Notice2023-13342
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Partial Cabinet Solution Bundles Offered as Part of Its Co-Location Services
Primary source
Metadata and text below are from the Federal Register, a public-domain U.S. government work. Always verify the official published version before relying on it for any legal matter.
Published
June 23, 2023
Issuing agencies
Securities and Exchange Commission
Full Text
<html>
<head>
<title>Federal Register, Volume 88 Issue 120 (Friday, June 23, 2023)</title>
</head>
<body><pre>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41134-41138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 2023-13342]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-97752; File No. SR-NYSENAT-2023-10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Partial Cabinet Solution Bundles Offered as Part of Its Co-Location
Services
June 16, 2023.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that on June 5, 2023, NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE National'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles
offered as part of its co-location services. The description of the
Partial Cabinet Solution bundles in the Connectivity Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') would be updated accordingly. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's website at <a href="http://www.nyse.com">www.nyse.com</a>, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Partial Cabinet Solution
(``PCS'') bundles offered to Users as part of its co-location
services.\4\ The description of the PCS bundles in the Fee Schedule
would be updated accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 83351 (May 31, 2018), 83 FR 26314 (June 6,
2018) (SR-NYSENAT-2018-07). As specified in the Fee Schedule, a User
that incurs co-location fees for a particular co-location service
pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-location fees for the
same co-location service charged by the Exchange's affiliates New
York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., and
NYSE Chicago, Inc. (together, the ``Affiliate SROs''). Each
Affiliate SRO has submitted substantially the same proposed rule
change to propose the changes described herein. See SR-NYSE-2023-23,
SR-NYSEAMER-2023-32, SR-NYSEARCA-2023-42, and SR-NYSECHX-2023-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Fee Schedule currently lists two PCS bundles, Options C and D.
As originally formulated, each PCS bundle option included a partial
cabinet powered to a maximum of 2 kilowatts (``kW''); access to the
Liquidity Center Network (``LCN'') and internet protocol (``IP'')
networks, the local area networks available in the data center; two
fiber cross connections; and connectivity to one of two time feeds.\5\
Users are only eligible to purchase PCS bundles if they meet specified
requirements.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 83 FR 26314, supra note 4, at 26315.
\6\ See id. The requirements are set forth in Note 1 under
``Colocation Notes.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In May 2020, the Exchange amended PCS bundle Options C and D to add
two 10 Gb connections to the NMS Network to each bundle. The NMS
Network is an alternate dedicated network connection that Users use to
access the NMS feeds for which the Securities Industry Automation
Corporation is engaged as the securities information processor.\7\
These two 10 Gb NMS Network connections were added to the Option C and
D bundles at no additional cost.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88837 (May 7, 2020),
85 FR 28671 (May 13, 2020) (SR-NYSE-2019-46, SR-NYSEAMER-2019-34,
SR-NYSEArca-2019-61, SR-NYSENAT-2019-19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange expects that the proposed rule change would become
operative no later than September 1, 2023. The Exchange will announce
the date through a customer notice.
[[Page 41135]]
Proposed Changes to the Current PCS Bundles
The Exchange proposes to amend current Options C and D so that
Users may elect to include 40 Gb connections to the LCN, IP network and
NMS network, rather than just 10 Gb connections, in their PCS bundles.
There would be no change to the existing fees for the PCS bundles.
The purpose of the proposed changes to the PCS bundles is to allow
a User to connect to all or a large part of the expanded Options Price
Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') feed. More specifically, OPRA has
announced that it is expanding data dissemination from a 48-line to a
96-line multicast data distribution network.\8\ As a result of this
change, OPRA has estimated that an increase in bandwidth will be needed
to consume the OPRA feed.\9\ This means that a 10 Gb network connection
will not suffice for a User that wants to connect to all or a large
part of the expanded OPRA feed.\10\ Current and potential Users with
PCS bundles have requested the inclusion of 40 Gb connections in the
bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Industry Automation Corporation, Memo to OPRA
Multicast Subscribers, August 31, 2022, at <a href="https://assets.website-files.com/5ba40927ac854d8c97bc92d7/6377e5e4114b88c77be5552c_OPRA%20Migration%20to%2096%20Multicast%20Line%20Network_Q3%20Postponement.pdf">https://assets.website-files.com/5ba40927ac854d8c97bc92d7/6377e5e4114b88c77be5552c_OPRA%20Migration%20to%2096%20Multicast%20Line%20Network_Q3%20Postponement.pdf</a>. Connectivity to the OPRA feed is
an Included Data Product available over the IP network and the NMS
network.
