Notice2023-15465
Certain Power Semiconductors, and Mobile Devices and Computers Containing Same Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part and, on Review, To Affirm a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of Investigation
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
July 21, 2023
Issuing agencies
International Trade Commission
Abstract
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part and, on review, to affirm a final initial determination ("ID") issued by the presiding administrative law judge ("ALJ") finding no violation of section 337. The investigation is terminated.
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 139 (Friday, July 21, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 139 (Friday, July 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 47188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15465]
[[Page 47188]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1308]
Certain Power Semiconductors, and Mobile Devices and Computers
Containing Same Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part
and, on Review, To Affirm a Final Initial Determination Finding No
Violation of Section 337; Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to review in part and, on review, to affirm a
final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') finding no violation of section 337.
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Lall, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2043. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket system (``EDIS'') at
<a href="https://edis.usitc.gov">https://edis.usitc.gov</a>. For help accessing EDIS, please email
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40050409137308252c300035332934236e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1257565b41215a777e625267617b66713c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at <a href="https://www.usitc.gov">https://www.usitc.gov</a>. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on April 1, 2022, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Arigna
Technology Limited (``Arigna'') of Dublin, Ireland. 87 FR 19124-25
(Apr. 1, 2022). The complaint, as amended and supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain power semiconductors, and mobile devices and
computers containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1 and 2
of U.S. Patent No. 7,183,835 (``the '835 Patent'') The Commission's
notice of investigation named thirteen (13) respondents: (1) Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. of Suwon, Republic of Korea and Samsung
Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey (collectively,
``the Samsung Respondents''); (2) Google LLC of Mountain View,
California; Lenovo Group Ltd. of Beijing, China; Lenovo (United States)
Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina; Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago,
Illinois; Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington; and OnePlus
Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China (collectively,
``the Additional Settling Respondents''); (3) TCL Electronics Holdings
Limited and TCL Communication Limited, both of Hong Kong Science Park,
Hong Kong; TTE Technology Inc. of Corona, California; and TCT Mobile
(USA) Inc. of Irvine, California (collectively, ``the TCL
Respondents''); and (4) Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California. The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations is participating in the investigation.
On December 8, 2022, the Commission terminated this investigation
as to the Samsung Respondents and the Additional Settling Respondents
based on respective settlement and license agreements. (Order Nos. 24,
25) (Nov. 10, 2022), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Dec. 8, 2022).
The presiding ALJ held an evidentiary hearing in this investigation
on February 13-17, 2023.
On June 7, 2023, the Commission terminated this investigation as to
the TCL Respondents based on a settlement agreement. Order No. 51,
unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (June 7, 2023).
On May 18, 2023, the presiding ALJ issued the subject ID finding no
violation of section 337 because: (1) Arigna failed to prove that the
accused Qualcomm Chips or Qorvo Chips infringe the asserted claims of
the '835 Patent; (2) Arigna failed to satisfy the technical prong of
the domestic industry requirement; and (3) Arigna failed to satisfy the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The ID also finds
that the asserted claims of the '835 patent have not been shown to be
invalid as anticipated and/or obvious in view of certain asserted prior
art or for lack of written description.
No party filed a petition for review of the subject ID.
Having reviewed the record of the investigation, including the
final ID and the parties' submissions to the ALJ, the Commission has
determined to review the ID in part and, on review, to affirm the ID's
finding that Arigna has not satisfied the economic prong of the
domestic industry requirement.\1\ The Commission has determined not to
review the remainder of the final ID. The investigation is hereby
terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On review, Commissioner Karpel notes that she disagrees with
the ID's per se exclusion of investments in post-sale technical
service and support, including field engineering and product line
marketers, who engage in customer-facing engineering activities as
non-qualifying investments. In her view, the statute does not
require the per se exclusion of plant and equipment investments or
employment of labor or capital in customer-facing engineering
activities with respect to articles protected by a patent, whether
or not they are characterized as sales and marketing. See Certain
Artificial Eyelash Extension Systems, Products Containing Same, and
Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1226, Separate Views of
Commissioners Karpel and Schmidtlein, at 35-36 (Oct. 24, 2022)
(``There is no statutory prohibition against inclusion of these
types of expenses; rather, the key is whether the expenses properly
fall within (A) or (B).''); Certain Vacuum Insulated Flasks and
Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1216, Comm'n Notice, 86 FR
59424, 49425 (Oct., 27, 2021) (``As the Commission has previously
stated, ````[w]hile marketing and sales activity, alone, may not be
sufficient to meet the domestic industry test, those activities may
be considered as part of the overall evaluation of whether or not a
Complainant meets the economic prong.''' (quoting Certain Solid
State Storage Drives, Stacked Electronics Components, and Products
Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1097, Comm'n Op. at 22 (June
29, 2018)). In this investigation, Arigna has failed to establish
that any articles practice one or more claims of the `835 patent,
and thus Arigna cannot satisfy the domestic industry requirement
regardless of the magnitude or alleged significance of Microchip
expenditures considered for the economic prong of the domestic
industry requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission vote for this determination took place on July 17,
2023.
The authority for the Commission's determinations is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: July 17, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-15465 Filed 7-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on July 21, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.