 23.16
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results to interested parties with an administrative
protective order within five days after the date of public announcement
of the preliminary results, or within five days after the publication
of the preliminary results in the Federal Register.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties will be notified of the deadline for the
submission of case briefs and written comments at a later date.\12\
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed not later than seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.\13\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) a statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.\14\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages
total, including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2); see also Temporary Rule
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule).
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days after the date of publication
of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) the party's name, address,
and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; (3) whether any
participant is a foreign national; and (4) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised
in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing
is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a date and time to be
determined.
All briefs and hearing requests must be filed electronically using
ACCESS \15\ and must be served on interested parties.\16\ An
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary information, until further notice.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
\16\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
\17\ See Temporary Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), Commerce intends to determine, and CBP shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise
covered by this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this administrative review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
For an individually examined respondent whose weighted-average
dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50
percent), upon completion of the final results, Commerce intends to
calculate importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each
importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those
sales.\18\ Where we do not have entered values for all U.S. sales to a
particular importer, we will calculate an importer-specific, per-unit
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total
quantity of those sales. To determine whether an importer-specific,
per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2), we also will calculate an importer-specific ad valorem
ratio based on estimated entered values. Where either a respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-
specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we intend to instruct
CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping
duties.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\19\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2); see also Antidumping Proceeding:
Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment
Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR
8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by an
individually examined respondent for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the United States, we intend to instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, if we continue to find no shipments of subject
merchandise for Astrotech, Region Systems, Region Industries, and/or
Region International in the final results, for which we preliminarily
find no such shipments during the POR, any suspended entries of subject
merchandise associated with these companies will be liquidated at the
all-others rate. If we continue to find Concord International, Create
Trading, and Wiresmith had no reviewable entries during the POR in the
final results, any suspended entries of subject merchandise associated
with these companies will be liquidated at the rate applicable to the
unaffiliated producers, or the all-others rate if there is no rate for
the unaffiliated producers.
For the companies which were not selected for individual
examination, we intend to assign an antidumping duty assessment rate
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined for
[[Page 51294]]
the non-examined companies in the final results of review.
The final results of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by
the final results of this review and for future cash deposits of
estimated antidumping duties, where applicable.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit rate for the companies
listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is
less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of
19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero;
(2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not covered in
this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior completed review, or the
less-than-fair value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the company-specific rate established for
the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the producer
of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers and exporters will continue to be 2.16 percent, the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\22\ These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination in Less Than Fair
Value Investigation and Notice of Amended Final Determination, 82 FR
55090 (November 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of the Review
Unless the deadline is otherwise extended, Commerce intends to
issue the final results of this administrative review, including the
results of our analysis of issues raised by the parties in the written
comments, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results
in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4),
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: July 28, 2023.