\9\ See id., at 2 (providing estimated bandwidth requirements).
\10\ The proposed change would be of utility even if OPRA were
not expanding its data distribution network, as a User cannot
connect to all of the OPRA feed with the current 10 Gb connections
in the PCS bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ability to connect with a larger section of the OPRA feed is
not the only benefit that would occur. A User with a revised PCS bundle
would be able to use it to connect to more of the Included Data
Products and Third Party Data Feeds. The addition of 40 Gb connections
may allow a User to have the same size connection in co-location that
it has elsewhere. As the Exchange understands that 40 Gb connections
are increasingly considered the industry standard for options trading,
and understands that smaller customers--such as those who might qualify
for a PCS--often prefer to normalize all of their equipment to one
connection size, this may be a benefit to some Users.
There would be no change to the initial charge and monthly
recurring charge (``MRC'') for the PCS bundles. As a result of the
change a User would receive an enhanced offering, with the option of
both 10 Gb and 40 Gb connections, for the same price that the Exchange
currently charges for PCS bundles with 10 Gb options only. Users with a
PCS bundle would not have to pay a second initial charge to change the
content of their PCS bundles. As a result, a User would be able to
upgrade its PCS bundle from 10 Gb to 40 Gb, in whole or, if it opts to
retain some 10 Gb connections, in part.
To implement the proposed changes as well as remove or update
obsolete text, the Exchange proposes to make the following amendments
to the description of PCS bundles Options C and D:
<bullet> Update the names to Options A and B. Currently no PCS
bundles use those names,\11\ and the Exchange believes that continuing
to use Option C and Option D as names could be confusing as a result.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The previous Options A and B were deleted in 2022. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95972 (October 4, 2022), 87 FR
61416 (November 11, 2022) (SR-NYSENAT-2022-22).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Amend the description to state that Users may elect to
include 40 Gb connections to the LCN, IP network and NMS network,
rather than just 10 Gb connections, in their PCS bundles.
<bullet> Consistent with the requirements for NMS Network
connections,\12\ add text stating that a purchaser of a Partial Cabinet
Solution must select NMS Network connections of the same size (i.e., 10
Gb or 40 Gb) as the related LCN and IP network connections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 85 FR 28671, supra note 7, at 28674 (stating that ``if
a User purchases a service that includes a 10 Gb or 40 Gb IP or LCN
network connection, that purchase would include an NMS Network
connection of the same size''). By way of example, if a User with a
PCS bundle selected one 10 Gb LX LCN connection and one 40 Gb IP
network connection, it would receive one 10 Gb NMS connection and
one 40 Gb NMS connection. If the User instead chose 10 Gb for both
its LCN and IP network connection, it would receive two 10 Gb NMS
connections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<bullet> Currently, the Fee Schedule includes text regarding a
reduced MRC for PCS bundles for 24 months, which applied so long as a
User ordered its PCS bundle on or before December 31, 2020. Since that
time has expired, the text has become obsolete, and the Exchange
proposes to delete it.
The amended portion of the Fee Schedule would read as follows
(proposed deletions in brackets, proposed additions italicized):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of service Description Amount of charge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Partial Cabinet Solution bundles Option A[C]: $10,000 initial charge per bundle
Notes: 1 kW partial cabinet, 1 LCN plus [monthly charge per bundle as
A User and its Affiliates are connection (10 Gb LX or 40 Gb), 1 follows:
limited to one Partial Cabinet IP network connection (10 Gb or 40 <bullet> For Users that order on or
Solution bundle at a time. A User Gb), 2 NMS Network connections (10 before December 31, 2020: $7,000
and its Affiliates must have an Gb or 40 Gb each), 2 fiber cross monthly for first 24 months of
Aggregate Cabinet Footprint of 2 kW connections and either the Network service, and $14,000 monthly
or less to qualify for a Partial Time Protocol Feed or Precision thereafter.
Cabinet Solution bundle. See Note 1 Timing Protocol. <bullet> For Users that order after
under ``Colocation Notes.'' Option B[D]: December 31, 2020: ]$14,000 monthly
A purchaser of a Partial Cabinet 2 kW partial cabinet, 1 LCN charge per bundle.
Solution must select NMS Network connection (10 Gb LX or 40 Gb), 1 $10,000 initial charge per bundle
connections of the same size (i.e., IP network connection (10 Gb or 40 plus [monthly charge per bundle as
10 Gb or 40 Gb) as the related LCN Gb), 2 NMS Network connections (10 follows:
and IP network connections. Gb or 40 Gb each), 2 fiber cross <bullet> For Users that order on or
connections and either the Network before December 31, 2020: $7,500
Time Protocol Feed or Precision monthly for first 24 months of
Timing Protocol. service, and $15,000 monthly
thereafter.
