Notice2023-13523
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of 2015-2016 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 26, 2023
Issuing agencies
Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Abstract
On June 9, 2023, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court no. 18-00191, sustaining the Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China (China) covering the period December 1, 2015, though November 30, 2016. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. (Jilin Forest).
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 121 (Monday, June 26, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 121 (Monday, June 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41386-41388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13523]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-970]
Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China:
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Results of 2015-2016
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Notice of Amended Final Results
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 9, 2023, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT)
issued its final judgment in Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring
Group Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court no. 18-00191, sustaining the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s second remand results pertaining to
the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on
multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China
(China) covering the period December 1, 2015, though November 30, 2016.
Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not
in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review,
and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the
dumping margin assigned to Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group
Co., Ltd. (Jilin Forest).
DATES: Applicable June 19, 2023.
[[Page 41387]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Cherry, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0607.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 26, 2018, Commerce published its Final Results in the 2015-
2016 AD administrative review of MLWF from China.\1\ Commerce
determined that mandatory respondent Jilin Forest did not qualify for a
separate rate because it is an entity that is majority-owned by the
Chinese government and, therefore, had not demonstrated an absence of
de facto government control. Jilin Forest appealed Commerce's Final
Results. On April 29, 2021, the CIT remanded the Final Results to
Commerce.\2\ The CIT held the following: (1) Commerce's determination
of de facto government control of Jilin Forest, a cooperating mandatory
respondent, lacks the support of substantial evidence and is not in
accordance with law; and (2) Commerce failed to explain how the
application of its non-market-economy (NME) presumption to Jilin Forest
after the company was selected for individual examination was in
accordance with law and supported by substantial evidence.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Multilayered Wood flooring from the People's Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission; 2015-
2016, 83 FR 35461 (July 26, 2018), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum; and Multilayered Wood Flooring from the
People's Republic of China: Correction to the Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2015-2016, 83 FR 45418
(September 7, 2018) (in which Commerce corrected the misspelling of
Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd.'s name and included Double F
Limited among the companies for which this review was rescinded)
(collectively, Final Results). Commerce referred to the respondent
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. as ``Jinqiao
Flooring'' in the Final Results.
\2\ See Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd.
v. United States, 519 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (CIT 2021).
\3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its first remand redetermination, issued in November 2021,
Commerce further explained its determination that Jilin Forest failed
to rebut the presumption of de facto government control and, therefore,
was not entitled to an individual weighted-average dumping margin
separate from the rate established for the China-wide entity.\4\
Additionally, Commerce provided an overview of its broad authority
under the statutory scheme, the purpose of Commerce's NME
presumption,\5\ and the application of its NME presumption and the
application of the weighted-average dumping margin established for the
China-wide entity to Jilin Forest.\6\ We also referenced the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (Federal Circuit's) decisions that
have affirmed Commerce's application of the NME presumption and
recognition of an NME-wide entity as a single exporter for purposes of
assigning an antidumping duty rate to the individual members of the
NME-wide entity that have not demonstrated either their de jure or de
facto independence from government control.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. v.
United States, Court No. 18-00191, Slip Op. 21-49 (CIT April 29,
2021), dated November 15, 2021, at 4-13, 37-42, available at <a href="https://access.trade.gov/Resources/remands/21-49.pdf">https://access.trade.gov/Resources/remands/21-49.pdf</a>.
\5\ Id. at 15-22.
\6\ Id. at 25-28.
\7\ Id. at 19-21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CIT remanded for a second time, finding that Commerce did not
provide a ``lawful justification for its use of the NME presumption
with respect to Jilin {Forest{time} as a cooperative mandatory
respondent'' and ordered Commerce to calculate an individual weighted-
average dumping margin for Jilin Forest.\8\ The CIT also held
Commerce's reliance on the China NME Status report for the basis that
labor unions in China are under state control is substantial evidence
``to support Commerce's conclusion that Jilin has not rebutted the
presumption of state control { {time} because if Jilin's labor union
is under state control, its appointment of a majority of Jilin's board
of directors confirms that the state controls the company.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co. Ltd. v.
United States, 617 F. Supp.3d 1343, 1369 (CIT 2023).
\9\ Id. at 1350.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its second remand redetermination, issued in May 2023, Commerce
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin for Jilin Forest, under
respectful protest, in accordance with the methodology set out in the
Preliminary Results.\10\ The CIT sustained Commerce's second remand
redetermination.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. v.
United States, Court No. 18-00191, Slip Op. 23-14 (CIT February 9,
2023), dated May 3, 2023, at 4-13, 37-42. See also Multilayered Wood
Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary
Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part;
2015-2016, 83 FR 2137 (January 16, 2018) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\11\ See Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd.
v. United States, Consol. Court No. 18-00191 (CIT June 9, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\12\ as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades,\13\ the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section
516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's June 9,
2023, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in
harmony with Commerce's Final Results. Thus, this notice is published
in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\13\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending
its Final Results with respect to Jilin Forest as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Exporter (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd.. 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because Jilin Forest has a superseding cash deposit rate, i.e.,
there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative
review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the
current cash deposit rate.
Liquidation of Suspended Entries
At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from
liquidating entries that were exported by Jilin Forest, and were
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period
December 1, 2015, through November 30, 2016.
In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed,
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping
duties.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 41388]]
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 20, 2023.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2023-13523 Filed 6-23-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
</pre></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 26, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.