Lisa W. Wang,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation
V. Partial Rescission of Review
VI. Preliminary Determinations of No Shipments and No Reviewable
Sales
VII. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference
VIII. Rate for Non-Selected Companies
IX. Discussion of the Methodology
X. Currency Conversion
XI. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
1. A-Jax Enterprises Limited
2. A-Jax International Company Limited
3. A-Stainless International Company Limited
4. Advanced Global Sourcing Limited
5. Aimreach Enterprises Company Limited
6. Alisios International Corporation
7. Allwin Architectural Hardware Inc.
8. A.N. Cooke Manufacturing Co., Pty., Limited
9. Asia Engineered Components
10. Asia Link Industrial Corporation
11. Asia Smarten Way Corp. (Taiwan)
12. Autolink International Company Limited
13. BCR Inc.
14. Bestwell International Corporation
15. Boss Precision Works Co., Ltd.
16. Budstech CI Limited
17. Bulls Technology Company Limited
18. Canatex Industrial Company Limited
19. Cata Company Limited
20. Cenluxmetals Company Limited
21. Chang Bin Industrial Co., Ltd.
22. Channg Chin Industry Corporation
23. Charng Yu Industrial Company
24. Chen Nan Iron Wire Co., Ltd.
25. Chen Yu-Lan
26. Chia Da Fastener Company Limited
27. Chiang Shin Fasteners Industries Ltd.
28. Chin Tai Sing Precision Manufactory Co., Ltd.
29. Chun Yu Works & Company Limited
30. Cross International Co., Ltd.
31. Da Wing Industry Company Limited
32. Dar Yu Enterprise Co., Ltd.
33. Eagre International Trade Co., Ltd.
34. Ever-Top Hardware Corporation
35. Excel Components Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
36. Fastguard Fastening Systems Inc.
37. Fastnet Corporation
38. Fujian Xinhong Mech. & Elec. Co., Ltd.
39. Funtec International Co., Ltd.
40. Fuzhou Royal Floor Co., Ltd.
41. FWU Kuang Enterprise Co., Ltd.
42. GoFast Company Limited
43. H-H Fasteners Company
44. H-Locker Components Inc.
45. Hau Kawang Enterprise Co., Ltd.
46. Hecny Group
47. Hi-Sharp Industrial Corp., Ltd.
48. Hom Wei Enterprise Corporation
49. HWA Hsing Screw Industry Co., Ltd.
50. Hwaguo Industrial Fasteners Co., Ltd.
51. Hy-Mart Fastener Co., Ltd.
52. Hyup Sung Indonesia
53. In Precision Link Co., Ltd.
54. Intai Technology Corporation
55. JCH Hardware Company Inc.
56. Jet Crown International Co., Ltd.
57. Ji Li Deng Fasteners Co., Ltd.
58. Jinhai Hardware Co., Ltd.
59. Jinn Her Enterprise Limited
60. Jockey Ben Metal Enterprise Co., Ltd.
61. Kan Good Enterprise Co., Ltd.
62. Katsuhana Fasteners Corporation
63. Kay Guay Enterprises Co., Ltd.
64. Key Use Industrial Works Co., Ltd.
65. KOT Components Co., Ltd.
66. K. Ticho Industries Co., Ltd.
67. K Win Fasteners Inc.
68. Kuan Hsin Screw Industry Co., Ltd.
69. Liang Ying Fasteners Industry Co., Ltd.
70. Long Chan Enterprise Co., Ltd.
71. Lu Chu Shin Yee Works Co., Ltd.
72. Mechanical Hardwares Co.
73. Midas Union Co., Ltd.
74. Min Hwei Enterprise Co., Ltd.
75. Ming Cheng Precision Co., Ltd.
76. Ming Zhan Industrial Co., Ltd.
77. ML Global Ltd.
78. Newfast Co., Ltd.
79. Noah Enterprise Co., Ltd.
80. Nytaps Taiwan Corporation
81. Pao Shen Enterprises Co., Ltd.
82. Par Excellence Industrial Co., Ltd.
83. Pengteh Industrial Co., Ltd.
84. Pneumax Corp.
85. Printech T Electronics Corporation
86. Pro-an International Co., Ltd.
87. Pronto Great China Corp.
88. Professional Fasteners Development Co., Ltd.
89. P.S.M. Fasteners (Asia) Limited
90. Qi Ding Enterprise Co., Ltd.
91. Right Source Co., Ltd.
92. Rodex Fasteners Corp.
93. Rong Chang Metal Co., Ltd.
94. San Shing Fastech Corporation
95. SBSCQ Taiwan Limited
96. Shanxi Pioneer Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.
[[Page 51295]]
97. Somax Enterprise Co., Ltd.
98. Spec Products Corporation
99. Star World Product and Trading Co., Ltd.
100. Sumeeko Industries Co., Ltd.
101. Sunshine Spring Co., Ltd.
102. Suntec Industries Co., Ltd.
103. Supreme Fasteners Corp.
104. Szu I Industries Co., Ltd.
105. Tag Fasteners Sdn. Bhd.
106. Taifas Corporation
107. Taiwan Geer-Tai Works Co., Ltd.
108. Taiwan Quality Fastener Co., Ltd.
109. Team Builder Enterprise Limited
110. Techno Associates Taiwan Co., Ltd.
111. Techup Development Co., Ltd.
112. TG Co., Ltd.
113. Tianjin Jinchi Metal Products Co. Ltd.
114. Topps Wang International Ltd.
115. Ume-Pride International Inc.
116. Unistrong Industrial Co., Ltd.
117. United Nail Products Co. Ltd.
118. Vanguard International Co., Ltd.
119. Wa Tai Industrial Co., Ltd.
120. Win Fastener Corporation
121. WTA International Co., Ltd.
122. Wumax Industry Co., Ltd.
123. Wyser International Corporation
124. Yeun Chang Hardware Tool Company Limited
125. Yng Tran Enterprise Company Limited
126. Yoh Chang Enterprise Company Limited
127. Yow Chern Company
128. Yumark Enterprises Corporation
129. Yu Tai World Co., Ltd.
130. Zenith Good Enterprise Corporation
[FR Doc. 2023-16581 Filed 8-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on August 3, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.