<bullet> For Users that order after
December 31, 2020: ]$15,000 monthly
charge per bundle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PCS bundles would continue to include a 1 kw or 2 kw partial
cabinet and either the Network Time Protocol Feed or the Precision
Timing Protocol. The requirements set forth in Note 1 under
``Colocation Notes'' would continue to apply.
General
The proposed changes would not apply differently to distinct types
or sizes of market participants. Rather, they would apply to all Users
equally.
Users that require other sizes or combinations of cabinets, network
connections, and cross connects could still request them. As is
currently the case, the purchase of any co-location service, including
PCS bundles, is completely voluntary and the Fee Schedule is applied
uniformly to all Users.
[[Page 41136]]
The proposed changes are not otherwise intended to address any
other issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and
the Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange further believes
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\15\ because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Change Is Reasonable
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and would perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest to expand the
connectivity options in the PCS bundles because it would allow Users to
connect to all or a large part of the expanded OPRA feed. As noted
above, OPRA has announced that it is expanding data dissemination from
a 48-line to a 96-line multicast data distribution network.\16\ As a
result of the change, OPRA has estimated that an increase in bandwidth
will be needed to consume the OPRA feed.\17\ This means that a 10 Gb
network connection would not suffice for a User that wanted to connect
to all or a large part of the expanded OPRA feed. The proposed revised
PCS bundles allow the User to connect to all or a large part of the
expanded feed, however.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See supra note 8.
\17\ See id., at 2 (providing estimated bandwidth requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that it is reasonable and would perfect
the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, protect investors and the public interest to expand
the connectivity options in the PCS bundles because a User with a
revised PCS bundle would be able to use it to connect to more of the
Included Data Products and Third Party Data Feeds. Moreover, the
addition of 40 Gb connections may allow a User to have the same size
connection in co-location that it has elsewhere. That said, although
the Exchange proposes to expand the connectivity options within the two
PCS bundles, a User that currently has a PCS bundle would not be
obligated to make any changes.
The Exchange further believes that it is reasonable and would
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest to
expand the connectivity options in the PCS bundles because it would be
responsive to requests from current and potential Users of PCS bundles,
who have asked for the bundles to include 40 Gb connections.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed change is reasonable
and would perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a
national market system and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest because there would be no change to the initial charge
and MRC for the PCS bundles. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change is reasonable because the change would mean that a
User would receive an enhanced offering, with the option of both 10 Gb
and 40 Gb connections, for the same price that the Exchange currently
charges for PCS bundles with 10 Gb options only. A User with a PCS
bundle would not have to pay a second initial charge to upgrade its PCS
bundle from 10 Gb to 40 Gb in whole or, if it opts to retain some 10 Gb
connections, in part.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and would perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest to add text
stating that a purchaser of a Partial Cabinet Solution must select NMS
Network connections of the same size (i.e., 10 Gb and 40 Gb) as the
related LCN or IP network connection. The requirement would be
consistent with the current requirements for NMS Network connections
\18\ and so all Users would be treated equally. The Exchange believes
that adding such text would alleviate any possible customer confusion
as to whether the same requirements would apply to the PCS bundles. In
this way, it would enhance the clarity and transparency of the Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 85 FR 28671, supra note 7, at 28674 (stating that ``if
a User purchases a service that includes a 10 Gb or 40 Gb IP or LCN
network connection, that purchase would include an NMS Network
connection of the same size'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that updating the names of the PCS bundles
from Option C and D to Option A and B and removing obsolete text from
the Fee Schedule would be reasonable for the same reasons. It would
make the Fee Schedule easier to read and understand, alleviating
possible customer confusion.
The Proposed Change Is Equitable and Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposed change provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities and does
not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers because, even though the connectivity options available in a
PCS bundle would increase, there would be no change to the initial
charge and MRC for a PCS bundle. A User with a PCS bundle would not
have to pay a second initial charge to upgrade its PCS bundle from 10
Gb to 40 Gb in whole or, if it opts to retain some 10 Gb connections,
in part.
Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory since, as is true now, only
Users that purchased a PCS bundle would be charged for it. The proposed
change would not apply differently to distinct types or sizes of market
participants but would apply to all Users equally. Moreover, although
the Exchange proposes to expand the connectivity options within the two
PCS bundles, a User that currently has a PCS bundle would not be
obligated to make any changes. Users that require other sizes or
combinations of cabinets, network connections, and cross connects could
still request them. As is currently the case, the purchase of any co-
location service, including PCS bundles, would be completely voluntary.
The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to add text stating that purchaser of a Partial Cabinet
Solution must select NMS Network connections of the same size (i.e. 10
Gb or 40 Gb) as
[[Page 41137]]
the related LCN and IP network connections. The requirement would be
consistent with the current requirements for NMS Network
connections,\19\ and so all Users with NMS Network connections would be
treated equally. The Exchange believes that adding such text would
alleviate any possible customer confusion as to whether the same
requirements would apply to the PCS bundles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that updating the names of the PCS
bundles and removing obsolete text from the Fee Schedule would be
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory, as it would enhance the
clarity and transparency of the Fee Schedule. It would make the Fee
Schedule easier to read and understand, alleviating possible customer
confusion for all market participants.
For the reasons above, the proposed changes do not unfairly
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms, and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange believes that the proposal will not impose any burden
on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of Section 6(b)(8) of the Act.\20\ The proposed expansion
of the existing PCS bundles would allow Users to connect to all or a
large part of the expanded OPRA feed, unlike the 10 Gb network
connections currently offered in the PCS bundles. More specifically, as
noted above, OPRA has announced that it is expanding data dissemination
from a 48-line to a 96-line multicast data distribution network.\21\ As
a result of the change, OPRA has estimated that an increase in
bandwidth will be needed to consume the OPRA feed.\22\ This means that
a 10 Gb network connection would not suffice for a User that wanted to
connect to all or a large part of the expanded OPRA feed. The proposed
revised PCS bundles allow the User to connect to all or a large part of
the expanded feed, however.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\21\ See supra note 8.
\22\ See id., at 2 (providing estimated bandwidth requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A User with a revised PCS bundle also would be able to use it to
connect to more of the Included Data Products and Third Party Data
Feeds, and the addition of 40 Gb connections may allow a User to have
the same size connection in co-location that it has elsewhere.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
place any User at a relative disadvantage compared to other Users, but
rather that competition among Users would be enhanced. By allowing PCS
bundles to include 40 Gb connections, the proposed change would allow
smaller Users to not only take advantage of the option for co-location
services with a PCS bundle but also compete with Users that have 40 Gb
connections. The smaller Users include those with minimal power or
cabinet space demands or those for which the costs attendant with
having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection bandwidth are
too burdensome. The PCS bundles originally were designed to make it
more cost effective for such Users to compete,\23\ and the Exchange
believes that the proposed change would enhance their ability to do so.
The proposed change would be responsive to requests from current and
potential Users of PCS bundles, who have asked for the bundles to
include 40 Gb connections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77072 (February 5,
2016), 81 FR 7394, at 7396 (February 11, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2015-53).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change would not impose a burden on competition
because it would expand the existing PCS bundles without changing the
initial charge or MRC or otherwise adding any fees. As a result of the
change a User would receive an enhanced offering, with the option of
both 10 Gb and 40 Gb connections, for the same price that the Exchange
currently charges for PCS bundles with 10 Gb options only. A User with
a PCS bundle would not have to pay a second initial charge to upgrade
its PCS bundle from 10 Gb to 40 Gb in whole or, if it opts to retain
some 10 Gb connections, in part. As is true now, only Users that
purchased a PCS bundle would be charged for it.
All Users would be able to choose what size connections they want,
and all Users, whether or not they had a PCS bundle, would be subject
to the same requirements for connectivity to the NMS network.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule
change would place any User at a relative disadvantage compared to
other Users.
Finally, the Exchange believes that removing obsolete text from the
Fee Schedule would not place any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate. Rather, it would benefit competition, as it
would enhance the clarity and transparency of the Fee Schedule. It
would make the Fee Schedule easier to read and understand, alleviating
possible customer confusion.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change reflects this competitive environment and does not impose any
undue burden on intermarket competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \24\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\25\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \26\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
[[Page 41138]]
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
<bullet> Use the Commission's internet comment form (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>); or
<bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9cbccd5dc94dad6d4d4dcd7cdcaf9cadcda97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98eaedf4fdb5fbf7f5f5fdf6ecebd8ebfdfbb6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include
file number SR-NYSENAT-2023-10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
<bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSENAT-2023-10. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (<a href="https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml">https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml</a>). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-NYSENAT-2023-10 and
should be submitted on or before July 14, 2023.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-13342 Filed 6-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>Indexed from Federal Register on June 23, 2023.
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.